It is always sad when a cricketer of genuine potential fails to realise it.
For every top player, in any sport, there are dozens more who might just have got there but for some intangible factor that legislates against their development. For some it is a technical issue, for others mental, while some are simply incapable of the self-discipline to make the most of their talent.
I've played with a few over the years, including one lad who got himself wrecked on booze the night before an important regional trial, where he had every chance of selection. He failed miserably and he never made it past the "highly talented, but..." grouping in which he found himself.
To that grouping - at least for now - must be added the name of Dan Redfern.
Dan can play cricket, without doubt. He can make batting look the easiest thing on earth and as someone who saw his maiden century for the club, I can vouch for how good he looked at his best. The drives were a delight and the ball was despatched with the degree of elan that is the preserve of the very best. His technique looked organised and compact; he looked, in short, a player.
That was two seasons ago, when the long-awaited breakthrough finally arrived - or so we thought. The summer of 2013 should have been the one in which Redfern announced himself as a genuine contender in county cricket's highest tier. Yet it didn't happen, nor indeed did it ever look likely to do so.
It was quite disappointing to see a batsman of such talent reduced to a bit-part role as a T20 spinner, firing it in briskly at the batsmen's feet. The bowling looked OK, but the batsman we knew and respected simply wasn't there. Occasional gritty innings that usually failed to develop into anything substantial were among far more where cavalier shots, often inappropriate for the match situation, resulted in an early demise. All players go through such phases, but one had only to walk around the ground to hear stories that did the player few favours.
These stories are alluded to by Mark Eklid in today's Derby Telegraph and today's news came as no surprise to me, especially after the engagement of Scott Elstone a few weeks back. Elstone is a very similar player, capable of batting and fielding brilliance, together with useful bowling.
There will, as it is the nature of the supporter 'beast', be those who blame the club and say that more should have been done, but I disagree.
When a player with the natural talent of Daniel Redfern is allowed to leave, two years before the end of his contract, things must have broken down way past the point of rescue. Confidentiality clauses will dictate that we may never know the full extent of the issues here, nor are we entitled to; such is the way with employer/employee relations.
What is sad is that a player of potential has failed to realise his talent, nor justify a decade of investment in it by the club. Time will tell if he does so elsewhere, or becomes another of those "highly talented, but..." statistics.
The ball is firmly in his court now. As for Derbyshire, we move on.
I,ve perhaps been slightly more critical of Redfern than most over the past two or three seasons,though I agree there is a certain tinge of sadness at the manner of his demise.
ReplyDeleteOn form,like most left handers,he looked a quality player and was pleasing on the eye. The biggest problem was his lack of consistency.I detest statistics,as you well know,but there is no getting away from the fact that Redfern never quite lived up to his billing and always seemed to fall short of expectations. 2012 was his best season without doubt,but even during that season he failed to dispell lingering doubts. As a one day player his record is poor and for me was never suited to the format.
I think the club have taken the right course of action and severing ties is the best for both parties. Whether he makes the grade elsewhere remains to be seen. I have my doubts but I wish the lad no harm at all. As for Derbyshire,like you say,we move on.