When Derbyshire supporters look back on the 2025 Vitality Blast competition, they will not be doing so through rose-tinted spectacles.
There was the win over Yorkshire at Chesterfield, but that has become an annual event now. Nye Donald's thirteen-ball fifty and other cameos, a good weekend when they beat Nottinghamshire at Trent Bridge and Leicestershire at Edgbaston and then what?
Seeing a potential international star like Mohammad Ghazanfar has been enjoyable, but it has been a very disappointing tournament overall.
It isn't too difficult to see the reasons why. While our spinners have conceded eight or nine runs an over, the seamers have gone for ten and eleven. Take that over an innings and the target is going to be 180-190 every time, which has been a struggle for a stuttering batting line up.
A major issue has been team selection. There has been no suggestion that we went into the tournament with any idea of our best side, certainly not our best batting lineup.
Thursday night was an example of this. Harry Came was back in the side after playing (but not batting) against Yorkshire, then tasked with batting at three, after not previously playing in the tournament. Meanwhile, Brooke Guest scored a lightning-fast ton the day before but didn't play, and the indecision over whether the second best bat in the club - and top wicket keeper - should be in the first choice T20 side has been damaging and faintly embarrassing.
I cannot understand any logic that sees a club sign a mystery spinner, then drop the first choice keeper, when his batting record compares to most, especially when used in the right way. Talk about self-inflicted wounds...
Then there's Samit. I don't think his signing has worked and his reluctance to bowl in the Powerplay has not helped the side, only his figures. He appears to bat where HE wants, without any steer from above and his captaincy has been, at best, average. The bowling order seems preordained, with no consideration of match ups, the under-use of Andersson has been baffling and the batting orders, openers aside, seem to be the result of a lucky dip.
Caleb Jewell has disappointed in this format and while they may consider retaining him for the red ball game next year, perhaps our greater need is two overseas bowlers, at least one of who can handle a bat. Maybe, as one correspondent noted the other night, Blair Tickner - currently in the Caribbean with the Central Stags team - might have been a better option, if we were picking two from our three overseas.
Look at Worcestershire. Ben Dwarshuis averages 8.5 an over for them AND averages 53 with the bat. Down at Somerset, Matt Henry and Riley Meredith have 40 wickets between them, going at just seven and eight runs an over each. Correct overseas recruitment is key to success in this format, as Durham are showing in the North Group. Jimmy Neesham has had a fine all round tournament (30 with the bat, eight an over with the ball) while Zak Foulkes has bowled his overs at just seven.
I will broadly exempt Ross Whiteley from criticism as he has done as well as anyone, but again has been oddly under-utilised. Our top four should have been Jewell, Donald, Madsen, Whiteley. If they fail, so be it, but at least give your proven best players in the format the maximum time to have an impact. Ross has averaged over 40, but has usually been down at six or seven, by which point he has too often had to play catch up. Surely you want your 'impact' players to have an.. impact?
That would still have left Guest to steady the ship, with Andersson, Chappell and maybe even Ghazanfar. The latter looked like he could hit a long ball, but has only batted four times.
Maybe the biggest issue has been the form of Pat Brown. He has previously been a potent weapon in the Powerplays, but this year has too often missed his length and has come in for some stick. It is so very hard to bowl at these times, but a hard-earned reputation is maybe even harder to maintain. Perhaps using him as a shock 4-day bowler has messed him up his variations, but next year needs to be so much better
I have said before that the challenge of competing in all formats is difficult. The even greater one, perhaps, is when the squad has so obviously been recruited for a format in which it subsequently falls down badly.
It will need a rethink, a recalibration, a new focus on recruitment for 2026. There isn't a lot of leeway in the budget, yet there is no doubt that additional skill sets - including an improved mental one - are required to turn 'nearly men' into genuine challengers.
This could come from overseas, other counties or the talent emerging from the excellent Pathway, in time.
Maybe there should be consideration of tapping into the talents of a data analyst, such as Dan Weston. Such a person could help drive recruitment. Recently he wrote about Derbyshire:
When I watched their match against Birmingham, it was clear that Derbyshire were another one of those teams who needed pace bowler reinforcement. Yes, they had Zak Chappell out, but they still looked short in that department, regardless.
I have more sympathy for Derbyshire because this is where counties have their hands tied a bit by needing players to play multiple formats. Don’t get me wrong, I think Caleb Jewell was a good signing, he is a very good player and continues to do well for Derbyshire, but is the difference between him and Harry Came bigger than the gap between an overseas pacer and their lowest-level domestic pacer? I’m not sure it is.
He also referred to a group of young players around the country with little opportunity to play T20 but a high ceiling of potential and talent.
Rob Yates, Ali Orr, Freddie McCann, George Thomas, Joe Cracknell, Josh Blake, Josh de Caires, Dom Kelly, Sam Wood, Farhan Ahmed, Taz Ali.
There are so many other options too - James Minto, Eddie Jack, Archie Lenham, Blake Cullen, Jack Morley and Hamza Shaikh among them
Food for thought, when our selection seems to have been very much driven by short termism.
Speaking of which...what happened to Mickey Arthur's comment about giving opportunity to those who will have a part to play long term, once we were out of contention in the T20?
If recent selections are indicative of such a policy, I am supporting the wrong county..
Postscript - for what it is worth, I would make Nye Donald white ball skipper. He is an intelligent lad who knows his cricket. It might be the making of him and perhaps give a greater appreciation of the need to go on, when he's made fantastic starts.
If he did that, he would be one of the most sought after white ball players in the world.
