Wednesday 25 July 2018

Close season pointers in recent events

This has been an exciting week for Derbyshire supporters.

The thrilling T20 win at Northampton was followed by an equally exciting one against the same opposition at Chesterfield today. The performances in both matches were excellent, the commitment of the players exemplary and the results exactly what we wanted.

There is talent at the club and people within it who are making strong cases for contracts and/or improved deals. The club administration's response to these will largely determine whether members, supporters and I can continue to take them seriously.

Ben Slater, as we all know, is being courted by Nottinghamshire. That was always likely to be so, given their scouting network runs all the way to Leicester and Derby. I still maintain that Ben won't walk into their first eleven and would be better served by staying at Derbyshire for at least one more contract. He isn't yet the finished article and needs to convert more of these fine fifties into terrific tons, but the talent is there. He has passed a thousand runs in all forms this summer and is fully deserving of an enhanced deal. My understanding is that such a deal is on the table and I sincerely hope that is the case.

The same goes for Matt Critchley. He signed a contract with the club that gave him the security of a four-year deal, which was great for a lad of his age. Yet performances like the one in this match will make potential suitors look at him and wonder whether it might be worth making an offer to buy out the remainder of his contract. It was signed and agreed before his leg spin developed this year and before he became an England Lion. I know we are a club that has to live within tight budgets, but we simply MUST fight off the predators and retain the talents of a young man who will be in the England side before he is 25. Remember, you read it here first...

Then there's Harvey Hosein. Now I have written before that I don't think him an outstanding wicket-keeper, but I do consider him a technically gifted batsman. He played two key innings in this match and should have a run in the middle order now. It is deserved and it is the only way to see if a longer, deal should be offered.

Let's not forget Luis Reece, desperately missed. He has been absent for a fair chunk of the season but had shown before the stress fracture that he had developed into a real deal all-rounder. Everyone and their kid brother wants such a player and the club needs to be proactive in retaining his services.

Then we look at other players. Based on his performances in the T20, most would want us to look at signing Calum MacLeod for next summer. Not so much the runs, but the way that he has made them have made me think that he would be worth a contract. It's not all been bucolic hoiks and slogs, there's been sound defence, classy cover drives and deft glances, things that make you think there is potential in him.

There's also the case for Chesney Hughes. I understood the reasoning behind letting him go, because he hadn't kicked on and was getting out cheaply far too often. But he has gone away, thought things through, looks as if he has lost a bit of weight and looks more sprightly as a result.

He has made three scores of over 150 for the second team now. The case for re-engagement grows strong and it is one being made by actions, not words.

Lastly there's the case for Charlie Hartley. I have seen him two or three times this summer and liked what I saw. He is a strapping big lad, bowls at a lively lick and nips it around. While accepting that the level is lower, I haven't seen many batsmen play him with ease and his record for Kent suggested that he can do it at senior level. Being perfectly honest, as I try to be, I would prefer to see him in the eleven next year to Hardus Viljoen, on this season's form.

I've not mentioned Anuj Dal and I haven't mentioned Matt McKiernan. Not all of these second team players can get deals but we need to ensure that top performance is rewarded and encouraged.

Ah, but this all costs money, I hear you say. Well, of course it does, which is why my ears pricked up rather more than might otherwise be the case when I saw that the Little Mix concert had sold out, just as the forthcoming ABBA night at the 3aaa County Ground has done.

I don't think my pretty good grasp of arithmetic has let me down, and my appreciation of the costings of such events in the past has not eluded me, so I would estimate that each of these nights should be generating a ballpark six-figure sum for the club. That's £200K-plus, to you and me. If they aren't, you would question why we are doing them and why we are employing thirteen off-field managers when cricketers aren't being signed or retained.

Unless we have staff who are taking inappropriately large, top-line bonuses from this figure - and we would need to know why, were that the case, at a club that is always in a state of near penury - that is a sum of money that could be reinvested in the playing side. That was the entire rationale of the development of the off-field activity at the club and should be its raison d'etre. 

That being the case, a lot of people will be looking at the announced figures with a realistic expectation that we will see player retentions and signings this winter.

I know I will.

8 comments:

  1. According to the Derby telegraph Peakfan, the little mix concert had over 16,000 attend. I believe the average cost of a ticket was fourty five pounds. That is a goodly sum to go into the clubs coffers.
    Let's hope it is all used for cricket.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Ben Slater might make the Nottinghamshire first eleven PF. They need and opener and Jake Libby hasn't proved the answer. However agree fully that another season or two at Derby would be more beneficial to him. Next season - and of course it always depends on conditions, I'd like to see something like
    Slater
    Godleman
    Reece
    Madsen
    MacLeod
    Hosein (and he needs to be wicketkeeper)
    Critchley
    Palladino
    Overseas bowler e.g. Olivier/Ferguson
    Viljoen (given that he's still contracted)
    Gleadell

    Alex Hughes as back up and for one days, Wilson or Smit as wicketkeeping cover and for one days. Hartley (go with what you say PF - I haven't seen him), Dal, McKiernan and Quadri.

