Monday 6 June 2011

Monday musings

I’m well aware of the difference between even high quality league cricket like the Derbyshire Premier League and the first class game, but weekend events in the game between Chesterfield and Ticknall are worthy of note from a county perspective.


In that game Paul Borrington reeled off an apparently brilliant unbeaten 143, his fifth ton of a prolific summer for Ticknall which has given him an average of Bradmanesque proportions, a staggering 168 from just eight innings. His innings contained fourteen fours and four sixes, suggesting that the old accusation of a player unable to force the pace is no longer valid.

Borrington suffered the unluckiest of injuries pre-season that ruled him out of matches in which he might well have been expected to play. Now of course, the surfeit of T20 in the next month makes it unlikely he will force his way into the side until July at the earliest. Even the seconds are playing smack and giggle stuff all month, an environment hardly conducive to making a case for inclusion at a higher level.

But what then? Borrington is an opening batsman – a specialist position – and in his way are our most prolific batsman in Wayne Madsen and our overseas player, Martin Guptill. We could, of course move Madsen to number five, where he does so well in one-day games, but who do you drop? Hughes, Durston, Smith and Redfern have all done well so far and none of them deserve to miss out on current form.

When we are considering options for next season, however, I hope that the path of a young, locally reared player like Borrington isn’t blocked. Martin Guptill is a fine player with a growing reputation in the game, but the likelihood of him being here after this year is slim, given the congestion of the international calendar. Borrington, however, is potentially a Derbyshire player for the next ten years and it would be a shame to see him have to move elsewhere for greater opportunity after the years he has been at the club. We have, after all, seen Wayne White make a success of such a move, while I’m still minded of young off-spinner Bob Swindell who showed promise but had his path blocked by the signing of Venkat many moons ago.

Some will say that Borrington hasn’t made the most of opportunities thus far, which is fair, but he’s rarely had the chance to bat in his preferred position (some bloke called Rogers…) and needs more than a game or two here and there. My understanding is that his current contract is to the end of next season and it would be to everyone’s advantage if he had the opportunity to show what he can do between times.

In six years since his debut in 2005 he has just 42 first-class innings to his name, some of them for Loughborough UCCE. An average of a shade under 30 is no disgrace and the signs are that he is ready for an extended run that could just be the making of him. It may well not happen this season, but I'd certainly like to see him given the chance to make the position his own next year. In between times he can only keep scoring runs at every opportunity, work on his technique and enjoy a spell where it would appear he could get runs with Geoff Boycott's proverbial 'stick o' rhubarb'.

In a normal match such an innings as he played on Saturday would be a match-winner, but an extraordinary knock of 131 from 65 balls by James Pipe stole the show. Pipe’s innings contained 19 fours and 9 sixes, which means that he only ran one single before, with delightful irony, he was run out, presumably having forgotten he could do…

Such an innings, not his first of the season, highlights something we have missed over the past couple of seasons, a lower order player who can take the game away from the opposition in a short space of time. Luke Sutton is a fine cricketer who will give 100% at all times and is at least Pipe’s equal behind the timbers, but he is unlikely to turn a match with dazzling stroke play and the launching of a counter attack. He will always sell his wicket dearly though and has made an excellent contribution already this season.

In closing tonight, the T20 division is starting to take shape, with Lancashire top and Nottinghamshire second. That makes our tie on Friday night the more laudable, while the loss to Nottinghamshire was hardly something new. There are games coming up that are winnable and our campaign is far from over, irrespective of what happens against Durham in next weekend’s double-header. I maintain that we’re not too far away from winning games and I disagree that the lack of a second overseas role will cost us. Looking at who sides have brought in and what they have done so far, it is hard to argue with Chris Grant.

Our success will be more a case of what our overseas player does. If Martin Guptill plays a few major innings, rather than attractive twenties, we will win more matches than we lose, as he is a naturally quick scorer. If he doesn’t, I suspect that the win/loss ratio will be less favourable, simple as that. While Botha and Vaas at Northamptonshire, Voges and Hussey at Nottinghamshire and Van der Merwe at Somerset have done well, there’s a few under-achievers at present.

Let’s hope it stays that way when we play them.

24 comments:

  1. I echo your thoughts regarding borrington, peakfan but I am not comfortable with Guptill as an opener in CC matches. He is definately a one day player. Correct me if im wrong but Guptills first class average is only around 30, which is considerabely low for an international opener. I would like to see Borrington play for the remainder of the championship season when it resumes, which would also give us the extra ecb funding will it not? The chances of this happening though, are very very low.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, F/c average is 30, Test average of 35. Bozza averages 29...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I take on board what you,re saying peakfan,but...Borrington has been around for 6 seasons now. Starting at 2008,talking specifically about the county championship, his average is not good. 324 runs in 13 innings (average 27). In 2009 he didn,t feature at all and in 2010 he scored 246 from,ironically, 13 innings (average 20.5). That is going backwards im afraid.

