At the end of a season that was far shorter than anyone wanted, Derbyshire ended up a second in their group, pipped at the post by Yorkshire. They were the fifth best performing team in the country, with the best record of any side ostensibly in division two of the County Championship. They were ahead of Lancashire, Surrey, Hampshire, Warwickshire, Northamptonshire and Gloucestershire, all done with an attack in which their two most experienced bowlers never played. Had the weather stayed out of the game at Durham, they may have done better still.
Even more impressive is that the side is some way from its peak. An attack largely made up of youngsters making their formative steps in the county game was able to somehow bowl sides out. A batting line up in which no one really excelled was able to cobble together the runs with contributions down the order. In this regard, it matched the best county sides of the past, where they always managed to get the runs together for the bowlers to work with.
In a side packed with all round talent, two stood out. Luis Reece averaged 46 with the bat and took thirteen wickets at 26, often opening the batting and bowling. Such herculean efforts confirm his value to the side, as well as his unique standing in the game, as no one does that, or to my knowledge ever has over a sustained period. He bowled more overs than anyone and was second top scorer, as well as remaining a man who appears to enjoy every single minute he is on the field. We are lucky to have him, but in Derbyshire he has found his home.
Matt Critchley also blossomed, with seventeen wickets at 26 and a batting average of 39. In both departments he improved his game and if such progress continues he will play international cricket. His batting was straighter and he looked a fine player, even if he was unduly creative in his dismissals. His bowling was more accurate and the variations in flight and spin caused problems for more than a few. He is one to watch and the new contract signed pre-season means Derbyshire supporters can enjoy that for the immediate future.
The rest of the top four each played one good innings without discovering their sustained best form. They will all come again and likely threaten the thousand run mark in a normal summer. Leus du Plooy played an innings of genius at Trent Bridge to keep his side in the game, before second innings heroics down the order saw an extraordinary win. Billy Godleman sometimes looked to impose himself too quickly, while Wayne Madsen looked more vulnerable to the moving ball than in the past. Both will come again, though there may be merit in Wayne moving down one in the order, better to take toll of the bowlers with the shine gone from the ball.
Fynn Hudson-Prentice was rarely fully fit and his bowling was missed. His batting won the game at Nottingham and his value to the side for the future is clear. Anuj Dal chipped in with bat and ball, as did Mattie McKiernan and the challenge to each is to confirm their undoubted ability and cement a place in a first choice eleven. As the two best fielders in a decent fielding side they give themselves a good chance, but competition for places, even in a small squad that favours rotation of players, is hotting up. Alex Hughes is another who found himself on the periphery and will be looking for a better summer in 2021.
Harvey Hosein kept better than I have seen him before and did a good job, both standing back and up to the stumps. He batted well in the first innings at Liverpool and remains an organised player , even if not one who can lead a counter-attacking rearguard action. He will remain the first choice for now, though new arrival Brooke Guest will hopefully push him to show his best form through a long, normal season.
As for the bowlers, Sam Conners showed good progress and produced some excellent spells, even if his line needs a little work at times. That issue is there for others too, with Michael Cohen showing rare pace but an inability to sustain the lines to cause a constant threat. His potential is clear, however and another winter under Steve Kirby could see the emergence of a serious bowler. Both showed they could handle a bat, too, which was heartening to see.
Dustin Melton was much improved and bowled very well at Leicester and Liverpool, though a reversion to previous erratic lines in the second innings of that final game was frustrating. He may return, depending on the final decision on Kolpak deals, as my understanding is that he becomes qualified by residence next summer.
The best of the young seamers, for me, was Ben Aitchison. Before an ankle injury curtailed his summer, he bowled accurately and intelligently throughout. After looking to bowl too quickly on his first appearance at Trent Bridge, he got into a lovely rhythm with his well grooved action and troubled good batsmen on a regular basis. His final figures don't fully reflect his contribution and I have no doubt that his season trial will be extended to a longer deal in the coming weeks.
Which leaves another on a short-term deal, Tom Wood. His only opportunity was in the one innings at Headingley, when he let no one down, even if his dismissal was unusual. I had hoped that his contract might afford greater opportunity and if Madsen were to drop down to four he would be an obvious option at three for another year.
I'm not sure how much more we know about him though. Hopefully he gets a chance in the remaining T20 matches to show what he can do, because there is a good batsman in there.
In summary? T20 finalists in 2019, fifth in the Bob Willis Trophy in 2020. With shrewd winter recruitment, promotion from division two next summer is a distinct possibility. The all round strength of the side means we bat long and can use seven or eight bowlers if required. That will be appreciated by Billy Godleman, who again led a contented squad well and will look forward to further success and progress in 2021.
'Little' Derbyshire? Not any more. Go down to Trent Bridge and they will put you straight on that..
A good review. Clear that we missed Abbott, Ravi and Dino from the bowling attack and I suspect we will be looking to bring in more experienced seamers for any of the above who aren't with us next season. We know now that we've a promising group of young bowlers to supplement a couple experienced bowlers though we shouldn't expect them to carry the full load alone through a long first class season.
