Monday, 13 July 2026

Thoughts on The Blast and a way forward for Derbyshire

It has been another disappointing T20 summer for Derbyshire. 

Few among the support will have gone into the Vitality Blast with high expectations. Yet it has still been frustrating that the same failings have come back to haunt us. There were close finishes, but the big moments went the other way too often for comfort. Inexperience in some quarters, or a lack of mental toughness? There will be different opinions on that.

I know my own lack of confidence in the batting unit to chase and the bowling unit to contain has seeped into my reports and comments. Even the experience of sixty years of watching struggles to keep the sunny side up all the time.

The batting was too heavily dependent on Martin Andersson and Nye Donald. Once they had gone, the run rate usually dropped. If they failed, the shockwave impacted adversely on the rest. 

Donald remains an astonishing talent, an entertainer par excellence, but my concern remains how many matches he has won, at least until yesterday. How many times have his innings crossed the line from 'highly entertaining' to 'match winning'? Perhaps they might be considered so if those further down lent greater support, but he could be one of the biggest players in the world IF his knocks frequently continued outwith the Powerplay.

That said, he averaged over 40 in the competition this year, which is extraordinary given how he plays. The game changes all the time, but fifty years from now there will be youngsters watching him today who will regale their own children and grandchildren with tales of watching him bat. I know I haven't seen anyone quite like him and I saw Wilkins and Kuiper at their best. I would love to see him succeed in the four-day game, but suspect that in this form, franchises and a T20 deal is the most that we will see him.

I was not convinced by his glovework, which sometimes highlighted how infrequently he does it, while his captaincy was only adequate. Too often a bowler was given a second, even third successive over with an inevitable detrimental  consequence and there appeared no real game plan in the field, no match ups. It all seemed pre-determined, rarely the way to success in an unforgiving format, where you need to think on your feet.

Losing one of these responsibilities might be a way forward, the restoration of Brooke Guest behind the stumps the most likely and welcome move.

Nye will always be the first name on my T20 team sheet. But I don't think he will change his game, so to maximise his input the rest of the side needs to be looked at over the winter.

Andersson has been a superb signing. His medium pace can develop further and his variations with it. But a player who can bat in the top three with success AND offer some handy overs is a prize indeed. 

The crucial number three berth was never successfully filled this year, while the decline in Wayne Madsen's returns was a further issue. We will likely see the county legend in 2027, but now know that it will be in red ball and 50-over cricket only. How he is replaced will be key to any upturn in T20 fortunes next summer. Matthew Montgomery could come in higher, where he wouldn't have to hit from the get go and he may be the best bet for the Madsen role at four. The similarity in style, if not yet weight of runs, should make the parting easier to bear.

You don't easily replace those runs with one man. The team has to be reshaped and there has to be a greater collective approach to setting and chasing totals.

Ross Whiteley scored steadily, but had a highest score of 46. There will be consideration over a new deal and it will depend on if there is anyone better for that role. Of the other all rounders on the staff, Anuj Dal hasn't been seen as a T20 player and Luis Reece has had a lot of injuries. More on that later.

Neither Yusuf bin Naeem nor Amrit Basra made the best of opportunities, but it was telling that when Harry Came was brought in against Somerset he batted three, which was the logical slot for Basra to play. The jury is still out on his ability at this level, but to judge him on batting in the last three overs of an innings is unfair. Naeem clearly has talent and plenty of time on his side, so hopefully his time will come again. Came did pretty well, but I don't yet see him as a T20 regular. I would love to be proved wrong and more knocks like the one yesterday would do that.

The side always seemed both a batter AND bowler short. The absence of Chappell, Moore and Brown cannot be ignored, but nor can their respective inexperience and more recent poor returns in the format. Chappell was the most missed, not least for his lengthening of the batting line up and ability to hit long at the end of an innings.

The bowling was the curate's egg. Those injuries gave opportunity to Nick Potts and he did pretty well. Another winter working with Chris Wright should see him improve still further and if he can hit his yorkers more often he could be a real talent, his changes of pace being good to see. Ben Aitchison started well, but I don't see white ball as his stronger suit at this stage.  He is an outstanding red ball bowler and perhaps could  earn a deserved breather for T20 another year, like Rory Haydon.

