Derbyshire v Lancashire T20

Lancashire 178-5 (Davies 82)

Derbyshire 174-7 (Madsen 44, Reece 39, Critchley 32)

Lancashire won by 4 runs

It was much better from Derbyshire tonight, but the end result was the same as they slipped to narrow defeat by 4 runs.

Even worse, Wayne Madsen, who looked like he would have won it for us, sustained a nasty looking injury to his achilles tendon which is likely to render him doubtful for the weekend four-day game.

Considering the inexperience of the attack I thought we did OK with the ball. Barnes and Conners pulled it back well at the end when they looked set for 200. The fielding was sharper, with Dal and McKiernan outstanding. The latter also bowled tidily. 

I didn't get the rationale of him going in to pinch hit, however and the experiment didn't last long. Godleman was in uber frenetic mode and Reece batted well for a while, but when Madsen and du Plooy got going, a win seemed on.

Then came the injury as Madsen played his ramp shot. Thereafter he could only stand and hit to limited effect. Leus hit two fine sixes but could have showed greater nous than going for a third in the same over. Matt Critchley took us closer than looked likely, but we always looked just behind the rate. 

At this stage a repeat of last year looks unlikely. I would be surprised if we see Wayne again in the competition, but it at least offers an opportunity to Tom Wood.

We will keep fighting and there will be wins to come, but the inexperienced attack and loss of a major batsman would appear too great a handicap to overcome. 

We'll see. No complaints tonight, with better luck we might have nicked that one. 

Yorkshire v Derbyshire T20

Yorkshire 220-5 (Root 64, Lyth 61, Fraine 44* McKiernan 2-22)

Derbyshire 121-9 (Critchley 26)

Yorkshire won by 99 runs

After short consideration, I think that was the worst performance in this competition by Derbyshire in a couple of seasons.

We badly lacked the control of Rampaul, at the top and tail of the innings, but the rest did themselves no favours with bowling of erratic length and line. I wouldn't have gone for Conners and Cohen in this format, and their lack of overs confirmed the skipper might not have done either.

The only bowler who emerged with credit was Mattie McKiernan, who strangely didn't finish his allocation. The rest were summarily despatched by Lyth, Root and Fraine, who batted well but were given way too many full tosses and half volleys on which to gorge themselves. Nor was the fielding especially sharp either, with a few mishandlings and some wild throwing.

It was a good toss to win, to be fair, as it is usually better to bat first at Headingley in such matches. From Lyth's opening over of our reply, the writing appeared to be on the wall and neither Madsen or Godleman looked at ease. 

Once they and du Plooy had quickly departed, two to decent catches, it became a case of damage limitation and protecting, to some extent the net run rate. Their fielding looked far sharper than ours, Godleman's blinding catch at cover apart, but it is much easier to field when your bowlers are in the right areas, of course. 

This was our Leicestershire at the County Ground of two summers ago. A major sea change needs to take place for our T20 prospects to come close to those in the four-day game, or for us to come close to the knock out stage this year. It was diametrically opposed to our four day performances and while one eye will, naturally be on next weekend's game at Liverpool, we are much better than this. 

It was poor and I expect to see a reaction on the same ground in front of Sky cameras tomorrow. I doubt Dominic Cork will accept less.

Finally, a word about the stream. I know it was free, but it started late and later went out of focus and required refreshing several times. There is potential for such streams to raise income for counties in the long term, but it needs to be better than this one was. 

Yorkshire v Derbyshire preview

Derbyshire add Harvey Hosein and Dustin Melton to the fourteen that were due to play against Leicestershire for tomorrow's trip to Headingley.

Again, I won't try to pick a team, because without seeing the track it is pointless. 

Yorkshire welcome back England skipper Joe Root, but are without Bairstow, Rashid and Willey, as well as Gary Ballance. 

Their squad:

Lyth, Kohler-Cadmore, Brook, Coad, Fisher, Fraine, Root, Hill, Lyth, Pillans, Poysden, Revis, Shutt, Tattersall, Thompson.

There is more than enough in the Derbyshire squad to continue our recent domination over the White Rose in this format. 

While the bowling is largely inexperienced, the batting has shown itself capable of chasing down big totals and we have a good chance of opening our account in this one. 

We'll see tomorrow, but between times I welcome your thoughts! 

Leicestershire v Derbyshire T20

No result

The forecast rain ensured that there was no play in this game, as it did around much of the country.

We go again on Sunday, against Yorkshire at Headingley.

But in closing, a word of congratulations to the club. The Incora County Ground has become an effective and doubtless lucrative 'bubble' this summer for various touring sides, as well as England Ladies.

The Australians are there now, following on from Pakistan and the West Indies, as well as England Ladies. 

If you book into the Travelodge at the ground in future, you could be sleeping in a room once used by a cricketing legend.. 

Meanwhile the club is bringing in much needed money and, with the function spaces set to reopen, better times seem to be around the corner. 

It is good to see. 

Leicestershire v Derbyshire T20 preview

 I have no idea which of the fourteen players named will take the field for Derbyshire tomorrow, against Leicestershire, but I do know they will be ready to give their all.

With the exception of Harvey Hosein, who misses out as Brooke Guest is preferred this time, all the fit players on the staff are included. 

As listed by the club, the squad is:

Godleman, Reece, Wood, Madsen, Du Plooy, Hughes, Critchley, Hudson-Prentice, McKiernan, Dal, Guest, Cohen, Barnes, Conners.

As I wrote yesterday, you could play the first eleven named, bat all the way down and still have eight bowlers, such are our all-rounders. However, as someone else said (I think notoveryet) I would like to see a death bowler in there and the angle and pace of Cohen could get him the nod.

We will miss Ravi Rampaul, but a lot of counties are missing key personnel, including our opponents, who are without Mark Cosgrove. My guess is that Hudson-Prentice may be the other death bowler, allowing Reece, Hughes and Critchley to hopefully tie down the middle overs, as they did so well last year. Don't discount a key role for Mattie McKiernan in the competition either, as his leg spin variations and fine fielding could make him a key player.

Leicestershire have named a thirteen-man squad with three former Derbyshire players in it, namely:

Ackermann, Davis, Delany, Dearden, Griffiths, Hill, Klein, Lilley, Mike, Parkinson, Rhodes, Swindells. Taylor.

Colin Ackermann is the danger man and has a fine record in the competition. Although they have some good players, my money is on a Derbyshire win, to start the competition in style.

What about you?

Durham v Derbyshire day 4

 As I write this blog, with the rain battering off the patio doors and the wind blowing the plants to and fro with gusto, there appears little likelihood of further play at Chester-le-Street, with the scene replicated there in tweets from the ground.