    As you know this is one of my major concerns when it comes to a number of the younger players at the county. A lack of any perceivable progress. Borrington is not the only one by any means,but how long can we go on paying these people on this basis that someday they may justify it.

    Dont get me wrong on this, i have nothing whatsoever against Borrington, Needham and various others in a similar position. On the contrary,i would like nothing better than to see them succeed,but i have doubts this will happen.

    I agree Borrington should be given another chance and if it means rotating one or two of the other batsmen,then so be it. If it was me,i would guarantee him four or five games and asses him after that. That way it would take a bit of pressure off him. If he doesn,t shape up,then for me he will have to go. Sad as that may be.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree he needs a run and the best time to do it is when the lad is in good form.
    Its also unfair to judge him as a middle order bat. If he has an extended run and doesnt' make a fist of it, fair enough. But two/three games isn't enough. If two of them are first day Derby tracks the odds will be stacked against him...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Borrington has to keep plugging away and wait for his turn like Garry Park who as done well in the seconds. I am sure that barring an injury at the start of the season JM would have given Borrington a run as opener. Borrington's chance will come there is no doubting that. I would also like to think that Whiteley will be given a go into the 20/20 matches as he gives it a real whack. I would give Poyton a go as he too has potential and is another player who would get us lots of ECB money!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I keep reading on various websites Derbyshire fans having a go at our former staff and I have spotted this week someone having a go at Chris Rogers for opening in the Middlesex side. Buck actually has a decent strike record of well over 100 in Twenty/20 and no Falcons fan should ever forget Buck's contribution for us. I have also seen Lancs fans claiming Luke Sutton is no Twenty/20 player either.

    ReplyDelete
  7. There is always merit in giving young players a chance,but when those chances come they have to take it. You can,t go on doing it forever. Somewhere the line has to be drawn. Selecting players on the grounds of collecting ECB money is totally unacceptable,if that is the only reason for playing them in the first place and is no way to run a county cricket club. If a championship game ends in two days because you,ve been thrashed any financial benefit of playing young players will be cancelled out simply by the loss of revenue for two blank days.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I wasn't having a go "anon" I just pointed out it was strange Buck was opening for Middlesex in the T20, he took a break when it was our T20 not being suited to the game. The stats don't lie, he averages 19. I have no agenda he did brilliant for us, just found it odd they open with him in this format.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Maybe that southern air has given him a new lease of life. You,re right though,it does seem strange. The only difference at Middlesex is he aint captain.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Simon Katich and Marcus North have been omitted from the Aussie set up. Wonder if North would fancy coming back over here,bearing in mind the next ashes series.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am seeing too much speculation about who will be running us next season! We have an Head of Cricket in Karl Krikken. Instead of everyone going on about who will replace Krik why don't we all get behind him and give him a fair chance at the job. I suppose though it doesn't help Krik when the Chairman started the speculation!

    ReplyDelete
  12. It,s pretty obvious the chairman sees him as no more than a stop gap measure. He knows the situation better than any of us,so i for one will back him whatever he decides to do.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Outstanding programme tonight on Radio 5 on depression among professional cricketers.

    The programme had a particular resonance for us because it discussed Mark Saxelby. Few will remember that he spent a year on our books in 2000, played two games before committing suicide a month after the end of the season.

    Astonishingly, it's not available on play again, but if you heard it, it should give us all pause for thought when we rubbish individuals, rather than complain about what they do.

    I don't think many of us finish a day's work and can log on to find out how crap we have been.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Part of the price of being a well paid sportsman. Most people would give their eye teeth to enjoy such a life.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Jesus. I thought you might be one of the thinkers on here. I take it you've never played any reasonable level of cricket so don't know how alone you are when your first three balls have gone to the boundary, and none of your team-mates are making eye contact. Three balls to go and you could be the last person in the universe - and that's when you're doing it for fun like I did.

