Well done.
In my forecast an hour ago I neglected the considerable talents of Dan Redfern, who gave us an example of why we have reasons to be cheerful.
The youngster must be in our side next summer. Even in defeat and adversity, fans are understanding if youngsters have been given an opportunity and the way that Redfern and New batted this evening was refreshing. Running hard, placing the ball well and hitting it when it was there to be hit, they came very close to stealing an improbable win and restored the faith of a few fans, myself included.
Tom New has let no one down since his move from Leicestershire and was an excellent ally for Redfern, who seems to have a wonderful knack of accumulating, even if he is not necessarily hitting the ball to all corners.
I've thought who it is that he reminds me of and its Neil Fairbrother, the former Lancashire and England player. Fairbrother was an outstanding one day player who made the most of his talents with placement and running between the wickets.
Redfern is, like most left-handers, very strong through mid wicket but has, at 18, got the world at his feet. The great thing about tonight is that he did it with the pressure on and the eyes of the cricket-watching nation on him.
Quite a talent that young man. Well done to John Morris in securing his future for the next two years. I look forward to watching his career develop.
Thursday, 21 August 2008
Derbyshire v Yorkshire Pro 40
Another night, another 40 0ver game, another loss
Maybe I'm a little premature, but the thinking money is on the visitors when we need 105 in 13 overs with the big guns gone.
It's nice to see John Sadler make a few runs but I wish I could have got to the bookies in time to put money on Rashid getting Rikki. There's something about spinners that make his eyes light up and while I'm sure that in peak form he'd send it to all parts, this hasn't been close to that for the ex-skipper all season.
110-5 as I type and Sadler is just gone. That'll teach me. Dan Redfern gets a game tonight after his exploits for England Under 19s, but ironically he hardly scored a run in the one-dayers against them so doesn't come into this game a man in form.
The bowling got some hammer from Rudolph, another paid up member of the "Nearly came to Derby but got injured, so couldn't" club. He's done very well for Yorkshire and we're entitled to ask "what if?"
Come to think of it, there's a nice article in there, with players who very nearly came to Derbyshire but for one reason or another, didn't. Some amazing names, might have a think about that one over the weekend. The only problem would be the lack of a keeper. We've always had a good one and never needed to go overseas to find a Faroukh Engineer or Nick Pothas.
128-6 and if not down and out, we're sleeping in the park for tonight I'm afraid. 84 from just under 10 overs isn't going to happen and the early batting let us down. I should have a shortcut made for that phrase by now, I've typed it so often this season. I really rate Greg Smith but don't like seeing him as an opener (yes, I do remember his knock at Headingley, but....) and Wavell is always susceptible early in his innings before he gets his feet moving. After this it is Leicester on Monday and then the battle royal at Edgbaston, which can't come soon enough for me.
Bottom line is we can't play one day cricket yet. We can't bowl tight enough and we don't bat with enough discipline and common sense to win more than a handful of matches each season. I live in hope that over the winter our batters will learn how to pace an innings and our bowlers learn from the lessons of Langeveldt.
136-6, 78 needed from 8. The fat lady is warming up as I close.
Maybe I'm a little premature, but the thinking money is on the visitors when we need 105 in 13 overs with the big guns gone.
It's nice to see John Sadler make a few runs but I wish I could have got to the bookies in time to put money on Rashid getting Rikki. There's something about spinners that make his eyes light up and while I'm sure that in peak form he'd send it to all parts, this hasn't been close to that for the ex-skipper all season.
110-5 as I type and Sadler is just gone. That'll teach me. Dan Redfern gets a game tonight after his exploits for England Under 19s, but ironically he hardly scored a run in the one-dayers against them so doesn't come into this game a man in form.
The bowling got some hammer from Rudolph, another paid up member of the "Nearly came to Derby but got injured, so couldn't" club. He's done very well for Yorkshire and we're entitled to ask "what if?"
Come to think of it, there's a nice article in there, with players who very nearly came to Derbyshire but for one reason or another, didn't. Some amazing names, might have a think about that one over the weekend. The only problem would be the lack of a keeper. We've always had a good one and never needed to go overseas to find a Faroukh Engineer or Nick Pothas.
128-6 and if not down and out, we're sleeping in the park for tonight I'm afraid. 84 from just under 10 overs isn't going to happen and the early batting let us down. I should have a shortcut made for that phrase by now, I've typed it so often this season. I really rate Greg Smith but don't like seeing him as an opener (yes, I do remember his knock at Headingley, but....) and Wavell is always susceptible early in his innings before he gets his feet moving. After this it is Leicester on Monday and then the battle royal at Edgbaston, which can't come soon enough for me.
Bottom line is we can't play one day cricket yet. We can't bowl tight enough and we don't bat with enough discipline and common sense to win more than a handful of matches each season. I live in hope that over the winter our batters will learn how to pace an innings and our bowlers learn from the lessons of Langeveldt.
136-6, 78 needed from 8. The fat lady is warming up as I close.
Wednesday, 20 August 2008
Cat among pigeons...
I know that this won't meet with approval, but hear me out...
I've changed my mind about Dominic Cork.
There, I've said it and I think we should try and sign him this winter.
It won't be easy and there'll be division one interest without doubt, but I've changed my mind about the club legend, which, whether some like it or not, he most assuredly is.
For one, I think he's matured over the past few years since he bought out his contract in 2003. Maybe a settled home life has something to do with it, maybe the need to be a role model for a teenage son of above average cricketing ability, who may end up at the Derbyshire Academy before long. When I read Stuart Law saying how disappointed he was that Cork's contract was not renewed it spoke volumes. Then when I read the comments of Lancashire fans on various boards it seemed to be about a different chap to the one who played here, in an atmosphere of increasing acrimony, for many years. They talk of his commitment (which we wouldn't doubt) and a couple of Lancashire lads in our club have said they have found him "very approachable".
Hmmm. Then look at his record this season. Not spectacular, but in both four and one day cricket he has taken his wickets at 25 and has bowled aggressively at times on bland tracks. His batting is still good enough to average around the same. Two more good Kent wickets today (Denly and Van Jaarsveld) on the way to figures of 20-5-34-2.
Last there's common sense. Does anyone think there'll be a better bowler on the market this winter? 892 wickets in first class cricket at 26, another 370 in one day games at around the same, together with a batting average of 25. He has been an outstanding player and in my humble opinion has at least another couple of years in him. A burgeoning media career lies ahead and that will be jeopardised if the immaturity that periodically dogged his time at Derby resurfaced. Cork was effectively in the camp of Kim Barnett, others weren't. I don't know the facts. Sure, I've heard stories, but these can grow wings and exaggerate to suit the needs of the teller. There were doubtless faults on all sides as there usually are.
It does not detract from the fact that a fit, motivated and committed Dominic Cork could add a lot to this team. Another who is rumoured to be out of contract this winter is Steve Kirby of Gloucester. A decent bowler, a trier, but in the same class as Cork as a cricketer? Uh-uh.
I'd be surprised if many agreed with me, but I'd hope that dissenters would fall short of tearing up their memberships if he returned. The vote on his return a few weeks back was overwhelmingly against, but that pre-dated the comments from the Lancashire camp and was based on our recollection of the troubled times of the early new millennium.
He'll not be short of suitors. Durham are supposedly interested, as are Notts (he'd seal his popularity if he went there!). Warwickshire almost certainly would be and several others too.
Cricketers of that calibre come on the market all too infrequently. If the silliness is consigned firmly to the past, yes - I'd definitely take Corky back.
The thing is - would John Morris?
Derbyshire v Yorkshire Pro 40
With TV cameras in situ and our old rivals in town (OK city), all is set fair for tomorrow.
Apart from the weather. I've not yet seen the forecast there but if its anything like it has been here for the past week or so they'll be bowling from the Lake End tomorrow.
We've had five successive games rained off up here and it ruined the Scotland v England game earlier in the week. Hopefully the weather is OK tomorrow so we can make amends for the debacle that was the Kent match. As pointed out on the In Morris We Trust site tonight, the commentators will probably mention that at every opportunity tomorrow.
No news of the Derbyshire side but it would be a surprise if there were wholesale changes tomorrow as we don't have that many players. With Hunter and Lungley injured and White out of form, there's only the usual seamers - Langeveldt, Wagg, Clare - plus Kevin Dean. Since Rikki Clarke still has an ankle problem and Greg Smith can't bowl seam this season after his muscle injury, the bowling picks itself.
As for the batting, I'd assume Dan Birch will return from his ricked back and take the place of Dom Telo, whose nightmare debut season continued with a duck down south. The youngster will come good, I am confident of that, but needs a lot of hard work this winter. His homeland must seem a long way away at present, as must his good form of last winter.
Yorkshire have a full squad to choose from (lucky them) so we may see the last appearance in Derbyshire of Darren Gough. I hope he gets a good welcome as he has been a fine servant both to Yorkshire and English cricket. Anthony McGrath and Jacques Rudolph will again bear the brunt of batting responsibility, while Gerard Brophy is fit after a bruised finger and should be behind the stumps.
I'd see Derbyshire's line up as being pretty close to
Rogers
Birch
Hinds
Smith
Clarke
New
Clare
Wagg
Needham
Langeveldt
Dean
Holding my hands up, I don't expect a win, but right now I'd settle for a more competitive performance than Monday.
Wouldn't be that hard really, would it?
Apart from the weather. I've not yet seen the forecast there but if its anything like it has been here for the past week or so they'll be bowling from the Lake End tomorrow.
We've had five successive games rained off up here and it ruined the Scotland v England game earlier in the week. Hopefully the weather is OK tomorrow so we can make amends for the debacle that was the Kent match. As pointed out on the In Morris We Trust site tonight, the commentators will probably mention that at every opportunity tomorrow.
