Derbyshire 278-8 (Andersson 67, Came 58, Cliff 3-57)
Yorkshire 281-5 (Whiteman 94, Wharton 75, Hill 63* Potts 3-78, Aitchison 2-41)
Yorkshire won by 5 wickets
At 140 for no wicket in the 26th over, they should have been looking at a minimum of 300. Instead, the last 24 overs brought only 138 runs for the loss of eight wickets, which was a mediocre effort. This was why I didn't get excited at the last two wins, because the elevens we were playing bore no relation to the senior sides of the clubs concerned, while ours did. Here, the sides were more evenly matched and after an excellent opening burst by Ben Aitchison, James Wharton and Sam Whiteman were able to work it around on a small ground and ease the home side to within range of a comfortable win.
Hill came in on Wharton's departure and in a situation when they only needed to be sensible, that is what they did. Both he and Whiteman showed eminent good sense and in the end it was a stroll for them, although the latter missed out on a century when brilliantly held down the leg side by Guest, from the bowling of Nick Potts. He took three wickets today, but there was a little too much loose stuff amid the wickets and it wasn't a 3-78 pitch.
Came and Andersson were excellent in that opening stand, but to lose both in the same over was a setback from which Derbyshire never recovered. Only Madsen and Potts, each too briefly, hinted at fluency thereafter on a pitch that seemed to get slower. It was good to see Luis Reece back, but his usual rhythm wasn't there with bat or ball, while Whiteley again struggled to deliver the hoped for late impetus. I don't know why Ross didn't come in before Luis, as the team's nominal finisher and there was a case for Potts to come in before Dal as the innings subsided. Indeed, there were spells when it appeared Derbyshire were fighting for a fourth day draw, rather than building a defendable one-day total.
Derbyshire's interest in this competition ended with the defeat - if it hadn't already - and the sensible thing now would be to give opportunity to younger players, which might bear fruit down the line. Surely Naeem and Stewart should play in the remaining games, if only to give a breather to Madsen and Aitchison before the return of the red ball fixtures.
For now, Derbyshire are a very ordinary white ball side. It hurts to say it, but you can't look at performances this year and say otherwise.
There is much to do to change my mind on that assertion, because there have been too many capitulations with bat and ball this year.
Another game where you put ourselves in a great position, thanks to Came and Andersson, but we failed to capitalise. We should have posted between 300 to 320. Our bowlers started well, but fell away in the latter part of the game.
ReplyDeleteDownthewicket
The harsh reality is that in this competition, we have beaten 2 second elevens, and lost to others. I don't suppose MA will include that in his summation.
ReplyDeleteAnother predictable performance and loss. The failure to capitalise on a good/excellent start has been the theme of the white ball summer for Derbyshire. I completely agree that Madsen and Aitchison should be rested now and please give someone else a chance rather than Whiteley who has shown no capacity to fulfill the role for which he was brought back to the club.
ReplyDeleteRob
It was always going to be a tough task, as Yorkshire have a fair few 1st division cricketers, as opposed to second 11 players. I always felt we were 30 runs short with the bat. While I think we have improved as a red ball side, we are further away in white ball than ever. We were good at T20, 2017-22 and maybe we need a refresh, whatever that looks like. Kris.
ReplyDeleteA development competition and the average age of our top 7? Just under 33, and we still lost.
ReplyDeleteYorkshire one of the more experienced sides we've faced but still had half the side 25 or younger including a 19 year old trusted at 3.
Will our youngsters get the dead rubbers...we'll see.
Chapel Guy
ReplyDeleteAn excellent summary of the game and of our current situation, Steve. After our opening stand I had high hopes of victory but as so often these were unfounded and we slumped to defeat again. Bring out the youngsters! Our only hope for the future when looking at our ageing team.
My first ever trip to Scarborough CC yesterday. A ground seemingly transported here from the 1970's, in all aspects other than the admission price, though to be fair £33 was still good value for a full days entertainment.
ReplyDeleteAnd it was entertaining. The result was, in theory, in balance right to the last, altough to be fair, once Yorkshire stabalised after the first 3 wickets fell quickly, they were always in control.
In truth we only had 4 performers yesterday, Came and Andersson with the bat, and only Potts and Aitchison looked remotely threatening with the ball.
Aitchisons opening burst of 3 overs. 3 maidens, 1 wicket was a thing of beauty. He increasingly reminds me of Mike Hendrick. And in my eyes there is no higher praise.
I'm all for giving others a chance in the remaining games, but equally am concerned that if we rest the likes of Aitchison and Andersson (the only one to have played in every match this season)
I think the true measure of quality isn’t the number of wins. The net run-rate is a much more important factor of measuring the competitiveness of a team. Andy
DeleteSorry - meant to finish my remarks - If we rest players, we may get steamrollered, and then carry that over back into the Championship.
ReplyDeleteIs this Whiteley's last season with us, because we surely can't carry on picking him when his form carries on to be rubbish. He's been a disappointment on his return tbqh, only a few innings of note in that time stand out. Beating second string elevens in Glamorgan and Sussex proves nothing to where we're at, pretty much rock bottom. MA out!
ReplyDeleteWe bowled some absolute dross in the last overs of The Yorkshire Innings.Is the yorker banned at Derbyshire? Simon
ReplyDelete3 worrying things to add:
ReplyDelete1. Came’s interview where he said he thought we had enough, whereas every supporter I spoke with after our innings going round the ground said we were at least 20 light, which would make sense looking at previous games here, particularly where Hants got 320 and Yorks got 270. If the team are working out / being told that a clearly inadequate score is sufficient, we have big problems.
2. Potts’ death bowling. 91 off 10 overs gives a reasonable chance for the bowling side, but as commented above, the absence of yorkers and resulting short stuff was mind-boggling, and not for the first time. We need Potts to be a good death bowler next season, with overseas plugging other holes (e.g. death hitting), or we have no chance next season.
3. As commented above also, “A development competition and the average age of our top 7? Just under 33, and we still lost.”
A bright note to end on - the number of Derbyshire fans supporting their team. Cos it still is OUR team, even when sometimes I wish it weren't.