Sunday 2 September 2018

Averages don't lie - the task awaiting Dave Houghton

Despite the best efforts of Harvey Hosein and Tony Palladino, Derbyshire's remaining hopes of a late promotion charge evaporated with a final session defeat to Kent at the 3aaa County Ground. Following on from the defeat at Hove, the remaining matches are for the dual purposes of professional pride and impressing the new Head of Cricket, Dave Houghton.

There were decent individual efforts throughout the game, but that word is key, because all too seldom we have played as a tight team unit this summer. Each game has seen standout performances, but a positive result is dependent on there being enough of them. Too often we have fallen short.

Let's look at the batting, first of all. With an average of 46 and more runs (875) than anyone in the division, Wayne Madsen still sits atop it like a colossus. Yet of the others who average 40, the benchmark of a good county cricketer, Luis Reece has played little through injury, Tom Lace is only on loan (at least for now) and Ben Slater has gone to Nottinghamshire.

The skipper, despite an outstanding RLODC and good T20, but because of his selfless earlier demotion to the middle order where he isn't suited, averages 23. Alex Hughes averages 24 and Matt Critchley a shade over 30, but with a season-best of only 86.

Good players all, but none can be happy with such returns over a summer. If three of your top six average 25 between them, you will struggle to get match-winning runs on the board. Unless one of the others is Bradman...

Then there are the wicket-keepers. We have three, but none has yet done enough to confirm the role as their own. As senior players, neither Gary Wilson nor Daryn Smit has come close with the bat. I am prepared to cut a little slack for Harvey Hosein, who continues to show potential as a batsman, but for me is some way short of the required standard with the gloves.

The bowling? It is led by the evergreen Tony Palladino, whose thirty wickets at 22 and batting average of 26 is an example of the expectation from a solid county professional. Yet he is out of contract at season end. Hardus Viljoen has 28 wickets at 33, not close, for me, to requirements for a highly paid Kolpak, while Ravi Rampaul has a disastrous eight wickets at 62.

I accept these bowlers have done better in one-day formats, but the averages don't lie. The bottom line is that Dave Houghton comes into a club where we only have three players - Madsen, Godleman and Palladino - consistently delivering an acceptable level of performance. He will take us forward if he can get more from the others, or replace them with players who can do better.

Things are in a mess, at present. Only one player in the second team, Anuj Dal, warrants a run as a batsman, but he was omitted from the team in favour of a lad we brought in from Middlesex, Tom Lace. He did well, but may or may not be with us for longer than a few games. We also brought in Sean Ervine on loan for the remainder of the summer, who played two matches and announced his retirement with immediate effect. Whether that was because Dave Houghton told him he didn't see him in his plans I don't know, but to be fair to Ervine, at least he quit before his reputation as a gutsy county cricketer is tarnished by playing for too long.

It will be a big winter for Dave Houghton, who I welcome back to the county as a good and extremely able man. His reputation as a coach precedes him, but it is not yet clear as to whether he will do some of that coaching. I suspect his appointment will see us retain the services of Wayne Madsen, who I know rates the new coach highly, but he will surely need a bowling coach at the very least.

My preference was for someone new to the county and to some extent we have that, as only a handful will know Houghton from his earlier spells at the club. I was pleasantly surprised at the announcement of John Wright as an advisor/consultant, as I didn't think he would want to stay on, but he has since said he will be here all summer, which can only be good news.  My first thought was how he could do the job at a distance, but his presence will be an asset.

Houghton has a big job and for me his first task is to look at a senior core of players who have simply not delivered, for whatever reasons, as well as ensuring that his better young players are on contracts appropriate to their talent.

I am always honest, so will say that for what we are reportedly paying them, we are not getting value for money from Rampaul, Viljoen and Wilson. Yet all are contracted for at least one, in Rampaul's case two more summers. Is coming to an agreement and paying them up an option?  Only the CEO knows the answer to that, but if we go down that route there needs to be money for cheaper but perhaps more effective replacements.

There are good players out there and the identification of those players will be part of John Wright's role. Such players as Luis Reece and Ryan Higgins at Gloucestershire are prime examples of what can be done with a fresh environment. I am not averse to a Kolpak signing per se, and look at players such as Kuhn, Morkel, Harmer, Wiese, Ingram, Ackermann and Kleinveldt for prime examples of what they can do.

For whatever reasons ours haven't done that, at least not consistently.

It may be that we have to accept next season as the start of the process, as Houghton will likely identify players he doesn't think are good enough, but cannot afford to move on. I will be impressed and astonished if he can start that process this winter, but either way it promises to be an interesting one.

