There are four outstanding candidates for the best "K" to represent Derbyshire.
Simon Katich had but one season in our colours, in 2007, yet finished it
with the highest average in a championship season by a Derbyshire
player (75.52). He was an accumulator, someone who, having got in,
rarely gave it away. By the same token, Katich was somewhat
one-dimensional and really couldn't play the one-day game, while T20 appeared anathema to him. For me, his season at the club will
be remembered for an outstanding championship season, but a limited
overs one that was, at best, average. That season's T20 campaign as a team was,
even with the benefit of hindsight, somewhat shambolic.
Adrian Kuiper was largely responsible
for our Refuge Assurance win in his one full season with us. A useful
medium pace bowler and good fielder, Kuiper's strength was that he could
hit a ball a country mile and did so with remarkable frequency.
Potentially close finishes that year were blown away by the brilliance,
yet common sense of his hitting, showing a man with good judgement of
the hittable ball. With Chris Wilkins he was the biggest hitter I have
seen in Derbyshire colours and that judgement made all the difference.
If a target looked like it was getting away from us, Kuiper simply
smacked a couple of boundaries and brought it within the realms of
respectability again. It sounds easy, but isn't - despite the South
African making it look so. Were he playing today he would earn a fortune
in T20.
For me, Kuiper is just shaded into second place by Karl Krikken, largely
by dint of service over a protracted period. By no standards would you
say that Krikk was a conventional wicket-keeper. His farmer in
wellingtons style, waddling between balls behind the stumps, was a long way
removed from the textbook crouching manner, while he looked almost like a
goalkeeper facing a penalty kick as the bowler's arm came over. Yet
Krikk missed little over 400 games, often taking catches, especially
down the leg side, that a more orthodox stance may not have allowed him
to get to. He had great hands and an even greater mouth, a never-ending
source of encouragement to bowlers from first ball to last.
As a batsman he was more than useful and should have scored more runs
than he did, though the Derbyshire side of his time was blessed with
greater batting talent than some of more recent vintage and Krikk often perished in the quest for quick runs. Having said all that, his greatest
contribution to Derbyshire cricket may be yet to come...
For me, though, the number one simply has to be Peter Kirsten, with Dean
Jones the best all-round batsman I have seen in Derbyshire colours.
Kirsten could accumulate and would often get to thirty before you
realised it and while you struggled to recall the strokes that got him
there. Yet once he was in, the strokes were dazzling and he had them
all. From late cuts to sweeps, "Kirst" played all round the wicket and
had lovely footwork. He was compact and composed at the crease and some
of us called him the "Little Don", reference to the dapper and
uncomplicated style that was reminiscent of the great Bradman.
His first two seasons saw him scrape past a thousand as he got used to
English wickets as a young player, but from 1980 to 1982 he was as good a
player as any in the country, recording 1895, 1605 and 1941
championship runs in successive seasons with averages of 63, 55 and 64. In
that 1982 season, with John Wright making 1830 runs, Derbyshire fans
enjoyed two batsmen at the peak of their form and batting brilliance that
had never been seen before, or since. Kirsten hit eight
centuries that season and Wright seven. Derbyshire were usually 195-1 or similar at the sports
bulletins, and there were matches when they hardly looked
like getting out. So good were they, indeed, that opponents started
setting ridiculous targets for us in the fourth innings of games, yet we
sometimes we still got them.
Kirsten
was a brilliant fielder and a useful off-spinner, at least until a knee
injury started to cause problems. A request for a year's break was met with a refusal
and his release was a startling example of the way the club has shot
itself in the foot too many times over the years. He was just 27 and
approaching his prime at the time.
He would have graced international cricket and, although past his peak,
at least made a dozen Test appearances when South Africa were
re-admitted to the fold. When he reached a century against England at
Headingley in 1994, I cheered more than if an Englishman had reached the
milestone. While his Test average of 31 in no way reflects his talent, considering he was 37 on
debut it was far from a disgrace.
57 centuries and 107 fifties; another ten centuries and 83 fifties in
one-day games - oh yes, Peter Kirsten could play alright. I consider it
an absolute privilege to have seen him in his prime and would be
astonished if I saw anyone comparable in our colours in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!