No news of the Derbyshire side but it would be a surprise if there were wholesale changes tomorrow as we don't have that many players. With Hunter and Lungley injured and White out of form, there's only the usual seamers - Langeveldt, Wagg, Clare - plus Kevin Dean. Since Rikki Clarke still has an ankle problem and Greg Smith can't bowl seam this season after his muscle injury, the bowling picks itself.
As for the batting, I'd assume Dan Birch will return from his ricked back and take the place of Dom Telo, whose nightmare debut season continued with a duck down south. The youngster will come good, I am confident of that, but needs a lot of hard work this winter. His homeland must seem a long way away at present, as must his good form of last winter.
Yorkshire have a full squad to choose from (lucky them) so we may see the last appearance in Derbyshire of Darren Gough. I hope he gets a good welcome as he has been a fine servant both to Yorkshire and English cricket. Anthony McGrath and Jacques Rudolph will again bear the brunt of batting responsibility, while Gerard Brophy is fit after a bruised finger and should be behind the stumps.
I'd see Derbyshire's line up as being pretty close to
Rogers
Birch
Hinds
Smith
Clarke
New
Clare
Wagg
Needham
Langeveldt
Dean
Holding my hands up, I don't expect a win, but right now I'd settle for a more competitive performance than Monday.
Wouldn't be that hard really, would it?
Tuesday, 19 August 2008
One day later...
Thankfully had no nightmares about yesterday's game, but then I wasn't there...
Anyway, we move on and will hopefully acquit ourselves better against the Yorkies on Thursday.
The last poll showed an overwhelming feeling that the club should be looking for an overseas batsman next season. 93% of those who voted felt that was the way to go and I'd agree totally. I'll not bore you with my thoughts again - check last week's posts if you've not already seen them - but I'm convinced it'll be either Chris Rogers or another Aussie. The only alternative is if Charl has a good contact or two in South Africa, but I can't see that.
This week's poll refers to the plans to rename our one day side from the Derbyshire Scorpions to something else. We've been Phantoms (and rarely stood a ghost of a chance) and we've been Scorpions (and there was often a sting in the tail). Should we be changing? Could we become the Derbyshire Peakites? One suggestion has been the Derbyshire Rams, but that's a little too football and city-related for my liking. The name should really reflect the county, not just the city of Derby. Maybe even the Derbyshire Dales and - I'm working on this one - we could get Dale Winton as our lucky mascot... maybe not, on second thoughts.
The other bit of news today is that Stephen Moore is staying at Worcester. No surprise there, he showed them what the interest in his services was, backed it up with a cracking season and has presumably got himself a much improved contract as a result. I again posted last week that he would be unlikely to move to Derby, slow wickets and all and can't say that I'm surprised by this.
With David Sales having committed to Northants and Alex Gidman to Gloucestershire, I'd be interested to hear who John Morris has in mind for next year. The thinking money is that there's not too many of genuine talent on the market and we'd need to bear that in mind when we're considering our own retained list.
More - hopefully - later. Busy night ahead though, so my first post on classic Derbyshire/Warwickshire games of the past may have to wait 24 hours.
Anyway, we move on and will hopefully acquit ourselves better against the Yorkies on Thursday.
The last poll showed an overwhelming feeling that the club should be looking for an overseas batsman next season. 93% of those who voted felt that was the way to go and I'd agree totally. I'll not bore you with my thoughts again - check last week's posts if you've not already seen them - but I'm convinced it'll be either Chris Rogers or another Aussie. The only alternative is if Charl has a good contact or two in South Africa, but I can't see that.
This week's poll refers to the plans to rename our one day side from the Derbyshire Scorpions to something else. We've been Phantoms (and rarely stood a ghost of a chance) and we've been Scorpions (and there was often a sting in the tail). Should we be changing? Could we become the Derbyshire Peakites? One suggestion has been the Derbyshire Rams, but that's a little too football and city-related for my liking. The name should really reflect the county, not just the city of Derby. Maybe even the Derbyshire Dales and - I'm working on this one - we could get Dale Winton as our lucky mascot... maybe not, on second thoughts.
The other bit of news today is that Stephen Moore is staying at Worcester. No surprise there, he showed them what the interest in his services was, backed it up with a cracking season and has presumably got himself a much improved contract as a result. I again posted last week that he would be unlikely to move to Derby, slow wickets and all and can't say that I'm surprised by this.
With David Sales having committed to Northants and Alex Gidman to Gloucestershire, I'd be interested to hear who John Morris has in mind for next year. The thinking money is that there's not too many of genuine talent on the market and we'd need to bear that in mind when we're considering our own retained list.
More - hopefully - later. Busy night ahead though, so my first post on classic Derbyshire/Warwickshire games of the past may have to wait 24 hours.
Monday, 18 August 2008
We shouldn't be surprised
At today's disaster, I mean.
To quote Sir Geoffrey of Boycott, "that were roobish".
It's not so much the fact that we were bowled out for a pitiful 60 in just 22 overs, or even the fact that Kent knocked them off in nine overs. It is the fact that a team that has shown signs of improvementin recent matches patently failed to turn up today. I didn't for a minute expect us to beat a good Kent side, but I did think we'd at least give them a game. A performance like that is one in the eye for the loyal band who follow Derbyshire around the country and is more akin to what I'd expect from my club side in the early season.
It also adds more fuel to the argument that we are not a first class county. I don't believe it, most of you reading this won't either, but such a show on an occasional foray down to the grounds frequented by the London journalists doesn't help our cause one bit.
There are plenty of idiots out there in the media who profess to be cricket writers but who know as much about the game as I do about macrame (trust me, that's not a lot). They'll jump onto any bandwagon because it as been decreed by a former Test player of some repute. Every time we lose they are happy but when we are embarrassed they'll love it as it simply fuels their arguments.
There's nothing more to say about today really. I hope the players had a miserable journey home because that was simply not acceptable from a first class county. It doesn't alter my opinion that we are an improving side, but it highlights the fact that we have a long way to go before we're a good one.
So much for the Pro 40. Might as well try a few kids now John, and save the bowlers for the Championship matches to come.
To quote Sir Geoffrey of Boycott, "that were roobish".
It's not so much the fact that we were bowled out for a pitiful 60 in just 22 overs, or even the fact that Kent knocked them off in nine overs. It is the fact that a team that has shown signs of improvementin recent matches patently failed to turn up today. I didn't for a minute expect us to beat a good Kent side, but I did think we'd at least give them a game. A performance like that is one in the eye for the loyal band who follow Derbyshire around the country and is more akin to what I'd expect from my club side in the early season.
It also adds more fuel to the argument that we are not a first class county. I don't believe it, most of you reading this won't either, but such a show on an occasional foray down to the grounds frequented by the London journalists doesn't help our cause one bit.
There are plenty of idiots out there in the media who profess to be cricket writers but who know as much about the game as I do about macrame (trust me, that's not a lot). They'll jump onto any bandwagon because it as been decreed by a former Test player of some repute. Every time we lose they are happy but when we are embarrassed they'll love it as it simply fuels their arguments.
There's nothing more to say about today really. I hope the players had a miserable journey home because that was simply not acceptable from a first class county. It doesn't alter my opinion that we are an improving side, but it highlights the fact that we have a long way to go before we're a good one.
So much for the Pro 40. Might as well try a few kids now John, and save the bowlers for the Championship matches to come.
Sunday, 17 August 2008
Kent v Derbyshire preview
Sunday and no cricket.
It's rubbish, it really is. I reckon that we need a modern day Leonard Sachs, the old compere from The Good Old Days, to sort out cricket for a Sunday on regular basis.
Tomorrow we play Kent in the Pro 40 and I know that they were in a Lords Final yesterday but one has to ask how many can go down there for a Monday afternoon game? I remember Derbyshire having to play a Sunday game after their Lords finals which can't have been fun with the inevitable hangovers, but there has to be a balance between supporting the players and playing fair by supporters (nice play on words there!)
The weather continue to be horrible and it will be interesting to see how it goes down in the "Garden of England" as they like to be known around those parts. Kent didn't really perform yesterday and Kemp, Mahmood and Arafat were all injury doubts prior to the game and presumably not at 100%. They are a talented unit and are well led by Robert Key.
Derbyshire are presumably going to go with the same side that played against Middlesex, unles one of the spinners comes in to replace Ian Hunter. There must be a temptation to rest Charl Langeveldt to ensure his knee niggle does not flare up to jeopardise our Championship hopes.
After two defeats in three matches, it is unlikely that we will be in the hunt for the Pro 40 and the South African is so important to this side that he may get a break, unless of course his knee problem has eased. It is unlikely that this willing workhorse would rest unless specifically asked to do so and I would expect to see something along these lines take the field down there:
Rogers
Birch
Hinds
Smith
Clarke
New
Wagg
Clare
Needham
Langeveldt
Dean
Paul Borrington is unlikely to feature and perhaps Dom Telo may be due a game, but Rikki Clarke's ankle problem makes him an unlikely bowler meaning a possible place for Kevin Dean.
I hope we continue our recent resurgence and give a good game to one of the better sides in the country. See you tomorrow to discuss how it went!
It's rubbish, it really is. I reckon that we need a modern day Leonard Sachs, the old compere from The Good Old Days, to sort out cricket for a Sunday on regular basis.
Tomorrow we play Kent in the Pro 40 and I know that they were in a Lords Final yesterday but one has to ask how many can go down there for a Monday afternoon game? I remember Derbyshire having to play a Sunday game after their Lords finals which can't have been fun with the inevitable hangovers, but there has to be a balance between supporting the players and playing fair by supporters (nice play on words there!)