It is a pity, because that extra batting bonus point that would otherwise have been a formality may prove crucial by the end of the final round of matches. The pitch was way too benign for a positive result to have been forced and credit must go to the Derbyshire bowlers for managing to get through their opponents on such a track. 

Indeed, the ability of a largely inexperienced attack to dismiss the opposition has been a feature of the Bob Willis Trophy campaign. Regardless of what happens elsewhere in the final round of matches, we have done extremely well with novices. Conners, Melton, Cohen and Aitchison have all done well, taking wickets at regular enough intervals for the team to get into the ascendancy, while the batting has looked every bit the force that it appeared pre-season. 

We all knew about the strength of the 'fab four' at the top of the order, of course. Yet, speaking as a non-statistician, I'd be willing to bet my house on our never having two batsmen, normally at seven and eight in the order, who average over a hundred, as Fynn Hudson-Prentice and Anuj Dal currently do. Both have looked very impressive and with Matt Critchley looking a far straighter, more correct and downright impressive batsman than in the past, I struggle to think of a batting order that has had such depth.

I do feel for Alex Hughes and Tom Wood, who have done little wrong, but it is hard to see how either can force a way in right now, with Harvey Hosein or Brooke Guest behind the stumps at six. Alex will doubtless be in the T20 side and few will fancy coming up against a side where there are genuine batsmen down to number nine in the order.

The professional performance at Durham has been overshadowed by the injury to Ben Aitchison yesterday, who injured ankle ligaments in a training drill. He seems unlikely to play again this season, but has surely done enough to earn a contract for at least two years. His well-grooved action and impressive accuracy would have made him a shoo-in for the Vitality Blast, but that will need to wait.

Our only problem seems to be running out of players. Ravi Rampaul may now not be able to get over from Trinidad and Michael Cohen's wavering lines don't suggest him as an obvious pick for the short form at present. Perhaps Tony Palladino could be our 'wild card' after several years of hardly playing the format? Or do we utilise the all-rounders and pack the side with batsmen?

With our next fixture the T20 against Leicestershire on Thursday, I'll hazard a guess at this team from the resources available:

Godleman, Reece, Madsen, du Plooy, Critchley, Wood, Hudson-Prentice, Hughes, Dal, Hosein, McKiernan

You could omit Wood and McKiernan for two seamers, but the eleven above has seven bowling options  anyway..

Thoughts?

Postscript: a player who has really impressed me in this shortened season has been Matt Critchley. He signed a two-year deal before the action started and looks a serious all-round talent now.

He has always looked a cricketer, but his batting looks much more straight, his defence better organised than in previous years. He gave his wicket away twice, but still averages over fifty, Meanwhile his bowling has developed a lovely loop and greater accuracy, twelve wickets at 24 runs each telling no lie as to his ability.

He has that number five spot nailed, by the look of it. We are very lucky to have such depth in all round talent in the squad, but credit to Dave Houghton and the coaching staff for identifying and improving them so well, 

As well as providing an environment in which they can thrive.

Durham v Derbyshire day 3

Durham 337-9 declared

Derbyshire 355-4 (Reece 122, Madsen 52, Godleman 51, Critchley 46* du Plooy 40, Hudson-Prentice 26*)

Derbyshire lead by 18 runs

I can only describe today's action at The Riverside as one of the more unusual I have seen over the years.

In the morning and for a good part of the afternoon, Derbyshire accumulated steadily on a slow, flat wicket. Reece and Godleman batted well, before the skipper holed out to cover. 

Enter Madsen and he went on to make a fifty, before being bowled playing perhaps the ugliest shot of his long career. The ball didn't get up and it ended half sweep, half pull, some way removed from his usual aesthetic self. 

Luis Reece played some fine shots in his first century of the summer, including a straight six and a few from his one-day repertoire. 

The wicket was flat yet not quick enough for all out assault. With tomorrow's forecast largely unpleasant, the task was to get as many batting points as possible, as a positive result would need nine days on such a wicket. 

Yet Durham put on Stuart Poynter for his first ever bowl of flighted filth at one end with plenty out on the boundary, as if trying to buy a wicket. Which seemed fine, but bowled Paul Coughlin at the other. It was all rather odd. 

When normal service resumed, Reece accelerated with the century achieved, before perishing in the deep. Like his captain, the shot was played with only one hand on the bat, adding to the surreal feeling of it all. 

Du Plooy and Critchley then moved into one-day mode, before the former was bowled by a slow yorker in the gathering gloom. 

It was left to the stylish Critchley and the powerful Hudson-Prentice to get us past 350 and four batting points, as a gloomy evening ended in bright sunshine. 

It was a professional batting performance, the innings well-paced. It also keeps us top of the group, for now. 

And very much in the mix for the final. 

Durham v Derbyshire day 2

Durham 337-9 (Critchley 4-53) v Derbyshire

I think the morning session today confirmed a couple of things for Derbyshire supporters.

One is that the attack, without Michael Cohen, is too similar. For me, five right arm fast medium bowlers is at least one too many. If you are going to bowl them out on a wicket offering help, you will likely do it with three, especially when you have Luis Reece as a fourth variant to them. If you can't, then you need other options in order to do so.

Thus our need for winter recruitment would appear to be in getting that variety. With all rounders Reece and Hudson-Prentice in the eleven, I don't think we need four additional seamers in the side. Alex Hughes will always lengthen the batting and give a bowling option, while Tom Wood could have given another batsman. I would love to see us find an off-spinner who can bat for another year, as it is one angle we currently have no option and there is no genuine spin partner for Matt Critchley in an otherwise strong side.

Second, sadly, I am not convinced that Ed Barnes is of the requisite standard and would be surprised were there any interest beyond this season, assuming he is released by Yorkshire. He runs in hard and gives his all, but at this unforgiving level needs that little bit more. Ben Aitchison is a far better option and judging by their respective workloads in this innings (20 and 11 overs respectively) I don't think I am alone in that assertion. 

Precious little passed the bat in the morning, or caused any issues until Critchley bowled Coughlin as he played on, then bowled Potts with a beauty that beat an otherwise perfect defensive stroke. Two wickets in three balls, after a 150 stand - like buses, eh? 

Barnes did get the wicket of Salisbury, well caught by Madsen, before the rain came with a vengeance, but it is hard to see where a result can come from without a contrived finish along the way. The home side would appear to have scored too slowly to threaten us with the follow on and may be unwilling to risk another defeat by setting a target that we would undoubtedly chase.

That extra batsman might well have been useful...

Durham v Derbyshire day 1

Durham 219-6

v Derbyshire

I only saw the last ten overs of today's play as I was returning home, so I am happy to defer to those who saw much more.

