Sunday, 18 September 2011

Season Review

 2011 will go down as one in which Derbyshire started to look a team again. It started horribly, with Don Amott resigning a chairman with the players on pre-season tour, then looked set to burst into flame when Head of Cricket John Morris and his assistant Andrew Brown were relieved of their duties mid-match. At that point the season could have imploded in spectacular fashion.

It is to the great credit of Karl Krikken and Luke Sutton that it did not. Indeed, while fully appreciative of the better quality of player that John Morris brought to the club, the advent of Krikken saw them start to realise potential, while the different environment in the dressing room saw young players given greater opportunity.

Ross Whiteley was perhaps the most spectacular improvement, transformed from a bowler who could swing it and handle a bat in the seconds into a batsman who could hit the ball a long way while possessing the technique to graft when the need arose. Tom Knight emerged at 17 from the Academy to become a key member of the T20 attack, while Dan Redfern enjoyed his best sustained spell since breaking into the senior side.

Krikken was unafraid to offer chances to youngsters he thought had the ability, so we saw Peter Burgoyne and Alex Hughes get their opportunities alongside Tom Poynton. There were varying degrees of success, but with the nucleus of the current squad being both under-26 and developed in-house, Derbyshire ended the season with a squad that should only get better with greater experience. The success of the Colts in the Derbyshire Cup highlighted the next generation and the club now has an opportunity to progress with its best set of young players in several generations. This was no accident, but the result of tireless and impressive work by Krikken himself, AJ Harris and Howard Dytham.

Of course, to go to the next level the side needs greater experience alongside them. Wes Durston led the way in batting, and while Wayne Madsen had his least productive season, the feeling remained that with perhaps the addition of another experienced batsman, a promotion push could be a possibility in 2012.

The two overseas players arrived with little experience of English conditions but left established as excellent team men who may return in the future. Both were sensible signings by John Morris and although the hoped for weight of runs didn't materialise, there were enough good moments for both to be judged a success.

There was greater knowhow in the bowling, with stalwart Tim Groenewald working well with his new opening partner Tony Palladino. The pair took almost a hundred championship wickets, with good support from all-rounder Jonathan Clare, the latter showing once more the abilities that set him apart as something special when he first burst onto the scene. There was useful, if at times erratic support from Mark Turner and Mark Footitt and if these two can harness their pace to greater control next year the slub has a seam attack to tank alongside any in the division.

The greatest concern lies in the spin department. Robin Peterson's wickets from the previous year were missed and in his absence spin was largely in the hands of part-timers. They did a good job but cannot be relied on to bowl out sides in favourable conditions. The advent of Tom Knight and Peter Burgoyne promises better times ahead, but it would be unfair to place too great a burden on the shoulders of two boys of 18 and 17 respectively. Jake Needham's technical issues were a blow and, with the youngsters likely to be set for England Under-19s duty again next summer, a spinner is needed for 2012.

Third place in the forty over competition and fifth in the Championship were rewards for better cricket played. Inconsistency was still the biggest problem, but was much improved and similar progress again next year would be confirmation that the club is on the right track. In the T20 the absence of a second overseas player was a factor, though it was not for the want of trying. The side have yet to make a really good fist of this format, which polarises opinion but is a major revenue source. Greater success, as shown by neighbours Leicestershire, could make a world of difference and does not require substantial change of personnel.

In short? Reasons to be cheerful, a pleasant change to many close seasons in the past decade. The new blueprint from an enthusiastic and committed chairman points the way to success and the future promises to be much brighter than the recent past.

7 comments:

  1. I agree Peakfan,for the first time in a long time we can look forward to the future. There is still plenty of work to be done and the squad needs to be stronger,but we do have many of the right ingredients in place. Some fine tuning over the winter and i believe we can mount a serious title challenge.

    We do need to improve in the T20. It,s a potential money spinner and progress from the group stage has to be a priority next season. I don,t think we did ourselves justice this season,not helped by some strange team selections and tactics.

    The CB40 was quite good for us,but as you rightly point out,we have to be more consistent. We lost too many games this season against teams we should have beaten,both in theory and in practice.

    With two or three good signings i am optimistic for our chances. Fingers crossed we get the players we need.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A bit more beef to the batting and an experienced spinner does seem to be the order of the day. Certainly if we can satisfy these two areas as a minimum, the side should gain real benefit.

    I am a firm believer that modest strengthening and few adjustments can lead to significant improvement in any side, if carefully and sympathetically introduced. The challenge for Krikken is to secure the right additions that will complement what we already have and features players that will integrate and buy in to the new team ethos we have seen emerge this term.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I can't see where you can say that youngsters got more opportunity under Krikken. After JM departed only Knight was given a championship debut and he only played twice all season! I am affraid the chairman's PR on the young players is starting to affect you!
    Ben

    ReplyDelete
  4. And there was Burgoyne, Hughes in one-day. C'mon Ben, you'll be telling me that the young players did better under Morris next! I had no problem with JM whatsoever as I've written plenty of times, but young players have developed more quickly this year, as the averages have shown.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Peakfan, yes Burgoyne played in a couple of meaningless 40 over games at the end of the season. Hardly a revolution!
    Ben

    ReplyDelete
  6. The winter recruitment will be very interesting - JM never hid his light under a bushel when it came to outlining his salesman skills in getting new players to the county - which with his confident articulation and past career as an agent was probably a reasonable assertion, so the close season may tell us how important that was.

    Groenenwald, Palladino, Park (certainly to begin with) have greatly added to the side, and all could have gone elsewhere or stayed where they were. Although we'd all love a team full of Academy kids producing the goods every week and an iconic overseas signing, it is these 'glue' players that determine a club's character and success - just look at what Lancashire did with a squad light on all-time greats but full of committed and keen artisans. Just out of interest Peakfan, would you take the newly released Akhil Patel back?

    Matt

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well put Matt. I think you have made a very good point.

    The 'glue' players are likely to influence our fortunes more than a series of youngsters, at least in the shorter term. Of course, there has to be a blended approach, but we are not likely to see every second team player emulate Ross Whiteley next term. Redfern has resurfaced fairly well and Knight has shown promise, but that is really the extent of it for 2011 if we are being honest.

    It is the apparent heavy emphasis towards youth alone that has worried me since early season. I feel it just an over-simplification to expect improved the conditions and job security (all commendable) to change our promptly fortunes where all the youngsters the successfully step up to pro cricket with little mishap. We have promise for sure, but we have not unearthed the golden generation that doesn't need a helping hand.

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!