If I'm honest, I'd say that from a supporter's perspective this game
didn't really work. Those who hoped for, or perhaps expected a gripping
encounter where the game ebbed and flowed were always likely to be
unhappy bunnies by the end of a game where both sides batted for a day,
then spent the last one in a 45-over game that was a part of, but
distinct from the main event. Or was the 45-over game the main event? I'm a little confused...
Perhaps I should say I'm not a huge fan of friendlies.
I don't watch them in international football, because they tend to be
interminably dull affairs where the eleven that starts is largely
replaced at half time, leaving that second period a little like a box of
chocolates, after all your favourites have disappeared in the first
trawl.
A game where the Indian side effectively became a
tag team, with eighteen players rotating on and off was unlikely to have
major appeal for me and any suggestion that it was as competitive a
battle as possible is perhaps inaccurate. It was, perhaps more appositely, a pre-season friendly - which for the visitors it was, of course.
Yet at the same time I appreciate the rationale and certainly the vast amount of work that went into the game from the club's perspective.
How
many chances does the Derbyshire cricketing public get to see players
of this stature? By allowing all eighteen members of the squad to be
involved, those in attendance saw all of the Indian squad, even if for
only a short time in some cases. And this game, like the Leicestershire
one before it, was all about the visitors and offering them an
opportunity to find form and gain match practice ahead of the
forthcoming Test series.
It is quite a change from the
old days, when the plan was to get county sides to target the stars of
touring sides and keep them from their finest fettle before the
'proper' stuff began. Back in the day when counties did their damnedest
to beat visiting touring sides, the games were highly competitive and a
number of players took the opportunity to state their case for inclusion
in the England side with a positive performance.
Derbyshire's
side here was largely of a novitiate first-class standard, containing
youngsters alongside players who had struggled for first team form this
year. Yet Graeme Welch will be pleased with their performances and ends
the game with a few more options than he had on Tuesday morning.
Ben
Slater produced a typically compact innings; Billy Godleman (pictured) had two
solid, unbeaten knocks and Wes Durston turned the clock back to his best
days. Similarly, Ben Cotton looked a talent with the ball, while Matt
Higginbottom and Greg Cork let no one down. Nor did Harvey Hosein, a
precocious talent with bat and gloves at just 17.
Was
it a competitive game in the keenest sense of the word? No, but that's
not to undermine the efforts of the players who have done well. We
shouldn't worry unduly about the defeat, but we should be quite
satisfied with the workout and the increased levels of confidence that the performances will bring.
Next up is the Chesterfield Cricket Festival, starting on Sunday against Leicestershire in a T20.
We can all get excited about that, can't we?
I can,t say these are games that excite me either. They are over hyped and to me represent a good excuse to catch up with some domestic chores.
ReplyDeleteNo doubt some benefit has been gained from it,from a player and management view point,but I do wonder if it hit it,s financial expectations.
Chesterfield will make a pleasant change,particularly if the weather is kind. Support should remain solid though many will turn up more in hope than expectation as the week progresses.