The weather continue to be horrible and it will be interesting to see how it goes down in the "Garden of England" as they like to be known around those parts. Kent didn't really perform yesterday and Kemp, Mahmood and Arafat were all injury doubts prior to the game and presumably not at 100%. They are a talented unit and are well led by Robert Key.
Derbyshire are presumably going to go with the same side that played against Middlesex, unles one of the spinners comes in to replace Ian Hunter. There must be a temptation to rest Charl Langeveldt to ensure his knee niggle does not flare up to jeopardise our Championship hopes.
After two defeats in three matches, it is unlikely that we will be in the hunt for the Pro 40 and the South African is so important to this side that he may get a break, unless of course his knee problem has eased. It is unlikely that this willing workhorse would rest unless specifically asked to do so and I would expect to see something along these lines take the field down there:
Rogers
Birch
Hinds
Smith
Clarke
New
Wagg
Clare
Needham
Langeveldt
Dean
Paul Borrington is unlikely to feature and perhaps Dom Telo may be due a game, but Rikki Clarke's ankle problem makes him an unlikely bowler meaning a possible place for Kevin Dean.
I hope we continue our recent resurgence and give a good game to one of the better sides in the country. See you tomorrow to discuss how it went!
Saturday, 16 August 2008
Can we do it?
I don't think there were many who fancied our chances yesterday and most of the press had effectively abandoned the game as a draw. Especially those of a southern bias (most of them?) who no doubt hoped that would be the case.
I had my doubts but did suggest that splitting the overnight pairing might expose an inexperienced lower order. That first wicket came quickly, but Malan and Housego batted solidly until "Golden" Hinds did for the middle order with his wobbling medium pace.
The rest is history and what it means is that Derbyshire now enter the most exciting final month of a Championship season since the Dean Jones/Les Stillman season of 1996. As many will remember, we eventually ended that season in second place and we'd be happy with that - and promotion - this time.
As I said earlier, Gloucestershire, Glamorgan and Leicestershire are all beatable in the last three games and make up the current bottom three. The first two we play at home with the final fixture at Leicester. We could well have lost to both Gloucestershire and Glamorgan earlier in the season but for the weather, but all are different sides now.
For one thing I sense that Derbyshire have got a side with good balance and long batting. We have started to produce the early innings runs that were sadly missing at the start of the season and have not yet seen the very best of either Chris Rogers or Wavell Hinds. Both have scored well without yet posting the really big scores of which they are capable. How sweet it would be if one or both could do that at Edgbaston! Paul Borrington has come into the side and shown a maturity beyond his years as well as a penchant for batting all day, while Dan Birch has proved the doubters (including me) wrong with a series of mature innings. All he needs now is a Championship hundred, just as Greg Smith will benefit from his against Middlesex. The South African has looked a player of talent over the past two seasons but now looks like a genuinely exciting talent.
With the all round abilities of Rikki Clarke, Graham Wagg, Jon Clare and Tom New in the middle order, John Morris' dilemma is who takes the 11th place in the side. Ian Hunter rarely seems to take a clutch of wickets and one suspects the final place is between him, Kevin Dean and the two spinners, Nayan Doshi and Jake Needham. My personal preference is for a spinner and Morris will know who is looking the better bet at present.
Warwickshire could and perhaps should have been beaten at Derby and the delayed declaration that allowed Fred Klokker to post a century cost a chance to put the visitors under more serious pressure. They have some exciting batsmen, but the key to this game for me will be how easily we can removed their influential and talented skipper Darren Maddy. Westwood, Poonia, Trott and Troughton are all good players but the captain is the key, even though his Championship average is lower than Trott and Troughton, both of whom have had good seasons.
A draw would not be the end of the world, but if the weather stays out of it I think we could win in Birmingham. It is at this point where players stand up to be counted and I am confident that Rogers, Hinds and Langeveldt will do so. If their younger and less experienced team mates do so, we could be in for an exciting last few weeks.
I had my doubts but did suggest that splitting the overnight pairing might expose an inexperienced lower order. That first wicket came quickly, but Malan and Housego batted solidly until "Golden" Hinds did for the middle order with his wobbling medium pace.
The rest is history and what it means is that Derbyshire now enter the most exciting final month of a Championship season since the Dean Jones/Les Stillman season of 1996. As many will remember, we eventually ended that season in second place and we'd be happy with that - and promotion - this time.
As I said earlier, Gloucestershire, Glamorgan and Leicestershire are all beatable in the last three games and make up the current bottom three. The first two we play at home with the final fixture at Leicester. We could well have lost to both Gloucestershire and Glamorgan earlier in the season but for the weather, but all are different sides now.
For one thing I sense that Derbyshire have got a side with good balance and long batting. We have started to produce the early innings runs that were sadly missing at the start of the season and have not yet seen the very best of either Chris Rogers or Wavell Hinds. Both have scored well without yet posting the really big scores of which they are capable. How sweet it would be if one or both could do that at Edgbaston! Paul Borrington has come into the side and shown a maturity beyond his years as well as a penchant for batting all day, while Dan Birch has proved the doubters (including me) wrong with a series of mature innings. All he needs now is a Championship hundred, just as Greg Smith will benefit from his against Middlesex. The South African has looked a player of talent over the past two seasons but now looks like a genuinely exciting talent.
With the all round abilities of Rikki Clarke, Graham Wagg, Jon Clare and Tom New in the middle order, John Morris' dilemma is who takes the 11th place in the side. Ian Hunter rarely seems to take a clutch of wickets and one suspects the final place is between him, Kevin Dean and the two spinners, Nayan Doshi and Jake Needham. My personal preference is for a spinner and Morris will know who is looking the better bet at present.
Warwickshire could and perhaps should have been beaten at Derby and the delayed declaration that allowed Fred Klokker to post a century cost a chance to put the visitors under more serious pressure. They have some exciting batsmen, but the key to this game for me will be how easily we can removed their influential and talented skipper Darren Maddy. Westwood, Poonia, Trott and Troughton are all good players but the captain is the key, even though his Championship average is lower than Trott and Troughton, both of whom have had good seasons.
A draw would not be the end of the world, but if the weather stays out of it I think we could win in Birmingham. It is at this point where players stand up to be counted and I am confident that Rogers, Hinds and Langeveldt will do so. If their younger and less experienced team mates do so, we could be in for an exciting last few weeks.
Friday, 15 August 2008
Double celebration
10, 000 hits.
Thanks guys. Seriously thanks to all of you. I had no idea that this blog would take off like this and I appreciate the interest. I wonder if the ECB have any idea about the level of interest in this club?
And wouldn't it be great if we could gate crash Division One next season...?
Thanks guys. Seriously thanks to all of you. I had no idea that this blog would take off like this and I appreciate the interest. I wonder if the ECB have any idea about the level of interest in this club?
And wouldn't it be great if we could gate crash Division One next season...?
Kolpak Killers...
Celebration time.... come on!
A thoroughly professional, well deserved and much needed win was wrapped up soon after tea by a Derbyshire side that have put themselves firmly back into promotion contention in so doing.
They owed a lot to their two Kolpak signings. Wavell Hinds (pictured) moved to second place in the club's first class bowling averages with a fine spell that ripped out the Middlesex middle order and then Champagne Charl Langeveldt did for the tail in his own inimitable style. That's 47 championship wickets for the South African who has had an outstanding season. I genuinely cannot remember a bowler who was as dangerous for the county since Michael Holding and then Ian Bishop's spells here. Whenever he gets the ball one expects a wicket and he has rarely let us down. Pop Welch was a willing workhorse, but Langeveldt has been a huge signing for John Morris.
Now time for an admission. I was wrong. No one should be too big to admit that and in recent weeks I've been increasingly impressed by Dan Birch and having pretty much written him off as a county player in the early season, I now think (and hope) that he can go on from here next year and establish himself. His second innings knock seemed pretty impressive and he looked to be in good nick from the moment he reached the crease.
I wrote yesterday that there seemed a greater solidity to the batting recently. I don't think it is the finished article but the emergence of Birch, Borrington and Greg Smith lead me to think that we are perhaps closer than we think.
We now have a Championship break until we go to Edgbaston for a huge game that starts on the 27th. If we can win that one, with Glamorgan, Gloucestershire and Leicestershire still to play, we could yet gain promotion.
It was interesting to see Boyd Rankin back from injury for them in their drawn game against Essex. Four wickets in twelve overs suggests that he still has the ability to get people out. Eighty runs conceded also suggests that he is no more accurate than in his time with us.
Talented he may be, but he ain't no Langeveldt.
A thoroughly professional, well deserved and much needed win was wrapped up soon after tea by a Derbyshire side that have put themselves firmly back into promotion contention in so doing.
They owed a lot to their two Kolpak signings. Wavell Hinds (pictured) moved to second place in the club's first class bowling averages with a fine spell that ripped out the Middlesex middle order and then Champagne Charl Langeveldt did for the tail in his own inimitable style. That's 47 championship wickets for the South African who has had an outstanding season. I genuinely cannot remember a bowler who was as dangerous for the county since Michael Holding and then Ian Bishop's spells here. Whenever he gets the ball one expects a wicket and he has rarely let us down. Pop Welch was a willing workhorse, but Langeveldt has been a huge signing for John Morris.
Now time for an admission. I was wrong. No one should be too big to admit that and in recent weeks I've been increasingly impressed by Dan Birch and having pretty much written him off as a county player in the early season, I now think (and hope) that he can go on from here next year and establish himself. His second innings knock seemed pretty impressive and he looked to be in good nick from the moment he reached the crease.
I wrote yesterday that there seemed a greater solidity to the batting recently. I don't think it is the finished article but the emergence of Birch, Borrington and Greg Smith lead me to think that we are perhaps closer than we think.
