Saturday, 30 August 2025

Weekend thoughts

There is no cricket for Derbyshire next week, which has worked out quite nicely because my wife and I are taking the dogs with us once again to Berwick upon Tweed. The final coastal break of the summer and I am sure it will be as relaxing and enjoyable as always. 

I had another interview with Matt Rhodes of North Derbyshire Radio yesterday, during which we discussed the 50 over competition, the successes and things we need to work on. We also talked about the ECB plans for next summer. 

Honestly, I am astonished at the lack of leadership, clarity and transparency from an organisation supposedly leading the national sport. At this stage, the overhaul of the county game looks like reducing the workload by two T20 matches and possibly one four-day game, which I wouldn't expect to transform many lives. 

I don't get the issues. I appreciate there is a lot of travelling - though most of it these days is done by luxury coach - but they play less than in the old days and are paid better than they used to be for the privilege. 

I accept and frequently refer to the stresses and challenges of maintaining a standard and how it isn't as much fun as some people might expect it to be, when your form is scrutinised and a lack of it criticised. It is one thing playing cricket, but there is a different kind of stress when it is your livelihood.

Yet is it any more challenging than what is faced by other people? I worked in high profile roles for over thirty years, where I was paid for 35 hours a week, yet often ended up working far more than that. I had my travel to do, I had a family to support and bills to pay. It was stressful, but life generally tends to be. 

Fifty-six days of red ball cricket and around twenty of white ball per summer, if you play all the matches. Is that really so difficult in a 365-day year? We constantly hear about down time, about time to work on skills, but surely there is enough in the other 289 days?  At any time in my working life, if I had gone to my boss and said I would like less time doing my job and greater opportunity to do more training about it, the response would have been short and sweet. 

Pressure, as Keith Miller once famously said, 'is a Messerschmitt up your arse. Cricket is not'. Sage words from a man who experienced far more severe challenges in the Second World War. Similarly, such comments would have got short shrift from my Dad, who spent most of his working life down the pit. Pressure was ensuring you didn't do something silly and bring the pit face down on you. Stress was carrying out one of your mates, either dead or seriously injured. It gave me a sense of perspective that carried me through the tougher days of my working life. Whatever the challenges, they simply didn't compare. 

So while I understand the need to look after players, I don't think they are unduly worked these days. Talk to any old professionals, when fixture planning saw them traverse the country, even mid-match, then back to resume the main game in their own cars. There were more overs per day, more days of cricket per season. With three games to go, no Derbyshire player will get close to bowling five hundred overs, yet it was once commonplace for even the quicks to bowl a thousand. Les Jackson certainly did and in his second-last summer, in 1962, he exceeded over a thousand overs at the age of 41. Yet still saw it as better than even a surface job at the pit...

Logically, a reduction in the playing 'offer' should see a reduction in salaries and, if continued, could see a reduction in players. If you aren't playing so many matches, you don't need so many players, do you? People need to keep such things in mind. Be careful what you wish for...

So we now get to a situation where Derbyshire might gain promotion (I don't think so) but it might not matter, because the structure has changed.

It seems as if the lunatics have taken over the asylum. I'm getting old, like it or not, but to me everything seems to get unduly complicated and one is left with the impression that the left and right hands haven't a clue what the other is doing.

Eventually the dust will settle, the game will carry on and we will all silently despair at what is happening to the game that we love. 

Without doubt, it is desperately sad. 

Postscript: last night's interview can be heard here

I am on 34 minutes into the show.

22 comments:

  1. Well said Peakfan. That viewpoint needed expressing on behalf of the vast majority of supporters. The only valid reason for reduced cricket is if the players are putting themselves in physical danger. If that’s the case then give other squad players a go. We all feel pressure and stress at work - it’s whatever you personally allow/ are forced to put on yourself. We all have days where we perform at less than 100 percent. An argument from a current player is that stats prove that too much cricket reduces his performance by a couple of percent and this is affects his international aspirations. As a supporter, I’d happily watch professionals slip to 95 percent as long as it was a competitive game.

