I'm not sure why, but it is noticeable that there are far less comments on posts after a win by the county than when we lose.
Maybe too many people are more used to losing, so like to get their moans in early, but check back over the last few pages and see what I mean. OK, perhaps more are attuned to our habit of, in the words of an old line dance classic, one step forward and two steps back, but surely people were impressed by last night?
We'll see after Friday's game. Revenge over a Worcestershire side we should have hammered at Derby is vital. Last night took us back into the pack for play-off positions and the boys batted well, bowled steadily and fielded superbly.
That eight overs were bowled by lads with an average age of eighteen and a half was most impressive. While Tom Knight is likely to go further with his bowling, Chesney's slow left arm 'darts' are a potent weapon. At one point last night he bowled a ball off three paces quicker than most seamers, giving a new dimension to the term 'quicker ball'. Knight, in contrast mixed his pace well but always attacked the stumps. He bowled a canny length and the batsmen had neither width to let their arms go nor leverage to get under the ball for boundaries. It was sensible, clever and heartening stuff.
It is a decent side for this format, though we are heavily reliant on one the top four making runs. It is to their credit that they have done so thus far and the batting unit, with the exception of that awful night last week at Derby, looks a decent one.
What makes a difference, of course, is fielding and there are some brilliant performers in the side. I mentioned Guptill, Madsen and Park last night, but it was a fine team effort last night, one that must be replicated tomorrow. What is especially heartening is the return to the team and form of Garry Park. He has endured a difficult year or so, but is for me beyond compare as a fielder. His speed over the ground, fast arm and secure hands make him easily the best I have seen in my time of following Derbyshire. People like Derek Morgan, Chris Adams and Phil de Freitas were fine fielders, but none had the all round brilliance of Park. As it was once worth the entrance money to see Bob Taylor keep wicket, so it is with Park in the field.
I hope that the runs continue to come and we see him in the county colours for some time. While the new blueprint may put a question mark against his long term future, as things stand he will always be in my one day side, irrespective of how many runs he scores or wickets he takes. In twenty years time, I guarantee that you will tell people that you saw Garry Park field, just the same as people talk about Jonty Rhodes, or those of a certain age recall Colin Bland. While those two remain the benchmark, I can't think of anyone better than Park in the modern game.
Too right peakfan> Worcester is a must win game. They all are now. We might and i say might get away with one defeat but no more. Hughes and Knight have bowled very well. It,s Hughes,s batting that worries me at present. It looks like its made out of elastic. Im not sure he really knows how to bat at three in this form of the game, which is why i would move him and re instate Park,who as you rightly say is a superb fielder. He,s a talented cricker and as i,ve said before,his recent demise can be traced to being shunted up and down the order for no good reason. The blueprint shouldn,t really affect him considering he,s English qualified. At least,thats how i read it.
ReplyDeleteNew job eh peakfan peakfan. No doubt it,s much shorter hours for lots more money!.Seriously, i hope you find you,ve made the right move.
Cheers mate! Yes, the job will save me 2.5 hours travel a day, a major attraction besides anything else....
ReplyDeleteFingers crossed for tomorrow!