Saturday, 11 October 2025

Weekend warmer - the road to improvement

For all that there was disappointment in white ball displays, the third place finish in the County Championship gave Derbyshire supporters the hope that good times might lie at the end of the tunnel, the light there being something more than a mere burglar's torch..

So what is needed for us to take that next step - promotion in the red ball, knock out and finals day in the T20, improvement in the one-day cup? 

Here is my list:

Quality overseas players

We need an attack leader in red ball cricket, someone who can take wickets and ideally be available for the full season. Everyone has seen the links with Mohammad Abbas, who would be great, but it is not yet a done deal. Your overseas bowler, if available for the full season, needs to take 50 wickets, or at least more than anyone else to justify his position. Abbas would likely do that, but importantly would be a man to bowl the 'hard' overs when the batters were in the ascendancy, much as Michael Holding or Charl Langeveldt once did.

In the white ball, we need a spinner of equal quality, ideally someone who can hit the ball a long way if required. Such players are always in demand and attracting them to Derbyshire, ahead of other engagements around the globe, will show how big the name of Mickey Arthur is and how strong that book of contacts.

Wanindu Hasaranga has been linked, but there's likely other interest there, too. Encouraging signs, but getting signings over the line is the challenge.

Result pitches

I have mentioned this before, but we need Derby pitches to be more like Chesterfield. Good for batting if your technique is strong, but with something for seamers and spinners alike at different stages of the game. In giving Neil Godrich the go ahead to prepare such pitches there is an element of risk, of course. Yet for Derbyshire to progress we have to be willing to risk losing, to give ourselves a chance to win. 

To quote the great Kim Barnett, in a recent Cricketer magazine interview:

I'd grown up with the stories of Yorkshire, only booking into their hotel for two nights. I took a detailed six-year look back at what made sides like Essex and Middlesex so successful. Their batters did well enough, but it was bowlers like John Lever, Wayne Daniel, Emburey and Edmonds who turned them into champions.

I'd started with John Wright and Peter Kirsten as overseas players – top international batters – but we couldn't bowl sides out. So we started preparing wickets for Michael Holding, Alan Warner and the like.

To attract Mohammad Abbas or any other seamer of genuine class, you need pitches to help them. I would argue that with Aitchison, Chappell, Reece, Moore and Haydon in your ranks, you have the potential to outgun most, with the addition of that quality overseas input.

New bowling coach

No disrespect intended, but the figures suggest that the bowling group need a different voice to that of Ajmal Shahzad. 

As Mickey Arthur said when he arrived at Derby, four years was what he regarded as the maximum for the input of a coach to remain fresh. 

There was little wrong with the Derbyshire batting in 2025. We scored well in all competitions, so credit to Ben Smith for his input in that area. The bowling let us down, especially in the Blast, where collectively we lost line and length, struggling as a consequence. Only the re-emergence of Ben Aitchison and the introduction of Rory Haydon saw us gain greater control later, neither of them, through circumstance, because of the input of the coach.

I have no idea on the contractual situation, but we need fresh input, new ideas on the bowling side, otherwise I fear for similar issues to plague us in 2026. Players do not 'lose it' when they are established, but the evidence suggests a disconnect between bowlers and coach.

Put it another way - the average runs per over conceded in The Blast, by bowlers who will be here next year, suggests we  would always be chasing 200-plus. There isn't the money to change the personnel, so I would hope for a close look at the alternative this winter.

Fielding

At times we could be very good in the field, Caleb Jewell brought greater consistency to the slip cordon, while Ben Aitchison was another asset, alongside the ever-reliable Wayne Madsen. Yet it goes without saying that the bowlers need that, especially when getting a response from pitches was far from easy.

In the Blast we looked slow and cumbersome in the field at times. One or two players are not athletes and you can only hide so many in an unforgiving format. Starting the competition with two men over 40 and an overseas bowler who, while supremely talented, didn't list catching and fielding among his attributes wasn't likely to end well. No disrespect to Wayne Madsen intended, who is still fitter than men ten years his junior, but at 42 he can't be as fast as he once was.

This time we have to be better and the addition of Basra, Haydon and Montgomery is a good start.

Luck

Few sides win without their share of the rub of the green. Whether it is in decisions going your way, key players staying fit or the weather playing its part, Dame Fortune smiling on you is always handy. Remember 2012, when we forced a win in Cardiff thanks to a Jon Clare masterclass with the ball? We won in three days, when other games barely got going, building an impetus in the process.

That year we came out of the blocks like Usain Bolt and despite a late season wobble, ended it with silverware. 

That extra five/ten per cent

Finally it is important that the current players haven't reached their ceiling. In the absence of big stars, it is important that everyone plays a part. If the batters can take their averages up by five runs and the bowlers their averages down by the same, we won't be far away. Similarly if a couple of bowlers go for eight an over, rather than ten or eleven in T20, it would make a world of a difference.

I think the addition of Montgomery, Basra and Haydon will be important in all formats and there should be increased vitality on the pitch in 2026.