    Add all of the other pressures that the professional has, and you have the perfect seedbed for the kind of agonies that Trescothick, Hoggard and others described. When you criticise, you don't know if you're attacking someone with the iron-clad self-esteem of a Vaughan or a Boycott, or someone clinging to the edge. Cricket has a long history of suicides, and I don't think it's coincidence. Just reflect on what you said.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Marc, if the Chairman sees Krikken as just a 'stop gap' then why appoint him? Its not fair on Krik who seams to be a doormat when he deserves better after all of his great work at the club. Who is the chairman to be making judgements on the likes of Krikken, Brown and Morris anyway? I can't remember him ever having played professional cricket.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Been on the official club website and read about another good win for the Second Team and more good contributions from Whiteley and Poynton.
    I am not so keen on that twitter rubbish on the 'official' website! Are the club really paying someone to tell us about Sutton's every golf shot and every trip he makes to the toilet?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Sorry notoveryet i just wasn,t thinking straight. I never used to get hit for three fours on the trot!. What are you saying?. I did silly things like keeping it straight and pitched up. Eye contact was impossible coz they were all somewhere near the boundary when i bowled and our keeper always wore sun specs whatever the weather. We didn,t call him iron gloves for nothing. Third man was usually knackered by the tea time. Big advantage of being captain,as i was for 14 years,is i could bowl myself stategically for the benefit of my team mates. I was lethal,ask any number 10 or 11 who,s ever played in the Yorkshire and Derbyshire league.

    The pressure of having to score the winning run from the last ball,with some useless number 11 at the other end never applied to me. I batted at 3 to influence the innings as any captain worth his salt would do,so usually i was out by the time the winning post appeared on the horizon, my mission long since accomplished. By then i would usually be relaxing with a pint in the pavillion, trying to explain to some of our batsmen that attempting to reverse sweep the opening bowlers first ball might not be a sensible idea. Never happened too often though as most of my players at least attempted to play proper cricket shots. Any watching coach would have been proud of them.

    The pressure was,at times, intolerable. As soon as you got to the pub everyone would start moaning about why they were batting where they were, why i took them off just as they were getting into their stride and why have a third man when the professionals clearly deem it a redundant position, even though he usually saved about a hundred runs a game. After 35 years of combining this with the minor distraction of having to earn a living,i called it a day and decided to concentrate soley on the professionals. If only you could bring back the good old days.

    ReplyDelete
  19. To anon. I dont know what the chairman has in mind for Krikken,none of us do. All i can say is when you look at football,following the managers dismissal,someone takes over for a time. Usually a new tried and trusted failure (sorry manager)is appointed as assistants rarely,if ever, step up to make a success of it. Its difficult to be "one of the lads" one minute and then having to rollick those same players the next.

    A head of cricket requires a number of talents from man management, good business sense, contacts, motivation etc,etc. Krikken has talents,no question about that,but whether he has enough of the right ones i dont know. The chairman is in a much better position to judge something like that than any of us are.

    The chairman has to judge people. Thats his job. Whether that judgement ultimately proves to be correct is often a matter of opinion,but someone has to pull the strings. Most chairmen have never played professional cricket,but i cant really see why that has any real relevance. It,s still the same game at whatever level it,s played.Give the chairman a chance to get it right,doing it his way. Ultimately,he is answerable to us all.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Marc, in a roundabout way you are agreeing with me! If the chairman doesn't rate Krikken then why give him the job for a season?
    Also, I thought that we had a 14 man Committee running the club and not one man!
    Whilst the Chairman has not been involved with professional cricket until the last few weeks there are other people on the committee that have been involved. As a supporter its worrying that a bloke who has only been involved a few weeks is deciding the futures of guys like Krikken, Brown and Morris who have around 60 years of brilliant service at the club we all love.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thanks for some excellent comments guys - will post on this shortly...

    ReplyDelete
  22. Just before peakfan gives us his thoughts i will finish by saying Krikken took the job due to prevailing circumstances and by doing so bought the club some time. Having taken the job,one can only assume he was happy to do so on whatever basis the chairman gave it him. What happens long term, we shall have to wait and see.

    We do have a committee. I have my views on committees, especially one the size of Derbyshire,s. The whole concept of a committee is flawed from the outset. In fighting, factions, weak kneed members, ego trips, etc. It all conspires to make most committees little more than useless. When it comes to professional sport im wholly in favour of dictatorship. That usually means leadership and as a consequence, things tend to get done.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Marc you talk about our committee but to be fair to them after the farce just before the season started they seemed to have patched up their differences and moved on. Its a pity therefore when Messrs. Morris and Sutton had a tiff that the Chairman couldn't have got then both in a room and told them both to sort it out!

    ReplyDelete
  24. I think you,re over simplifying the tiff,just a tad.We,ve all had our say on the Morris thing so lets wait and see what comes out in the future and leave it at that.

    I wasn,t specifically talking about this particular committee,nor any paticular individuals that may form it. The Derbyshire committee, as a functioning body, has been joke for as long as i can remember for reasons i stated earlier and other reasons aswell. Whatever motivates these people to join is debatable,but one thing for certain, Derbyshire cricket has not benefited one iota for having one.

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!