ReplyDeleteBatting shouldn't be a concern though becoming more and more clear that succession planning for Maddo is vital, hopefully he has a bit more in him. I'd love to see Slater return to fill that slot at 3 like you say perhaps allowing him to drop down to 4 but after Slater's loan spell early on maybe suggested he wasn't part of Nott's plans then his run making exploits may have changed their minds.
Excellent analysis. With a small squad and many young and inexperienced players, we've done well.
ReplyDeleteI'd like to see Wood given a chance in the T20s. Since his debut in 2016, he's only played nine games.
Connors has done well and has great potential. His run up reminds me of Michael Holding and when he prepares to deliver, Mike Hendrick.
Very good summary, most of which I agree with, apart from the chances of promotion next year. Reports today say that the conference structure is pretty much a done deal and ready to be announced imminently. If I read the seeding system proposal right, this would put us in an initial group with Hampshire, Surrey, Lancashire, Glamorgan and Leicestershire. With the full quota of overseas and England fringe players released from the bubble where they've spent most of the season as net bowlers and bottle carriers, we'll be doing well to get into the second conference group in the final stages. For all that, I think this is a really exciting development, and one that reduces the biggest threat to our ability to develop and retain players by removing one of the incentives for moves to bigger counties.
ReplyDeleteA through analysis Peakfan, I don't think anyone can be disappointed in our Bob Willis Trophy campaign. To win at Trent Bridge and to finish above Notts (and Lancs) is a great achievement, even more so when you consider the team that Notts had at their disposal, with their ranks not being depleted by England call ups as the other big two were.
ReplyDeleteI certainly agree that Matt Critchley looked to have moved up a gear in his game. He never quite got that big score he threatened, but he looked like someone who has really worked on his game and who is getting the rewards for doing so.
It was a little disappointing to see Tom Wood only get limited opportunity but also understandable that it was not always easy to find a spot for him. I think everyone would wants him to get his chance and his situation reminds of Ben Slater's, whose early years at the club sometimes saw him lack opportunity. Hopefully he is offered a contract for next year as over a full season, with injury and loss of form a constant threat, he would surely be called upon.
I would hope the young quicks all get a chance again next year and that includes Dustin Melton, who always seems to play with a smile on his face and seems to be quite a character. If he does qualify via residence next year, then one would hope that he would be retained. It has been a shame that Ben Aitchison missed out on the T20's as that would have been some good experience for him, and he potentially looked the most suited to the format out of the young quicks at present.
As notoveryet highlights, it seems almost certain that a conference system will be introduced for next season, I think that this seems to be an excellent idea. Every county will theoretically begin the season with a chance of winning the county championship and it will remove the prospect of players leaving for first division clubs in the hope of England recognition. It can only be a positive that next year our young players may get the chance to face Morne Morkel or bowl to Hashim Amla. The only slight reservation I have is will the championship be decided by league placings or via the winners of a final at Lords? I would like to think that season long form is rewarded and not decided in a one off match in September, when weather conditions can determine the outcome. Although the Sheffield Shield is decided this way, and there is some merit in a showpiece final generating casual and media interest.
I would also like to see some way in trying to ensure that there is meaning in every game of cricket that is played in all formats. There are various ways that you could do this but one that I quite like is a combined all formats table. This would be separate to the individual tables for the first class, 50 over and T20 competitions but counties would be rewarded (maybe financially or via other ways) for finishing as high as they can. As at present, at the halfway stage in all the competitions you can end up with matches with no incentive for counties to play their strongest side as qualification is already beyond them. Alternatively you can also have the situation when a county targets one competition to the detriment of the other competitions, I know that some counties may struggle with the resources to compete on all fronts, but I would like to see a solution sought. Whatever happens though, let us hope that we stick with the system chosen, as the regular changing of the domestic set up benefits no-one and it needs some consistency in its structure going forward.
As I understand the original proposal, the Championship is decided in a final between the top 2 teams from the second phase Div 1. I don't know if this has carried forward into the final proposal, as I agree it seems unfair that the entire season's performance is subsumed into a one-off game. Fine if there's only a couple of points between them in Div 1 but grossly unfair of the gap has been 30 points or more. The other problem with this is that it means the 2 finalists will play 15 games, and with a fair chance that the top 2 teams might also do well in the Blast and on-day cup, it could add up to a lot more cricket. This might have gone in the final version but there was a clear intent to brand the divisional phase as "the Road to Lords" or "September showdown", which can only be done with a final.
DeleteOn trying to ensure meaningful cricket in Div 2 and 3, the proposal was prize money (going to the players) down to 18th place but I think this may now have been replaced by scaling ECB funding (going to the counties) according to final placings.
My one regret, on reflection, is that with the end of relegation and promotion, we'll be deprived of the annual cycle of fun that is watching Notts trying to get promotion one year then avoid relegation the next year.