Alex Lees, a perennial thorn in our side, held us up for a good part of the day, while Ned Eckersley, who always scored heavily against us for Leicestershire, is still there at the close.

Not a bad day, with Yorkshire getting hardly any play, but could it have been better?

In the brief passage of play that I saw on arriving back home, I was impressed by the tidy glove work of Brooke Guest, who looks a very useful asset.

So over to you.. thoughts?

Normal service from me will be resumed tomorrow! 

Durham v Derbyshire preview

Derbyshire travel up north tomorrow in rude health and aiming for anothrr win that will cement their position at the top of the group table.

Brooke Guest makes his first appearance behind the stumps as Harvey Hosein is rested, while both Luis Reece and Fynn Hudson-Prentice return from injury. A final decision on the bowlers will be made tomorrow, but the 13 is:

Godleman, Reece, Madsen, Du Plooy, Hughes, Critchley, Guest, Hudson-Prentice, Dal, Aitchison, Cohen, Conners, Barnes.

Durham have had a poor tournament but have some good players and will be aware that they have something of a spell over us on this ground. 

They have also named 13, which is:

Alex Lees, Sean Dickson, Michael Jones, David Bedingham, Gareth Harte, Stuart Poynter, Ned Eckersley (c,wk), Brydon Carse, Paul Coughlin, Ben Raine, Matthew Potts, Matthew Salisbury, Chris Rushworth

I will be traveling tomorrow so won't see much of the first day's play, but if we play as we can, this game is very winnable.

With two group games to go, we control our own destiny.

You can't ask for more than that. 

Good luck lads. 

Yorkshire v Derbyshire day 4

Derbyshire did well yesterday, making 300-7 declared in the brief time available before the game was declared a draw.

Matt Critchley and Anuj Dal shared the first century seventh wicket partnership for Derbyshire at Headingley (statistic courtesy David Griffin) and the two batting bonus points kept us top of and in control of the group.

Matt is playing much straighter this year and looks a very good player. I suspect he will become established at five for us and be a massive asset in the years ahead. 

Anuj has gone from a player struggling to find his way in the first class game to one who looks at home. He fields brilliantly, which was always his route into the team, but can bowl more than usefully and here showed why he was a highly-regarded teenage batsman in the top three.

He is organised, busy, quick on his feet and has a good range of shots. His response to the mini-crisis on Monday, pulling Olivier for three boundaries, highlighted his calm persona.

He is a very good cricketer. 

Durham next, which may see the return of Messrs Reece, Hudson-Prentice and Palladino.

But we acquitted ourselves well here, and can be proud of the collective effort. 

Yorkshire v Derbyshire day, 3

Yorkshire 400-6 (Malan 219)

Derbyshire 198-6 (Godleman 54, Critchley 31*) 

Derbyshire trail by 202 runs

After making maximum batting points against Derbyshire today, Yorkshire made inroads into our reply by the close of play, which came with the score 198-6.

Dawid Malan made a superb double century, which never really looked in doubt, with continued support from Tattersall, before he was well caught by Anuj Dal.

The declaration came as soon as 400 was reached, leaving us with a tricky half hour before lunch, well-negotiated by Tom Wood and Billy Godleman.

I thought Tom looked the part before the interval, but stopped playing his natural game afterwards. A lobbed bat bad catch to the bowler, following through, was a soft way to go, but he didn't look out of place against a strong attack. 

Olivier and Patterson are a fine pair of experienced bowlers and it was the latter, captaining his side well, who caused the most problems. Madsen followed his Leicester ton with a duck, but du Plooy joined his skipper in a half century stand that steadied the ship at tea. 

Afterwards the batsmen again seemed less willing to play shots, but the attack was relentless and Patterson took both batsmen in the opening spell of the evening session. As he did on occasion with us, Olivier tended to bowl too short, while his captain pitched up and reaped the benefits. At the end of his spell he had 3-16 in 15 overs, tribute to his accuracy and skill.

Hughes and Critchley took the score past 150, before a rash stroke from the former gave his wicket away, an attempted pull lobbing to mid on from the bowling of the brisk but wayward Leech. Nor did Hosein suggest permanence, playing away from his body too often for comfort, before doing it once too often against the returning Olivier and being well caught by Bairstow.

Then came Dal and three pulled boundaries in an over from him largely erased the prospect of the follow on. He and Critchley, who batted very well for an unbeaten 31, saw us through to the close.

Tomorrow? Score the three runs to pass the follow on target and then try to get additional batting points.

Unless we do something stupid, the game SHOULD be a draw. 

Yorkshire v Derbyshire day 2

Yorkshire 288-4 (Malan 153*)

v Derbyshire

Only one over possible at Headingley today, in which Dawid Malan passed 150. 

Bad light then ended play early, after rain prevented a start until the afternoon. 

As I said last night, the likely result is now a draw, unless someone on one side does something spectacular. For both sides, first innings bonus points and those from the draw are of real value and I don't see us pulling out short of going for maximum batting points. Yorkshire look set for those and will close the gap on us accordingly. 

Heavy rain is due overnight in Leeds with more forecast on Tuesday afternoon.

I will be back tomorrow. 

Yorkshire v Derbyshire day 1

Yorkshire 280-4 (Malan 145*, Tattersall 64* Cohen 2-61)

v Derbyshire

With Derbyshire having put them in to bat, Yorkshire will certainly be the happier of the two sides tonight. They were 280-4 when bad light ended play for the day with twelve overs remaining, recovering from a shaky start and a mid-innings wobble that saw them 106-4 at one stage.

Dawid Malan made a fine century for them, playing some lovely shots through the covers. On another day, however, he could have seen a much earlier return to the pavilion, a couple of very close early  lbw shouts being turned down. He was well supported by Johnny Tattersall, who was on loan with us a few years back and has now carved a niche for himself in this Yorkshire side. They added an unbroken 174 for the fifth wicket in a fine effort. 

In the evening session they put our inexperienced attack to the sword and Malan looked a player of the highest class, better, to my eyes, than some currently holding down England places. 

Ben Aitchison was again the pick of the bowlers, keeping tight lines, a good length and getting plenty of movement, especially before lunch. He will bowl worse and pick up more than one wicket and pre-lunch, no one played him with confidence.

Michael Cohen bowled a poor first spell, getting pulled for two sixes, but came back well and either side of lunch was a real handful. He pitched it up more and got good swing, though again prone to deliveries that enlivened Harvey Hosein's day and later accelerated the scoring. 

The rest were a mixture. Dal started well and took the key wicket of Bairstow, remaining tidy throughout. Melton was less of a threat than at Leicester and leaked the most runs, while Hughes and Critchley were tidy, without looking especially threatening.