The summer has not been a shambles. There have been sufficient pointers for the future from some players to be encouraged. A top three of Godleman, Reece and Madsen is something to build around. I would offer a deserved further year to Tony Palladino, possibly with a coaching remit and hope that Duanne Olivier might consider a Kolpak role, given his distance from the South African national set up.

The concern is that after that there is no one whose sustained performances this year have suggested they have a long-term role to play, though Matt Critchley and Hamidullah Qadri can only improve with greater experience. I still rate Alex Hughes as a player, but despite his fine bowling in the T20 he has scored nowhere near the runs required for a number four and at 27 this month can no longer be considered a junior.

Having said all that, I look forward to your responses.

In closing, welcome back to Derbyshire Dave.

I hope your stay is a long and memorable one, for all the right reasons.

9 comments:

  1. Yes, DH has quite a task ahead. I wish him well.

    It has been pointed out that, last time he was in charge, we won only 22% of our games, the lowest success rate of any recent coach, which does not necessarily augur well, but It may have been a case of not being able to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear in terms of the playing staff he had at his disposal. Teachers and coaches will say that they can only get out of their students what is in there to be revealed. Only time will tell.

    Meanwhile, one wonders how many more opening batsmen our neighbours down the A52 need! Perhaps they are going to launch a whole new team? Tragically, cricket is following the trends that are damaging football, with the money being sucked up into the coffers of a few "elite" teams, who "cherry pick" the best young players from the smaller clubs in order to maintain their supremacy. In the large squads at Trent Bridge, the Oval and elsewhere, talented players, while they are well paid, get limited opportunities to use their talents as they had been previously doing. While one cannot blame players for seeking financial security and the chance to be part of a successful club, such trends will not, in my view, serve the best interests of the game In the long run. Talent in s being smothered for the sake of money, the love of which, the Good Book says, after all, is the root of all evil.

    REV KEITH, aka Gloomy of Darley Dale

    ReplyDelete
  2. Spot on, PF.

    Professionalism is the name of the game, and Kent showed it in spades and we did not. Whether you like the incessant appealing for clear not-outs or not, Kent were full of encouragement for each other and we barely showed a flicker, even when a wicket was taken.

    On the same subject - professionalism, to see a clearly unfit and overweight Rampaul as the drinks waiter was a surprise and its not what I would have expected from a professional sportsman. Secondly to see the body language and general attitude of Viljoen who appeared to have his mind somewhere else while he was fielding and bowling was a shock and again, not one I would have expected to see from someone who is, as I understand it, the highest paid member of the squad.

    Non of the squad are bad cricketers but motivation appears to be at the lowest level I've seen it for years and Dave Houghton is going to have a big job to turn around whatever has caused this total lack of professionalism.

    The Kent game told us little we didn't know already but merely confirmed our worst suspicions. 50-odd extras in the first innings told its own story and once again erratic bowling was the cause and little could be aimed at Hosein's perceived inadequacies behind the stumps. That 50 runs was the difference for me and showed the vast gulf in professionalism between to top sides and us.

    That 50 runs and there would have been no-follow on and the whole game would have changed. It was commented to me by a friend that Kent showed so much control when they bowled and when we bowled we just threw runs away.

    I'll say the word again - professionalism - that's what Dave Houghton needs to install into the squad. I like Billy and his general attitude but he has let this aspect of the game slip to a very low level and he must bear some part of the blame for this.

    Still three games to go and lets hope that in the home games at least, we have a wicket that is an equal contest between bat and ball and not one which resembles the bleached and rolled mud of Karachi for three days and a raging turner for the last two.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You make some excellent points, Peakfan, and your post is a very sensible reality check. Like you, I'm an optimist and I feel sure that despite limited resources it would be possible for Derbyshire to do well, as other smaller counties have done. But there's a big difference between optimism and wishful thinking, and the reality is that very few people who aren't Derbyshire fans would detect much evidence of real progress in recent years. I do feel that lessons need to be learned from the mistakes of the past. The supposedly long-term elite development project of the Welch era produced little or nothing of value - as you rightly say, Madsen, Palladino and Reece have been our best performers yet again this year.

    And then there were the more recent mistakes. I'm glad that we now have a Director of Cricket to take responsibility because the concept of "requiring players to take responsibility for results and performances" was hopeless in management terms, and proved an abject failure. It was doomed from day one because, as we've seen, it meant nothing.