We now have a Championship break until we go to Edgbaston for a huge game that starts on the 27th. If we can win that one, with Glamorgan, Gloucestershire and Leicestershire still to play, we could yet gain promotion.
It was interesting to see Boyd Rankin back from injury for them in their drawn game against Essex. Four wickets in twelve overs suggests that he still has the ability to get people out. Eighty runs conceded also suggests that he is no more accurate than in his time with us.
Talented he may be, but he ain't no Langeveldt.
Derbyshire v Middlesex day 4
Middlesex 147-8 at lunch, just 106 runs on.
Early on this morning this game had "draw" written all over it, when Malan and Housego were adding 50 for the fourth wicket. Then Chris Rogers, who has rotated his bowlers well, got the right bowler at the right end.
In a spell of 3-11 in seven overs, Wavell Hinds ripped the heart from the Middlesex batting. I was amused a couple of weeks ago when a press report referred to "a wicket by the West Indian paceman". Wavell is a useful bowler, but even he wouldn't call himself a paceman...
Today though he has given us a chance of a win and with Langeveldt coming back to take two wickets prior to lunch, the second by virtue of a stunning catch by Graham Wagg, we must be dining with good appetite just now.
If we can just roll over those last two wickets quickly, one would hope a sub-150 total should be within our compass.
No chicken counting JUST yet though!
Early on this morning this game had "draw" written all over it, when Malan and Housego were adding 50 for the fourth wicket. Then Chris Rogers, who has rotated his bowlers well, got the right bowler at the right end.
In a spell of 3-11 in seven overs, Wavell Hinds ripped the heart from the Middlesex batting. I was amused a couple of weeks ago when a press report referred to "a wicket by the West Indian paceman". Wavell is a useful bowler, but even he wouldn't call himself a paceman...
Today though he has given us a chance of a win and with Langeveldt coming back to take two wickets prior to lunch, the second by virtue of a stunning catch by Graham Wagg, we must be dining with good appetite just now.
If we can just roll over those last two wickets quickly, one would hope a sub-150 total should be within our compass.
No chicken counting JUST yet though!
Derbyshire Legends 8 - Derek Morgan (1929- )
Derek Morgan was perhaps the greatest British-born all-rounder to play for Derbyshire.
He had some good opposition for that role, with such luminaries as Les Townsend, George Pope, Stan Worthington, Geoff Miller and Graeme Welch all worthy and fine servants.
Yet Morgan's statistics speak for themselves. In a career that lasted from 1950 to 1969, he scored over 18,000 runs at an average of just under 25, took 1248 at 25 runs each and held 573 catches. He also captained the county with a good deal of common sense in a period when, during the late 1960's, we were not overly blessed with players of obvious class.
He was a functional rather than flashy player and few would have watched him and waxed lyrical, especially those who watched him bat. I saw him on several occasions and one never felt about him as you felt when watching a Peter Gibbs, a Chris Wilkins or a John Morris.
Yet Morgan had shots and on occasions showed them. They were often subjugated to the greater need, that of the team gringing out the runs to force a win. Fancy shots might get a few runs, but Morgan was astute enough to realise that a hard-fought 50 was more value than a flashy 20 and he often came up with the goods.
In the legendary game against Hampshire that started and finished in a day on a Burton "minefield", only one player made more than 19 in the match, Morgan's 46 in our second innings being an innings of unbelievable value and worth many a century in better conditions. ne has to bear in mind that wickets in his era were mainly left open to the elements and batsmen were exposed to "sticky" tracks on which only those with good defensive techniques, considerable skill and a great deal of bravery could survive. He had all of these in abundance and on eight occasions passed a thousand runs in a season.
As a bowler he was both fortunate and unfortunate to play in the same side as Les Jackson and Cliff Gladwin. Fortunate because he learned from them the merits of line and length and keeping batsmen under pressure and also because, as he openly admitted, batsmen often took a chance against him when they'd barely had a loose ball from the opening pair. At the same time, there were occasions where he never got on because the legendary pairing ran through sides and had no need for back up. Early in his career he was a typically Derbyshire fast-medium, but as he got older he dropped his pace and moved it around. His mixture of late outswing, coupled with an ability to bowl off-cutters made for a potent mix and on 35 occasions he returned five wickets in an innings.
As a fielder, he was beyond compare in a generally sound fielding unit. Alan Revill and Donald Carr were brilliant close fielders, but Morgan, in the words of my Dad, "caught swallows". He could field anywhere with distinction, but as a backward short leg to Gladwin and Jackson he held half-chances and on occasions some that would not have been considered a chance to most.
His fielding was so good that he was England's 12th man on five occasions, yet he never gained selection for the national side. The presence of Trevor Bailey was the main problem, but Morgan, born in Middlesex, is another who may well have got the nod had he stayed down south with one of the more fashionable counties.
The other factor with Derek Morgan is his resilience. If one goes through the seasons that he played, he missed precious few matches and was as great an advert for the solid county professional as could have been wished for.
There have been bigger names in the club's history, ones who produced brilliance over a few seasons, but on a pound for pound basis, over a twenty-year career Derek Morgan can be compared with and can stand alongside anyone. They named a suite after him at the County Ground, which is a worthy tribute, but he is well deserving of that brief but all important three word accolade.
He could play.
He had some good opposition for that role, with such luminaries as Les Townsend, George Pope, Stan Worthington, Geoff Miller and Graeme Welch all worthy and fine servants.
Yet Morgan's statistics speak for themselves. In a career that lasted from 1950 to 1969, he scored over 18,000 runs at an average of just under 25, took 1248 at 25 runs each and held 573 catches. He also captained the county with a good deal of common sense in a period when, during the late 1960's, we were not overly blessed with players of obvious class.
He was a functional rather than flashy player and few would have watched him and waxed lyrical, especially those who watched him bat. I saw him on several occasions and one never felt about him as you felt when watching a Peter Gibbs, a Chris Wilkins or a John Morris.
Yet Morgan had shots and on occasions showed them. They were often subjugated to the greater need, that of the team gringing out the runs to force a win. Fancy shots might get a few runs, but Morgan was astute enough to realise that a hard-fought 50 was more value than a flashy 20 and he often came up with the goods.
In the legendary game against Hampshire that started and finished in a day on a Burton "minefield", only one player made more than 19 in the match, Morgan's 46 in our second innings being an innings of unbelievable value and worth many a century in better conditions. ne has to bear in mind that wickets in his era were mainly left open to the elements and batsmen were exposed to "sticky" tracks on which only those with good defensive techniques, considerable skill and a great deal of bravery could survive. He had all of these in abundance and on eight occasions passed a thousand runs in a season.
As a bowler he was both fortunate and unfortunate to play in the same side as Les Jackson and Cliff Gladwin. Fortunate because he learned from them the merits of line and length and keeping batsmen under pressure and also because, as he openly admitted, batsmen often took a chance against him when they'd barely had a loose ball from the opening pair. At the same time, there were occasions where he never got on because the legendary pairing ran through sides and had no need for back up. Early in his career he was a typically Derbyshire fast-medium, but as he got older he dropped his pace and moved it around. His mixture of late outswing, coupled with an ability to bowl off-cutters made for a potent mix and on 35 occasions he returned five wickets in an innings.
As a fielder, he was beyond compare in a generally sound fielding unit. Alan Revill and Donald Carr were brilliant close fielders, but Morgan, in the words of my Dad, "caught swallows". He could field anywhere with distinction, but as a backward short leg to Gladwin and Jackson he held half-chances and on occasions some that would not have been considered a chance to most.
His fielding was so good that he was England's 12th man on five occasions, yet he never gained selection for the national side. The presence of Trevor Bailey was the main problem, but Morgan, born in Middlesex, is another who may well have got the nod had he stayed down south with one of the more fashionable counties.
The other factor with Derek Morgan is his resilience. If one goes through the seasons that he played, he missed precious few matches and was as great an advert for the solid county professional as could have been wished for.
There have been bigger names in the club's history, ones who produced brilliance over a few seasons, but on a pound for pound basis, over a twenty-year career Derek Morgan can be compared with and can stand alongside anyone. They named a suite after him at the County Ground, which is a worthy tribute, but he is well deserving of that brief but all important three word accolade.
He could play.
Thursday, 14 August 2008
Derbyshire v Middlesex day 3
The first hour tomorrow is crucial.
What we really need is a little cloud cover and we could yet win this game. The two current batsmen for Middlesex are the last "name" players, although wicket keeper Scott has played some fine innings this year. Twelve runs on with two good batsmen out is a good position but the concern must be that the weather, which has been very kind thus far, may intervene and ruin a potentially exciting (and winning) finish.
Top marks to Chris Rogers, who battled to another good score but who will doubtless be disappointed with 80, albeit the highest of his fifties this year. The real plaudits go to Greg Smith (pictured), who scored his first century in first class cricket. He really seems to have moved to another level with his batting this year and has made good progress. John Morris' signing of him on a two-year contract may well prove a significant piece of business, as he now seems to have married a better shot selection to an expansive range of strokes. Over the next two years he could emerge as a very fine batsman.
Those who have been quick to write off Dominic Telo should think about how long Smith has been on our staff before consigning him to the rejects pile. I suspect that the Telo will benefit from an intensive winter of coaching and living in England and may well emerge a better player in 2009, although he is four years younger than Smith and has time on his side.
There does seem a more solid look to our batting recently and it seems to have come with the introduction of Paul Borrington to the side. The youngster has done well, although he failed in this game and Dan Birch has also looked a better player in recent weeks. Wavell also failed in this innings but the West Indian has played some good hands recently.
Tomorrow we must hope that Charl will produce one of his golden spells or that Waggy will do similar. On the last day we wouldn't be wanting to chase much more than 200 and the Middlesex batting suggested that they would be happy with a draw here.