The fielding was good. Cohen and Godleman made a series of fine stops, while Wood also did well, sweeping on the boundary. Madsen held a very sharp catch at slip and they worked hard to maintain standards all day. 

The wicket seemed to ease and slow as the day went on, however and with rain forecast to take sizeable chunks from this game, as well as others around the country, a draw at this stage appears the likeliest result.

Which would suit Derbyshire just fine, of course...

Finally, a word about the Yorkshire stream, which was the best I have so far seen. The angle was good, the interchange of cameras professional and the experience generally excellent. 

It did go down after tea, however and I am not alone in thinking it was very short - sighted to publicise its limitation to members only, when cricket fans have been starved of the game all summer. 

The rationale was, I think, to incentivise members donating their subscription to the club, when a raft of social media comments suggest they have only managed to (again) alienate supporters. 

When the link was available all day anyway, it made absolutely no sense as a public relations exercise.

Yorkshire v Derbyshire preview - Bob Willis Trophy

 At the ripe old age of 25, Dustin Melton is set to be the senior member of Derbyshire's seam attack tomorrow against Yorkshire at Headingley.

Michael Cohen (22) and Ben Aitchison (21) look like being the other members of the seam attack, with support from Matt Critchley, who was 24 this week. Alex Hughes will doubtless pitch in with a few overs and ruin the age demographic, almost paternal at the age of 28.

There is no Luis Reece, who is rested for this one, so Tom Wood will likely open in his first first-class appearance since 2016. It is well-deserved, though I am sure that he would have preferred more match action than he has had this summer ahead of his return.

Nevertheless, Tom has an opportunity to show what he can do against the team that is our closest rival in the group. Nils Priestley is also in the squad and I suspect that the final place will come down to a choice between he and Anuj Dal. The latter may edge it by virtue of being another seam option, but the talented Priestley, at 19, would be an intriguing pick as an aggressive batsman of some talent, also capable of a few overs.

Tomorrow's attack could be sponsored by Farley's, with the eleven, bar for Messrs Godleman and Madsen having a very youthful look. It is great and I applaud Dave Houghton for rotating his squad and offering opportunity to young talent. 

That squad:

Godleman, Wood, Madsen, du Plooy, Critchley, Hughes, Hosein, Dal, Priestley, Conners, Cohen, Aitchison, Melton.

There is a Yorkshire return for England man David Willey, while former Derbyshire player Duanne Olivier will make up the other half of a potent new ball pairing.There is a similar youthful look to the home side, although they will hope for runs from the experienced top three of Lyth, Kohler-Cadmore and Bairstow. 

Their fourteen-man squad:

Lyth, Kohler-Cadmore, Bairstow, Brook, Malan, Hill, Leech, Patterson, Shutt, Tattersall, Thompson, Warner, Willey, Olivier.

It will be a tough test for us, but we have a good record against Yorkshire of late and will fear no one in present form.

I look forward to reporting on the events of the first day, later tomorrow.

Go well, lads.

Midweek Musings

We've all had quite a glow in these past few days, eh? Top of the league, Nottinghamshire lost again, we beat Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire lost again.. Sorry, might have said that twice...

It would have been handy had they beaten Yorkshire, but like I wrote a week or so back, they just don't strike me as a team. Eleven talented blokes, on their day, but not a tight unit and when the chips are down, that is what pulls you through. 

With this Derbyshire side, you get the feeling that you take on one, you take on eleven. It is why I don't fear playing anyone, regardless of their reputation. We might be missing several experienced players, but the rest are pulling manfully together. Hats off to the new recruits, who to a man have contributed. I read a tweet by David Griffin, the club's Heritage Officer, this morning that said that we have so far used eleven bowlers in two matches - and every one of them has taken at least one wicket.

Moving on, I have been asked a couple of times recently if I thought we should try to bring Ben Slater back from Trent Bridge. My answer is simple. No. 

For one thing, he is under contract to the end of next year, while for another I suspect he will end up where he is now, at Leicestershire. For a third, and most important, he wouldn't get into the current Derbyshire side. 

Cue protests from Chesterfield, but I am not saying he isn't a good player, his issue is consistency. He averaged 20 last year for Nottinghamshire, with a season-highest of 76. This year, he started at Leicestershire with 170, then followed it with a pair. By definition, as a county player you are among the top one per cent of players in the country, but to get to the national elite needs that little bit more.

How would Ben get into our current top four? Billy is skipper, Wayne and Leus pick themselves, then there's Luis.

Ben averages 31 in first class cricket, 50-plus in List A and rarely plays T20. Luis averages 33 in first-class and is a key all rounder in all forms. He opened batting and bowling in the last match and taking Ben out of the equation, who else could do that?

Ah but Luis could bat five, you say? No, because he likes and prefers to open. Besides, Critch bats five, or Alex Hughes. Then there's Harvey (or Brooke Guest) and Fynn, besides other options. I don't see it happening and I genuinely don't see how he could get into a first choice side. That is a sure sign of how we have progressed.

I think he made a mistake leaving Derbyshire and may have kicked on with Dave Houghton and Mal Loye as his batting coaches. He hasn't done so at Trent Bridge and I think he will look back on that move in years to come as one where he made the wrong decision or was poorly advised. 

Next, the T20 fixtures are out. No surprises, as we play the same teams every year, but it runs from 27 August to 20 September. You can see the fixtures here

And finally today, in response to emails, my thoughts on the team for Yorkshire. 

There will not be many changes, for me. I think Tony Palladino might be back soon, but not just yet. I don't think they will pick Fynn Hudson-Prentice as they will want to ensure he is right for T20. I also think that Sam Conners will be rested, as he looked tired on Monday and that Yorkshire's loan of Ed Barnes will preclude his involvement. 

With Ravi Rampaul stranded in Trinidad, I expect to see the following eleven at Headingley:

Godleman, Reece, Madsen, Du Plooy, Critchley, Hughes, Hosein, Dal, Cohen, Aitchison, Melton. 

As always, your comments are most welcome!

Leicestershire v Derbyshire day 3

 Leicestershire 199 and 220 (Dearden 47, Azad 40, Critchley 6-73)

Derbyshire 408 and 12-1

Derbyshire won by 9 wickets

Matt Critchley's career-best bowling figures spun Derbyshire to an emphatic nine-wicket win at Leicester today. 

There was early and late resistance from the home side, who went in one crazy session from looking like taking it into a fourth day to looking like being beaten by an innings. Critchley lived up to to pre-season noises from former Australian leg-spinner Stuart MacGill as one to watch with a fine spell, where he bowled a brilliant line and length, supported by excellent close catching. 

