Safely ensconced in the bosom of my family, I settled down last night to read a few comments from supporters regarding recent events and came across one that I've seen used before but realised, for the first time, that it really annoys me.
"This will be a test of our ambition" wrote a correspondent on the Forum, referring to the news of Mark Footitt wishing to speak to other counties. That comment always hacks me off and if you stick with me and settle down I will tell you why.
Chris Grant and Simon Storey are men who have made a massive success of their careers elsewhere and have been rewarded for their talents and success accordingly. Both are working tirelessly on our behalf, one without remuneration and the other for considerably less than he would get in the industry where he made a name for himself.
Why are they doing it? Because they care, because the want to make something special at the county and because they want to 'give back'. I'm grateful to both that they expend such energy on the behalf of a club that is far from affluent, is one of the smallest in the country and has a small - but let's say fairly vocal - fan base.
The latter is fine. Opinions are great. They make the world an interesting place, they get us talking and they open up communication with people who you previously never knew existed. Yet opinions should always be backed up by fact, which is the crux of today's little piece.
To suggest that the gentlemen named above are not ambitious is insulting. You could add the name of Karl Krikken in there too. All of them want to see Derbyshire taking a regular place at the game's top table, not just visiting it to take a few things home in a goodie bag, as we may end up doing this season.
In a brief tenure they have done remarkably well. Promotion in a first full season, fighting to the very last game to avoid a heavily predicted drop the next. The wider cricket world is now aware that something special IS happening at Derbyshire. Early on in the season we were overawed and outclassed too regularly for comfort and condescending comments showered on to us like confetti at a County Ground marquee wedding. We were upstarts and should know our place.
The last few weeks we have given good teams a bloody nose and changed perceptions. We have won three games, two against very good sides and have seen some young lads with very bright futures emerge. Sure, there have been disappointments too. There have been team selections that some of us have disagreed with, albeit without being in full possession of the facts from a fitness/availability standpoint. We're entitled to make such comments, while acknowledging that the one man who is paid to get them right has made his decision based on the facts and full knowledge of them, not just supposition and personal preference.
Mistakes have been made. Karl Krikken might well agree that he got an occasional team selection wrong (be honest, who doesn't?) We have dropped crucial catches and missed out on bonus points by a couple of runs when a little more savvy wouldn't have gone amiss. I think we also made a mistake in giving three-year contracts to players in the euphoria of the championship win that were a season too long in most cases.
Why? Because most were unproven at top level and some have been found wanting. Some may come back stronger, but for those who can't, we still have them for two more years, unless we pay them off, which costs money. Realistically, as the case of Ross Whiteley proves, they're of dubious merit anyway, if someone can walk away mid-season because he doesn't get his own way. For the record, the club's action in that instance was 100% correct in my opinion...
Of course Derbyshire are ambitious. That's why we secured the services of those championship-winning players last year. Yet a cursory glance at the staff tells you that Clare, Redfern, Durston and Godleman are currently out of the picture on senior player contracts. A club with our size of playing budget can ill-afford this, especially when the likes of Slater and Higginbottom need to have their contract situation addressed this winter and we all know that there are areas need strengthening.
Mark Footitt will have been offered what we can afford and what we feel he is worth. If he doesn't feel that offer is appropriate, he is entitled to see if anyone else has a better idea of that worth - or, more accurately, has more money to offer him. As I wrote the other night, I think Surrey will be offering him 2-3 times his Derbyshire salary as a 'carrot' and we cannot match that.
Again, why? Because despite the best efforts of Messrs Grant and Storey, together with the best pound for pound marketing team in the country, we're not on a level playing field. If we offered that sort of money to Mark, where does that leave other players, especially those who have made an even greater contribution to the successes of the summer? We'd end up with a staff of ten players on big money, some of them with a questionable fitness record, and nothing else.
As fans we have to accept that players will continue to go through the club like passengers on a bus. Some, like Wayne Madsen, Tony Palladino and Tim Groenewald, you would do your level best to keep, because you know they will always give good value. There may come a time that even our best offer for such players isn't enough, because we cannot match what the likes of Surrey, Somerset, Nottinghamshire and Warwickshire can offer. Note that the first two named, with all their money and big name players, are little better performing than our lads this summer - the last two haven't exactly set the heather on fire either.
There will be changes this winter, of that I am sure. But supporters will need to accept and understand that we cannot pick up England Lions. We're looking for good, honest professionals who could help the cause while the development of our own exciting talent carries on apace and in the hope that enough make the grade with the right support and coaching.
It has to be the Derbyshire way. We have an established and admired business model and a club that is self-sufficient. We have no debt and as such are the envy of many counties. Some have benefactors who have thrown serious money at their club, but not especially with the desired results. What happens when they eventually walk away?
It's not been a perfect season. But there have again been positive signs and lessons that will have been learned. Wherever we play our cricket next summer, it will be with players who want to play for Derbyshire and with administrators and coaches who want to be the best.
Stick with the ride. It's bumpy and it will have a few twists and turns on the way. But we will get there and we're all going to miss it for the next six months.
I know I am.
A thoughtful and wise article, Peakfan.
ReplyDeleteI agree with much of this post, Peakfan, but I don't think that criticising someone for mistakes means that one thinks they aren't otherwise doing a good job. You may have inside knowledge that the rest of us don't have, but in the absence of reasonable explanations and honest appraisal, it's not surprising if people form their own conclusions. The strong possibility is that our survival in Division 1 will come down to the dropped points at Surrey, or even a dropped catch at Derby on Saturday. This is nothing to do with how much we can pay to strengthen the side, it's got everything to do with whether we have made the best of what we have. Being relegated by 30 or 40 points says you aren't good enough, but by a couple of points, it says you haven't achieved what you might have done.
ReplyDeleteHowever, part 1 of my alternative relegation avoidance scenario worked out today with Durham bowling Notts out. Hard to see anything here but 3 points for Notts, leaving them 15 points ahead of us. Now a good win against Warwickshire and either Notts or Somerset winning heavily, and we're safe. Of course, Notts and Somerset might realise that a high scoring draw with 8 or 9 points each is their safest course to survival!