Sunday 11 June 2023

Derbyshire v. Yorkshire day one

Derbyshire 111 (du Plooy 28, Fisher 5-30, Coad 3-28)

Yorkshire 272-5 (Malan 76*, Masood 67, Lyth 48, Reece 2-37, Watt 2-42)

Yorkshire lead by 161 runs

Every year, Derbyshire supporters look forward to the  Chesterfield festival and anticipate a keenly fought game. This year was no exception.

And then that happens.

Notwithstanding that the toss was a good one to win, the home team's effort was pretty anaemic today. Indeed, on a day when stars of yesteryear were in attendance for the former players day, the cynical might say you could have got an eleven together from those players who might have resisted a little better. 

Madsen and Came got good balls early, but some of the rest did themselves no favours by playing across the line to a moving ball. I found myself pining for the days of Alan Hill, Tony Borrington, David Steele and others, who at the very least would have shown them the makers name on the bat, played through the V and made the bowlers work for the wickets. It wasn't easy, but surely not 'bowled out in 32 overs' difficult?

We were poor today and to be all out in the last over before lunch told everything you need to know about a pretty insipid, spineless display. 

Du Plooy and Thomson resisted better than most, but the quality of the batting was put into perspective as Yorkshire raced into a lead of over 150 runs by the end of a rain-shortened day.

Derbyshire went with two spinners, which might have been a decent tactic had we mounted a big enough first innings score to bring them into play in the final innings. Yorkshire had five seamers and could rotate them, which they did well. They were disciplined and impressive, everything we were not.

As it is, unless it rains for the next three days, this game could be over by the close of play tomorrow.

I'm not normally negative, but the Derbyshire attack, with the exception of Mark Watt, went for six or seven an over, including Suranga Lakmal, who we have been hoping to see on such a wicket. It is an understatement to say that the Sri Lankan has been a major disappointment. I suspect a Groenewald, Welch or Palladino would have had a field day.

Eighteen no balls didn't help the Derbyshire cause and it was perhaps the most desperate day of a season where we thought we had already reached the bottom.

I am still prepared to give Mickey Arthur the opportunity to turn this around, but next season is a big one for him, the winter ahead of us perhaps the key factor in whether he will be the success that we hoped for, or just another false dawn

I hope his plans are in motion already, because on the basis of today, major surgery is required.

26 comments:

  1. As bad a days' performance that I can ever remember. And I've been watching since the 1970's ! Also 2 of the most ineffective overseas recruits we've ever had. And over the years we've had some dross !

    ReplyDelete
  2. We need an overseas strike bowler who can take wickets, and if not, at least keep the run rate under control. It seems that Lakmal can do neither. Surely either Chappell or Zaman Khan would have been a better option.
    Is Mickey Arthur currently in the country or back in Pakistan...?
    Ian. South Africa.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Chesterfield blue11 June 2023 at 19:45

    Absolutely garbage and as you say Peakfan this could be over after two days which would be inexcusable. This season has been awful so far, we seem worse than ever and with a coach like Mickey Arthur in charge, it's just baffling how bad we've been.
    If we carry on this vain I can see Mickey being on his way before the season is out. Pathetic today Derbyshire and you should be ashamed of yourselves

    ReplyDelete
  4. Micky Arthur is hardly the first coach ever to struggle at Derbyshire. And who knows if it would be any better if he didn’t also have the Pakistan gig at the moment. But the optics of this are dreadful for Derbyshire. I share your view about giving Arthur the opportunity to turn things around Peakfan - but it’s frustrating when we don’t know if he is focused this evening on Derbyshire’s play tomorrow, or on a Zoom call to the PCB.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The pace bowling attack didn’t look strong enough before a ball was bowled. Aitchison doesn’t look as effective as he did 18 months ago and agree with what you say above re Lakmal. Dal over Lamb would have made far more sense.

    They applied constant pressure when they bowled, Watt aside we did the opposite, our bowling economy was awful. A really disappointing day. It feels like season over.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Not great but Yorkshire bowled well. This season is effectively over before the A Levels have been sat (let’s face it will be a miracle to get deep in the Royal London shorn of those off to play T16.4).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They bowled really well but why did our fast bowlers take no notice and at least attempt to replicate it?

      Delete
  7. Embarrassing. We can but hope that we take the remaining Yorkie wickets cheaply then show some mettle when batting again so at least this match goes into a 3rd day. An awful day for Derbyshire. Chesterfield deserves better.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Robert Hepworth11 June 2023 at 20:20

    As a Glossop boy reared on the fighting qualities of Derek Morgan, our own Harold Rhodes, and the two Jacksons etc I just feel ashamed that the current Derbyshire team are prepared even to draw their wages after such an appalling performance in front of their own supporters. As a teenager I regularly visited Chesterfield as well as Buxton and Yorkshire venues to watch us compete with our traditional opponents next door. I don’t recall us capitulating like this against Yorkshire teams which were usually stronger than us. Today’s opponents were bottom of the table - astonishingly even worse than us so far. We don’t seem to have one decent fast bowler. I know the mines are long closed, but why are Derbyshire totally incapable of identifying any home grown fast bowlers of genuine quality ? Are they trying to do so ? If they carry on like this they risk losing their First Class Status.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Well that was a hope crushing display to put before our former players, paying folk of Chesterfield and those like me watching on line. Been watching our lads since 1969 but this was the worst. Heading for the bottom and another season blown by early June. Could George Scrimshaw earn his wages and play 4 day cricket? Something radical is needed and hard choices made with our slim resources available. Goodnight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Totally agree about Scrimshaw. He should have been playing along with Chappell and Dal. Without these 3 our attack was as effective as peashooters against heavy artillery.

