Tuesday, 14 April 2026

Final thoughts on Old Trafford

Amid the fallout from Derbyshire's defeat at Old Trafford, there were many observations, but one stood out for me because it was used by two or three people, in comments and messages. 

On that last day, when Derbyshire batted, they failed to play Lancashire as they had throughout the match. Rather than playing each ball on its merits, they played the 'Anderson' name and the occasion. 

They were found wanting in doing so. 

Jimmy Anderson is one of the greats of the game and has been rightly knighted for his services to it. It must give you quite a boost to run into bowl from the end that bears your name and the Lancashire legend bowled extremely well on the last afternoon. Good as he has been, I'm not sure that a team approaching the very moderate 'run chase' sensibly should have been bowled out by someone who will be 44 years old in July. 

As someone else pointed out, perhaps a better tactic might have been for someone to go in and play a 'Nye Donald' innings. Maybe getting a quick 20 or 30, hitting over the top, top edging, putting the pressure back onto the home side. Plenty of balls were allowed to go through to the wicket keeper, that in other circumstances would have been punished. There wasn't a great deal of clarity in the thinking out there, however, much discussion took place in the dressing room. 

Thinking back, another area where I feel we lost control of the game was in the short-pitched bowling on the third evening. We had Lancashire 23-5 then 78-6, but started to bowl short at Hartley and Coughlin, rather than do what had previously been successful. We leaked too many runs in that final session and sixteen extras were unnecessarily generous, as things got a little ragged.

I don't understand this tactic. There was a time, before the advent of protective gear, that tail enders might have been intimidated, but I can't remember the last time I saw someone back away. I saw that a time or two when Alan Ward was in his pomp and there were plenty didn't fancy Les Jackson when he got the ball lifting. Hardly surprising, when you had cloth gloves with rubber pimples protecting your hands, a box protecting the nether regions and a rolled up newspaper down your trousers for a thigh pad. 

It is a strategy that smacks of desperation to me and for many tail enders the pull shot is one of their most effective run-scoring strokes.

Moving on and to answer questions, of course Wayne Madsen will come straight back once his confidence in the strength of his injured shoulder is restored. He remains the best bat in the side and we missed him in Manchester. It is very handy to have so many all-rounders, but for me the vulnerable one is Anuj Dal. His batting is useful, so too his bowling and he remains one of my favourite players with his whole-hearted approach. Yet I don't see him WINNING matches with either discipline. Zak Chappell is a better bowler, Martin Andersson a better bat, Luis Reece a better all-rounder. 

I did suggest that he and Ben Aitchison were competing for a place, pre-season, but Ben is bowling superbly. He looks to have raised his game this year, now confident in his body and he has been unlucky in both matches. He keeps it tight, takes wickets and is an excellent slip fielder. His partnership with Mohammad Abbas promises to be something very special.

I'm pleased that the players now miss the next round of fixtures, as they have time to digest what went wrong at Old Trafford. There is a lot of cricket to be played between now and the end of September, but key to success will be getting the balance of the side correct. 

It will be interesting to see the team that plays in the 4-day second team game, that starts at Scarborough today. Will Amrit Basra play? If Luis Reece isn't fully fit, might Amrit be an option at six? Or Nye Donald, for that matter?

We must also hope to get pitches like Old Trafford at Derby. We will not get promotion if half of our matches are pre-destined draws. If you knew it was going to zip around, you could afford to play an extra batter, because I would back our main seamers against most sides. 

I hope that Caleb Jewell rediscovers his form for the next match. That final innings cried out for the overseas bat to lead by example, but Lancashire seem to have figured Caleb out.

16, 12, 9, 4, 0, 5 are his six innings against them in red ball cricket. He had a poor winter in Australia (but on their pitches most batters did) and Derbyshire really need him to set the tone and example in the middle. 

As I said to a friend yesterday, players like Shan Masood, Chris Rogers, Dean Jones and John Wright would have seen you to victory yesterday, seeing off Anderson and knocking the others around. I don't wish to be unduly harsh, because that is elite company to be in. Yet as I have written before, the overseas role in any club carries responsibility and pressure. 

Lancashire has a jewel in Marcus Harris

We must hope our own Jewell matches him, as the season progresses.

11 comments:

  1. We could - and should - have won this game. We outplayed a very strong side for much of it but in the end the pressure took its toll and led to some very poor shots in our second innings. I would draw the following conclusions.

    1. We need Wayne Madsen back. He would have provided solidity and experience in the run chase, much as Marcus Harris did for Lancs.

    2. If he doesn’t bowl, Luis Reece should open the batting.

    3. Without Luis' left arm bowling our pace attack is quite samey (right arm, mid-70 mph). I don’t take anything away from their performance in the last four days but five right-arm seamers is a luxury we perhaps can’t afford (Martin Andersson only bowled 3 overs in total so is effectivement playing - very well - as a batsman).

