Derbyshire 206 (Guest 85, Moore 40, Parkinson 3-23)
Kent 207-7 (Leaning 81*, Stewart 48, Patel 3-30)
Kent won by three wickets
It was a day when, with the squad ravaged by injury, the senior players really needed to lead by example and do the heavy lifting. With the exception of the admirable Brooke Guest, they failed to do so. I have been critical of Mickey Arthur this season, but he didn't make the decisions that cost the wickets of key members of the batting lineup, when they could least afford to lose them.
I have no idea why Luis Reece attempted a quick single that would have challenged Usain Bolt, to be dismissed in only the seventh over of the earnings. Nor is there any explanation, with three wickets down in only the 19th over, for Anuj Dal hitting one down the throat of long on. Then Samit Patel, in an aggressive innings that never suggested permanence, slapped a delivery from Parkinson to cover and we were five wickets down before the halfway mark, with little batting to follow.
It is this sort of thing that frustrate supporters, certainly yours truly. We know there is talent in this side, but clarity of thought and understanding of match situations should be much better than it is at this level. That the county set a reasonable total was down to Guest, who batted with trademark skill and sound technique, aided by Moore, who once again confirmed his considerable promise. But at 125-7 and with 20 overs to go, you are engaged in damage limitation only. Twenty-one balls were unused at the end of the innings, all of them opportunities to score runs, as Bob Woolmer used to stress as a coach. A good bowling performance was required to defend only 206, albeit more than looked likely.
For a while it looked possible. It could be argued that the game turned when Leaning, who anchored the visiting reply with an excellent unbeaten 81, was given not out by the umpire, the only man who didn't appear to hear a nick with the bat a long way from the body. He had only just come in at that point, but while wickets fell steadily, the required support eventually came from the bucolic Stewart, before an excellent juggling catch by Moore (who else?) removed him.
The bowling was OK, Patel the pick of them, but Dupavillon was disappointing and erratic, bowling only five overs for 41 runs. It hasn't worked out for him at Derbyshire, despite a whole-hearted approach and his returns have been disappointing in that so-crucial overseas role. His captain's lack of confidence in him was clear, with the seventeen-year old Moore given the new ball in preference.
With Came forced off the field he wasn't expected to be on with a hamstring strain, the injuries and absentees have largely cost Derbyshire after a promising start to this competition.
But decision-making has to be better than this. We were not up against a strong Kent side here and the overriding feeling is that this was one that not so much got away, but was allowed to.
Overall, a singularly disappointing end to white ball cricket at home, in a season that has had way too much of that for comfort.
Disappointing but not entirely unexpected. In the absence of the vague hope that we might just, yet, qualify it would leave us only to try not to finish bottom of the CC.
ReplyDeleteNot great, but a seasons end that we have become far too comfortable with
Andy
Not
We needed to post around 250. We didn't because our top and middle order failed again. Why does this happen so often? We also had two more run outs, following on from Guest's run out - thanks to Samit - against Somerset. This is shambolic.
ReplyDeleteGuest, once again, batted sensibly and provided a much needed anchor, well supported by young Harry Moore. But once Guest went, it was curtains.
With only just over 200 to defend, it was always going to be tough for our bowlers. Patel and Chappell did a good job, but that was about it. I agree about Dupavillon. He hasn't produced the kind of match-winning displays we need from an overseas.
Dupavillon is not to blame for the defeat, though. What is to blame is inept batting from those who possess the skills and experience to score runs and build partnerships.
This was a very unprofessional top and middle-order batting performance. All that was needed to reach around 250 was for someone to bat steadily with Guest. That was never going to be Patel, who played as though in the final overs of a T-20. No sort of example to give to the young players.
ReplyDeleteAll very disappointing for the many spectators who'd travelled in hope.
Is there any chance of a responsive pitch being prepared for the final CC games? Conners and the other quicker bowlers need some encouragement and Mickey Arthur has said there's nothing in the Derby wicket for Thomson. Another strange aspect of a truly dismal season.
It was a disappointing batting effort, baffling at times. Anuj had started his innings so well, with great intelligence for the situation, rebuilding efficiently. With Luis' curious run-out and Samit batting so erratically it was as though we were panicking. If only we had a Jack Leaning (or if Wayne was available)! I thought we bowled with great heart and almost had the game won but for brave knock by Stewart. If only we had had another spinner!
ReplyDeleteWhen I watch Derbyshire, I am reminded of the advert, “Wouldn’t it be be nice … if we could win two consecutive matches … if we realised that hitting the ball mindlessly in the air usually results in a walk back to the pavilion … if instead of expressing endless “disappointment”, our HOC should look to improve his players’ performances … etc. … “ As a long-standing fan, I am, to say the least, growing increasingly frustrated by our displays of “dazzling ineptitude”! Desperandum!
ReplyDeleteQuite right, Keith. I was thinking along similar lines.
DeleteLast week we were rejoicing at a wonderful and totally unexpected victory which left us top of the table. Two defeats later and we have slumped to a situation where we will fail to qualify for the quarter finals. Two steps forward, three steps back. It seems it was ever thus for Derbyshire.
If you had offered me 4 wins at the start of the comp I would have been happy with that, but if we end 4-4 from the position of 4-1 you can’t help but be disappointed.
ReplyDeleteThat was poor yesterday, yes the numbers are depleted but 250 shouldn’t have been beyond that batting lineup and would have put us firmly in the game.
Ultimately, you have to look at the overseas recruitment. When we only have one on the books and he doesn’t get in your best 11 it’s been a disaster. The “smaller” counties like us really can’t afford that to happen. It has to be better next year.
We don't experienced all our experienced batsmen to score big in every game, but we expect that when a couple of them fail, others will come in and do the business.
ReplyDeleteSadly, this hasn't happened. On too many occasions, players have trudged back to the pavilion after hardly troubling the scoreboard. Yesterday, we relied on Moore at 9 to add runs, and previously we've had to rely on Chappell.
As I've said before on the blog, Derbyshire are consistently inconsistent.
Let's all try & be a bit positive, we have won a few games, we appear to be having a few youngsters coming through that show promise (Came, Moore, Guest, Brown, Bin Naeem, Conners, Wagstaff, Potts, Dal) with Chappel & Madsen, we just need a couple more solid batters & bowlers to also help youngsters. Overseas or not...we have to keep looking. Look what Leicestershire have achieved with a few key players. Come on Derbyshire!
ReplyDeleteThe point I made today - they recruited really well, match winners. Handscomb, Harris, Mulder, Rahane...
Delete