Saturday, 8 August 2026

Derbyshire v Middlesex Metro Bank One Day Cup preview

No detailed blog tonight on the Middlesex game, as the day has passed me by and there has been no announcement on squads from either side. 

All I can say is that if Yusuf bIn Naeem doesn't get a game tomorrow, especially after scoring a brilliant 132 for Sandiacre today, I don't see any logic in selection at all. He should be told that he is playing and batting three. End of story. 

I don't think we have enough to beat Middlesex, who are deservedly top of the group and have played some very good cricket. Their likely side:

De Caires, Fernandes, Geddes, Cracknell, Hellman, Nelson, Gohar, Roland-Jones, Brookes, Cornwell, Sharma

It looks like another hot day in Derby, but I suspect that will be the highlight for most of the home support. Drink plenty of water and take your sun cream! 

I will be back tomorrow night with an assessment of the game.

15 comments:

  1. Why are we fielding a virtually full strength team? The same players that have only won two games out of six get yet another go?

    We can't qualify and it's stopping youngsters playing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You cannot just play “youngsters” they need putting on a special contract as most are on pathway contracts all which cost extra money out of the cricket budget.When they might need to bring in extra players for the rest of the CC campaign why would that make sense ? which youngsters are you referring to ? It’s not the popular answer you are looking for though. Jason

      Delete
    2. Why would that make sense? Because we're out of the competition and we need to see how good they might be. Wagstaff, Khunti, Stewart, Blount and Brown?
      Half of the first team doesn't deserve to carry on playing because they've failed miserably.
      The club might be well run off the field but on the field it's an utter disaster
      And please don't talk down to me.

      Delete
    3. Utter nonsense Jason. Anyone in the club's academy pathway can play.

      Look around at every other county XI. Chock full of young players.

      Delete
    4. Let's keep it civil people, please. Pathway or not, they do still need to be registered and on a contract for the competition. I would still have thought giving Stewart a game would have had merit and putting him on a contract accordingly.

      But finances are always tight at Derbyshire and I do agree, if there is any chance of red ball promotion they need an overseas bowler to replace Abbas

      Delete
    5. Steve, if every other County has managed to put their young players on whatever deal supposedly required to play in this and we've failed to do so then that is the most tragic and damning indictment of our approach to youth development I've seen yet.

      I don't believe it either, how are Somerset playing 16 year olds if this is the case. Players in club academies can play in this as it's a development competition.

      Which ever way around anyone wants to play it, it's utterly damning for the club.

      Delete
    6. To be honest Rob, I think bringing youngsters wholesale into a struggling side wouldn't work. There is some serious talent there but we can't drop 3/4 15 and 16 year olds in against Roland Jones, Brookes and Gohar. But as I wrote the other day, we need a strategy for when they are ready, because this one isn't working.

      Will 2 more years change things? I am not convinced, gotta be honest..

      Delete
    7. Somerset lost 8 players to 💯 so they are getting a reimbursement for those players. They are therefore able to offer those opportunities to academy players and the cost is self funded.they probably actually save money on their cricket budgets. Derbyshire had 1 player taken at the time the competition started so chose to give the chance to Basra and Bin N etc I’m not defending a position or agreeing with any decisions made on cricket just stating why this happens.

      Delete
    8. Players have to be on approved playing contracts. These can be short term and as long as the player signs to accept it then can be exempt from the minimum salary expectations set by the ECB to protect full time cricketers. A common arrangement during the one day cup at other counties and indeed something we did last season for Hawkins. The cost is minimal.

      With our available pace bowlers I'm flabbergasted that what is basically a very low cost admin task wasn't carried out to ensure Stewart could play. Hawkins and Wagstaff are of course available to play as they're on pro or rookie deals.

      If the club can't be bothered to cover this minimal expense for the likes of someone as promising as Stewart when our attack is barebones then what's the point? We're rubbish and seemingly have little ambition to develop our own players either.

      It's not even about throwing 16 year olds in...it's giving proper opportunities to the young players already in or around the squad.

      Delete
    9. Point taken on Somerset, but both Basra and Naeem were already contracted by Derbyshire. Could they have used the saving on Donald for a short term deal for Stewart? Especially when Montgomery also went? He would have been useful today...

      The frustration, once again, is that we have lost less players than most to that competition, yet have played some very average cricket. That is my biggest concern. Aside from injuries, there was enough talent to do far better than we managed

      Delete
    10. Why bring in any more players and spend through more budget when the squad was big enough even with the bowling injuries The need to bring in academy players only arises if you get hit hard with 💯 call ups or if you have the luxury of spare money. It was the perfect opportunity for the 2 players mentioned to play .Just because they are contracted makes no difference in fact all the more reason to give them first chance.No secret it was said today that they wanted to give those players plus Potts the chance to play. Like you say the biggest disappointment is the results from on paper an experienced squad. I think everyone acknowledges that. If Basra had not got injured then it was very likely he would have been playing alongside Bin N Haydon and Potts. Just because we can no longer qualify does not mean you can just bring in a youngster for a couple of games. Jason

      Delete
    11. It quite literally does Jason.

      We've been eliminated. What on earth does continuing to play the same aging failures gain us? Give a couple more young players the exposure and experience. As explained Wagstaff and Hawkins are already on the staff. Bringing in Stewart costs peanuts, if anything - Hamez

      Delete
    12. Points made on both sides. Closing this one now. Agree to disagree

      Delete
  2. I wondered if they might declare when Holden was out, get home early... Dave.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Where was wayne madsen today ?
    Issy

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!