If all of these pieces fall into place, I have high expectations for next year. 

The key word is 'all'...

28 comments:

  1. Sadly I predict we'll do absolutely nothing next season under Arthur, reason being that the Derby pitch hasn't offered anything during his tenure so far and can't see that changing.

    Our batting numbers are aided by that pitch just as much as our bowler's numbers suffer which needs borne in mind.

    The results don't lie, we only won 3 games last season and 2 were against a woeful Kent side.

    We need to win more games and we need a pitch that can offer results to do it. I do agree we actually have a decent stable of placement in Reece, Haydon, Aitchison and Chappell with Moore returning to fitness as well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent article that is spot on. We could also do with rotating or resting players at times


    MarkB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think we have strength in depth to do that, Mark. If you had a first choice attack of three seamers, plus all rounders, who are first choice? Overseas, of course but the other two from Aitchison, Chappell, Moore and Haydon - as well as Potts?

      Delete
    2. I think you start by not having a first choice attack. Fitness, form, conditions & the need to rest should all have a bearing on who you select. Take Chappell as an example, he has been first choice in all formats but if we had rested him for some games I am sure his performances when he did play would have been better. Moore & Aitchison also need to have their workloads managed given their medical records.

      MarkB

      Delete
    3. BTW you did not mention Brown

      Delete
    4. Genuinely don't see him as a red ball bowler. And trying to make him into one has ruined - for now - his effectiveness as a white ball bowler. Let him play to his strengths...

      Delete
    5. I agree, and it's difficult to fathom how he took 5-21, including a hat trick, for England Lions in January.....

      Delete
  3. Kent won 2 games, so weren't woeful all season. I don't think you can judge the 50 overs, as we did use it as a development comp this year. T20 was a big disappointment and an injection of much needed youth can hopefully be provided by Montgomery, Basra, Haydon and Moore. The worry is that we still rely on Madsen and Reece in 4 day a lot, although Aitchison is quality and Chappell is reliable. Dal still excellent, on his day. Kris

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ian from Suffolk11 October 2025 at 23:00

    We did undoubtedly have a far better season in the championship but I’m inclined to agree with Hamez in thinking it might be mid table at best in 2026. I think because of home wickets and the bowling being the weak point we will be the draw specialists of the division. A brilliant article again Steve and as a point of interest do you know if Derbyshire voted in favour of retaining a 14 match season

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Depends if we get the attack leader but they need more in the pitches

      I understand that only one player voted to reduce to 13 matches. The rest wanted to stay at 14, Ian

      Delete
    2. Cheers Steve. I’m really pleased about that. Players who vote for a reduction in red ball cricket are either very selfish and greedy or plain stupid. Most players would play a almost endless amount of franchise cricket if the money was right and most bowlers get rested a fair bit now anyway. Almost all members of clubs love red ball cricket and players should remember that

      Delete
    3. One implication of your findings PF--unless we assume that the players aren't telling the truth when they're asked about the schedule--is that it suggests that the PCA are being dishonest about how many players support the status quo.

      Their much-trumpeted statistics--unless, again, they're being misquoted by media outlets--were, if I remember, that 84% of players wanted a reduction. I would guess that the average county squad is about 26 players--or 468 players in total. 16% of that (the number who support the status quo) is 75. We're being asked to believe that 50 of those 75 come from only two counties, Surrey and Derbyshire, and that the other 16 counties had a combined 25 players who wanted the number of games we have now.

      That to me seems....implausible.

      Dave

      Delete
  5. The Derby pitches have been a source of complaint for a number of years now. Is it a lack of will or ability to make them more bowler friendly? Performance in sport is hugely dependent on confidence and these bland pitches do nothing to help our bowlers state of mind.

    ReplyDelete
  6. We have to start being a bit more honest with ourselves if we're to go up. Last season was ok or even good if the target was midtable, but we won 3 games (Leics won 7 and Glammy won 5) and drew 9 games. And how many of those draws due to either the pitch or the ball experiment did we look like winning? Our target should very much be promotion as well.

    Our bowlers must feel very fed up and that is a huge issue.

    The One Day Cup IS a development competition so we can't argue we treated it as such so it's a write off, in fact I'd hazard a guess our regular XI still tended towards being one of the older units see last season.

    On a more positive note I am pleased with our squad now, Montgomery is a real coup of a signing and Haydon and Basra are excellent finds. We also have an excellent crop of youth, though Arthur has not done enough to give them chances yet. That needs to change next season.

    The real key will be the remaining overseas signings as Steve calls out, the bowling unit could perhaps do with one more domestic addition in an ideal world but frankly good seamers aren't common right now (see the churn around other counties) so I think the development of Potts, Moore and especially young Matty Stewart and Jake Green is absolutely key.