Both Wayne Madsen and Leus du Plooy held fine catches, the former's quite brilliant, while at the other end Dustin Melton bowled a tight, aggressive spell that kept on the pressure. The South African impressed in this game and deserves praise for match figures of 5-47 from 27 overs. It wasn't easy for the quicks in hot conditions, but he stuck very well to his task.

Earlier Ed Barnes took two wickets in an over to start the ball rolling and did much better in this innings. He accounted for Ben Slater, who went from the joys of a career-best 170 in the last match to a pair in this one, the joy and frustration of cricket clearly defined in those figures. Like the debutants in the last match, he settled well and didn't look out of place at this level.

The other wicket went to Leus du Plooy, who was brought on to bowl just ten minutes after I suggested on Twitter that we should utilise his 'golden arm'. He duly obliged in a spell that showed his all round value to the side.

Yet the day belonged to Critch. His 6-73 was a fine effort and although Callum Parkinson got the wicket of Billy Godleman when we went in (Billy wasn't impressed, nor was I from the replay) the win was a formality. It was all very well saying (as I heard) that 'if they had to chase 120 it would have been a challenge' but we bowled and batted well enough to prevent that. I was impressed, again.

Onward we march. Yorkshire on Saturday, who will either be buoyed by a win over our dear neighbours tomorrow or plumbing the depths of despair. A Nottinghamshire win would likely suit us (it's OK, I said it through gritted teeth) as it would leave us well clear of second place in the group.

Quite frankly, with the kind of cricket that we are playing at the moment, it doesn't matter who we play. It is confident, aggressive, bullish and hugely enjoyable. It is a small but patently tight-knit squad. Whichever eleven takes the field, we know they will be well-prepared and ready to roll their sleeves up for a battle. The greatest compliment of all is that I genuinely couldn't name our strongest eleven right now, because the squad en masse is playing so well.

I like that, a lot.

Altogether now...Derbyshire, la la la...

Brooke Guest signs from Lancashire

The signing of Brooke Guest from Lancashire, a player who will provide much needed competition for Harvey Hosein, is the one that I mentioned recently I had heard of.

It was a chance conversation with a friend, but I didn't reveal the player's identity at the time, as it is not my place to do so. The club had done all the work on the deal and deserved the opportunity to break the news when they were ready.

Harvey Hosein was the only wicket-keeper on the staff and my considered opinion is that competition is only ever healthy. If you are guaranteed your place in any team, regardless of performance, it is not conducive to a sustained high level, as complacency can set in. Harvey Hosein now knows that he has good competition for the role and must maintain standards with bat and ball to retain his place in the side. 

It also affords the opportunity for rotation, which he, like other players, will appreciate. Harvey took a bang on the finger in the first match at Trent Bridge and had that been serious, we would have been looking at emergency loans. A quality wicket-keeper as back up or alternative is exactly what we needed. With games coming thick and fast, this also helps to guard against mental tiredness, which can legislate against sustained performance.

Make no mistake, Brooke Guest, 23, is a talented player, Born in Manchester, he grew up in Australia and played for their under-19 side as well as Western Australia age group sides. He was named in the Australian under-19 World Cup squad for 2016, before security concerns saw them withdraw from the tournament. He has scored a lot of runs for Lancashire Seconds in recent years and is regarded as a 'dynamic' player with bat and gloves, according to those who know him.

I see him as a very good option for one-day cricket, where he has played some games for Lancashire, before leaving to take on what should be greater opportunity with us over the next two years.

Welcome to Derbyshire, Brooke!

Leicestershire v Derbyshire day 2

Leicestershire 199 and 2-0

Derbyshire 408 (Madsen 103, Hosein 66*, Reece 56, du Plooy 55)

Leicestershire trail by 207 runs

Although Derbyshire's batting lost its way a little after the giddy lunch heights of 205-2, they still batted with sufficient skill, consistency and purpose to play themselves into a very strong position by the close, In response to the home side's 199 all out, we were all out for 408, with a token over before the close seen off by night watchman Callum Parkinson.

You could tell it was high summer, because it brought with it another century of charm and class by Wayne Madsen. It was his 30th for the county, drawing him level with Denis Smith on the all time list, with only John Morris and Kim Barnett ahead of him. There were shots all around the wicket, from the textbook to the improvised and there appear to be plenty more runs in the tank.

Luis Reece gave away his promising overnight position with a needless attempted run on the arm of Klein, but du Plooy was quickly into his stride and the runs mounted as the two matched each other stroke for stroke before lunch.

It was a surprise when Leus, having been badly dropped by Swindells earlier, was adjudged caught down the leg side from Klein's bowling. Madsen reached his century, but was then bowled by Davis, who put in a good afternoon spell against his old county.  Critchley again looked in good touch, before being caught behind, while Hughes was outwitted by Ackermann, as he came down the pitch after playing some nice shots.

Hosein's feet were moving well from the start and his timing was good as he, with the fleet-footed Anuj Dal, took the total to a fourth batting bonus point. The latter was leg before to Klein, who bowled well with the second new ball, but contributed well to the growing total, the running between the wickets, as you might expect, especially noteworthy.

Thereafter the only question was whether maximum batting points could be achieved, but after the quick dismissal of Barnes, Conners came in to play an innings of old fashioned tail end 'humpty', carving the ball repeatedly over the leg side in an innings diametrically opposed to the one he played at Trent Bridge.

Hosein finishing unbeaten on 66 and did a good job for his side today.

Although the  home side reached the close with ten wickets in hand, they are 207 runs behind and have a mountain to climb to save this match.

As for Derbyshire. they couldn't have scripted the day better and will hope to push for an impressive victory tomorrow.

Well played, gentlemen.

Leicestershire v Derbyshire day 1

Leicestershire 199 (Dearden 70, Melton 4-22, Reece 3-51)

Derbyshire 101-1 (Reece 50* Madsen 37*)

Derbyshire trail by 98 runs

It was entirely appropriate that, on a day of soaring temperatures, the Derbyshire bowling effort should be led by a man named Melton..

Dustin of that name didn't make the most of his few senior appearances last year, perhaps being overawed by the experience, but today he made amends. After winter ankle surgery and hard work on his bowling he looked a completely different player, his line and length impeccable, his pace brisk as he blew away the home side's middle order.

Three were bowled, one caught at slip and he could have had another, du Plooy failing to cling on to a fast one, up to his left. This was the Melton I had seen in second team displays, hostile and accurate. His figures of 13-5-22-4 did not flatter him. 

