Derbyshire 194-4 (Andersson 81*, Whiteley 39*, Montgomery 35)
Yorkshire 195-8 (Ali 51, Tye 32*, Hasan 31*, Lyth 31 Morley 4-44, Potts 2-44)
Yorkshire won by 2 wickets
After a very good batting effort, they had done all the hard work with some fine bowling and fielding and Yorkshire needed 56 from the last four overs, with only two wickets left.
Yet they got them with three balls to spare.
They looked out of it at 102-6 and 139-8, but dangerous late order hitters Andrew Tye and Hasan Ali took advantage of some average late bowling to steal the win. Moeen Ali had earlier given them hope, with 5 sixes in his half century, but Derbyshire must have fancied their chances when the last four overs came.
Again it was down to small margins. There are two blokes swinging the bat and the smallest man on the side is at cow corner on the boundary. It was the height that did for Jack Morley on that occasion, but that should not detract from a very fine bowling performance. Anyone had him on their bingo card as our star T20 bowler this year? Me neither, but he has bowled beautifully and earlier held two fine catches.
Nick Potts also did well in his first two overs, but took punishment in his last two, while you would expect more from your overseas bowler than we got from Akif on this occasion. Matthew Montgomery also bowled a clever spell to follow a fine innings earlier, but that was very much a game that was thrown away.
Earlier, Martin Andersson batted beautifully (but we must assume is another unfit to bowl) and steered Derbyshire from 63-3 to 194-4. First with Montgomery and then Ross Whiteley, who clubbed in brutal fashion over the last quarter of the innings, he gave Derbyshire a strong total to bowl at. He looked shattered by the end, but batted through the innings in fine style.
The old failings came back today. For all that there is most of a first choice attack missing, the ones that played today delivered a fine performance until the final scene.
Sadly, that was when they fluffed their lines.
Fair play to Tye and Hasan, both players who I have seen do that a few times. But the discipline that was a feature of the earlier Derbyshire bowling disappeared and there didn't appear anyone in real control out in the field.
It is frustrating, that's all I can say. This could be a long competition and while I accept that the side competed very well and it was another excellent game to watch, the players will be wondering how that one got away.
Just the same as us.
Postscript: do we really need the interminable crowd shots? Between 'Oblivious cam' and all the other nonsense, deliveries were missed and the editing, for such a big club, was very poor.
Given a choice between that and a fixed camera at either end, I would have to think long as to my preference...