    With all the money coming the way of Counties, they should be offering more cricket to the public, not less.
    Craig

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fully agree with you Peakfan. Shouldn’t be reducing the amount of cricket for the reasons you give.
    One thing you haven’t mentioned is if we reduce the cricket does the membership go down in price? Not a chance!
    Also if we have less T20 games will we finally kick the Midlands mania “ home “ game into touch? Probably worked financially for the first two years but not this year with a crowd of less than 7k. And it wasn’t even on Sky !
    Paul

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well said, Peakfan. As you point out so well, all the reasons for reducing the amount of county cricket dont stand up to scrutiny. I have always found it striking that in Major League Baseball in America each of the 30 teams play 162 games in the regular season, which runs from early April to late September, then followed by the playoff system. A baseball game lasts about 3 hours. So parity would be for our county cricketers to play at least 80 days of cricket in 6 months? Just saying ... Bob Marsden

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ian from Suffolk30 August 2025 at 19:00

    Absolutely expertly written again peakfan. I am 60 years old and retire after 42 years of work at the start of next summer. I was looking forward to watching quite a lot more cricket in person but now I’m not so sure. The game seems so much to be drifting away from traditional fans like myself. I really struggle to even watch any highlights of England games and I don’t watch t20 or the rubbish that is the 100. The media coverage of the game now is so moronic it’s impossible to read. Every player is a great human being and so wonderful just for getting out onto the pitch. The stuff about more rest and more intense cricket is nonsense. The majority of players just want the easy money of the t20 or t10 leagues around the world. They don’t seem to want much rest from those. Like you said most bowlers now don’t bowl more then 500 overs a season. Many don’t get to even half of that. You get exceptions there are still county players who regularly play league cricket on Saturdays. But the elite ones now seem to want to play as little as possible whilst still being treated like heroes. When you sit and watch a county game you can sort of forget all that and still enjoy it but when you look at the bigger picture the game is along way off from the game I used to love. Here’s hoping we can squeeze another worthwhile 5 years out of the county championship because I really feel that’s the maximum amount of time left for it. Ps. Hope you have a lovely time away

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm 63 Ian and still at it mate. I ran my own business for years but the current political climate finished that off (not the place here to be political. I'm not, just stating a fact).
      Luckily, for I feared the scrapheap, far from it!
      My cricketing point being, if you make life easier, the next step has to be to make life easier again. It's human nature unfortunately. I honestly wouldn't advocate the work practices when I started, but I do fear we've gone far too far down the softly, softly approach. I think that is why employers are crying out for older workers - we still have that work ethic.
      Dave

      Delete
  5. Tim, Chesterfield30 August 2025 at 20:39

    I thought cricket clubs existing to play cricket.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Excellent post as usual. What I'll add is in the old days players would report for pre- season a couple of weeks before the season began. Nowadays they seem to start training months before the season and are probably jaded before it starts. So this argument of too much cricket doesn't hold much water with me. And like as already been said, if a player is tired they should ask for a break.

    ReplyDelete
  7. County cricket is digging it's own grave and I wouldn't bank on the Hundred money men to come up with the money again, in 10 years time. Kris

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would hope £28 million lasts longer than 10 years! The interest alone is a useful income.

      Delete
  8. It’s all very muddled thinking .A good business has clear mid term plans ,annual objectives and formal measured status to check progress along the way .
    It is 3 weeks from the end of the season and we don’t know what format of Championship or 50 over cricket we are playing next year .
    We are told there is too much cricket but I’m more concerned about the way cricket is being portrayed by the media .Its all short term ,bite size sound bites and all rather superficial .
    Tonight the Hundred Eliminator is a washout ,long into the night and the winners Trent Rockets have to play again tomorrow whilst Invincibles have rested up since BH Monday .Who plans this tripe ? Also with the influx of overseas monies I think the ECB are at risk of losing control of their own domestic planning .
    The Hundred needs to become a T20 ,120 ,100+20 ,24x5 franchise comp and surely it needs to have some connection with the counties and or regions for it to be sustainable otherwise it’s just a 6 week panini album and in 2 years nobody will remember who did what for which team .
    In terms of players ,they have flatter pitches ,bigger bats ,smaller boundaries,excellent facilities, sport psychologists ,improved logistics ,sponsorship deals ,multiple coaches ,agents and in some cases multi contracts .
    I respect the professional career ,best case, is potentially 10-15 years but it always has been !
    Not sure where it will all end up but I can see County Cricket being continually squeezed and marginalised and then the future funding model from the Hundred will be up for review ( 2027 from memory )

    ReplyDelete
  9. What should be the peak months of the season (July & August) it feels like the season has ended. When they quote days active the forget to say that half of a red ball game they are in the pavillion waiting to go out to bat.

    I think we need some sort of regular competition on a Sunday (possibly a T20) with a red ball game during the week.

    ReplyDelete
  10. A great analysis Steve. After a fifty year break from being able to follow cricket closely it has amazed me how little first team cricket is actually played. My last season in Derby was 1973 (junior member from 1967). My parents both worked full time and my memory tells me that I spent the majority of the school holidays watching Derbyshire with my friends. I think they played 7 days a week in those days. In retrospect that was too much and must have taken a lot out of the players. However, to have only four days of home cricket in August seems indefensible. How do the ECB expect to enthuse youngsters to play and watch when they have so little opportunity to see the players in the flesh? To consider further reducing the opportunities to watch seems perverse unless they are just interested in the Hundred (which like you I tried to watch but didn’t even make it to the start of play given the inanity of the build-up).

