Monday 7 October 2019

Stumbling block to Lace deal?

It would appear that I and a few others may have been premature in suggesting that Tom Lace will be at Derbyshire next summer.

It may still happen, but a Google search in a quiet moment this weekend revealed that the player is contracted to Middlesex until the end of next season.

That Derbyshire want to sign him is almost certainly a given. Not just the runs he made, but the way that he made them suggested that Tom is a player to watch, one who thrived under the tutelage of Dave Houghton.

It's a funny game. Tom didn't score too many in his Derbyshire Premier League appearances last summer, whereas Tom Wood racked up the runs in his time honoured way. It was the same the year before, when Lace averaged 25 for Middlesex seconds, while Wood was just under 40 for us.

Yet Lace took to county cricket as a duck to water, registering three centuries, the support of Billy Godleman and Wayne Madsen key in his development. Indeed, if you look back at the footage of when he reached a century for the first time, against Glamorgan, you can see his captain, importantly at the crease with him, celebrating almost as much as the player himself  as they ran the run to get him to the landmark.

Such altruism is indicative of the positive culture that Dave Houghton and Billy have engendered at the club. It was evident again after Luis Reece reached a sublime century against Sussex, when Godleman gave him the longest hug I have ever seen on a cricket pitch. It showed a captain who cared, a club that had a tight and supportive dressing room. Who wouldn't want to play in such an environment? Reece's willingness to commit his next four years to the county last week spoke volumes.

I know Tom loved his summer in Derby and has made good friends. If the decision was solely his, I am sure that he would be signing on the dotted line at the earliest opportunity. That he has developed under Dave Houghton's coaching is beyond dispute.

But it isn't his decision alone.

IF he has requested to be released from the final year of his contract, my guess is that we should hear something by the end of this month. Stuart Law and Angus Fraser will want to move on with their own team building plans and Law has already said that he wants to bring in 'greater experience' to a Middlesex side that under-performed this summer.

Of course, that doesn't fit especially well with offering greater opportunity to a 21-year old with a handful of first-class matches under his belt. They could, however, insist that he stays as an option in a batting line up that has lost Paul Stirling (now classed as overseas) and looks set to lose Dawid Malan. Rumours suggest an Australian batsman coming in as captain, which would fill one of those positions, while there are plenty of candidates for the other within the club.

We all know, of course, that contracts have been cancelled by plenty of counties around the country when a player is keen to move. Tom doesn't strike me as the sort of player to go in a huff if he doesn't get his way, but the point of keeping a player who wants to be somewhere else, and feels such a move perhaps best for his development is debatable.

What might happen is that Lace starts the summer at Middlesex, but is then made available for loan if seen then as surplus to requirements. Houghton would undoubtedly be interested at that point, as I am sure he is now, but the beneficiary might be Tom Wood.

If Lace were at Middlesex until, say, June then Wood might be a handy batsman to have on the staff until that point. Equally, were Godleman, Madsen and Reece to be picked up for The Hundred, then Wood again could be a more than useful player to step up.

It is all up in the air, but I suspect we will know more before the fireworks night party at the 3aaa County Ground.

3 comments:

  1. It was my understanding, and I thought everyone was clear, that Lace had another year on his contract. I recall reading (though I can't find out where) that Houghton said that, notwithstanding this, he was having discussions with Lace and Middlesex and was hopeful of signing him, as he was aware of where he was likely to be in the Middlesex pecking order compared to the opportunities he'd be likely to get at Derby. That suggests that Middlesex weren't necessarily going to stand in lace's way if he decided to ask for a release from his contract, so it's probably down to what he chooses to do on the basis of any assurances he gets from Middlesex about his future.

    With Stirling and possibly Malan leaving, and the desperately under-achieving Gubbins, Eskinazi and Holden perhaps no longer as assured of their places as they appear to have been this year, plus the attractions of playing at Lords right under the benign gaze of Ed Smith, I'd be surprised (though delighted) if Lace opts for Derbyshire. Still, Middlesex are making odd decisions, and if they choose to import a couple of batsmen as Stuart Law seems to be indicating, it may well be to our benefit.

    I note the discussion about Rayner in previous posts, but the Middlesex release I was more interested in is Tom Barber, given our need to reinforce our fast bowling. He's left arm, genuinely fast but tends to be very erratic, and has now failed to kick on at two counties, and at nearly 25, perhaps has only one chance left. Rather reminiscent of Mark Footitt's situation when he came to us, I'd be very inclined to have a look at him, although the fact that we've already taken on one wild fast bowler in Melton despite Dave Houghton no doubt being aware from his Middlesex connections of the possibility of Barnber's availability might suggest it's not on the cards.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I must have read up on Tom's contract situation but it had slipped my mind, notoveryet.

    Not so sure that no opportunity at Lord's is better for him, and several players there have failed to progress and have gone back since DH left.

    I thought about Barber but discounted it for the reasons you refer to. We are broadly speaking building a disciplined attack and if we were bringing in another seamer I might be inclined to go north.

    Toby Lester is out of favour at Lancashire, was farmed out to Warwickshire on loan and has seen Luke Wood brought in for next summer, presumably ahead of him and bowling similarly.

    He too, like Lace has a year on his contract, but I think he would be allowed to leave.

    6'4, 26 and left arm fast medium, he would be a good fit for us.

    If we go for anyone, Lester would be my pick of affordable options. If he did as well as Luis Reece we'd not complain...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wonder if George Scott leaving Middlesex for Gloucestershire reduces the chances of Tom Lace signing for Derbyshire?

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!