I agree with your comments. Whiteley has averaged 37 but with 5 not outs from 12 innings doing some heavy lifting. Just a single 50.
ReplyDeleteOnly Donald and Madsen have pulled their weight batting with both very good, though the latter took a few games to get going.
Squad needs serious surgery and offloading the aging Patel and Whiteley should be the first step. Probably Lloyd to follow. These guys will be soaking up a decent chunk of the budget also.
Lloyd is contracted to the end of 2026, so unless he opted to leave, that's it.
DeleteWhiteley? Comes down to if the money he is being paid enables someone better to come in, as with anyone else. Patel cannot be seen as part of any new look side, for me. I suspect there will be other departures, as there has to be
Excellent summary Steve, I suspect opportunity will be given to others in the remaining two games.
ReplyDeleteThe only thing I would slightly disagree with is the elevation of Whiteley. Some time ago, I heard an interview with Ross where he talked about T20 cricket and how he enjoyed his role as a 'finisher'. I'm sure that's what we signed him for, and I'm a big fan of players having clearly defined roles, particularly in a T20 side. I can't recall him having much success on the few occasions he has promoted in the order. It's worth noting, it didn't work with Andersson either.
I've mentioned previously the consistent failure of our quartet of 'dependable' bowlers to function as a collective. Death overs have been a huge issue, I think this was recognised when we loaned FHP, who was then asked to perform the role.
Personally, I believe it's time to move on from Samit and Ross. Both have been excellent players, but both are now performing below their peak. As for Pat Brown, interesting and possibly valid point about the use of him in red ball affecting his variations. All I would say is, we have a bowling coach and you would hope that sort of thing falls under his remit...
When there has been a collective bowling failure, you have to look at individuals AND the coach. I have watched a lot of matches this year and other counties bowlers seem to drop in the yorkers almost at will. Are ours instructed not to do so? I watched Marchant de Lange last night bowl yorker after yorker at the death, a real skill but so hard to score off!
ReplyDeleteI’m not on the same page re the batting line up. Donald has been excellent, Jewell ok but could do better, No3 is the problem position, Madsen has been good at 4, I think that the 2025 &2026 Madsen needs to be the stable role through overs 7-16 so needs to bat at 4/5. Whiteley ok at 6/7 & he remains a good fielder. Patel has been poor with the bat. So I’m looking at 3 batting roles that need improvement, from either within or outside the current squad
ReplyDeleteMarkB
Definitely Mark and with the right players your line up is what we want. But that's for next year and squad improvements - hopefully!
DeleteThe stats don't lie. Our batsmen don't score quickly enough, our bowlers concede too many runs, and too often our fielding has not been precise enough.
ReplyDeleteSurprisingly (at least to me) we only have 5 batsmen who have received at least 120 balls (20 overs). Of these, Patel has scored at 7.8 per over, Madsen at 7.9, Whitley at 8.2, Jewell 8.5, and Donald 13.5.
On the other hand we have 6 bowlers who have delivered at least 20 overs. Of these Ghazanfar has conceded 7.6 per over, Patel 8.5, Andersson 9.2, Chappell 10.3 and Aitchison and Brown both 11.2.
You don't win many matches with figures like that.
Finally, in response to your comment on data analysts. Yes, of course we need analyst, although as John McEnroe said on the Wimbledon commentary yesterday, data makes average coaches better, but just confirms what good coaches were already doing. But isn't Alex Hughes already employed as our analyst?
I think we have failed collectively in the competition. Patel has captained the side poorly, Brown is a luxury in all formats that we just can’t afford and we desperately need a prolific number 3 and a strike bowler who can keep things under control in the last few overs. Give the youngsters a chance for the remainder of the competition. Grant from Telford
ReplyDeleteI don't get the obsession with Guest to play. He doesn't score fast enough. It's a huge difference scoring runs in the 1st and 2nd teams
ReplyDeleteThere's been no improvement since Patel and Arthur arrived at the club. It's not good enough. Patel said we were mentally weak but he's not done a thing to change it and Mickey says a lot but nothing has improved
Rob, I'm a big believer in getting a skipper, then picking your best wicketkeeper, then build the rest around them. A good keeper sets the tone in the field and keeps them on their toes. And there will always be a place for a couple of batters who knock it around. They can't all be Donald and Whiteley, but with the exception of Wayne, too many try to be.
DeleteRef Bopara, Roderick. I watched Kane Williamson yesterday, just playing cricket shots..
Besides Donald and Maddo we have nothing else in this squad for the T20 format. Even Wayne struggles to score at a quick rate and don't even get me started on our bowling unit, desperately poor. We're a million miles away from ever winning this tournament let alone qualifying again for the knockout stages. Ideally we need about nine new players but that is totally unrealistic, I get that but the quality just isn't there for this format
ReplyDeleteSome of the decisions taken this year, both before and during games, has been baffling. Whatever, my good lady has a picnic in the fridge ready for our trip to Headingley tomorrow.
ReplyDeleteAfter watching what the noisy neighbours did to the Lancashire attack, it is with some trepidation, it has to be said.
Never say never though .....
Andy
I agree that the main issue is the seam bowlers have leaked too many runs this season particularly in the final overs. Donald despite early season criticism has the most fifties (5 in total), has the highest strike rate (225) and is the fifth highest run scorer in the whole competition. Madsen despite not achieving the heights of previous seasons is the seventh highest scorer in the whole competition. Jewell for me has done ok but I would have expected more match winning knocks. Patel for me has bowled well but is really a lower order batsman. Whiteley needs to bat four.
ReplyDeleteNatwest 81