That would depend on overseas and domestic recruitment. I thought Akif Javed got better as the tournament progressed and he became more accustomed to the pitches. An early reluctance to bowl yorkers was odd and his tendency to drop short and also overstep was costly on occasions. I wouldn't be averse to his return, when he would have this experience to draw on, but even if the international fixtures allowed it, I don't think we should sign both he AND Sufyan Moqim. Neither are natural fielders and offer nothing with the bat. One of the overseas has to do that in this side, for sake of balance. Nor is it ideal to have two players in the side whose language challenges make contribution to the group dynamic problematic.

Moqim was excellent, although a return for either depends on the pitch strategy for 2027 and I suspect Javed may be more readily available. Having said that, the other domestic bowling success was Jack Morley and unless we produce dry slow pitches (like Old Trafford) then two non-batting spinners doesn't make a lot of sense. As a friend wrote in an email to me last week, when we have a stronger spin than seam attack,why didn't we play to that strength? Aside from the fact that none of the spinners have any batting credentials, of course, but it is a moot point

So how can recruitment help? Domestically, we could do worse than look at Sol Budinger, who seemed more peripheral at Leicester, even before his injury and could give the innings a super-fast start with Donald, as well as affording an important left/right combination. He is a mercurial talent but maybe needs the right environment in which to thrive. At his best he is a southpaw Donald and extremely dangerous. Andersson could then drop to three, with the ability (and instruction) to try to bat through the rest of the innings. Any successful T20 side needs such a player.

Another player I like, again lacking opportunity is Will Rhodes at Durham. A gritty competitor, he could be a handy all rounder in this format, as well as an opener in the red ball game. If they could pick up these two - and finances are likely to be a challenge - they could consider just one overseas player. Perhaps someone in the vein of Romario Shepherd, Shadab Khan or Sikander Raza, although Worcestershire would surely want him back. One would hope that Mickey Arthur's Big Book of Contacts could find an all rounder of sorts, ideally one who offers a different angle, or perhaps unorthodox spin? Hayden Kerr was a decent asset in 2022, to give but one example in the recent past. The team's balance would look far better if the overseas player had another skill set.

Wouldn't this side, on paper at least, offer greater potential?

Donald, Budinger, Andersson, Montgomery, Naeem/Basra, Rhodes, Shepherd/Raza/Kerr, Guest, Chappell, Potts/Moore/Stewart, Morley

If there was sufficient budget for a second overseas, bring back either Moqim or Javed. Better still, perhaps another with multi-discipline skills. As I have written before, Brandon McMullen of Scotland is a serious talent and the success of George Munsey at Nottinghamshire highlights how experience of UK pitches is very much an asset. Indeed, I would consider him for that first role,  a dynamic bat, more than useful bowler and brilliant fielder.

So an alternate eleven might read:

Donald, Budinger, Andersson, Montgomery, Naeem/Basra, McMullen, Rhodes, Guest, Chappell, Moore/Potts/Stewart, Morley/second overseas

 I would expect Matt Stewart to be on the staff next year and he might push Potts for a place in the white ball eleven, at his current rate of progress. So too could Harry Moore and perhaps T20 and four overs at a time eases him back into the first-class game?

How do they afford this? Tough decisions have to be made, but I would sadly release Caleb Jewell, Anuj Dal, Pat Brown and Ross Whiteley. I don't think Mitch Wagstaff has convinced enough to remain either. He will be 23 in September, has not yet broken through and at this level patience will be limited. He needed weight of runs in league and Second XI and that hasn't happened.

It hasn't worked out for Caleb this year, while the returns of Nuj have been in decline for a few summers now. Pat is another single-format player, which is tough to justify and Ross...well, he is the finisher, but isn't finishing. A wonderful fielder, but he should be getting us over the line in tight situations and isn't. The game on Friday night was a clear example of this.

All of these are players whose best cricket I have enjoyed immensely, but progress requires change and that necessitates tough decisions being made. There can be no room for sentiment in professional sport.

At the very least, the team I listed above would offer seven/eight bowling options and bats deep, as well as having a specialist wicket-keeper.

What do you think? I am especially interested in your overseas batting/bowling/genuine all rounder suggestions. Even if the complexity of the international calendar means the county may get down to their tenth choice before striking gold...

