Thursday, 29 August 2024

Sussex v Derbyshire day 1

Sussex 391-4 (Hughes 144, Haines 72, Alsop 69*)

v Derbyshire

Even when you have supported a club for 57 summers, not to mention having played the game for around 45,  there are still things that have a tendency to surprise. 

In a season that has produced a few such moments, 'Hove day one' will go down alongside 'Chesterfield day one' in the biggest surprises. We chose to bat at Chesterfield and pretty much everyone else was surprised at the decision. We chose to bowl today and it looked equally contentious. Unless the master plan is to easily chase down 400 on the last afternoon, of course..

There was a time when bowling first at Hove made a lot of sense. Sussex tended to do it often when they had Maurice Tate to open the bowling and they did it even more frequently when Imran Khan and Garth Le Roux steamed in with sea fret hanging around and more than a tinge of green on the pitch. Heck, even our own Michael Holding will recall the 8-21 he took here, the ball seemingly on a piece of elastic for him to tug at will.

Today? On a lovely sunny day (a rare beast in 2024) the pitch looked like a road and the decision to bowl first in such conditions seemed odd. I don't think we bowled especially well, but the Sussex openers cast nary a backwards glance, as they racked up 150 without loss by lunch. 

It was my first real sighting of Daniel Hughes in Sussex colours and I could see why they have signed him for next season over Cheteshwar Pujara. He is an assertive player, similar in style to Michael di Venuto and looked hugely impressive today. Plenty of time to spare, wide range of strokes, willing and able to rotate the strike. What's not to like? Tom Haines is a fine player himself but looked almost pedestrian in comparison. 

The attack looked somewhat toothless and the need for a good overseas opening bowler was clear. Then again, a talented leg spinner would have been interesting to watch and one of these options has to be on our winter shopping list. 

Chances were put down, something I seem to have written far too often this summer and we need to find more reliable slip fielders for 2025. Either that or find a modern version of Brian Statham, mainly dealing in bowled and leg before victims. My report card on the slip cordon this year would definitely read 'C+, must do better'.

The batting was more subdued after the departure of Hughes at 240, made in only 46 overs, but it was largely damage limitation by that point. Jack Morley bowled steadily, as did David Lloyd, but if the spinners are bowling 42 overs on the first day AFTER you won the toss, then either the seam attack has had a collective off day or you are making an admission that the decision to bowl wasn't the right one. 

Before half an hour of the day's play had elapsed, I messaged a friend to say that Sussex would rack up 400 before the close. 

I wasn't too far wide of the mark with that assertion. Although Derbyshire fought back hard, especially in the session between lunch and tea, they are looking down a barrel at the end of the first day. Logically, the home side should go on to score 600 here, but based on what I saw today, there is no reason why Derbyshire shouldn't respond in kind. 

I guess we will have an idea on that by this time tomorrow.

17 comments:

  1. Equally baffling, to me at least, was the omission of Harry Moore. Daryn Dupavillon isn't going to be with us next summer so why select him ahead of giving the young lad his four-day bow? Dave

    ReplyDelete
  2. I get that Dave, but from Harry 's perspective it was probably a good game to miss. I suppose DD taking five wickets in the second team swung it his way, but you consider the opposition in that match. He has been a disappointment, no way of disguising that really. But he's a decent cricketer back home, it just hasn't worked out on our pitches for whatever reason.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It was another crass decision by Lloyd after winning the toss. As at Chesterfield he was thinking more about day 4 than day 1. As at Chesterfield the match is lost by lunch on day 1. Woeful captaincy. As you say there is no reason why we can't respond in kind. However you just know we won't. It's the Derbyshire way. It was said in commentary that Dupavillon was chosen to play because he is experienced with the Kookaburra ball. From his opening spell you would struggle to comprehend that he'd any experience with any type of cricket ball. The new ball completely wasted

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh dear. After the euphoria of our big win just a few days ago we come down to earth with an almighty bump . It would be very interesting to say the least to hear from the skipper what in earth possessed him to insert Sussex on a batting paradise . To avoid defeat now would in my humble opinion be quite an achievement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That would have been the call of MA, Chapel Guy. The skipper is in charge on the pitch, that's all...

      Delete
  5. If we’d lost the toss we could chalk this up to a tough day and praise the bowlers for sticking at it in the afternoon. The new ball bowling wasn't great, I sense Chappell needs a good rest before he breaks down.

    The fact we put ourselves in that position though was sheer madness. Now a batting line up that has a history of buckling under pressure is going to right up against it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A worrying rumour on the Notts blog that Luke Fletcher is joining us next season. Surely not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it is a logical rumour with Samit coming across last year. For me it depends on his fitness and on his attitude. If he is just after one last payday, I'm not interested. But he is a proven new ball bowler of quality. 36 when next year starts..not old, IF he is fit and motivated.

      Delete
  7. Another bizarre decision to bowl in a season of strange decisions for a professional outfit. Queens Park was another bad one to bat first on a green wicket with overcast conditions. Then there were players omitted when they were in form and occasions when the batting order was messed about with. I along with many on here cannot comprehend some of the decision making. Muddled thinking springs to mind!

    The players toiled manfully but we were desperately short of a stand out overseas bowler to make inroads against a strong batting line up. Just hope we can respond in similar style when it is our turn to bat. Probably a high scoring draw if conditions remain the same.

    Nudger

    ReplyDelete
  8. Obviously the wrong decision to bowl on what was clearly a Batting day but I wouldn’t blame the captain. I’m sure it would have been Mickey s call . Just need to bat well on what looks a good wicket and ensure a draw. Let’s face it, any chance of a win dissapeared by tea time yesterday. No reason why the game can’t be saved. Can’t see them pulling the ladder up before 500 at least . Then bat for our lives. Can we save the game? Absolutely yes. Probable ? Not so sure about that.
    Chadd Jim

    ReplyDelete
  9. Interesting listening to two of the commentators on the YouTube feed yesterday they were saying a deal has been struck between the ECB and the IPL for the IPL to takeover the 100 but the IPL will turn it into a franchise T20 and will be played at prime time for Indian TV coverage ,if this story is true then the ECB will have achieved with the T20 what it always wanted a regional T20 franchise tournament albeit one out of their control ,where does this leave the counties T20 tournament? Surely running two identical competitions would be overkill

    ReplyDelete
  10. Two down already which is non surprising after 140 overs in the field surely we could have put Guest down the order a bit as a wicketkeeper is the busiest person when fielding he must be jaded

    ReplyDelete
  11. Northants have collected 11 points after their game at Bristol was abandoned due to a dangerous pitch. This means that we will almost certainly be back on the bottom of the table again.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I had always assumed it was the captain at the toss who chose whether to bat or bowl. Is it a modern trend for the coach to decide? I can't believe that Edwin Smith would have had the final say when Eddie Barlow was skipper.
    Mark, Buxton.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the coach decides. Edwin wasn't coach when Eddie came. He coached 1971-3, Eddie didn't arrive until 1976, Mark

      Delete
  13. My mistake. So who was coach when Barlow was captain?
    Mark, Buxton

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eddie was captain, coach, motivator in chief! But very few had the talent and force of personality to do all of that..

      Delete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!