Friday, 20 June 2025

Derbyshire v Lancashire Vitality Blast Game Eight

Lancashire 243-7 (Wells 83, Hurst 59, Jennings 33, Livingstone 33, Chappell 2-44)

Derbyshire 163 (Jewell 65, Chappell 31, Ghazanfar 28, Green 3-16)

Lancashire won by 80 runs

After the excitement of two wins last weekend, Derbyshire were firmly put in their place tonight by Lancashire. 

It was, as I wrote last night, a considerable step up in the standard of opposition. Half of the visiting side had played international cricket and the gulf in class was visible to all. While capable of beating anyone on their night, Derbyshire  need eight or nine players at their best to do so and were not remotely close to that tonight. Mainly because the Lancashire big guns turned up and blew us away.

I don't think that Derbyshire bowled especially badly, although the figures of some of them don't bear close inspection. It was more that they were not allowed to bowl well. The game plan appears to be that Ghazanfar has to take early wickets and it seems that opponents are now playing him as an offspinner, who occasionally turns one the other way. He remains a handful, but without pitches supporting turn, there is a limit to what he can do.

Neither Aitchison nor Chappell did much wrong, but they still went for ten an over and with boundaries that were not overly expansive, the risk of being outhit was always there. Lancashire hit SEVENTEEN sixes, so it is fair to say they managed it. It was the second highest score conceded by Derbyshire at Derby, just behind Hampshire in 2017, when Shahid Afridi went berserk.

Wells, who must want to carry the Derbyshire bowling around in his kit bag, did the damage again, well supported by Jennings. Hurst made the equal fastest fifty for Lancashire in this competition  and Livingstone hit merrily until smartly stumped by Guest. The Derbyshire ground fielding wilted in the face of the onslaught, but it was hardly surprising.

Chasing 244 to win, my expectations at the break were zero and so it transpired. Donald and Jewell started well, but the departure of the former saw the fall of three quick wickets, Madsen first ball, well held by the diving Jennings at cover.

Patel hit it straight up in the air, as he is always likely to do given his approach, Guest edged to the keeper and only Jewell suggested permanence and gave a semblance of respectability to the score with a battling half century, a decent net for Sunday. Chappell struck some powerful blows, as did Ghazanfar, but there was far too much to do when twelve an over are needed from the outset.

It was a rude awakening for Derbyshire. They cannot afford to lose the first five games and the reality is that this will not be the last defeat in this tournament. There are obvious weaknesses in the side and that comes down to a range of factors. No one can be happy with 2-6, but it reflects a competition where they have played some good cricket, but nowhere near enough. 

One final comment on the stream. I have praised it over the past couple of summers, but the standard slipped tonight, in keeping with events on the field. The 'ghosting' of images as bowlers ran in, the wrong angle being shown and wickets being missed was not what we have become accustomed to from a very good team. There was too great a focus on events beyond the boundary edge and there's only so many times you  can watch Freddie the Falcon throwing T shirts to the crowd.

Derby has seen some memorable nights in this competition over the years. Tonight wasn't one of them.

Thank goodness the red ball is back, starting on Sunday.

31 comments:

  1. Tim, Chesterfield20 June 2025 at 22:05

    A fair summary. A belting wicket really and chasing even a 'big' score of 190-200 might have helped us keep out heads as after 3 overs we were 'on track' as tenuous as it felt. Glad I didn't go tonight! Hopefully the proper cricket gets us back to our best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ten an over is doable with a good start and wickets in hand. 12 is nosebleed territory and very few sides in the world game could chase such a total successfully.

      One to consign to the bin, quickly...

      Delete
  2. Chesterfield Blue20 June 2025 at 22:07

    A battering of all batterings tonight. We're simply nowhere near strong enough to compete consistently in this format. There needs to be a big rethink after this campaign has finished as we really need to get this squad right. Several players simply aren't good enough, I'm not going to name them we can all work out which ones. Out of that line up tonight I would keep four for next seasons t20 , two of them our overseas players. Not at all surprised by losing tonight, but it really shouldn't have been mentioned against boys

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chesterfield Blue21 June 2025 at 08:51

      Men

      Delete
    2. I think you need to take into consideration contracts, before suggesting widespread changes. Not to mention budget, because we don't have enough to attract all of the players that we need.

      And I suspect Ghazanfar will get a more lucrative offer than we could afford for next year. Even if the congested international calendar allowed him to take part at all

      Delete
    3. It's fine CB I had worked that one out after reading it a couple of times!

      Delete
  3. I can only echo your last sentence. I really think that people like me who only really like red ball cricket have only got 2 or 3 seasons left before we will struggle to love the game anymore. If the championship is reduced to 10 games and most are still in April May and September it really will be debatable if it’s worth watching anymore. Some of the best batsmen to watch Rory burns. Nick gubbins. Sam robson and rob yates are not injured but haven’t played a single t20 game for there respective clubs which I think says everything about the lack of finesse and skill in t 20 baseball

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed totally - please remember a name Anon!

      Delete
    2. Sorry it was Ian from Suffolk

      Delete
    3. One thing I have noticed is that there doesn’t seem to be many 2’s or 3’s on the county ground anymore it’s either a 1 or a boundary the days of a 3 anywhere at Derby are gone

      Delete
  4. Another very poor performance. Our pace bowling has been abject in this tournament.

    Chappell economy of 10.9, Aitchison a smidge over 10 and Brown a shocking 11.6. FHP and Andersson not as bad at just over 9 but not great.

    We've got no chance when our bowlers are getting caned like this.