    Excellent win in this game and a really good game - in fact some very competitive games in D2 this time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Still think you’re being harsh on Viljoen Peakfan. He averages 30 in the championship, has bowled a decent amount of overs (over 220) at under 3 runs per over, can hold a bat and gives us something different in the attack in the Championship. I know he can spray it around on days and will be high up on the wage bill but would much rather he be in the team rather someone like Rampaul who has been hugely underwhelming but that’s just my personal opinion!
    On the Slater issue am guessing we should know one way or the other on him as haven’t Notts put an offer on the table? If he’s going then there’s not much point in playing him from now onwards is there?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Paul Fitzpatrick25 July 2018 at 22:01

    Fully agree
    Invest in youth
    Grow and retain our own talent
    Hold it together with a couple of strong overseas and seasoned pros

    ReplyDelete
  5. I go back to when we paid Eddie Barlow 10k and he was, best paid overseas in the country.
    Yet was worth every penny.
    Wickets at 31 can be got from a solid county pro. As I said the other night, with responsibility and reward comes expectation of standards.
    Mine are quite high and by those standards he hasn't delivered.
    I would like to add 'yet' but we will see.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm really pleased to see you arguing these points so strongly. Today's win was one largely delivered by our young players, and while none of Slater, Hosein, Critchley or Qadri are the finished article, they and their successors are the compelling argument for our continued existence is a club, and the only long-term way of ensuring it. We will be castigated (and quite rightly so) across the cricketing community if we are can't offer improved contracts that enable players who want to stay to stay simply because the money has been spent on long contracts for aging and declining imports, whether or not they deliver short-term success.

    Of course, players will want to move for reasons other than money - the chance to test themselves and achieve at a higher level than they can expect to reach with Derbyshire, the higher profile they will get playing for a more prominent county, and perhaps given our current circumstances, a more stable environment in which to develop. If any of these factors are critical to any of our young players, more money on the table won't make a difference. But it was very encouraging to see Matt Critchley's very mature and thoughtful interview today. Though it stopped well short of committing his future to Derbyshire, it reflected a sensible appraisal of what he can do here that might not be possible elsewhere. He clearly wants to develop as a bowler, but while there are probably lucrative offers out there for him if he was available, I suspect that they would be for him as a batsman, and that he wouldn't be the front-line bowler that he is at Derbyshire. Fully developed, he will be close to unique in English cricket, a genuine all rounder bowling high quality leg spin, but only if he's able to bowl consistently.

    So we're agreed that the money needs to be found for competitive new contracts and extensions that reflect the changes in contribution. I'm not convinced, though by any of the suggestions about where the money will come from. I'm no expert on concert promotion but I expect (and hope) that the risk of poor attendance is carried by the promoter rather than the venue, and that the profit from a successful show will go to them rather than the club. I imagine that Derbyshire will be getting a flat venue rate regardless of how many tickets are sold, plus whatever they can earn from hospitality and parking, and will already have been budgeted for. Neither are we likely to be able to negotiate our way out of expensive or long-term contracts that aren't delivering results without incurring expensive compensation costs. I don't know enough about the various corporate roles around the club to know if they are needed and deliver value for money, but don't think they can easily be dismissed as management roles just because they have "manager" in their job titles. I suspect that most are front-linr delivery roles, with an imposing title simply to impress the clients.

    It might be that the exceptional weather will produce its own surplus, as I'm certain that no county will have budgeted for uninterrupted matches and balmy weather to bring out the crowds, but probably not enough for what we want to see in terms of new and improved contracts. So my suggestion is that as supporters and members, we make it clear that if the only way for Derbyshire to offer sufficiently competitive contracts that might keep or bring in young talent here is to do without one or more overseas player slots next season, it's a price we are prepared to pay. o keep

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ben Slater is 27 in 4 weeks and has played 64 first class matches, he is almost at the stage of having a great future behind him. I would fight to keep him though , not because he is some exceptional talent but because there are so few decent openers about he would be almost impossible to replace .

    ReplyDelete
  8. Notoveryet's last paragraph is very pertinent. I agree young academy talent should not be compromised for costly o/s imports. Isn't this where we were a couple of years ago, with young players coming through, Slater, hosien, Hughes, taylor, cotton, parkinson etc. and suplimented with young players from other counties critchley and thakor, some having fallen by the wayside for various reasons. If we can retain the young nucleus we currently have in the 1st XI and do what man utd did and regularly introduce at least 2 others into the squad each season, the players will get experience and develop (Hosien) I think the supporters would be happy with that. Obviously a prolonged stay in div 1 would assist in the retention of the young talent, but we need to get there first, is it chicken or egg? I did not see any of the match, but from what I hear we played as a team, celebrated each others success, hopefully the disinterested attitude we have seen over the previous weeks has been banished. Let's hope for a good run in to the rest of the season, obviously supporters want success, but 100% effort is all we can ask, and if we get that we will win matches as we want it more than the opposition.

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!