Tuesday, 4 April 2023

Two more sleeps..

Looking at the scores in the very few matches where play has been possible in the past week, I suspect that the wicket for Derbyshire's first match - indeed the wickets for all of the first round of matches - will be very much in favour of the bowlers.

It has thus far been a Spring pretty much diametrically opposed to that of last year, when it was dry and batters around the country racked up large scores on almost blameless wickets. Thus we saw the nigh permanent smile on the face of Shan Masood, while it was closer to a grimace on that of Suranga Lakmal.

The experienced Sri Lankan seamer will be eagerly anticipating this week's game. It would be a major surprise were any side to win the toss and bat, while Kent or someone might even consider a match by match contract for Darren Stevens, with conditions likely to offer the veteran all rounder what he has thrived in for the last two decades.

Could Derbyshire go with an extra batter for the Worcestershire game? We are very fortunate to have Anuj Dal and Luis Reece in our side, which gives us two seam bowlers before we consider the specialists.

Lakmal will play, as almost certainly will Zac Chappell, which would leave the final place between Sam Conners and Ben Aitchison. Much as I prefer a balanced attack, which would normally include one of our spinners, I can't see conditions favouring them at this stage.

So Derbyshire may go with:

Godleman
Ali
Guest
Madsen
du Plooy
Lamb
Reece
Dal
Chappell
Conners/Aitchison
Lakmal

I am not a fan of playing four seamers, because if you pick the right three, you don't really need a fourth. Playing five when two are all rounders is OK, I think, but Mark Watt may otherwise get the nod if it is felt variety is more important than the extra batter.

But I am happy to leave that to Mickey Arthur, who has seen them all through the winter and knows who is in form.

Two more sleeps..

5 comments:

  1. I think 8 is to low for a batter of Dal's standard so I'd drop Godleman and open with Reece with Dal at 7 (he could still easily bat higher too) then we're very, very strong from 1-7. One of the spinners in at 8 - they can all bat at least a bit as can Chappell.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Chappell a decent 8, but either Thomson or McKiernan would bat ahead of him, Watt below.

    I think at this stage of the season it is more about the change of pace, than any available spin. But as I wrote in my season preview, you could go several ways and still come up with a good side.

    It will be interesting to see the way the Mickey Arthur goes on Thursday.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And yes, I agree, 8 is too low for Dal. But if you play the extra batter, that is the only spot available, realistically

    ReplyDelete
  4. Horses for courses. With the weather we have had it makes sense to go with the extra batsman. I expect a low scoring match which will be more entertaining than last seasons 500+ scores which were at times extremely boring to watch.
    Simon.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I would go with this team too. TBH if Lakmal, Chappell, Conners/Aitchison, Dal and Reece can't take 20 wickets on these early season tracks, then I can't see us winning anyway - regardless of the presence of a spinner or not. More batters also allows us to bat more aggressively which may be useful as the threshold for batting bonus points has increased.
    PS still loving the blog Peakfan!



    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!