    I watched the interview with the CEO which YouTube here had dubbed into French. I think I may be the only one to have watched. I found it bizarre that in discussion of performance there was no talk of the urgent need to address the bowling. I trust that despite this work is going on behind the scenes to address the obvious bowling coaching issues and to get a suitable overseas quick.

    Have a great break in Berwick.

    Adrian, Nice

    ReplyDelete
  11. This is the snowflake generation.
    Everything affects their mental health, especially work.
    I wonder what Fred Trueman would have made of it all.
    We'll be lucky to have any 4 day cricket within 5 years.
    The sugar coating of instant short period cricket with lots of sixes is what the modern childish generation want.
    They don't eat their greens and don't have the staying power for 4 days of cricket.
    Us oldies don't generate enough income for the greedaholics who run cricket so our opinion matters not a jot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bore off Grandad.

      These sort of attitudes are even worse than the so called "snowflake generation".

      It's nothing to do with the generation. It's about money and "performance culture".

      Delete
    2. Let's keep it civil, gentlemen, please. Different opinions are fine and I have no issues with them, but please express them without being rude to others, thanks

      Delete
    3. Perhaps I should word my thoughts in a different way.
      The average age of spectators gets lower roughly in line with the duration of a game.
      Generally speaking there isn't enough interest in 4 day cricket amongst younger people.
      This will surely have an adverse affect on the longer game.
      We have seen a gradual reduction in the number of 4 day games played and it looks like there will be a further reduction next year.
      Unless there is a radical change I cannot see this situation changing.
      By the way, I fully admit to being a bore but I'm not a Grandad.

      Delete
  12. Our new floodlights won't get used much, if they carry on at this rate. Maybe we can have more concerts, to compensate for lack of cricket, at a cricket ground. Kris

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ian from Suffolk31 August 2025 at 22:04

      That might not be the joke it’s intended to be. Look At Lancashires use of old Trafford. Cricket is now very secondary to concerts and other events. If you ever see the Lancashire live stream it starts with a dreadfully made bit with David Lloyd talking about how much the past means to Lancashire cricket club. Whilst nearly all the older members say all the club does now is promote corporate events concerts and the 100

      Delete
  13. I listened to the CEO interview and for the most part found it frank & free of MA platitudes. He was open about any absence of MA during the 'other' tournament and explained, mostly to my satisfaction, the reason it was out of the counties control.

    I would have liked MA to have tucked into his 'contacts book' and found a strike bowler for the last three CC games; surely we can afford a single month's contract and we are one short of an O/S player.

    There is a very good T20 side among the wider squad [I have put thoughts elsewhere on the blog] with, in terms of batting, only the need for a replacement for Whiteley; a younger 'biffer/finisher' currently languishing in a seconds dressing room in one of the other counties. However, the absolute first recruit needs to be a strike bowler for both the 'death' overs and leadership of the bowling unit.

    The same O/S strike bowler is a must for the CC. We have a plethora of good all-rounders but really struggle to bowl teams out. I would have Haydon & Aitchison rotating next season, Chappell maybe rotating with a fit again Moore, but the key is to have that O/S strike bowler, fit and raring to take wickets.

    My XI would look like:
    Came, Jewell, Montgomery, Madsen*,Guest, Reece, Andersson/Dal, Chappell, Aitchison, O/S, Morley

    I had my doubts about Came, but he has showed in recent one day games that he can up his strike rate when necessary, besides I suspect we wont see Lloyd next season. I wouldn't discount Basra or Donald contributing over 4-days.

    Thoughts by PJS

    ReplyDelete
  14. I was quite impressed with Donald, in his 4 day return. No massive scores, but he liked Iike he wanted to be there and bat time. Came is a slow starter, but good once in. Kris

    ReplyDelete
  15. The lack of fixtures at weekends is bothering me. What is the point of renewing my membership when we have weekend after weekend with nothing happening?

    I know it's the school holidays, but even in the devalued 50-Over competition we repeatedly had fixtures on weekdays.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Postscript .. Just watched England bowled out for 131 in 24.3 overs . Well the 16.4 cricket has worked a treat in terms of player readiness for international cricket against a SA team who are well organised and have just had a mini series in Australia .. Hioefully the ECB can join the dots up .. oh well TV off , back to the gardening

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!