The hugely prolific and highly respected Shan Masood has gone, as have Dustin Melton and Mikey Cohen. The last two were players not without talent and capable of some fine spells, but injury issues and their South African roots conspired against them when it came to any cost/benefit analysis.
In their place we now have a very good seam bowler of genuine potential in Zak Chappell, a middle order batsman of power in Matt Lamb, spinner Mark Watt for the full season and now Haider Ali for most, if not all of it too. Not to mention securing some of our best young talent to improved, longer-term deals.
For what it is worth, I think the batting looks very good. An article in the Cricketer suggested Ali may open the batting in 50-over and 4-day cricket, which surprised me but may be part of his development plan. I could more understand that rationale in the 20 over game, but perhaps Luis Reece and either Harry Came or Tom Wood will get the nod, with Ali entrusted the role of late innings pyrotechnics.
A sign of a good squad is when you can't honestly name a first choice eleven to start the season. I genuinely can't this year. I think there are players who are guaranteed playing, bar for injuries and the rest will need consistency of performance or rotation of seam bowlers to play.
I would have a go at the following:
Reece
Ali
Guest
Madsen
du Plooy
Lamb
Dal
Chappell
Aitchison
Conners
Lakmal
But I could just as easily make a case for others. It is a position of strength when one looks at four very good seam bowlers and ponder which one is omitted if they are all fit and a spinner warrants inclusion. Which, with Dal and Reece in the side, I think should be the case. I have never been convinced in the need to have four, even five seamers in an attack, if you are picking the correct first three.
Equally, which spinner gets the nod? Watt has the international experience, Thomson can bat, as can McKiernan, but which is more likely to take wickets when the opposition doesn't have to slog? Decisions..
The side above doesn't include Godleman, Wood or Came, good players all. Nor does it include George Scrimshaw or Nick Potts, or for that matter Archie Harrison, who I suspect will enjoy game time this year as an all-rounder of considerable promise. This is how far we have come in just one year under Mickey Arthur.
With so many players playing for their future, supporters will expect intensity of performance and competition for places like never before.
It should make for compelling and memorable viewing.
Postscript: I have finally got around doing a draw from those kindly sponsoring the blog. My sincere apologies to to everyone for the delay, but there is plenty going on at present.
I have made contact with those who have won and thank everyone for their kindness and generosity.
Another draw will take place in due course.
Very interested to see how Lakmal fares this season, he's like a new signing as he barely played last season. Really looking forward to April and I'm optimistic it's going to be a great campaign
ReplyDeleteMy only quibble would be that the line-up includes six seamers (including Reece and Dal) and no full-time spinner. It might be a case of rotating the seamers in order to include a spinner. So Watt or McKiernan for Aitchison, for example.
ReplyDeleteOne potential weakness we have is batting with a long tail. We need to be able to bat down to 9. Neither Connors or Lakmal are handy with the bat, and I'm yet to be convinced that Ben Aitchison can score runs on a regular basis. Perhaps, though, Zak Chappell, who as a first class average of 20, can be someone who can put 30 or 40 on the board when required. McKiernan averages 25 in first class games and 30 in List, so he'd be perfect to come in at 9.
Anyway, it's good to have these dilemmas. I can't wait for the new season.
Promising signs for the new season. I just hope that Derby pitches prove more conducive to results than the string of draws last year.
ReplyDeleteLeus DuPlooy with another MOM performance 81 not out today in the SA T20 batting against Joffra Archer Sam Curran etc. Looked classy 👍
ReplyDelete