The bowling was very impressive this evening, with 31 overs producing only 53 runs. No extras, which is all too rare these days.
On a different tack, I've been interested reading the comments of Stuart Law about the departure of Dominic Cork, as well as the comments of their fans on 606. There is pretty much unanimity that he should have been kept on and that they loved his never-say-die spirit. It suggests that Corky may be a changed man from the somewhat fractious image we had of him at Derby.
Could he work with Morris? Could Morris work with him? I read an article a few months back where he said that he'd love to finish his career at Derby, with his stepson emerging as a young player of note. The opinion of fans on here was that signing him would be a big mistake and certainly a divisive influence in the dressing room would not be of any use. Yet it also flies in the face of what comes out of Manchester and I've a foot in both camps here.
I remember his latter days here with little relish, but the fact remains that there will be few better bowlers available this winter, especially ones who can also bat well. Irrespective of how he left the county, I'll always remember his innings against Lancashire at Lords where he was quite brilliant. Take away that personality (can you?) and you'd have to say that an attack next year of Langeveldt, Cork, Wagg and Clare would be a bit useful. I suspect that he will prefer to play at the highest level and rumours abound on the Durham board that he will go there.
It promises to be an interesting winter and if we win tomorrow it could be a very interesting next few weeks...
Wednesday, 13 August 2008
Close of play
128-3 at the close, Rogers 59 not out.
So the captaincy hasn't affected Buck. I thought I'd go back over his scores in the Championship this season
In order, they read:
13, 77, 19, 64, 69, 10, 63, 11, 14, 52, 20, 1, 118, 57, 20, 15*, 59*
So in 17 innings he's had 7 fifties and 1 century. Interestingly only one single figure score.
He also had a century against Bangladesh A and is just short of the 800 mark. Only six players have scored more runs this year in division two and only eight in division one. So all things considered, he's had far from a bad season.
The problem lies in that conversion rate and no one will be more aware of it than Rogers himself. Of his seven fifties his highest innings is 77. Maybe we'd have been more understanding if he'd scored 3 centuries and 4 fifties? He still has time to score more centuries and will, as a thoroughly professional man, want to lead by example. The stories emanating from the club when Travis Birt was there have not been replicated with this chap and we should all be grateful that we have a man of that substance.
Last night I suggested Cameron White for next season, but I wouldn't be disappointed if we had Rogers again. Where we missed a trick this year was in not signing someone for the 20/20 and White's explosive style would be useful in that competition. Until the 20/20 our season was going quite steadily, but it went down like a balloon after the early success at Headingley.
Rogers isn't a top class one day batsman, but he has 2 fifties in 3 Pro 40 games and had 3 in five FP trophy matches. Throughout the season he has maintained an average between 40 and 50 and with our batting frailties, we'd have been in serious trouble without him.
Interesting spin....
There have been one or two posts lately on t'internet about Derbyshire putting spin on the Rikki Clarke situation. I don't know if we are, but i wish we could find someone who can do it on the pitch.
I think Jake Needham is a promising young bowler but he has a lot of bowling to do before he becomes an established county pro. Nayan Doshi has bowled with great control at times but doesn't really look like running through sides. Several posters have suggested that "we need a better spinner".
My question is where is he?
When I was a kid (this is where I settle back in my rocking chair and call for my pipe and slippers!) most counties had a decent spinner. We're not here talking about pre-war, we're talking 1970's. Much as you could with overseas stars, you could go through the counties and come up with decent spinners. Miller at Derby, Ray East, David Acfield and Robin Hobbs at Essex - right through to Norman Gifford at Worcester and Don Wilson and Geoff Cope at Yorkshire.
What about today? The only counties who have spinners taking regular wickets are those whose wickets are prepared for them or the ones who have persevered with players for the 3-4 games a year where they do the business. Most of the spinners keep it tight, but few of them REALLY give it a tweak. I used to read about Jim Laker and how he'd bathe his spinning finger to toughen the skin where it had torn at the knuckle but I can't think there's much of that goes on today.
When people say that we should sign a decent spinner I can come up with Crofty at Glamorgan, Keedy at Lancashire, Swann at Nottinghamshire and Monty Panesar. That's about it and I'm stretching the term "decent" quite a bit there. Last winter when Ant Botha left, there were two spinners of any name on the market. One was Nayan Doshi, whose reputation had been made (and maintained this year) in the 20/20 where people try to slog him out of sight. The other was Worcestershire's former Zimbabwe slow left armer Ray Price, whose record in all cricket was decidedly underwhelming and didn't warrant serious consideration.
A few counties have gone overseas for players with some success (Kartik has done well at both Lancashire and Middlesex) but even Danny Vettori and Saqlain have struggled. Murali did a good job for Lancashire when he could play a game here and there, but even Shane Warne was only OK at Hampshire. I doubt any of their fans saw him bowl with the intensity that he showed in Ashes series and there were times when he appeared fairly ordinary, especially last year.
The problem is that while fast bowling can't be a barrel of laughs these days with the amount of cricket played, spinners don't have a chucklefest either. Tracks are rarely in their favour unless they play for Glamorgan or Northants, boundaries are pulled in to encourage big hitting and batsmen have bats that have enormous sweet spots and weigh the same as an average piano leg.
Pretty much every development in the game favours the batsman, while few encourage the bowler. When the odd wicket gives bowlers the upper hand, the ECB are quickly in to dock points and slap the county wrist. Maybe we should encourage the bowlers by allowing them to use a little vaseline when they've no atmospheric help, or produce balls with a bigger, more pronounced seam that will bite on the moribund tracks around the country.
I've said before that I get more enjoyment from a game where all four innings are around the 200-250 mark than from one where my county scores 800 to set a new club record. Sadly the powers that be don't appear to share my dislike, so we continue to have merely average players posting high batting averages while bowlers struggle to keep theirs below 35.
So if anyone thinks we need a new spinner, please start to work on a cloning machine and we'll have a Murali, a Derek Underwood or a Tommy Mitchell - hey, or someone who can bowl like all three!
PS Just had a look at Ant Botha's average this year. 14 wickets at 46, batting average 23. Jake Needham 10 wickets at 33, batting average 22.
Not really missed him have we?
I think Jake Needham is a promising young bowler but he has a lot of bowling to do before he becomes an established county pro. Nayan Doshi has bowled with great control at times but doesn't really look like running through sides. Several posters have suggested that "we need a better spinner".
My question is where is he?
When I was a kid (this is where I settle back in my rocking chair and call for my pipe and slippers!) most counties had a decent spinner. We're not here talking about pre-war, we're talking 1970's. Much as you could with overseas stars, you could go through the counties and come up with decent spinners. Miller at Derby, Ray East, David Acfield and Robin Hobbs at Essex - right through to Norman Gifford at Worcester and Don Wilson and Geoff Cope at Yorkshire.
What about today? The only counties who have spinners taking regular wickets are those whose wickets are prepared for them or the ones who have persevered with players for the 3-4 games a year where they do the business. Most of the spinners keep it tight, but few of them REALLY give it a tweak. I used to read about Jim Laker and how he'd bathe his spinning finger to toughen the skin where it had torn at the knuckle but I can't think there's much of that goes on today.
When people say that we should sign a decent spinner I can come up with Crofty at Glamorgan, Keedy at Lancashire, Swann at Nottinghamshire and Monty Panesar. That's about it and I'm stretching the term "decent" quite a bit there. Last winter when Ant Botha left, there were two spinners of any name on the market. One was Nayan Doshi, whose reputation had been made (and maintained this year) in the 20/20 where people try to slog him out of sight. The other was Worcestershire's former Zimbabwe slow left armer Ray Price, whose record in all cricket was decidedly underwhelming and didn't warrant serious consideration.
A few counties have gone overseas for players with some success (Kartik has done well at both Lancashire and Middlesex) but even Danny Vettori and Saqlain have struggled. Murali did a good job for Lancashire when he could play a game here and there, but even Shane Warne was only OK at Hampshire. I doubt any of their fans saw him bowl with the intensity that he showed in Ashes series and there were times when he appeared fairly ordinary, especially last year.
The problem is that while fast bowling can't be a barrel of laughs these days with the amount of cricket played, spinners don't have a chucklefest either. Tracks are rarely in their favour unless they play for Glamorgan or Northants, boundaries are pulled in to encourage big hitting and batsmen have bats that have enormous sweet spots and weigh the same as an average piano leg.
Pretty much every development in the game favours the batsman, while few encourage the bowler. When the odd wicket gives bowlers the upper hand, the ECB are quickly in to dock points and slap the county wrist. Maybe we should encourage the bowlers by allowing them to use a little vaseline when they've no atmospheric help, or produce balls with a bigger, more pronounced seam that will bite on the moribund tracks around the country.
I've said before that I get more enjoyment from a game where all four innings are around the 200-250 mark than from one where my county scores 800 to set a new club record. Sadly the powers that be don't appear to share my dislike, so we continue to have merely average players posting high batting averages while bowlers struggle to keep theirs below 35.
So if anyone thinks we need a new spinner, please start to work on a cloning machine and we'll have a Murali, a Derek Underwood or a Tommy Mitchell - hey, or someone who can bowl like all three!
PS Just had a look at Ant Botha's average this year. 14 wickets at 46, batting average 23. Jake Needham 10 wickets at 33, batting average 22.
Not really missed him have we?
Derbyshire v Middlesex day one and two
This weather is shocking isn't it?
I went up to our club to check the ground for games on Tuesday and Wednesday and both were cancelled on Monday morning. It's barely stopped raining since.