    ReplyDelete
  7. David exiled in Lancs13 October 2025 at 09:35

    I hear what you say about the need for a change in the bowling coaching set up, and I don't disagree. The plummet in the skills and confidence of Pat Brown this year mirrors and exceeds that of Sam Conners in 2024. Others such as Zac Chappell are just about hanging on to their prior levels rather than kicking on to new levels.

    And yet... Luis Reece has massively gone the other way. He has gone from being a 3rd or 4th bowler, probably good for 18 or 20 wickets per season, to a star bowler taking 50 wickets in a season. How has this happened? I'm not sure I saw anything greatly different in his action this year, maybe a couple of additional mph, maybe a little more swing and seam.

    Was any change the result of coaching? Was it the result of not also opening the batting? Was it that he had the confidence of a new captain to open the bowling?

    We may never know, but if we criticise the coaching for those that have gone downhill, we should also give them credit for those that have improved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But how many others improved, David? The big picture is that there isn't another. I suspect it is the result of confidence in his body (until the ankle injury) and having the confidence of his captain to take the new ball.

      And yes, a middle order role helped. I accept he improved, but on the whole, the bowling unit simply didnt

      Delete
    2. 'Massively gone the other way?' I think he has been a decent bowler for a while. Stats can be misleading. Anyhow, didn't he take 50 wickets last season? Higher average, granted. He probably has a little more confidence in his body now, after being hampered by injuries over the years.

      The 'downward trend' in our bowlers form in recent times is a bit of a concern......in my opinion.

      Delete
    3. Reece has taken 50 wickets in a season in the past so I don't think he's hit new heights. Instead I wonder if a combination of not opening the batting and having his game time managed more effectively (he didn't play any white ball cricket this season) has helped him. Additionally suspect over the last few seasons he may have been carrying more of the smaller niggles that didn't prevent him playing but perhaps curtailed his effectiveness at times hence the management of his playing time helped this season.

      He took 24 wickets in the last 7 games he played which means he took 26 in the first 4 so he was both consistent whilst also really cashing in early doors too.

      Delete
    4. Was Chappell ever that good though? His statistics don't really suggest so, especially since he's rarely played in division 1. Maybe I've been unlucky, but that's rather the experience of the matches I've seen him play too: OK but not especially threatening.

      Two other points about the bowling:
      --I take your point about Shahzad PF, but I wonder too about MA's role in this. I rather got the feeling from reading things last year that Conners's decline and subsequent leaving was primarily fuelled by something between him and Arthur, which makes me wonder if that's the issue with Brown this year. And his treatment of some of the bowlers has been bizarre (virtually never giving Potts a chance to show what he can do even when most of the bowlers are injured; saying that your main spinner is useless at home).

      --I'd be amazed if Abbas came to Derbyshire tbh. There can't be a county player who's more in demand than him, so I imagine that someone richer will outbid them. Hasaranga would seem to me be a non-starter, looking at the international schedule--and as you say, he's also someone who would be in high demand.

      By this stage, I'm also thoroughly sceptical about MA's famous pulling power (not to mention his ability to correctly identify what the club needs in terms of a new player!)

      Dave

      Delete
  8. The tragic/unforgivable thing is that you could have written this article almost the same 12 months ago...maybe even 12 months before that...and 12 months before that...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks to Dean for checking this up...

    Reece prior to Shahzad appointment Feb 2021.

    2017 8 wickets at 59
    2018 11 at 16
    2019 52 at 19,

    Then, since his arrival

    2020 COVID,
    2021 12 at 46,
    2022 10 at 50,
    2023 20 at 30
    2024 18 at 36.

    Figures from the club stats site

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dave Houghton literally ran LR into the ground, opening the bowling very often bowling the most overs and then opening the batting this eventually led to a serious injury which required surgery

      Delete
    2. In the final game against Kent LR opened the batting, scored 211 in 123.3 overs. He bowled more than 29 overs and took 7 wickets. He bowled more overs than anyone else in the 2nd innings.
      Flogging a willing horse?

      Delete
    3. I guess they were aware he was getting surgery and it wasn't going to be to his detriment. He couldn't sustain that over a season of course. No one could handle that sustained workload, and certainly not in their mid-30s

      Delete
    4. Ian from Suffolk15 October 2025 at 10:24

      In another era he would have got plenty of England caps( particularly one day cricket) remember Dermot reeve and Derek pringle similar players but I think Reece is far better

      Delete
    5. Both played and contributed significantly to multiple trophy winning sides, so not quite sure how you have called that one!

      He's a good underrated county pro at div2 level but can't really judge more than that.

      Oh and Steve another excellent blog this season, winter well.
      Essex fan

      Delete
  10. Has anyone given Mickey Arthur any credit for giving Jewell his first gig in county cricket, aged 28, or for signing Montgomery? We tend to always look at the negatives, but I think we can do ok next season. The idea that we are going to excel across all formats, is folly. Don't get me wrong, the T20 needs a lot of work and was very poor, but a lot depends on form and fitness, in a small squad. Kris

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Congrats Kris on finding two needles in a haystack of abject failure.

      Delete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!