It was an excellent effort by the strapping quick, who was well supported by Luis Reece and Sam Conners, who again impressed, though a little jaded in his final spell. Ed Barnes bowled some good balls in his spells, but a tendency to a loose one an over was to the detriment of his figures.

Harvey Hosein had a good day too, looking much tidier in his work than at Trent Bridge. His excellent stumping of the talented Azad from all of 20 yards built on the early dismissal of Ben Slater and he later held a good catch off Alex Hughes, standing up. I would love to see a good knock from him now, to build on it. 

Only Harry Dearden lasted for long. He played some fine shots, but a tendency to play across his front pad always gave encouragement to the Derbyshire bowlers. Dogged late resistance from Will Davis promised a batting bonus point, but Reece prevented that with a run to spare. 

Luis then completed the rare feat of opening both bowling and batting on the same day and breezed to an unbeaten half century by the close, well supported by the classy Wayne Madsen, who looked equally good as the score chugged along at five an over. Reece is a unique commodity, one of huge value to his captain, who got a good ball from Chris Wright before he got going.

Closing at 101-1, just 98 runs behind, tomorrow's task is to bat all day and build a lead so we do not have to bat again. There is sufficient talent there to do so and in this battle of the table-toppers, Derbyshire looked a very good side today.

The Leicestershire stream was appreciated, though there were lagging issues with the pictures and also sound problems. It was oddly parochial too. There were replays of squirts through gulley for two, but none of wickets, or chances missed in the home innings. Nor any replays at all when we batted.

It was as if they were in denial... 

Let's bat them out of the game tomorrow, lads.

Leciestershire v Derbyshire preview

 As he promised he would do after the win at Trent Bridge earlier this week, Dave Houghton has rotated his squad for the visit to Leicestershire, starting tomorrow.

Ben Aitchison, who did a lot of bowling in that game, steps down while both Dustin Melton and new recruit Ed Barnes join the other eleven that saw duty at Trent Bridge.

Ben bowled 41-7-114-4 in that match, more than any other Derbyshire bowler, so will sit this one out and doubtless return for the next one. Like most of you I was very impressed with the way that he handled the step up and he looks a good bet for a contract for next year.

If Melton gets the nod tomorrow, he and Michael Cohen will make up a lively pairing, but there may also be an opportunity for Anuj Dal. Alex Hughes will also be raring to go, so I'll not attempt to name a final eleven from this thirteen-man squad:

Godleman, Reece, Madsen, du Plooy, Hughes, Critchley, Hosein, Dal, McKiernan, Barnes, Conners, Melton, Cohen.

There is no news at this stage of the home squad, though they signed James Weighell on loan from Durham this week. With Ben Slater on loan from Nottinghamshire, they have three former Derbyshire players in their side (Tom Taylor and Callum Parkinson the others) and shouldn't be too far away from this twelve:

Azad, Slater, Dearden, Ackermann, Rhodes, Taylor, Swindells, Mike, Klein. Parkinson, Wright, Weighell.

First plays second, to the victor, the spoils. Losing will not end the hopes of either side, but winning will put that team firmly in the driving seat of the group. 

If we can replicate the intensity and team spirit of the last game, this one is winnable. There are quality players throughout this Derbyshire squad and whichever eleven takes the field will ensure that they acquit themselves well. 

As always, your thoughts are appreciated!

Derbyshire sign Yorkshire all-rounder Ed Barnes on loan

 Ed Barnes, a former England under-19 player, is perhaps more accurately described as a seam bowler who knows how to bat, rather than an established all-rounder. Perhaps more, at this stage, a Michael Cohen than a Fynn Hudson-Prentice, but a welcome addition all the same. Fynn Hudson-Prentice may be rested to get over his leg injury from Trent Bridge, very much a player we want fully fit for the T20.

With the return of Ravi Rampaul from Trinidad delayed for the time being through Covid-19 travel restrictions, as well as Tony Palladino being out for foreseeable future, we will perforce have to continue with the rotation of our young bowlers in the Bob Willis Trophy. We don't want to get to the Vitality Blast and find ourselves with a couple of them burned out too, so swapping them in and out looks like the way to go.

I have to admit, I didn't see this one coming.

Although, given that the Yorkshire player was due to play his club cricket for Barnard Castle this summer, its established credentials for assessing optical ability should have ensured that I did..

I don't know much about Ed Barnes, other than his having taken a lot of wickets for the Yorkshire Academy and second team. He went on loan to Sussex last year, but didn't play any games for them, though I suspect he will get game time with us.

It could be mutually beneficial. The player is one of twelve who are out of contract at the white rose county come the end of season and good displays with us could either persuade them that he is worth another deal, or make him an option for us to look at.

I am sure that he is known to Steve Kirby and Dave Houghton and descriptions I have seen say that he is tall, lively and gets a lot of bounce. 

They sound like handy starting points for any bowler and I look forward to seeing him in action in the next week or two.

Nottinghamshire thoughts and the new guys

Wasn't it great to wake up this morning and think back to that game?

I apologise if my euphoria post-win was over the top for anyone, but if you can't get excited over a game that good, you had best get a doctor to check your pulse.

It was, as I said last night, a genuine team effort, as much down to Sam Conners' gritty defiance in the first innings as the headline-grabbing feats. Were it not for that last wicket stand, our hosts would have been out of sight. 

Speaking of which, our opponents always seem to me to be eleven talented (but desperately under-achieving) blokes, but not a team. In contrast, the closeness of our squad is tangible. From Leus du Plooy pounding his chest after his sublime first innings century, to the jump for joy of Michael Cohen and Fynn Hudson-Prentice as they completed the final two runs, then the comments of the latter at the end of the game. Derbyshire is more than a club, it is a family, the interaction of players with supporters always appreciated. 

So too your interaction with this blog. I love to see them and they are a useful barometer for me as to how you are all feeling about things. Do please remain involved and for those new to posting, I always vet prior to publication, though this is more down to blocking the spammers who attempt to link to sex sites and the like. Your comments will always appear as soon as I see them and get the chance to do something about it.

It is always especially exciting when the club signs new players. The game just finished afforded an early opportunity to look at three young men, all 21 (when the game started), who may just hold the future of our club's seam bowling in their hands.

The one we knew best, of course, was Sam Conners. I have previously written that he looked a talent, even a couple of years back, but the ubiquitous back issues of the young seamer held him back a little, until his physiology caught up with his undoubted talent.

There's a touch of Harold Rhodes in his action, which can't be a bad thing. He is tall, whippy, gets plenty of bounce and swing and is likely to be a very potent force in the next couple of years. His spell of 3-19 on the second evening combined both hostility and skill and while he has a quicker ball, he isn't fixated on pace, which I think is the correct thing. There are plenty of people already taking notice of Sam, who also showed himself no mug with the bat in his support of Leus du Plooy on the second afternoon. I don't think he will bat eleven for long, and his self-effacing support was all the more laudable when you consider that he has played some punishing knocks for the second team.