It seems to be as bad over the whole of the UK and I'd be interested to see which county has lost the most time to the weather this year. We have been badly hit (although it's gone in our favour a time or two) and I'm sure there's counties worse off than us. Lancashire for example, they're always sobbing their eyes out.
Anyway, we've bowled Middlesex out for 306 and as I write we are 41-1 in reply. The visitors will be both pleased and disappointed with their score. They have a young side out, with no Smith, Shah or Strauss and to get 300 on a track helpful to bowlers gives them a fair chance in the game.
They could have had more, and contributed to their own downfall with two runouts - although credit should be given to the fielders too. By all accounts our fielding was sloppy on the first day and several chances went down. Tom New appears to have had a poor day, dropping one regulation chance and conceding a few too many byes for my liking (again the bowling could be at fault).
With more rain likely over the next couple of days, it is hard to see anything but a contrived finish and I just hope that Derbyshire go for it if anything remotely gettable is set in the last innings. Promotion can only come with three wins minimum in the last few games and I think we are capable of beating the teams we have coming up. Warwickshire are a strange outfit and their batting is either feast or famine, but the others are eminently beatable.
52-1 as I close, Buck and Dog both going well. I hope that's not tempting providence.
I went up to our club to check the ground for games on Tuesday and Wednesday and both were cancelled on Monday morning. It's barely stopped raining since.
It seems to be as bad over the whole of the UK and I'd be interested to see which county has lost the most time to the weather this year. We have been badly hit (although it's gone in our favour a time or two) and I'm sure there's counties worse off than us. Lancashire for example, they're always sobbing their eyes out.
Anyway, we've bowled Middlesex out for 306 and as I write we are 41-1 in reply. The visitors will be both pleased and disappointed with their score. They have a young side out, with no Smith, Shah or Strauss and to get 300 on a track helpful to bowlers gives them a fair chance in the game.
They could have had more, and contributed to their own downfall with two runouts - although credit should be given to the fielders too. By all accounts our fielding was sloppy on the first day and several chances went down. Tom New appears to have had a poor day, dropping one regulation chance and conceding a few too many byes for my liking (again the bowling could be at fault).
With more rain likely over the next couple of days, it is hard to see anything but a contrived finish and I just hope that Derbyshire go for it if anything remotely gettable is set in the last innings. Promotion can only come with three wins minimum in the last few games and I think we are capable of beating the teams we have coming up. Warwickshire are a strange outfit and their batting is either feast or famine, but the others are eminently beatable.
52-1 as I close, Buck and Dog both going well. I hope that's not tempting providence.
Tuesday, 12 August 2008
Rikki goes as skipper
Maybe not a big surprise, but I had a feeling something may happen.
Clarke said at the start of the season that he retained England ambitions and hoped to use the captaincy as a springboard to that. It hasn't worked out for the guy and there are various reasons for that.
They say that moving house, having a baby and starting a new job are, outside bereavement, the most stressful things that can happen to someone. Clarke has had all three in the last few months and has been responsible for the rest of the squad. Its a hard call and no shame to him that it has not worked out. Of course, he has been well paid for the privilege but its a shame for him that it has not gone better.
He's not the first to find captaincy a problem of course. Ian Botham never hacked it as England captain, although in his case the mitigating factor was that he spent most of his tenure playing against the Caribbean howitzers of that era and was on a hiding to nothing. Bob Taylor was one of our all-time greats but couldn't keep up his impeccably high standard behind the stumps and handle the rest of the captaincy issues. He only lasted half a season and once relieved of responsibility soon regained his former standard.
Kevin Pietersen may or may not go down in history as a great England captain, but what he has done in his first Test as skipper is to show that the role doesn't faze him - as if anyone really thought it would. His aura of confidence (arrogance?) may convey itself to his side but importantly his century has bought him time, something that Rikki was never able to do.
Apart from a solid pre-season tour and a brilliant knock against Warwickshire at Derby, his 4-day performances have been punctuated with brief cameos and irresponsible shots. Clarke is like many other gifted stroke players. When it comes off, they are burdened with the label "genius". When it results in an early dismissal they are called "irresponsible". Think Michael Slater. Slats came to us as one of the great opening batsmen in the world game and is even now regarded as the man who revolutionised Test match batting. What did we see at Derby? Cameo 20's and 30's, a very occasional century and a county spell that was ultimately unfulfilled.
The "conspiracy" and "spin" devotees are now suggesting that Clarke will go at season-end. They may be right for all I know, but if the club say they will support him and help him to realise his ambitions then one has to believe that for now. The bottom line is that he has another year on his contract, which one assumes is fairly lucrative (even allowing for losing something for no longer being skipper) and after the season that he has had I find it hard to think someone will come in and offer him a megabucks deal to leave and for us to tear up that remaining year.
The captaincy now reverts to Chris Rogers to the end of the season and after that it is anyone's guess. It will remain a strong bargaining tool for a player coming in but suggestions of offering it to the likes of Jim Allenby are silly. Someone has to have shown something to suggest captaincy material, not just have a couple of good seasons behind them. I like Jim Allenby and have written recently that I'd like to see him at Derbyshire, but captain? Purleeese....
Michael Di Venuto? I wouldn't be unhappy with that but think he signed a three-year deal with Durham at the start of this year. The romantic in me would like to think he would return to the scene of former glories, but the realist asks why the heck he would leave one of the country's top two sides to come back to us.
For what its worth, I'd see the captaincy as being a bargaining tool for an overseas player. Maybe Chris Rogers, but there are other options. Matt Hayden is one, but he could be in line for one last Ashes hurrah and has been a little injury prone of late.
Ian Harvey might have his fans, but I suspect that the bridges are sadly burnt there and that Morris is unlikely to bring in someone who was a rival for his role as coach a year back.
Cameron White, who I suggested the other night on here for the overseas role would again fit the bill. Victorian captain since 2003-4, and highly rated skipper of Somerset in 2006, he is, at 25 a seasoned and highly talented player, but possibly not quite good enough to make the Ashes tour.
One would expect Hayden, Ponting, Symonds, both Husseys, Watson, Katich, Clarke and Marsh to be ahead of him in the pecking order, but that should not detract from the fact he is a very fine player. Remember his unbeaten 260 against us for Somerset, essentially on one leg? He also made brilliant 20/20 centuries and bowls useful leggies.
The problem would be that he could not, or would not presumably sign up until the Ashes party was announced. If I had John Morris' job, I would certainly be enquiring about the possibilities and making a provisional offer. I'd pay good money to watch that fella.
Clarke said at the start of the season that he retained England ambitions and hoped to use the captaincy as a springboard to that. It hasn't worked out for the guy and there are various reasons for that.
They say that moving house, having a baby and starting a new job are, outside bereavement, the most stressful things that can happen to someone. Clarke has had all three in the last few months and has been responsible for the rest of the squad. Its a hard call and no shame to him that it has not worked out. Of course, he has been well paid for the privilege but its a shame for him that it has not gone better.
He's not the first to find captaincy a problem of course. Ian Botham never hacked it as England captain, although in his case the mitigating factor was that he spent most of his tenure playing against the Caribbean howitzers of that era and was on a hiding to nothing. Bob Taylor was one of our all-time greats but couldn't keep up his impeccably high standard behind the stumps and handle the rest of the captaincy issues. He only lasted half a season and once relieved of responsibility soon regained his former standard.
Kevin Pietersen may or may not go down in history as a great England captain, but what he has done in his first Test as skipper is to show that the role doesn't faze him - as if anyone really thought it would. His aura of confidence (arrogance?) may convey itself to his side but importantly his century has bought him time, something that Rikki was never able to do.
Apart from a solid pre-season tour and a brilliant knock against Warwickshire at Derby, his 4-day performances have been punctuated with brief cameos and irresponsible shots. Clarke is like many other gifted stroke players. When it comes off, they are burdened with the label "genius". When it results in an early dismissal they are called "irresponsible". Think Michael Slater. Slats came to us as one of the great opening batsmen in the world game and is even now regarded as the man who revolutionised Test match batting. What did we see at Derby? Cameo 20's and 30's, a very occasional century and a county spell that was ultimately unfulfilled.
The "conspiracy" and "spin" devotees are now suggesting that Clarke will go at season-end. They may be right for all I know, but if the club say they will support him and help him to realise his ambitions then one has to believe that for now. The bottom line is that he has another year on his contract, which one assumes is fairly lucrative (even allowing for losing something for no longer being skipper) and after the season that he has had I find it hard to think someone will come in and offer him a megabucks deal to leave and for us to tear up that remaining year.
The captaincy now reverts to Chris Rogers to the end of the season and after that it is anyone's guess. It will remain a strong bargaining tool for a player coming in but suggestions of offering it to the likes of Jim Allenby are silly. Someone has to have shown something to suggest captaincy material, not just have a couple of good seasons behind them. I like Jim Allenby and have written recently that I'd like to see him at Derbyshire, but captain? Purleeese....
Michael Di Venuto? I wouldn't be unhappy with that but think he signed a three-year deal with Durham at the start of this year. The romantic in me would like to think he would return to the scene of former glories, but the realist asks why the heck he would leave one of the country's top two sides to come back to us.
For what its worth, I'd see the captaincy as being a bargaining tool for an overseas player. Maybe Chris Rogers, but there are other options. Matt Hayden is one, but he could be in line for one last Ashes hurrah and has been a little injury prone of late.
Ian Harvey might have his fans, but I suspect that the bridges are sadly burnt there and that Morris is unlikely to bring in someone who was a rival for his role as coach a year back.
Cameron White, who I suggested the other night on here for the overseas role would again fit the bill. Victorian captain since 2003-4, and highly rated skipper of Somerset in 2006, he is, at 25 a seasoned and highly talented player, but possibly not quite good enough to make the Ashes tour.