At a members forum earlier in the year, Mickey Arthur said that the thrust of recruitment this winter would be on white ball cricket and it is clearly the area of greater need. We *should* remain competitive in the red ball game, but the right signings could see that extend to white ball too.

Postscript: I am aware that Budinger and Rhodes are under contract until the end of 2027. I am equally aware that modern contracts are barely worth the paper they are written on and seem heavily weighted in favour of players. If they are offered greater opportunity elsewhere, in a short career they will generally seek their release and take it.

Whether they interest Mickey Arthur only he knows, but both are players I feel could enhance the Derbyshire squad. 

As for overseas players - well, he knows a lot more players than I, but Derbyshire prospects would improve if they offered balance to the team and better complemented its existing personnel.

Besides fitting into the available budget, of course...

26 comments:

  1. A very insightful analysis. I agree with you re Rhodes as his talent is underutilised at Durham, but Budinger is too “hit and miss” for me in both white and red ball. Mitch Wagstaff needs a really productive One Day Cup run in the coming weeks to positively influence a new deal being offered. I agree with your other release decisions except that I still think that Ross Whiteley deserves another year as he scored nearly 300 runs and is our best fielder by far
    Andy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Andy. For Budinger read Donald. Nye has had 2 good seasons but can thrill and frustrate in equal measure.

      With those two you could easily be 0-2 at the end of the first over. But you could be 95-0. So you need batting depth but the capacity for more power

      A white ball batter with Came for red ball. Can see the merit of retaining Ross but is there better out there?

      Delete
  2. Definite starters for next season for me are: Donald, Andersson, Montgomery, Chappell, Potts, Morley, Basra, though some/all would have to improve for us to qualify based on this season’s performances – again bringing into question / putting onus on Mickey’s coaching.

    Basra is the interesting one – he looked a decent middle/lower order player in the One Day Cup last year, but didn’t get us over the line much if at all, and regressed this year.

    There would also be 2 overseas, if those found can be better than domestic options (Mickey’s famed contact book has been mixed at best).

    That makes 9 players – roles we need from those out of the side (e.g. Moore, Came, Bin Naeem but he would need a new contract)/domestic/overseas arrivals) would be: top-order batter to continue momentum, finisher, death and/or powerplay bowler(s).

    Most of all we need the mentality and/or finishers and death bowlers to get us over the line.

    Despite the results I have enjoyed the games this year – playing southern teams has freshened it up. Also the weather has been glorious, so making plans has been easier, and pleased to see so many children enjoying the games.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting thoughts and I agree with a lot of ot. My main disagreement would be that to bring in Guest would add another place to a batter that is too slow for the current era of T20. An additional batter that can score an average of 40 runs at a rate close to 200 looks to me to be essential.
    2 Donald's and an Anderson ought to suffice I guess Whiteley was supposed to be that guy but looks like time has caught up with him to me. Looking forward to the 59 over stuff with only 1 player in 100 surely we will be competitive. Our overseas pace optio came good too late and the bowling needs a finisher.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would bring in 2 T20 overseas for next year, but none for the county championship. If Brown can regain his old fitness & form then I think we have a decent 3 man domestic pace attack in Chappell, Potts & Brown. Backed up by Aitchison, Haydon, Moore & Stewart. Morley & Bashir are good enough for a second spinner role should we want to go down that route. So the 2 overseas roles would go to a keeper batsman & spinning all rounder. We need to be more ambitious in our signings which not having overseas for the county championship would allow.
    Donald, Bin Naeem, Andersson, OS keeper, Montgomery, Basra, Spinner all rounder, Whiteley, Chappell, Potts, Brown

    I think we have shown progress this year, though very frustrating with what could have been. The squad definitely seems to have more depth, what it needs is a bit more star quality

    MarkB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course we already have Abbas for 4 day cricket, Mark. I understand Hasaranga was an early target until his Sri Lanka commitments ruled him out. Would have been a good option

      Interesting idea, a WK/bat. Most of the good ones will be at the IPL. Wouldn't say no to Josh Inglis, but likely out of our league financially!

      Delete
  5. Brandon McMullen holds a British passport, which would allow him (or any Scot) to play in English domestic cricket as a local player rather than an overseas signing.

    I think Wagstaff deserves a chance before being written off.