I thought Ben Aitchison looked better with every spell he bowled. I got the impression on the first morning that he was trying to bowl too quickly, to the detriment of his line and length. He isn't that kind of bowler, but when he reduced his pace he got bounce, swing and lateral movement, becoming a far more tricky proposition. On the third day he bowled beautifully and was treated with respect by the Nottinghamshire batsmen, picking up good wickets in the process. A bowler in the Matt Mason/Terry Alderman mould, I predict a very bright future.

Indeed, I saw enough of Ben in that game to justify a two-year deal immediately and I could see him taking a lot of wickets in the years ahead. Definitely one to watch - and he again looked no mug with the bat, either. A shot through the covers in the first innings suggested he knew what he was doing.

Michael Cohen? Very few are blessed with the natural assets to bowl quickly, which sets him apart from the outset. His pace disconcerted the batsmen, when he got it right, but he will know that raw pace and poor direction will not be a long-term wicket machine. Yet his line also improved as the game went on and, as they so often are, a bowler with that change up in pace transforms an attack. He got five wickets in the match, most of them beating good players for pace. 

He is not tall, more Larwood and Marshall than Ambrose and Walsh, so shouldn't be putting so much strain on his back.Once he locks on the radar, with greater experience, he will be a real handful, as he was at times here. I liked his personality, which bubbled through with regular smiles and an almost coltish enthusiasm in the field. 

With the bat I suspect he will become a fan favourite. In the first innings he was animated, with exaggerated held poses, plenty of movement around the crease and expansive shouts of 'Wait!' accompanied by a pointed bat almost thrust at the non-striker. He looked organised, but it didn't suggest what he produced in the second innings.

A South African friend messaged me on Twitter last night to say that he had never seen him bat like that over there. On which basis we must assume he has worked very hard on his batting over the winter, because he was not at all fazed by the situation. As he pinged a couple to the cover boundary, I wondered if we had sent in du Plooy a second time...

All three will benefit from having bowled at a team where you have someone like Samit Patel in at eight. In many teams you are getting to the dead men at that point, but Samit showed his class in both innings and punished them as they tired and the ball got old. 

They will also benefit from an older head alongside them, like Ravi Rampaul or Tony Palladino, players who have been through that stage and become respected, professional bowlers. 

With Ravi presumably back for Saturday's game, team selection will need careful consideration. One will need to drop out, while I suspect either Alex Hughes or Tom Wood may replace Mattie McKiernan. Again, that would be no reflection on his performance, as he caught well, took two quick wickets in a short first innings bowl and contributed valuable runs yesterday. I just feel the greater team need is for an extra batsman, with both Alex and Tom excellent in the slip cordon too.

There's genuine potential in that squad of ours. 

I look forward to seeing its development in the years ahead.

Derbyshire v Nottinghamshire day 4

Nottinghamshire 324 and 279

Derbyshire 239 and 365-7 (Hudson-Prentice 91*, Godleman 86)

Derbyshire won by three wickets

Wow, wow, wow, wow, wow...

At 234-6, with all the senior players gone, most Derbyshire supporters will have given up on winning this game. 131 still to get, a bloke with a sore leg the senior player left, after just twelve appearances, A debutant in next and a man making only his second appearance on his way to the wicket.

Who credited Fynn Hudson-Prentice, a man who lives in Nottingham, with playing such a superb unbeaten innings of 91? We knew he could bat, but this was an innings of genuine quality, innate common sense and superb game awareness. Credit to to Mattie McKiernan too, who lent crucial support in a stand of 65, before looking crestfallen on his dismissal, after a stand of 65.

Sixty-six to get and down to the debutants. Not to worry... 

Michael Cohen, previous career-best 23, came in on his 22nd birthday and started spanking the ball through the covers like a latter day Graeme Pollock. His first innings hadn't really suggested that was in there, but his unbeaten 30 was impressive, brave and bolshie. Typical of the new Derbyshire in many ways, standing toe to toe and slugging it out with one of the 'bigger' counties. No more Mr Nice Guy. The way they batted, there were likely fifties in Ben Aitchison and Sam Conners too...

Michael's off side play was a revelation, but when he tucked one off his legs from Jake Ball and they ran the winning two, even my non-cricket fan wife jumped off the couch in excitement with me. We wait four months for a game of cricket and then get one that we will remember for the rest of our days. 

There were records broken along the way, but I can only doff my cap to a team that just kept going and paced their massive run chase to perfection.

I am thrilled for all of them, but especially Fynn Hudson-Prentice. He came to Derbyshire after rejection at Sussex and has made himself a fixture in the side. His bowling was limited in this match with injury, his first innings hampered by the same. Today, he was simply sensational and has entered county legend, as they all have.

To win, I thought that one of our top four had to score big. Truth is that once Billy Godleman and Leus du Plooy had gone, much depended on Wayne Madsen, who can seldom have batted so long for so few. 43 in almost four hours tells that it was far from easy and his departure, closely followed by Harvey Hosein, looked like game over. 192-5, still 173 needed.

Maybe we could bat out time for the draw points? Matt Critchley again looked in good nick and seems to be playing much straighter, but for the second time in the match rather gave it away when he had done all the hard work. At 234-6, 131 needed from 35 overs, it seemed like a case of how long we could last.

Fynn, Mattie and Michael had other ideas. Tonight, gentlemen I salute you all. It was a genuine team effort, from first to last day. I could likely live another fifty years and not see another game of cricket that ended in such a special manner. Who said four-day cricket was boring?

I didn't have a lot of time for the home side's appealing as the game got tighter. Twice Hameed ran in from mid wicket to the umpire to appeal for leg before wicket. Next time, you can have your guard from there, son, if you can see so clearly...

But I digress. This was wonderful stuff. The only disappointment being that their supporters have taken to social media tonight to berate their side, rather than giving credit to a side that were better, over the piece.

By crikey, we'll enjoy tonight.

Special stuff, Derbyshire. Well done!

Derbyshire v Nottinghamshire day 3

Nottinghamshire 324 and 279 (Patel 80, Hameed 52, Mullaney 48, Aitchison 3-55, Connor 3-63

Derbyshire 239 and 129-1 (Godleman 69*, Madsen 27*) 

Derbyshire need 236 runs to win

At the end of an absorbing day's cricket, Derbyshire left the field at Trent Bridge needing 236 runs run to win with nine wickets in hand. 

