Friday, 15 July 2022

Durham thoughts and the Godleman 'situation'

I appreciate your forbearance this week while I sorted some pressing domestic things at my parents.

I saw very little of the Durham game, only the last hour or so of the final day when we got home, but I appreciated all of your comments as always.

First up, a massive round of applause for Leus Du Plooy for scoring two centuries in the match. I recall seeing him bat at Durham when he first started playing for us. The game was noteworthy both for his low place in the order (Dave Houghton saying he had to earn his elevation) and for the fact that he got hit in the 'crown jewels' several times, which was the first time I had seen it so often for one player.

His was the starring role for Derbyshire, although the 90 by Anuj Dal in the first innings and the century by Brooke Guest in the second were also crucial knocks as the game progressed. Both men have had stellar seasons and I can pay no greater tribute to Guest than that there have been no comments about our missing Harvey Hosein, nor about needing competition for him. Only the legendary Bill Storer has more centuries for the county as wicket keeper (12) than Brooke, while Bernie Maher also scored four.

Meanwhile Nuj has a batting average of 76 and a bowling one of 20 wickets at 32. A genuine all rounder who has come to the forefront this year, he is now a key part of the side. 

That trio, plus a good second innings from Hilton Cartwright, enabled us to set Durham a challenging total after the timeless Chris Rushworth threatened to run through us, not for the first time. I would love to see how many career wickets he has against Derbyshire and how many overall at Chester le Street, because there can be few better bowlers on the circuit who didn't get a national call.

It was always said - and wrongly - that Les Jackson was overlooked because most of his wickets came at Chesterfield and Derby. I am not sure if that is true of Rushworth, but what a servant he has been to the northern county.

Which brings me to another loyal servant and Billy Godleman. He has been a fine player for us since his arrival from Essex in 2013 and especially from 2015 to 2019 was a run machine at the top of the order. The two Covid-wrecked seasons saw his average slip to the mid-twenties and last year would have been the same, bar for an unbeaten century in his final innings.

This year that average has slipped to just fifteen, with a season - highest of just 38. Like everyone else, I have willed him to runs each time he has batted, but the charm and effortless flow of Shan Masood has made his unique, awkward style look all the more eccentric.

At 33 he is young enough to rediscover his best days, but after his latest failures he must surely be allowed some time out of the firing line. Nottinghamshire are next and their attack will be a challenge for any opener, especially one for who form is so elusive. As pointed out by a contributor earlier, Harry Came scored 87 and a century in his two innings against Yorkshire and deserves a chance, albeit against the best seam attack in the division.

I was and remain surprised that Billy was given a new twelve-month deal, though it may be tied into a benefit. Either way, with Mickey Arthur saying that the currency of players is runs and wickets, it is clear that he needs to rediscover his mojo fast.

His poor summer has overshadowed that of Luis Reece, another who in a season of batting 'plenty' has struggled for rhythm and his best form. An average of 28, with just one fifty in the four-day game, with one of only 15 and one fifty in the Vitality Blast. I suspect and hope that his winter of inactivity with surgery to knee and shoulder are the contributory factors.

But the truth is that however well we have done this year, to pick up on it in 2023 we need both men back at their best. Neither has suggested permanence at the crease and for the club to move forward we need eleven players contributing their best form.

Overall, though, a decent four days at Durham. The fight is strong, the 'failure' to force a win on the last afternoon down to a young attack and the wicket not really deteriorating, as few have this year.

I thought we might have seen Hilton Cartwright bowl on the final day, just for something different, while the spin of Madsen and du Plooy might have been worth an over or two.

But we ended the game in the ascendancy and that is again a step forward.

Sound winter recruitment will take it on again. 

24 comments:

  1. I think you've said it all, Steve. Mickey arrived with the aim of turning us, over the next three years, into a top-class county. Just like in football, this means everyone has to perform. Mickey has discovered our two weakest links in the top order: Billy and Reece. In 2019 they both looked good, but being a good batsman is about consistency. Madsen is the perfect example. Masood's magnificence at the crease has inspired Madsen, Guest, du Plooy and Dal, but not Billy or Reece, sadly. I've no idea why, as Masood's scoring has taken a lot of pressure of them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why we gave Billy an extended years contract is anybody's guess, is he a good leader, is that why it was extended?. Seems like his confidence at the crease is shot and he needs some second eleven games to get that confidence back. Came back in for the next match please, he can't do any worse.
    As for Luis, another mystery why his form has dipped massively. If we had another batting option I'd be saying he should be playing with Billy in the seconds

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree, Chesterfield Blue, Reece's dip in form is hard to explain, even though he's come back from injury. Unlike Billy and Reece, Dal is having a fantastic season. He's scored more runs in the CC (533) than Billy (225) and Reece (281) combined). I've said this before, if you want a successful team, then you can't have two of your top order batsmen failing to provide runs.