    The recruitment policy has also been baffling. Whilst I accept that Viljoen, Smit and company are good players, there's been a failure to develop a balanced squad that has been depressingly obvious. Three wicketkeepers, and yet a squad so small that just one major injury to a good player is disastrous? A poor batting season last year, yet a failure to recruit even someone to replace Thakor's runs? A dependence on loanees whose recruitment seems random? I'm sorry to say it, but I'm not surprised that this season has gone as it has.

    I feel sorry for Billy Godleman, a very good player, because the pressure on him must have been enormous. I don't feel that, in four day cricket, Ben Slater's cameos will be greatly missed, but we do need to find from somewhere a batsman who can score heavily and is capable of winning a match or two, as well as improving the bowling. A suitable Kolpak would be fine in my opinion. The supporters deserve much better than what they have been given in recent years. Unfortunately, the best time to be a Derbyshire fan seems to be before the season starts, before optimism is dimmed by grim reality. Let's hope Dave Houghton and John Wright - two men who know about winning - can achieve something much better in 2019.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A good review of the situation for red ball cricket. In white ball we are competitive & can give any team a game (except Notts for some reason). In red ball we are not wooden spoon candidates but definitely in the bottom third of counties.
    Given my understanding of the contract situation we may not see many changes in personnel this winter, so I expect the emphasis will be on getting more out of the personnel that we have.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've more to say when I have time, but Rev Keith's comment about Houghton having the poorest wins record of any Derbyshire coach took my attention. It needs to be responded to, as it demonstrates the task that Houghton faces, and he certainly needs to be aware of its source.

    I heard this statistic at the County Ground on Friday from a particular individual who has an official position with the club and has long standing and recognition among supporters. If the statistic is correct, it takes no account of the dire circumstances of the club that Houghton inherited and the lack of any pathway for new players other than Kolpaks and rejects from other counties, as Rev Keith points out.

    I've no idea of this individual's motivation for circulating this statistic to so many people, but if it wasn't actively hostile, it's certainly unhelpful and unsupportive coming from someone with status within the club. I'm certain that there will be other, perhaps more malicious, individuals who will already be sharpening their knives with this information, ready to slice at the reputation and credibility of someone who hasn't even taken up their post at the moment.

    Both times Houghton has been here the playing fortunes of the club have improved, and each time it has been stronger when he left than when he arrived. Perhaps it's a coincidence, perhaps it's an indication of how he works to improve things. But anyone who starts, or at least enables, a campaign to undermine him before he's even started, needs to be called out and told to stop it, or just walk away.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Fair comment as always. Hughes is mid-career rather than Promising Youngster and fwiw I was never convinced by Rampaul, even before he started hitting the kebabs, or Wilson. There are reasons why Viljoen and Smit are miles from the SA team and they are nothing to do with race, and we have too many bits-and-pieces players who spark only occasionally.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well said, "notoveryet"!

    I was at the meeting on Friday and was disturbed to see that our new coach could face opposition before he arrives. I hope that EVERYONE will give him a fair chance to prove himself.

    REV KEITH

    ReplyDelete
  8. There's little point in being negative about the new DOC before he arrives - he has to be given a chance and at least someone is accountable which has not really been the case over the last couple of yours. Assuming that DH will have some performance objectives and that we'll all be patient because as has been highlighted elsewhere there is a limited amount he will be able to do given contracts already in place.
    Do wonder whether he has been instrumental in bringing in Lace and Andersson in which case not impossible we will see them again next season if things go well in the final games. It's really an opportunity to experiment at at the same time look to win at least a couple of the games. I saw one of the days at Colwyn Bay last week and there is a reason why Glamorgan are bottom of the table but they have been giving their young players a go; on the face if it a win should be achievable. In the Kent game I only attended the third day and the thing which struck most was how many of the wickets were given away - Hughes Critchley and Palladino the most noteworthy whereas better application would have saved the follow on and probably the game. An interesting challenge for DH - avoid situations like this and also the crazy number of extras which are conceded.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Peakfan,

    Been a long time since ive posted or got involved with the forums but felt that i needed to leave a comment about Gary Wilson.

    Personally i think Wilson is one of our better players. Without getting that elusive 100 in two seasons, his county championship record, i think, makes for good reading. Scoring over 700 runs, averaging around 30 in the middle order, playing about 16 games (due to international call ups). Yes it could be better but its certainly not the worse. His leadership and glovework behind the stumps is excellent.

    For me Wilson is the type of player the county needs to be looking for. Hopefully with 3 games left he can improve on those stats.

    B the Derbyshire Blade

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!