It would be an improbable, extraordinary win, as we appeared out of the game at tea, after being in it at lunch. Ben Aitchison bowled splendidly, but in the post-lunch session Samit Patel again took the game by the scruff of the neck. He twice batted beautifully here, no doubt keen to extend his contract past its current end of season.

His presence at eight showed the difference in experience between the sides, our eleven containing a bottom five of next to none. 

Hampered by the injury to Fynn Hudson-Prentice, Reece and Aitchison were the go to bowlers to keep things in check, that being praiseworthy for the latter's debut. It wasn't ideal when Reece had also to open the batting, of course, but in the absence of Rampaul and Palladino, the skipper could only use what he had available. I thought Aitchison outstanding today, troubling the batsmen throughout. 

Before lunch the wickets went down steadily. There were good catches held and better lines bowled, before Patel took charge. Habeeb made another fifty, though he looks full of idiosyncrasies at the crease. The batsman we all hope is there could return, but his dismissal, after almost two hours of self-denial before lunch, was an odd one, a lazy poke at the type of ball he had left all morning.

Evison confirmed the good impression of the first innings and helped Patel get the home side in a good position, as did Ball. Critchley then trapped Patel leg before when a century was beckoning and Cohen got a quick throat ball spearing in at Ball to leave 365 in 4 sessions to win. 

Reece set off as if we had to get them in 50 overs, but was sadly caught at mid on when he failed to get over a drive. 

Yet that was as good as it got for Nottinghamshire, because Godleman and Madsen played with eminent good sense, considerable class and lots of skill in taking bite-sized chunks from the total by the close, which Derbyshire reached at 129-1.

We have only once exceeded 365 as a winning total in our 150 year history. With a bottom five of negligible experience, logic suggests we shouldn't, but the reality is this.

Tomorrow, with nine wickets in hand, we need 236 in the day. We have done that plenty of times. 

What a day of cricket it looks set to be. 

Derbyshire v Nottinghamshire day 2

Nottinghamshire 324 and 84-3

Derbyshire 239 (du Plooy 130)

Nottinghamshire lead by 169 runs

A magnificent innings of 130 from Leus du Plooy helped Derbyshire stay in the game against Nottinghamshire today, despite an otherwise anaemic batting display that saw them all out for 239.

Honourable exception can be made for Matt Critchley, who batted well before lunch for 45, before inexplicably going for a quick single first ball afterwards. It was his call, but unnecessary at that juncture and he failed to make it back when du Plooy declined the single. 

Earlier Reece got a good one, Godleman didn't seem to think he hit one and Madsen played loosely to see three quick wickets fall in the first half hour, all of them to Jake Ball. Thereafter, du Plooy and Critchley batted with common sense and skill to take us to lunch at 114-3.

The decline to 159-9 was painful to watch, last night's assertion on here that we were a batsman light proving correct. They all seemed to be batting a place too high and the game appeared to be gone.

Then came Conners, looking a more solid bat than Cohen and Aitchison, who preceded him. Assaying no shots, he made 5 from 55 balls as he and du Plooy added 80 for the last wicket, a new record against Nottinghamshire. I was there when Alan Ward and Harold Rhodes set the previous record, at Ilkeston in 1969, but neither played shots like du Plooy! 

Switching from four-day to one-day mode, he shrugged off a couple of painful blows to score all around the ground. The boundaries flowed, even with nine fielders around it, as he reached his century with a six and clumped two more before he was eventually dismissed. We are very lucky to have a player of such talent and it was heartening to see him pumping the badge on his chest as he reached his century.

We were still 85 behind when the innings ended to a fine catch by Evison, who bowled well, but that was a long way from the 165 behind when they came together.

After tea the home side extended their lead to 169, despite a fine spell of 3-19 by Conners, who had a memorable day. Aitchison also bowled more accurately than in the first innings and the two appear to be fine prospects. 

Nottinghamshire on top at the close, but a big first session ahead tomorrow. 

Nottinghamshire v Derbyshire day 1

Nottinghamshire 324 (Cohen 3-47, McKiernan 2-3 Reece 2-45) 

Derbyshire 9-0

After putting Nottinghamshire in on winning the toss, Billy Godleman will have hoped for greater control from his rookie attack than was shown before lunch today.

Both Ben Aitchison and Sam Conners bowled good deliveries, but both were errant in line and length too often for peak county supporters and the opening pair of Hameed and Nash were able to score with relative ease. Greater control only came with the advent of Reece and Hudson-Prentice.

Aitchison seems to get a lot of bounce and has a quicker ball that caused Harvey Hosein to require treatment in his second spell. There is certainly a bowler there and I thought he bowled better as the day went on. 

I understand our wanting to have a look at all three young seamers, but it meant that Michael Cohen, reputedly the quickest, didn't bowl before lunch. Perhaps his 'skiddy' nature is deemed better suited to an older ball, which will bounce lower, but five seamers appeared overload, an extra batsman perhaps more useful, especially with several spinners available. 

Lunch came with the home side a largely untroubled 109-0.

Conners was the morning pick of the bowlers and quickly took the wicket of Nash, palpably leg before, after lunch. When Aitchison took his first, squaring Duckett up to be nicely caught by du Plooy at slip, things looked a little better. 

It became a session diametrically opposed to the one that preceded it. The answer to why Cohen didn't bowl in the morning appeared to be that his pace brings a risk of varied line, which we already had, but his advent tore the heart from the home batting. 

Reece took two in an over, the second a brilliant catch by McKiernan, while the young South African was too quick for Clarke and Trego, both caught behind by Hosein. On first viewing he is a bowler of serious pace and potential, one who will only get better with experience.

Moores was also gone before tea, edging Hudson-Prentice to Hosein, who shortly before put down a catch from him that should have been held, or left for Madsen at first slip. The interval came with Nottinghamshire 209-7, the game even 

Heavy rain delayed the restart but sterling work by the groundstaff saw only six overs lost. Patel then batted beautifully, aided by bowling that again lacked length and direction. Both Conners and Cohen took stiff punishment, before the latter took his third wicket, a routine catch to Madsen at slip.

Ball and Evison then took their side to slight ascendancy with a merry partnership that took the score to 321, before the belated introduction of McKiernan saw him take the last two wickets in eight balls. The innings ended at 324, with Derbyshire left to face four overs.

This was safely negotiated by Godleman and Reece, as Derbyshire finished 9-0.

In closing, a word of praise for the Nottinghamshire stream. They didn't always get the angle right (being on the midwicket camera for Habeeb's dismissal) but it improved as the day went on, in what was its first use. It was a big improvement on what it was, which was already appreciated. 

Well done, guys.