      Delete
  10. The Derbyshire fans around me seemed to be blaming the wicket and there is absolutely nothing wrong with it! Fisher and Coad are quality players in div 2 and it showed. We seemed to pick a team to bowl last and that won't happen now! Kris

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wonderful venue, wonderful weather but, oh dear, a woeful performance with bat and ball. Maybe things might have been different if we had won the toss but that is doubtful on todays performance.

    The only highlight, for me, was shaking the hand of that Derbyshire legend, Bob Taylor.

    One can only hope that the players turn up tomorrow.

    Nudger Needham

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We said we would wanted to bat had we won so no difference

      Delete
  12. My home town fixture and it’s one of my favourite places on gods earth especially when the sun is shining but that was pathetic !! A complete let down and probably going to lose to the Yorkers in 2 days. Already written this season off after it promised so much. Gutted

    ReplyDelete
  13. Terrible. Lakhmal taken off after 3 overs of his opening spell, and going for about six an over on the day as a whole, on a wicket where their seamers had blasted our batting apart. Pretty clueless captaincy. Terrible batting. I saw Haider at Headingley last Sunday and hoped he’d finally hit some form. Today it was back to single figure dismissals. And that attack - how could it ever take twenty wickets to win a match? So weak, yet Chappell was at the ground - apparently he’s been ‘rested’ as he put it. Shambolic. I hope things pick up but today it feels raw!
    Andy T

    ReplyDelete
  14. When Mickey was appointed, he said it was a three-year project, with the aim of winning at least one trophy. Last season was good, and it gave us a platform to build on.

    However, this season - so far - , we seem back in Dave Houghton territory. Such abysmal batting today and, Watt and Thomson aside, poor bowling as well. You can't blame the wicket. It was the same for both sides.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I haven't heard Mickey Arthur's reaction to that batting performance but I know what Denis Smith would have said
    in no uncertain terms. Such a lack of basic defensive technique and application.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That takes me back,he coached me as a young trialing.his stock phrase was .I could blow it harder than that. Malb

      Delete
    2. All very quiet on the Mickey Arthur front, quick to get on twitter after a t20 victory, very very quiet at other times

      Delete
  16. I don't think we have learned anything new here. Concerns were raised previously about Lakmal's ineffectiveness, Haidar is a work in progress and will not be here if and when he does progress. We have a number of players who unfortunately are not good enough and will not be at the club much longer. Masood's sheer weight of runs last season engendered confidence throughout the team, and ensured at the very least that we didn't lose many games.

    Again, one of the issues we have which Steve raised in his recent blog is that a number of our players are only either suitable for, or selected as, white ball players but are presumably on full time contracts. This is far from ideal for a club with limited resources. It was interesting to hear Scrimshaw say after the Notts T20 that he was ' available and happy to play red ball cricket' but didn't think he would be playing at Queen's Park bearing in mind the upcoming T20's later in the week. So, are we 'managing his work load' at the moment? Will he play red ball later in the season? Is he actually on a full time contract? I suspect the answer to the letter is yes, given that he says he is available to play.

    We do need some answers to which direction the club wants, or is aiming, to go. Do we concentrate on white ball cricket and accept we are a 2nd division championship team? If that isn't the case and I'm sure MA wouldn't accept that, we really have to clear the decks of players who are either not good enough or not considered multi format players. Or will it become the norm for counties to have a number of players on white ball contracts who are happy with such a situation, along with hoping for a gig in the Hundred and any other competition which comes along 🤔

    I would hope, and expect, to hear more from MA in the next few months as he will surely have seen enough of the current squad to be making the decisions required to move the club forward. Here's hoping..

    ReplyDelete
  17. Chesterfield blue12 June 2023 at 11:52

    If Mickey's heart isn't in this job we need to be looking at a replacement asap. I just can't believe we would be this poor if he was in charge of daily coaching sessions with this current squad. Something isn't right and we need to be told after this inevitable latest hammering

    ReplyDelete
  18. I feel changing room isn't right due to Godelman situation

    ReplyDelete
  19. I have come to the conclusion that the management board care very little regarding the results on the field the only thing that they are bothered about is profit they probably don't give a hoot about the county championship they are more interested in filling the ground for T20 matches and how much money can they rinse out of people while they are there no doubt thay will be rubbing their hands at the prospect of a full house at Queen's Park on Sunday I have been a member for forty years and I am very much aware about what's happened in the past at Derbyshire and understand that the club has to be run properly but it's a cricket club and the cricket must come first

    ReplyDelete
  20. Is MA oblivious to the many requests from loyal DCCC supporters for a 'progress' report on his 3-year project.

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!