I am beginning to think Mickey Arthur’s days are numbered, although his time with Derbyshire may stretch to the end of next season. Unless the team have a dramatic upturn in form (the best possible outcome) he will come under a lot of pressure to resign at the end of the current season at the top end of the chain. Based on his time with Pakistan he may not do so and to pay him off would almost certainly be enormously expensive.
When Arthur’s appointment was first muted, I thought it was a mistake. It was obvious the appointment would lead to some good publicity and plaudits to the Management Board for their initiative in bringing a top International Coach to the club. For a time, a feel-good factor existed and the team showed some improvement but this has now disappeared.
My initial concerns about the appointment were twofold. Firstly, the deal was far too expensive for a small club – we could probably have funded a suitable Head Coach and two decent players for the money paid to Arthur. Secondly, Mickey knew little about the English game below the international level which made it very difficult for him to come to a club like Derbyshire. Where knowledge of players at a lower level is vital.
I am sure Mickey is hurting right now at the club’s lack of success, which he did not expect when he was appointed. This could lead to his resignation at the end of the season or he may attempt to put things right in the final year of his contract.
The head coaches that have achieved the most success at Derbyshire since I have been a supporter, mid-70s, have been aware of players at other clubs whose opportunities at first-team level have been limited. Players who it might be possible to sign and turn into regular county cricketers. They have also had good shop-floor contacts who want young players to prosper who they know might not get anywhere with the so-called ‘Big Clubs’ and are prepared to recommend them to Derbyshire (Brooke Guest) and players outside the county system (Ben Aitchison.)
I know that things were different in the 1980/1990s but Phil Russell with very little money built a team that was not only competitive but won several trophies as well. A lot is said about Dean Jones and the season we finished second in the County Championship, but the team was largely built by Russell.
This century the efforts of John Morris at team building led to Derbyshire becoming Division Two Champions under the stewardship of Karl Krikken. Morris did not have his contract renewed because the players did not like his management style. He brought Wayne Madsen, Tony Palladino, Mark Footitt, Tim Groenwald, Wes Durston and Chesney Hughes as well as several others to the club. Long-term contracts were offered to several former academy players.
The ideal Head Coach for Derbyshire would be in the mould of Russell/Morris as far as recruitment is concerned. Someone with undiminished enthusiasm whatever the situation who would get the best out of the players and set achievable goals.
With more money now being spent on the Academy and Pathway (£258,000: source 2023 Annual Report - £182,000 was paid to Derbyshire for this purpose in 2023 by the ECB) the theory is that more players should be produced who go on to become first-team regulars. This is a slow process and currently should be looked at only as a support to a recruitment drive and not the answer. Players must earn selection whether home-grown or recruited from elsewhere.
Derbyshire is at a particular disadvantage compared with other similar counties owing to the scarcity of junior talent mainly due to the lack of school cricket in the county. This often leaves coaches with the thankless task of trying to coach young players who have virtually no chance of making the grade at the county level.
Absolute common sense, and written from 'our' perspective, with the benefit of real knowledge about the club. Thank you to the author for taking the time on that.
ReplyDeleteIF we lurch poorly to the end of the season, then I would hope that positive action is taken to remedy this situation.
'All that glitters is not gold' sadly.
Andy
Very interesting and well thought out post. What particularly resonates with myself is the final paragraph around lack of school cricket in the County. Reminds me of my school days in the 70's playing for the school on a mown football field! No sign of County coaches/scouts anywhere near comprehensive schools in those days. Had to learn to play from the age of 14 in adult club cricket. Lots of talent went by the wayside.
ReplyDeleteThanks for this comment Swad Dave. I'm a long term lurker on the blog and this post really resonated with me as the father of a keen young cricketer at a state primary school. Higher standard youth cricket in Derbyshire is effectively a private school sport with minimal input from Derbyshire CCC. This stands in stark contrast to football where there is well organised school and grassroots game, and an effective scouting and talent pathway reaching all sectors of the community. Long term investment in development coaches and state school cricket would seem to be a much more effective investment than expensive and high profile international coaches. (Derbyshire Dales Member). I'd also like to take the opportunity of my first post to express my heartfelt thanks to Peakfan - this site is my favourite internet site.
ReplyDeleteMany thanks for your kind comments! Welcome to the site and do please keep contributing. Great to have you on board!
DeleteBut Derbyshire is no different to any county in that. School cricket of any standard bar kwik, is the realm kf fee paying schools. A time issue.
DeleteAre Derbyshire and staffordshire lacking in public schools?
Essex fan
A very interesting read and couldn’t agree more, especially the lack of cricket played in schools, that is something that needs addressing.
ReplyDeleteThe future of cricket in this country is worrying. Much has been written above about the lack of cricket in state schools and I agree with what has been said.
ReplyDeleteBut what also occurs to me is the fact that it is impossible to watch cricket on terrestrial TV. Only those wealthy enough to subscribe to Sky can watch cricket at home. This has been the situation ever since the ECB gave exclusive rights to Sky in I think 2003 in exchange for vast amounts if cash.. And ever since , coverage of county cricket has virtually disappeared from newspapers. For several seasons I wrote Derbyshire match reports for the Supporters' Yearbook, using the Times and Telegraph for information on matches I didn't attend. That would be impossible now. Instead we get wall - to - wall coverage of evrything related to football (including womens'!) plus many other sports but, unless England are playing, nothing about cricket which has, as a consequence, become a minority sport. Unless live cricket coverage returns to terrestrial tv and reports return to the press things will only get worse.
The problem with lack of cricket in state schools goes back decades when I was at school in the sixties and seventies time was the problem a PE lesson usually lasted 1hour if you then factor in the children getting changed you are probably left with about 45 minutes, here in East Staffordshire lots of children go to cricket clubs and play quick cricket and later pairs cricket it wasn't so long ago that Derbyshire could almost field an 11 of Staffordshire born cricketers, one of the few advantages of the modern digital world is that you can watch live ball by ball coverage of Derbyshire on YouTube
Delete