    I'd bring in Came for the game against Notts and give Billy a spell playing in the seconds. I'd also be inclined to replace Reece with McKiernan, who scored a century against Leicestershire. He's only had one innings since.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hard to disagree there. World of difference for Harry in Yorkie 2s then Notts, but he is at least in form and Billy isn't. Nor Luis, so McKiernan deserves a crack in the middle order. But the question is then on who opens..

      Delete
  4. To remain a good player into your 30's, requires dedication and luck with injuries. Reece has had no luck with the latter and maybe his peak in the dual role was around 2019. As for Godleman, I wonder how much batting practice he has, when the others are playing T20. Came has made a strong case, against a good Yorkshire attack. He deserves a chance. Kris

    ReplyDelete
  5. Off topic - but what an amazing Blast final! Really who needs the 'other competition' when the Blast can deliver like that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed! I didn't expect Yorkshire to do anything as they were lucky to get there. Lancashire make a habit of imploding on the big occasion, while Hants picked up a very good overseas bowler. They deserved their win, but it was a great game

      Delete
  6. On form we cannot go into the Notts game with Godleman and Reece as an opening pair. Harry Came's runs for the 2nd's has surely ensured he gets a chance as Reece was recalled earlier this season after a century for the 2nd's. The dilemma is who misses out. Could Billy go to Luis Reece and say we are leaving you out due to your lack of runs ?

    I cannot see both being left out as there are few other options at the top of the order unless we loan someone. Although I did notice Tom Wood was back playing in the 2nd XI match. Brooke Guest would be an option to open but who else could bat at 3 and we couldn't expect him to keep wicket and open.

    Wayne Madsen scores far more runs once the shine is off the new ball and this season the form of Shan Masood and Brooke Guest has been crucial in the amount of runs Wayne has scored as he has been coming in most times at 100/2 instead of 10/2.

    I thought the bowling attack looked very samey v Durham with Pettman in the team. He looks a decent bowler but I think we missed a chance to give Mikey Cohen some overs. Yes he can go for runs but with a different angle coud unsettle the batters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good comments, but I don't think Cohen is fit and hasn't been for most of the season. A left armer with pace is always an asset, but I don't think his fitness record good enough for a new deal, nor expect him to play much in the remainder of the summer. Shame, as there is a decent bowler in there

      Delete
    2. Sorry I hadn't logged in correctly when posting the main article.

      I had guessed with Cohen that as he was in the 12 for the Durham game he was ready to go.

      Delete
  7. My starting XI for the Notts game;

    Came
    Guest
    Madsen
    Du Plooy
    Cartwright
    McKiernan
    Dal
    Thomson
    Aitchison
    Connors
    Pettman

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pettman will not play against his own team.

      Delete
    2. Any news yet regarding a possible replacement for Hayden Kerr?

      Delete
    3. Not yet. It may be we leave it, with Masood back. Cartwright will play the Hundred... Mickey will perhaps offer opportunity to who he has.

      Delete
  8. Can Pettman play? Notts player , 1 game loan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doubt it. Should he do well it would be a major embarrassment for Notts!

      Delete
  9. Oliver - me too. Incredible final and another trophy for Pop Welch too. Delighted for him.

    Andy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good coach, Pop. Outstanding as a bowling coach. Probably not a HOC, as it didn't work for him here. But excellent in getting the best out of a group of bowlers

      Delete
  10. Just seen squad announcement for tomorrow. Billy out, Harry Came in. At last.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes, and about time. Billy's confidence with the bat must be low at the moment. What we don't know is whether Mickey dropped Billy, or Billy dropped himself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They will have agreed between them, but as HOC the decision would have been Mickey's to make

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  12. A) Chris Rushworth has 66 wickets @ 15.46 (6x 5WI, 2x 10WM) in 11 first-class games v Derbyshire, more than against any other county bar Sussex, against whom he has 69 wickets @ 20.14 (4x 5WI, 1x 10WM) in 15 games. Only against Northamptonshire (37 wickets @ 14.21; 3x 5WI, 1x 10WM) has he taken his wickets at lower cost than against Derbyshire.

    B) In 79 first-class games at Chester-le-Street, Rushworth has 322 wickets @ 20.49 (18x 5WI, 3x 10WM); in 74 games elsewhere, he has 275 wickets @ 25.04 (12x 5WI).

    David

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks very much, David. Much appreciated! Takes his wickets elsewhere, but at greater cost.

      And wishes he could bowl against us in alternate weeks!

      Delete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!