Anyone who watched the excellent series of videos by Tom Poynton on the club site will know that the Head of Cricket is highly regarded, irrespective of results so far not going as we may have wanted.
His first year at the club was a success, managing to get more from the players than had previously been the case. The last two have been disappointing, but there are signs throughout the club that the 'process' is starting to bear fruit.
The short-termism highlighted in the signings of Samit Patel and Ross Whiteley may or may not bring dividends this summer. But the recruitment of Aneurin Donald and Martin Andersson suggests a longer-term game. At this stage, I would expect Donald to be the white ball captain in 2026 and that additional responsibility could be the making of him.
The progression of Harry Moore and Yusuf Bin Naeem to the senior squad may only be the start. The county under-fifteen squad is highly regarded and I understand that a number of Derbyshire players look like playing at the Bunbury Festival this year, which showcases the country's top under-15 talent.
Of course, Daryn Smit and the Pathway deserve great credit for this, but so too does Arthur, for putting in place the requisite structure. I have been quick to criticise when results haven't gone as they should and mistakes have been made - and there have been a few - but the development of the club, within budget and without incurring substantial debt, goes on and I respect that. I suspect that the end of this season will see further change in the playing ranks and that will of course be dictated by results and performance in 2025.
The bottom line is that Derbyshire cannot compete on purely financial terms for players. It is all very well for supporters to look at other counties and suggest we should be signing player X and Y, but the club has made the decision to be financially prudent. In that regard, they are a model to their peers, debt free and living firmly within their means, building from the roots upwards.
The 'Derbyshire way' has to be identifying young overseas players of talent around the globe, giving them the opportunity to play in this country and build their reputation, while at the same time not breaking the bank in so far as the outlay is concerned. I have heard the sums asked for some players and been astonished, but franchise cricket has been a game-changer for many. Like it or not, we cannot match a salary offered by a franchise host, so we need to identify the talent more quickly. Realistically, the best chance of doing that is with someone who has contacts throughout the world game.
Supporting such players with home-grown and keenly sourced talent from elsewhere will ensure that there is a Derbyshire County Cricket Club in the future. The road to financial ruin, regardless of the 'riches' coming from the recent investment in The Hundred, is still a very easy to follow, one perhaps likely to see one or two casualties in the next twenty years.
Stability is important in all walks of life and, as supporters, we need to get behind the players, the coaching staff and the club in the hope that Mickey Arthur can build a Derbyshire that is greater than the sum of its constituent parts.
It promises to be an interesting summer and we now know that the man tasked with making it successful will be there to see the job through, until at least the end of 2026. He will have the opportunity to continue to shape the squad next winter and to further progress what he has often called 'the project'
It will make fascinating viewing.
Personally I believe crocket is a results based business. On that measure Arthur has failed and rather than progression the last 2 seasons have seen us regress rather than progress. I can't think any other County would reward a coach that has the record Arthur has with us, with a contract extension. As a lif Member I will always support the club but believe today's decision to be wrong.
ReplyDeleteTotally agree. Just seems to be rewarding failure. Grant from Telford
DeleteThe post at 10.47am was my post I have been a life member for 15 years (Didn't realise I was posting anonymously) but happy to clarify.
DeleteI have subsequently seen Tom Poyntons justifications and I think he and the rest of the Board have certainly put themselves in the firing line should our fortunes not improve
. I hope the faith in Arthur turns out to be well placed as that will mean improvements in competitiveness and results which i maintain is very important and having held the role for 5 years by the end of 2026 the excuses will have to stop.
Totally agree John, poor decision giving him another year
DeleteVery underwhelming news
ReplyDeleteI really can't see any reason for doing this now. Why not wait until the end of May or June to see if there has been any improvement?
ReplyDeleteIf the members own the club is there a method for them to put this to a vote?
Paul (Pride Park)
It’s not just the poor results. On many occasions, especially in the County Championship, we have looked no better than a Minor Counties side. Embarrassing at times. Grant from Telford
ReplyDeleteI agree with an earlier comment that it would be wiser to wait until we see how the season progresses before extending Mickey's contract. On the other hand, despite us going backwards in the last two seasons. he has the experience to reverse this. He knows the club and the players well by now. If we achieve something other than the wooden spoon this season, it will seem a smart move to retain his services. If we don't, then it might seem a hasty decision.
ReplyDeleteSo if we come 2nd from bottom it's a smart move to extend his contract ?? Jeez some people are so easily pleased. No wonder he's under no pressure to succeed !
DeleteNo, to be fair it would need more than that to justify it, as down the wicket presumably means. But more competitive cricket and pushing upwards will be needed
DeleteDear oh dear, this will be fun if we have another dismal campaign this season
ReplyDeleteShocking decision. Serves no value doing it now; he is being rewarded for failure and a lack of loyalty. If there had been improvement this season then maybe there would be an argument for them to sit down at the end of the year. For me he should have already gone after his conduct at the members forum and the shocking performance of HIS team. Another year of this is not great news.
ReplyDeleteChris
This is an absolute shocker. The last two seasons have been woeful and what grounds are there for an extension?
ReplyDeletePerformances at the tail end of last season were completely bereft of even hope and our captain looked a broken man.
Staggeringly poor decision, it's obvious we're going nowhere with Arthur in charge and a fresher and younger approach both in terms of coach and recruitment would have been better.
I was disappointed at this news. Why the rush? If there's a repeat of the last two seasons we're stuck with him for another year.
ReplyDeleteSeems it's a unanimous big no then to this news. I just don't get it I really don't when it's obvious his interests don't lie with the county, quite annoyed about this tbqh
ReplyDeleteGuess that's a 'No' then.
ReplyDeleteQuick thanks to Peakfan for this continuing excellent site. Whatever happens it is always great to huddle here with like-minded folks and 'chew some cud'. However it is often quite indigestible
Thanks again
Silenius
Thank you, I do appreciate that, Silenius
DeleteIn a world that is increasingly bonkers it's good to see that Derbyshire are joining in.
ReplyDeleteWhat a reward for failure.
Go on Mickey, prove me wrong.
We will soon find out, Ian!
DeleteI have to agree with everyone above. He has been a complete failure yet he is rewarded with a new contract.
DeleteWhat happened to Mickey’s theory that players stop listening after four years?
ReplyDeleteMaybe they haven't listened for the last two, so it starts now? 😁
DeleteBut the squad is evolving, so new ears, new input?