    I look forward to seeing Chappell fit again but those pencilling him in to team sheets need to remember that batting aside he was awful last season. In that respect he joins a long list of players who have regressed badly. Dal and Guest head that list, from two of the best players in the division to players whom few other counties would be interested in.

    The club need to get rid of MA. Since he's come in results have been awful and players have consistently gone backwards with youth given few chances unless everyone else is injured. I don't count putting bin Naeem into a struggling team as a proper chance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, sorry, I know Brandon is UK qualified but we would still need to pay him! So the saving would be on flights etc and I suspect the opportunity might see him more affordable than some other options.

      MA is contracted to the end of 2028 and nothing will happen until then. We all need to accept that.

      Wagstaff? 20, 5, 2, 1, 2, 0, 82, 27, 38, 4 are his most recent scores in the 2s. I rate the lad too, but I don't see such scores as making a case for promotion to the 1st eleven. Suspect he will join a long list of talented, but not quite good enough players over the years.

      But I have seen times he would have got in more easily than today, over the years..

      Delete
    2. A very unfair way to judge Wagstaff. Only 4 of those numbers (which include the 82) are from red ball games. T20 doesn't seem his format but his reb ball numbers for the seconds are good including two magnificent tons in one game earlier this season.

      Red ball opener is the hardest job in the game and he has real potential. To release him would be foolish. He even has 2 excellent first team 50s to his name from when he did get a couple shots opening (after which he was rewarded by being dropped for the remaining dead rubber games - well done MA). I've no doubt he could offer a lot there and develop in white ball as a mid order player who can bowl some useful leg spin.

      Why should we accept MA being here till 2028? Why should we as fans accept constant failure just because the board continue to reward it. If MA fails to secure promotion I'd prefer to see him go for the reasons in my initial post.

      Delete
    3. I'd see the ODC as last chance saloon for him. Don't get me wrong, I like the lad as a player AND I agree he hasn't had the best of deals.

      But the coaches see things and know when someone can kick on. We all know players can be later developers..Aitchison and Potts prime examples of this.. but equally by the time someone is approaching mid-20s there will be an expectation. Probably unfairly matched against the Rew brothers and similar.

      As for Mickey, the club is not going to pay him off and he is unlikely to fall on his sword. So I don't see a change. Others may disagree and it is all about opinions, but I suspect we work with what we have for the next two summers

      Delete
    4. Oh I agree they won't get rid of them. But we also know exactly what 2027 and 2028 hold and it's more of the same.

      Sometimes the club could do with thinking about what the cost of not doing something is.

      Delete
  6. Regarding overseas players in the T20, if we are going to play two of them in the same game, one of them should be able to hold a bat. You can't afford a lengthy tail.

    I'm not sure whether Whitely should be signed again. He did okay this season, but I wonder if he is losing his ability to clear the ropes.

    I'd like to see Guest behind the stumps next season. He is someone who can keep the scoreboard ticking over. He has a strike rate of 125, which is decent.

    I'm hoping Wagstaff can shine in the 50 over competition. This might be his last chance. I'm also hoping Bin Naeem and Basra show just what they can do.


    Downthewicket

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. I don't think Brooke is Chris Tavare or Trevor Bailey and sometimes you just want somebody who can play cricket, rather than smack it out of the park. That tactic doesn't always work.
      I have also seen him score quickly in all forms of the game. You don't necessarily need to rain sixes to score at ten an over

      And if we are going to go with a spin-based attack, I want my best wicketkeeper behind the timbers.

      Delete
  7. Derbyshire finished with 16 points the exact same as last season only winning three games one less than last year its been another dreadful season under Mikey in the Blast

    ReplyDelete
  8. Some interesting views. I guess we all see things differently. In my opinion Rhodes would be an inferior version of Anuj Dal. Nuj's batting average being higher than his bowling average this season, something I personally always look for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think they're different cricketers. Rhodes is a batting all rounder who has played a lot of division 1 cricket. Nuj is stronger as a bowler. In an ideal world, he would play for us until he was 40, but we need a solid left hand opener for 4 day cricket, but who can add nous in the one day game. With a finite budget, we either need to find some money down the back of the sofa, or be creative with the playing staff, if we want to improve.

