One swallow doesn't make a summer and one defeat doesn't ruin a T20 campaign. But Derbyshire need to make some key decisions ahead of the game against Nottinghamshire at Derby on Friday evening.
Let's face it, few expect us to win and we don't have a great track record against our under-achieving neighbours. They will probably do well in this competition, because they appear to have spent the summer playing T20 with the bat and doing appallingly in the county championship.
They should win, given their massively different resources, and probably will. Yet we can give ourselves a half-decent shout of competing better than we did last night by getting some key decisions right.
Much as I respect Billy Godleman as a cricketer, a man and a decent captain in other formats, we missed a trick in not giving the role to Daryn Smit for T20. When Dominic Cork made the decision to select him for this competition ahead of Harvey Hosein, he should have made the even bolder decision to give him the captaincy. Everyone I have spoken to who has played with him has only praise for his shrewd and innovative captaincy. What he has done with a young second team, largely made up of trialists, has been remarkable and his reputation preceded him in that respect, both from his time in South Africa and as a highly respected professional at Ramsbottom, where he will return as professional next year.
A good captain can get ten per cent more from his team, individually and collectively. I fear that Corky won't change things now, but for me it was an opportunity missed. Whether there was a concern over making the second team captain the first team skipper is neither here nor there. A team without a second overseas has to find advantage where it can, and this would have been an easy win, for me.
Billy is a fine batsman, but he is developing a reputation as a poor and sometimes indecisive runner. In a team with two outstanding batsmen who can score quickly, in Madsen and du Plooy, it is self-defeating to run one of them out, especially when Wayne looked to be in fine form last night. I don't know how you fix that, but if Billy is the self-appointed man to bat through the innings, he has to score more when he has the strike, not get bogged down, like last night. A run a ball is the bare minimum for the 'anchor' role.
Then there's the Darren Stevens signing. The jury is out on whether this was an inspired move or a panic buy, but he needs a good performance. Of course he has been an outstanding cricketer for many years, but in two matches he has scored five runs and bowled three overs for 33 runs. Both Alex Hughes, our most successful T20 bowler last year, and Anuj Dal could better that, AND improve the fielding.
Maybe Friday is too soon to press the button for the ejector seat, but at some point the case for Hughes, at least, will be undeniable. The same goes for Logan van Beek. He needs to show that Chesterfield wasn't a fluke, because the runs I thought he might offer, based on his record, don't appear likely and my concerns over him going for 11/12 an over came to fruition last night, perhaps not for the last time.
Dominic Cork was critical about the bowlers this morning and rightly so. With one short boundary, your lines need to be bang on, just as Ravi Rampaul showed. Our hosts had three international bowlers and that difference told. With eight bowlers, a captain will hope five of them get the basics of line and length right, but when they don't, you have nowhere to go.
My conclusion? Well, we keep working, try to find that extra ten per cent and deliver the basics better. There will be times, in a tough group, where the basics just aren't enough and a better team gives you a good hiding. For what it is worth, were I picking the side for Friday, it would be as follows:
Godleman
Critchley
Madsen
Du Plooy
Reece
Hudson-Prentice
Hughes
Dal
Smit (captain)
Watt
Rampaul
In the field we would give ourselves a better chance and there is greater depth to the batting too. Nine bowlers as well, so we can mix it up.
It still might not be enough, but I'd be keen to hear your thoughts, as always.
Sadly looks as good as it gets Peakfan, but there's such a lack of quality in that side it's frightening. I think we'll get smashed tomorrow, probably by eight to ten wickets if we bat first and eighty or ninety runs if we bat second. The difference between the two sides is a country mile, a bit like Chesterfield facing Manchester City. Stranger things have happened though, do good luck to the lads.
ReplyDeleteLooks a fair shout peakfan. I would bring yozza in for van beek as we improve the batting considerably and the bowling to some significance. I would give Stevens 2 more matches to find his feet. We are nearly in August, van beek is not good enough, phrase it as kindly as you like, however the evidence is there. Yes Godlmans running is a concern but last night apart he has largely been outstanding with the bat.
ReplyDeleteI too would have given Smit the captaincy when it became clear he was going to play. Billy could then have concentrated on not running people out and not arguing with umpires (though I could see why he was aggrieved at one not given as a wide).
ReplyDeleteI'd though be inclined to give the same side another go on this occasion. Van Beek bowled well enough at Queens Park to have a little more in the bank than Stevens. If DS is dropped we might as well send him back as his brief career with us will join a very long list of those who have come and gone with zero impact. I'm going to be charitable though and predict he's 'due one' though whether it's with bat or ball I'm not sure.
I'd like to think we can beat Notts but we're up against it with bat and ball in truth. They have better players which is tough to overcome and we will need 5 or 6 players to play extremely well to have a chance. Last night we had two who performed exceptionally and little else.
I disagree regarding van Beek as with the limited resources available he at least offers pace and potential wicket taking ability. I feel it essential both he and Watt play well which gives three bowlers with Ravi. Hughes would offer the fourth and then some combination would have to bowl the other 4. I hope you are right about Stevens being due one but my money is on another miserable failure.
ReplyDeleteThink if Stevens place he has to perform or move aside for Hughes. Yozza is at least as good a better and bowler and offers loads more in the fielding department in which to be honest along with Billy, Ravi, Watt and Stevens is starting to look abit like a club side
ReplyDeleteChaddesden Jim