    Batting is paper thin, nobody has scored runs consistently. To be honest though if Madsen was in the usual form we've come to rely on then we'd have a player for the others to play around so maybe an element of bad luck.

    After the 4 day games I'd say time to give Came and Wagstaff the remaining t20 games in the top order and give Potts at least more than 1 over. Hawkins worth a look as well. Rest the old boys.

    Donald
    Jewell
    Came
    Whiteley
    Wagstaff
    Andersson
    Guest
    Hawkins
    Chappell
    Ghazanfar
    Potts

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes the decline of Madsen in this competition has highlighted how so often he has papered over cracks in the past.

      I agree, time for opportunities to be given

      Delete
    2. Fully expect Patel and Whiteley to continue to feature. Completely pointless with nothing to play for.

      Delete
  5. Went down tonight. I think our performance was best summed up as 'sub optimal'. Lancashire different gravy completely.

    Praise to the off field operation. A decent crowd in, stewards on the car park and gates doing a grand job. The bars were busy and the food outlets all doing a roaring trade. A good atmosphere for a summer evenings cricket!

    I fear the T20 is almost dead rubbers now. We move on to the CC hoping we get 'back on it'

    Andy

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think you give the opposition too much credit, our bowling at times was poor (how many on side wides, full tosses?). Chappell and Ghazanfar showed that it could be done with the bat, why wasn't the top order (Jewell excepted) as unforgiving to a a good but not outstanding Lancs outfit. Regards, Adrian, Chesterfield

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There were only 6 wides, Adrian, which isn't that bad. Too many yorkers were missed and became full tosses, but you still need to put them away and Wells and Hurst were terrific for them.

      Delete
  7. Agree with your comments. Despite the heavy defeat, I didn’t think we played that badly, but the prospect of chasing down that huge total would stop all but the best teams, and let’s face it the game was practically over after 15 overs of the Lancashire innings. Still an enjoyable night watching some top cricketers. Ian, Heanor.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I’d argue that seeing thrown into the crowd and missing the action was probably preferable last night! :-)

    Chris in Shropshire

    ReplyDelete
  9. It was painful to watch our bowlers being hit to all parts of the ground. After a brisk start from Jewell and Donald, I thought maybe - just maybe - we might chase down the huge Lancs total. But, once again, we collapsed. Andersson, Madsen, Patel, Guest, and Whiteley managed just seven runs between them.

    Regarding Jewell, I felt it was a curious innings. He started aggressively, but then seemed to go quiet for the rest of the innings until he hit some fours at the end of it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I assumed he was trying to protect our NRR and seeing we almost batted out out overs.
      Our target now is not to be bottom and Yorkshire are the team to beat, for us. Small consolation, but better that than being bottom with a squad designed for this tournament

      Delete
  10. I think there's a difference between playing below par and getting tonked by a better side. I can take this defeat better than the first five. I'm afraid we haven't nailed down a number 3, since du Plooy left. It's a revolving door and that isn't great. I'd be on the phone to Zaman Khan for next year. We miss a death bowler. Kris

    ReplyDelete
  11. I presume that having seen the results that Ben Stokes got from bowling first on a day that batters dream of Samit decided he would have a bit of that action with inevitable results on a perfect batting track.
    It beggars belief.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just watched the post match interview. Why wasn't Arthur questioned as to why we chose to bowl on winning the toss..?
      He gives us the same old rhetoric in every interview.
      I think he would have made a good Politician...
      Ian. South Africa.

      Delete
  12. Let's face it, we were schooled by a decent Lancashire line up. One that didn't have Salt, Buttler or Anderson.

    If we were to qualify, (we won't), it would mean an away tie at somewhere like Surrey or Somerset. The outcome of that would be much like yesterday's.

    Once again, bowlers were too often unable to execute their variations. I know that full tosses can sometimes get wickets, but I don't think that's the plan! I'm not going to single anyone out, but as I have mentioned previously, one is a pale shadow of his former self, it's sad to see. Our fielding in this competition has generally been below the required standard.

    We could now give some of the youngsters a go, although I think MA will wait until after the next defeat. Personally, I wouldn't be expecting a different outcome, but we may find out if one or two are capable.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The format is so short that if you lose the powerplay or quick wickets you’ve had it tbh .
    We didn’t play well with only Jewell and a couple of tail end swipes taking us to 160+
    I’ve seen Hampshire recently suffer a similar fate and their squad is stronger .
    For myself the Northants & Durham games were more difficult to take because at stages we were in the ascendancy.
    No doubt that will be part of Mickey's mid competition review .
    Need to bounce back at Bristol and park it for now

    ReplyDelete
  14. Despite the thrashing I enjoyed last night. Good atmosphere & a decent crowd. Our biggest weakness is that we do not have a wicket taking bowler. The attack is based around bowlers that look to contain. It was also noticeable how Lancs took advantage of the small straight boundaries at Derby, like they knew our ground better than us

    MarkB

    ReplyDelete
  15. Looking back at the North group qualifiers over the last 4 years. Birmingham and Lancashire have qualified every year. The other 2 test match counties Notts and Yorks have each qualified twice. The remaining 4 qualifying spots were Northants, Durham, Worcs & Derbys one each.
    Its a tough gig to get out of the group if you are one of the five minnows.
    Martin

    ReplyDelete
  16. Whilst in no way am I blaming Ny Donald for our loss, (the damage was already done with our bowling) but surely one of the coaches must have a chat with him to say, just have a look at a bowler for 1 or even 2 balls to see what the bowler is doing, then plan the attack, not just rely on his hand eye coordination & fast hands. It is better to get a couple of singles then boundaries, than be back in the hutch with no further runs.

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!