    4. The Lancs pace attack had four right arm seamers but with the nuance that one of them (Stanley) bowled 10mph quicker than the others. This seems to be an option we don’t have in the squad.

    5. Nye Donald would bring an extra dimension and threat to the batting line-up. A rapid 25 or so would have made a big difference yesterday.

    Subject to injury, and Andersson able to bowl his quota as a fourth seamer my team for the next game would be

    Jewell
    Reece
    Came
    Madsen
    Andersson
    Guest
    Donald
    Chappell
    Aitchison
    Shoaib
    Abbas

    Allez Derbyshire, plenty more points to play for!

    Adrian, Nice

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm yet to be convinced by Montgomery at 3, but you're dropping him after 2 games? He might be an overseas, but I'd leave Jewell out before him.

    I suspect Wayne will replace Dal, as the only change for the next game, barring any injuries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, Jasper. Montgomery needs time to settle at 3 but he will be long term there and likely captaincy option, though Harry threw his cap in the ring over these two games.

      Delete
    2. With regard to my earler comments, I don’t disagree that dropping Montgomery would be harsh after three innings and I do agree that he will become successful fixture in the side. I just felt that Donald would be a good and positive option for upcoming games against "weaker" opposition and didn’t see how else to get him into the side. Both Montgomery and Jewell have been guilty of rash shots so far and both are assets to the team. One would have to go to give Donald a chance. I’m just glad that I don’t have to make the team selection!

      Adrian

      Delete
  3. Listening to the Ashes commentary over the winter, it was interesting hearing Glenn McGrath talking about "bazball". And to paraphrase (hopefully not too badly) - "I've worked out where bazball works. It's great for a fourth innings run chase where you put the pressure back on the bowlers".

    I don't think we should expect Came to play like Duckett (and definitely not like Crawley!), but a bit more aggression might have dampened Lanc's enthusiasm.

    That said - other commentators have pointed out how our first three wickets were 'given away'. I guess we can't have both. If we're going to be more aggressive in this situation then people will get themselves out sometimes. The frustration yesterday was that the top/middle order got themselves out without showing much aggression (perhaps Andersson excepted).

    Finally - and apologies for the long comment - but it's a credit to your blog Peakfan that fans of other counties come and engage here too. It shows it's possible to be even handed without pretending to be neutral.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Oliver! I know fans of quite a few counties come on here and they're all welcome. From an early age, my Dad always told me to appreciate the qualities in other teams, and acknowledge that you always need two sides to make a game. I've always tried to do that.

      A lot of sports fans will automatically say 'we were rubbish' when their team gets beaten. They might be, but often you have to appreciate the other team, or individuals within it, were better

      As I wrote last night, without Harris and Anderson that game wasn't even close. But you have to accept it happens at times...

      Delete
  4. David exiled in Co Durham14 April 2026 at 16:45

    I don't argue with your contention that Anuj Dal is the all rounder under pressure, But the figures suggest that it should really be Zac Chappell. 2 matches is too early to comment conclusively on this seasons form, but so far Nuj has taken 5 wickets at 22 and Zac 6 wickets at 39. In 2025 Nuj had an average of 30 and Zac 37. 2024 was the outlier season where Nuj had a very poor bowling year and Zac did well, but in 2023 it was back to Nuj having the better average. Few would argue against Nuj being the better batsman of the two, although Zac can give it the long arm very successfully.
    I get that the attack can be samey, especially without Reece, which is why I'm happy that Shoaib has been given plenty of overs, and lets be honest it was the batting that let us down, not the bowling.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree that we have to expect more from our overseas player than Jewell has achieved against Lancs. I have yet to be convinced that he is an asset to our batting lineup and if someone needs to be dropped to make way for Wayne it might have to be him. May I also add a name to those you listed Steve as being capable to take us to victory in this game? Muhammed Azharuddin was the finest batsman I have seen playing for us. His elegance and timing were a delight to watch and second to none in my humble opinion.
    Chapel Guy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It wasn't a comprehensive list, CG. Simon Katich, Peter Kirsten and Shiv Chanderpaul would likely have done the same.

      Those are the situations when your key players need to carry you home. Like Lord's in '81, when Wright and Kirsten came together.

      Azharuddin was brilliant. I still think of his double century against Durham at Chesterfield, when hardly anyone else scored any runs and he hit a century before lunch. He was, as you say, an elegant, wonderful player

      Delete
    2. Chesterfield Blur14 April 2026 at 22:26

      Martin Guptill as well, class act

      Delete
    3. Anzac was a strange one 94 was almost a complete opposite to 91 in 91 he scored 2000 fc runs but struggled on the one day game whereas in 94 apart from his 200 against Durham he didn’t have the same impact in the first class game but was better in the one day matches

      Delete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!