One would expect Hayden, Ponting, Symonds, both Husseys, Watson, Katich, Clarke and Marsh to be ahead of him in the pecking order, but that should not detract from the fact he is a very fine player. Remember his unbeaten 260 against us for Somerset, essentially on one leg? He also made brilliant 20/20 centuries and bowls useful leggies.
The problem would be that he could not, or would not presumably sign up until the Ashes party was announced. If I had John Morris' job, I would certainly be enquiring about the possibilities and making a provisional offer. I'd pay good money to watch that fella.
Monday, 11 August 2008
Derbyshire v Middlesex preview
Middlesex, Warwickshire, Glamorgan, Gloucestershire, Leicestershire
With the exception of tomorrow's opponents, all teams we could easily beat. I'd qualify that by saying we could beat them too, given the rub of the green, mainly from the weather.
We could go to fourth in the Championship with a good performance here and John Morris has named the following squad:
Rogers
Borrington
Birch
Hinds
Smith
Clarke
New
Wagg
Clare
Langeveldt
Doshi
Hunter
I suspect Hunter will be the one to drop out as I think we need the variety that Doshi brings to the side. His bowling has been controlled without being especially penetrative this season but I'd sooner have one spinner (Greg Smith is currently an extra to me, rather than a genuine spinning option).
I've been impressed by the methodical way that Paul Borrington has gone about his game. He is not a fancy player and at times is soporific, but young players need to fill out to time the ball well in many cases and the fact that he seems to have great powers of concentration sets him apart from his peers. I remember the young Glen Turner coming to Worcestershire and he was almost strokeless but had a fine defensive technique. Once he filled out, the confidence to hit through the ball came and he was eventually one of the finest players of his generation. I'm not saying Borrington is in that class, but after the many wickets we've given away this season it is refreshing to see a youngster prepared to graft and sell his wicket dearly.
The visitors are likely to be without Owais Shah and Andrew Strauss, so we should waltz to victory (sorry).
Their side has not been announced but will include exciting batsmen such as Eoin Morgan, Ed Joyce and Billy Godleman. The bowling attack relies heavily on Tim Murtagh in the seam department, but their spinners, veteran Shaun Udal and Indian Murali Kartik are fine bowlers. One assumes our groundstaff won't prepare a raging turner...
Can Derbyshire win to stay in the promotion hunt? Can the weather stay fine? Can Langeveldt's knee hold up? Can our batting put on a score in the first innings to put them under pressure? Can Jon Clare do pre-match warm ups without getting taken to hospital? Can Waggy get his swing and length back after some torried spells lately?
The answers to all these questions will become evident in the next few days. The big question will not be answered until the season end - namely, can John Morris get the same attitude side to turn up for successive games? We're capable of thrashing this lot then losing heavily to Leicestershire. Until we sort out that mentality issue, we will remain among the also rans.
With the exception of tomorrow's opponents, all teams we could easily beat. I'd qualify that by saying we could beat them too, given the rub of the green, mainly from the weather.
We could go to fourth in the Championship with a good performance here and John Morris has named the following squad:
Rogers
Borrington
Birch
Hinds
Smith
Clarke
New
Wagg
Clare
Langeveldt
Doshi
Hunter
I suspect Hunter will be the one to drop out as I think we need the variety that Doshi brings to the side. His bowling has been controlled without being especially penetrative this season but I'd sooner have one spinner (Greg Smith is currently an extra to me, rather than a genuine spinning option).
I've been impressed by the methodical way that Paul Borrington has gone about his game. He is not a fancy player and at times is soporific, but young players need to fill out to time the ball well in many cases and the fact that he seems to have great powers of concentration sets him apart from his peers. I remember the young Glen Turner coming to Worcestershire and he was almost strokeless but had a fine defensive technique. Once he filled out, the confidence to hit through the ball came and he was eventually one of the finest players of his generation. I'm not saying Borrington is in that class, but after the many wickets we've given away this season it is refreshing to see a youngster prepared to graft and sell his wicket dearly.
The visitors are likely to be without Owais Shah and Andrew Strauss, so we should waltz to victory (sorry).
Their side has not been announced but will include exciting batsmen such as Eoin Morgan, Ed Joyce and Billy Godleman. The bowling attack relies heavily on Tim Murtagh in the seam department, but their spinners, veteran Shaun Udal and Indian Murali Kartik are fine bowlers. One assumes our groundstaff won't prepare a raging turner...
Can Derbyshire win to stay in the promotion hunt? Can the weather stay fine? Can Langeveldt's knee hold up? Can our batting put on a score in the first innings to put them under pressure? Can Jon Clare do pre-match warm ups without getting taken to hospital? Can Waggy get his swing and length back after some torried spells lately?
The answers to all these questions will become evident in the next few days. The big question will not be answered until the season end - namely, can John Morris get the same attitude side to turn up for successive games? We're capable of thrashing this lot then losing heavily to Leicestershire. Until we sort out that mentality issue, we will remain among the also rans.
Sunday, 10 August 2008
Football.... great
You always know that the cricket season is coming to an end when the footie starts
In truth, there's a lot of cricket still to play, but the advent of the live commentaries always make you look ahead to the long winter nights and the hope that you will get home to hear of a signing by Derbyshire.
I still support Derby County and hated every minute of last season, but I'm less interested, much less, than I used to be. Dad and I were season ticket holders at the Baseball Ground from 1968 to 1976 but since then we've gone only occasionally.
Cricket started around the same time but my love for the game has grown with the years and I loved it from the start. It is probably something to do with footballers being, in my humble opinion, overpaid prima donnas who are so far removed from the man in the street that its scary. Cricketers are still decent guys who will happily (in most cases) have a word before or after a game. Could you honestly see Ronaldo stopping to chat about the state of the game like Steve Stubbings or others? Or Paul Jewell walking through the crowd and chatting about the way things had gone like John Morris.
Now this is where I get controversial. You see, I no longer look at the 606 boards for football as it is pathetic. My team's better than yours, your side are full of fat no marks - honestly, its as if most contributors share brains and they've all left it in the park. Sack the manager, get rid of that player - the hatchets are out for Paul Jewell after a defeat to an offside goal yesterday.
Cricket fans are generally more understanding, probably because they have a greater appreciation of the game than football. For one thing, its a harder game to understand so needs a level of intelligence that is - how shall I put it - not always the preserve of a footie fan. Don't get me wrong, a lot of intelligent people follow football, or both sports, but its not the hardest game in the world to understand. You get it in that goal, we get it in this one - that's pretty much it. The offside rule is the concession to intelligence (and few, including officials, seem to understand it).
I've played club football and hated it, only lasting for a season. Games were often regulated assaults on individuals and the language, threats and behaviour was pathetic. By the same token I've played club cricket for 35 years and loved every minute, more now than ever when I'm part of a fantastic club and I realise that I've more behind me than ahead.
I love to go to a cricket match and chat with someone from the other team about the respective merits of the sides. If you did that at football and to the wrong person, it could be an excuse for violence. Trust me, I've seen it. I can go to see Derbyshire play in Glasgow with my club baseball cap on and have a good laugh and plenty of banter. I wouldn't go in there with a Derby County top on, that's for sure.
I've been hit four times when batting in those 35 years, thankfully never on the head, and the concern from the opposition was quite touching. I've been kicked up in the air at football and been told to get up - accompanied by a fair amount of invective.
So I hope that the cricket boards don't descend to that level or there's little hope left. A couple of times this season I've complained about a comment and its been sorted quite quickly, once with a retraction and once with being deleted. I'm all for free speech but really don't see myself going on the Notts board this winter and saying how rubbish they are, while hoping none of them are silly enough to go on ours.
For the winter I intend to post an occasional blog - when there's something to write about - and keep in touch with fellow fans on the excellent In Morris We Trust board, linked on the left of this page. Here is an oasis of calm where like minded Derbyshire fans can swap thoughts, be irreverent without getting personal and plan our next step to global domination next year.
OK, maybe I lied about that last bit...
But you never know!
In truth, there's a lot of cricket still to play, but the advent of the live commentaries always make you look ahead to the long winter nights and the hope that you will get home to hear of a signing by Derbyshire.
I still support Derby County and hated every minute of last season, but I'm less interested, much less, than I used to be. Dad and I were season ticket holders at the Baseball Ground from 1968 to 1976 but since then we've gone only occasionally.
Cricket started around the same time but my love for the game has grown with the years and I loved it from the start. It is probably something to do with footballers being, in my humble opinion, overpaid prima donnas who are so far removed from the man in the street that its scary. Cricketers are still decent guys who will happily (in most cases) have a word before or after a game. Could you honestly see Ronaldo stopping to chat about the state of the game like Steve Stubbings or others? Or Paul Jewell walking through the crowd and chatting about the way things had gone like John Morris.
Now this is where I get controversial. You see, I no longer look at the 606 boards for football as it is pathetic. My team's better than yours, your side are full of fat no marks - honestly, its as if most contributors share brains and they've all left it in the park. Sack the manager, get rid of that player - the hatchets are out for Paul Jewell after a defeat to an offside goal yesterday.
Cricket fans are generally more understanding, probably because they have a greater appreciation of the game than football. For one thing, its a harder game to understand so needs a level of intelligence that is - how shall I put it - not always the preserve of a footie fan. Don't get me wrong, a lot of intelligent people follow football, or both sports, but its not the hardest game in the world to understand. You get it in that goal, we get it in this one - that's pretty much it. The offside rule is the concession to intelligence (and few, including officials, seem to understand it).
I've played club football and hated it, only lasting for a season. Games were often regulated assaults on individuals and the language, threats and behaviour was pathetic. By the same token I've played club cricket for 35 years and loved every minute, more now than ever when I'm part of a fantastic club and I realise that I've more behind me than ahead.