      We could just mosey along as we are, but I would like to see us being proactive and aspiring to better

      Delete
  9. Some very interesting and thought provoking comments. All I should like to add is that I think whoever made the incomprehensible decision to extend MA's contract till the end of 2028 should be ashamed of themselves. This is a reward for failure and a very expensive reward too. It would be very interesting to see a summary of all games played under MA'S tenure with wins and losses highlighted.
    Chapel Guy

    ReplyDelete
  10. It seems that regardless of who is playing the problem of dealing with the closing overs of both batting and bowling needs to be addressed. We lose too many close games. I'm not sure that any change of personnel is going to sort this one out.
    As for MA, he has another t20 failure on his record.
    The England boss has been sacked.
    Just saying.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ian from Suffolk13 July 2026 at 20:48

    If we do have to accept MA will stay for 2 more seasons after this the talk about different signings becomes quite irrelevant. I should imagine most players see Derbyshire as very low down on their list of clubs but as a very easy ride where nothing much is expected. Under MA the next 2 seasons will obviously be pretty much like the last few. 3rd to 6th in the championship bottom or 2nd from bottom t20 and mid table at best 50 overs

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think Mickey Arthur would be a great appointment as England coach 😉

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, England, please take him off our hands!
      Chapel Guy

      Delete
    2. Ian from Suffolk14 July 2026 at 09:37

      You can well imagine the England set up being stupid enough to actually appoint him

      Delete
  13. What's interesting is that Derbyshire and Leicestershire both comprehensively beat Lancs and Yorkshire in their last 4 day games. How quickly things are forgotten about, once white ball misery takes over! Kris

    ReplyDelete
  14. David exiled in Co Durham14 July 2026 at 10:17

    Thanks for your summary Peakfan, and sorry to join the discussion a day late!

    For my money the Blast season can be summed up as "So close and yet so far away".

    There were only 3/12 victories, but that only tells part of the story. There were 2 ties, that could easily have been victories, and probably 4 losses that were very narrow and could have gone the other way. If they had, we would now have been looking at who our QF opponents would be.

    What do we need to turn those narrow losses to narrow victories? I think it comes down to 3 things - Skill, Discipline and Conviction.

    In skill, we are a sadly a few players behind. We know that Donald, Andersson, Montgomery, Whitely, Javed and Moqim have what it takes. I would also add Potts, Morley and Came to that list on this seasons performances. I've left Madsen off the list as he wont be around next year and his golden short form years are behind him. Bin Naeem and Basra have been given an extended chance and have both come up short. 20 overs isn't Aitchisons best format, he takes wickets but too expensive.

    So we need some more players to have a squad of 14 or 15 to get us through a season. In particular we need "finishers". Whitely is our only real batting finisher and he actually did pretty well this year, but too often wasn't batting in the crucial last 2 overs. We need at least 1 other for this specialist role. I would never have dreamt this a month ago, but based on his performance in the last 3 games, Harry Came may just be able to do this, but we probably need at least one more batting finisher.

    We also need bowling finishers, especially people who will take vital late wickets. Javed seems to have grown into that role, 5 wickets in the first 6 matches and 13 in the last 6, but again we need someone at the other end. Personally I would love to see Javed team up with Zaman Khan. That would be properly intimidating to any opposition, but can probably never happen.

    Discipline next. This isn't just about Donald throwing his wicket away. He is far and away our leading batsman, and should be left to do his thing. Its also about bowling to the field that has been set, and about commitment in the fielding and catching. Most of the team are excellent in the field, but sometimes too many catches have not been taken, and too many 4's have slipped through fielders hands.

    Conviction finally. This is more intangible, but too often it looks like we just don't actually believe we are going to win. We look hesitant, we look intimidated by the big boys. We can fake it a little by just being louder in the field, much as that annoys some of us old timers. I'm not sure how we actually turn it around. Maybe conviction just comes with success?

    I don't pretend to know enough about who may be available across other counties, let alone around the world, to take us forward next year, but as I said at the start the gap is strangely, both very small and very large!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I couldn’t have summed it up any better than you have!

      Delete
  15. John life member14 July 2026 at 13:12

    Interesting views. I am in the 125 scoring rate is insufficient for T20 camp. So no Guest in my T20 sides. Nobody has mentioned Bashir was he unable to play T20 due to his central contract. If not preferring Morley in every game was very strange.

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!