I love to go to a cricket match and chat with someone from the other team about the respective merits of the sides. If you did that at football and to the wrong person, it could be an excuse for violence. Trust me, I've seen it. I can go to see Derbyshire play in Glasgow with my club baseball cap on and have a good laugh and plenty of banter. I wouldn't go in there with a Derby County top on, that's for sure.
I've been hit four times when batting in those 35 years, thankfully never on the head, and the concern from the opposition was quite touching. I've been kicked up in the air at football and been told to get up - accompanied by a fair amount of invective.
So I hope that the cricket boards don't descend to that level or there's little hope left. A couple of times this season I've complained about a comment and its been sorted quite quickly, once with a retraction and once with being deleted. I'm all for free speech but really don't see myself going on the Notts board this winter and saying how rubbish they are, while hoping none of them are silly enough to go on ours.
For the winter I intend to post an occasional blog - when there's something to write about - and keep in touch with fellow fans on the excellent In Morris We Trust board, linked on the left of this page. Here is an oasis of calm where like minded Derbyshire fans can swap thoughts, be irreverent without getting personal and plan our next step to global domination next year.
OK, maybe I lied about that last bit...
But you never know!
Saturday, 9 August 2008
Overseas update
As comments and opinions fluctuate as to who should be our overseas player next year, I am increasingly of the opinion that John Morris' hand will be forced.
There have been comments on message boards that we should sign a bowler, rather than a batsman. This to me falls flat on several counts.
First, there are no quick bowlers available of top quality. The intensity of the international programme means that any quickie worth his salt is already running in 10 months a year and simply cannot fit a county season in, even if his body is up for it. The only available seamer of any ability is Isa Guha of England ladies...
Seriously, being a quickie today is a thankless task and I am astonished and grateful that Charl Langeveldt has proved such a diamond. The next level down is a big gamble though. Dillon du Preez came from South Africa to Leicester with a big reputation after a fine domestic winter. He's done OK but had had his share of injuries and I'd question whether 23 wickets at this stage is worth a Kolpak payment. Vernon Philander came from South Africa as a budding all rounder and left with a batting average of 15 and a bowling one of 38.
As for spinners, there's a handful in the game but they're all Indians or Sri Lankans and they are involved in so much cricket that they're only free for around four weeks, which is barely worthwhile.
This pretty much rules out bowlers to my mind. Even the Aussies don't have much in the background and the likes of Shaun Tait and Doug Bollinger have hardly impressed in county stints, nor did Magoffin do especially well for Worcester. These guys are just outside the Aussie top rank, which must mean they're very worried for when Brett Lee retires.
So it's a batsman. The same goes for Indian, Sri Lankan and Pakistani batsman as bowlers - they're in ten a penny, but megabucks tournaments all year round in cricketing outposts so simply aren't available. There are no decent batsmen in Bangladesh or Zimbabwe, nor indeed in the Caribbean. Chris Gayle is like the little girl in the rhyme - when he's good, he's very, very good but when he's bad - he's awful.
Chanderpaul is a fine player but dare I say a lesser talent on the County grind, and that's it. Sarwan did little at Gloucestershire and Bravo was a disaster at Kent. New Zealand have a fine player in Vettori, but even he did little in stints at Notts and Warwick. Now Fleming has gone they've a couple of batsmen but the star turn, Brendon McCullum, can name his price in India and doesn't need county cricket.
Which leaves South Africa and Australia. It may be feasible that Langeveldt could put us in touch with one of their Test players, but their Board are very protective of them. Amla or Prince might be a good signing, but Kallis wouldn't want to come and Smith wouldn't be allowed to burn out. I felt this season that Loots Bosman, a specialist 20/20 player and phenomenal hitter, might have been worth bringing in for the 20/20, and we suffered from the absence of an overseas star in that competition.
As for Australia - well, they tour next summer, so much will depend on who is in the party and who isn't. I said on the 606 board early in the year that Sean Marsh would have been a good signing but he's now in the Aussie squad (at least for one dayers) and James Hopes is also in the frame. The market is very restricted and there's a lot of Jon Moss's and Travis Birt's out there who could be a success but might well not be.
The state of flux in the Aussie side may be a route to a bigger name. As Watson and Marsh come in, so Matt Hayden may well go out. I suspect the giant opener may be up for one more crack at England in the Ashes, but if not might be persuaded to "do a Langer" and have another crack at County cricket after earlier success with Northants and Hampshire. There may be others who might not make the squad but feel that being in England during an Ashes tour could see them in poll position in the event of injury.
So, Simon Katich it is....
Seriously, you'll see from the above that there really are few options out there. One question I've asked myself this season is - would Ian Harvey as overseas player have done better than Rogers? Would Damien Martyn? Both were playing in India with fair success but might struggle over a county season.
After due consideration, I'd offer two options to Chris Rogers, who I still feel is in pole position for next year. One is Luke Pomersbach, a 24-year old left hander who averages over 50 in first class cricket and boasts centuries against both English and South African touring sides. He still only has less than 30 first class innings, however, so would be a major gamble.
The other is someone who is an outstanding player, as we know all too well, but doesn't seem to find favour with the Aussie selectors for some reason. Although he made a few one dayers in the Caribbean, he didn't cement a place in the side and may struggle to get a place on the Ashes tour in a country with so many outstanding batsmen. Yet that batting is brilliant, his fielding the same and his bowling a more than useful asset to any side. His previous stint in county cricket saw him break one day records, impress all those who saw him and almost win his county a game at Derby against all the odds.
Ladies and gentlemen, anyone for Cameron White?
There have been comments on message boards that we should sign a bowler, rather than a batsman. This to me falls flat on several counts.
First, there are no quick bowlers available of top quality. The intensity of the international programme means that any quickie worth his salt is already running in 10 months a year and simply cannot fit a county season in, even if his body is up for it. The only available seamer of any ability is Isa Guha of England ladies...
Seriously, being a quickie today is a thankless task and I am astonished and grateful that Charl Langeveldt has proved such a diamond. The next level down is a big gamble though. Dillon du Preez came from South Africa to Leicester with a big reputation after a fine domestic winter. He's done OK but had had his share of injuries and I'd question whether 23 wickets at this stage is worth a Kolpak payment. Vernon Philander came from South Africa as a budding all rounder and left with a batting average of 15 and a bowling one of 38.
As for spinners, there's a handful in the game but they're all Indians or Sri Lankans and they are involved in so much cricket that they're only free for around four weeks, which is barely worthwhile.
This pretty much rules out bowlers to my mind. Even the Aussies don't have much in the background and the likes of Shaun Tait and Doug Bollinger have hardly impressed in county stints, nor did Magoffin do especially well for Worcester. These guys are just outside the Aussie top rank, which must mean they're very worried for when Brett Lee retires.
So it's a batsman. The same goes for Indian, Sri Lankan and Pakistani batsman as bowlers - they're in ten a penny, but megabucks tournaments all year round in cricketing outposts so simply aren't available. There are no decent batsmen in Bangladesh or Zimbabwe, nor indeed in the Caribbean. Chris Gayle is like the little girl in the rhyme - when he's good, he's very, very good but when he's bad - he's awful.
Chanderpaul is a fine player but dare I say a lesser talent on the County grind, and that's it. Sarwan did little at Gloucestershire and Bravo was a disaster at Kent. New Zealand have a fine player in Vettori, but even he did little in stints at Notts and Warwick. Now Fleming has gone they've a couple of batsmen but the star turn, Brendon McCullum, can name his price in India and doesn't need county cricket.
Which leaves South Africa and Australia. It may be feasible that Langeveldt could put us in touch with one of their Test players, but their Board are very protective of them. Amla or Prince might be a good signing, but Kallis wouldn't want to come and Smith wouldn't be allowed to burn out. I felt this season that Loots Bosman, a specialist 20/20 player and phenomenal hitter, might have been worth bringing in for the 20/20, and we suffered from the absence of an overseas star in that competition.
As for Australia - well, they tour next summer, so much will depend on who is in the party and who isn't. I said on the 606 board early in the year that Sean Marsh would have been a good signing but he's now in the Aussie squad (at least for one dayers) and James Hopes is also in the frame. The market is very restricted and there's a lot of Jon Moss's and Travis Birt's out there who could be a success but might well not be.
The state of flux in the Aussie side may be a route to a bigger name. As Watson and Marsh come in, so Matt Hayden may well go out. I suspect the giant opener may be up for one more crack at England in the Ashes, but if not might be persuaded to "do a Langer" and have another crack at County cricket after earlier success with Northants and Hampshire. There may be others who might not make the squad but feel that being in England during an Ashes tour could see them in poll position in the event of injury.
So, Simon Katich it is....
Seriously, you'll see from the above that there really are few options out there. One question I've asked myself this season is - would Ian Harvey as overseas player have done better than Rogers? Would Damien Martyn? Both were playing in India with fair success but might struggle over a county season.
After due consideration, I'd offer two options to Chris Rogers, who I still feel is in pole position for next year. One is Luke Pomersbach, a 24-year old left hander who averages over 50 in first class cricket and boasts centuries against both English and South African touring sides. He still only has less than 30 first class innings, however, so would be a major gamble.
The other is someone who is an outstanding player, as we know all too well, but doesn't seem to find favour with the Aussie selectors for some reason. Although he made a few one dayers in the Caribbean, he didn't cement a place in the side and may struggle to get a place on the Ashes tour in a country with so many outstanding batsmen. Yet that batting is brilliant, his fielding the same and his bowling a more than useful asset to any side. His previous stint in county cricket saw him break one day records, impress all those who saw him and almost win his county a game at Derby against all the odds.
Ladies and gentlemen, anyone for Cameron White?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)