Tuesday, 2 July 2024

Derbyshire v Yorkshire day three

I'm not going to write too much tonight, because I am tired and frustrated. 

After the game against Yorkshire finished, Mickey Arthur said that the 'genuine fans' need to get behind Derbyshire. He's right to a point, I class myself as 'genuine fan', in my 57th year of supporting the club and seventeenth year of writing about them. 

But I left at lunch today, when the writing was on the wall and I preferred getting back to Scotland, to my wife and dogs, rather than another night in a hotel room. When my journey in each direction to the festival took longer than it did Derbyshire to bat, I think I'm entitled to voice my frustration, as anyone is in this world. 

You can support, yet disagree. You can follow, but air your misgivings. I and others will do that and continue to do so. Such is the way with professional sport. I can't speak for others, in and around the club, but I will always be honest - when performances deserve praise, I am happy to give it, but you have to take the rough with the smooth. The level of performance this year has been unacceptable and in any professional sport, the buck stops with the coach. 

What I found really odd in the post-match interview was when he talked about the toss and said that if Yorkshire had batted first and scored 450, we would have been out of the game. But they wouldn't have done that. I spoke to a number of people who have played a lot of cricket on that ground and they were all incredulous that you would opt to bat on such a bright green, first morning surface. When the opposition feel the same, there is a major misreading of conditions and not for the first time. You cannot make a decision on what 'might' happen in three days time, only on what is in front of you.

You have to assess, he said, whether the first session of the game will be tougher to navigate than the fourth innings. Fair enough, to a point, but when you win the toss and have such a pitch at your disposal, surely you take advantage? 

I am genuinely baffled.

When the club next has a members forum, pertinent questions should be asked of the Head of Cricket. These should include:

'In the 3 years you have been here, what have you done to take the club forward?’ I am struggling to see anything, right now. The early shoots of progress in his first season are now but a distant memory.

'Do you regret taking up the role during the English season with Pakistan.' Because for me, the rot set in when he felt he could do two high profile jobs at the same time. It sent out the wrong signal to players and supporters alike and was disrespectful.

'Which young player have you signed for the county and which young pathway player have you given a chance to?' Big noises were made about Derbyshire becoming 'the county of choice'. I don't see that has happened, do you? 

'How have good players ALL lost form and confidence at the same time?' Surely you have to question your methods? 

'Is there one player that you feel you and your coaches have improved?'

I could go on...

These are pertinent questions and they are not being asked. They are certainly not being answered.

In case anyone is in any doubt, I am, have been and always will be a supporter of Derbyshire, regardless of the level they played. I follow the second team, the pathway sides and both enjoy and celebrate the successes.

But like any supporter, I am entitled to question what is going on when there appears no strategy, no progress and worryingly, no hope. 

This weekend's T20 fixtures are massive. If we lose them both, another competition has passed us by, in a season where Mickey Arthur has HIS team, players he has signed, or re-signed.

If that happens, everyone is entitled to question whether he is the right man for the job.

I look forward to your comments.

Monday, 1 July 2024

Derbyshire v Yorkshire Day 2

Derbyshire 76 all out 

Yorkshire 416-6 (Wharton 188, Tattersall 93*) 

Yorkshire lead by 340 runs

There's not a lot to write about today's cricket at Chesterfield. Before the rains came down and mercifully brought proceedings to a premature close, Yorkshire had extended their lead to 340 runs, with wickets to spare and time to extend that should they wish. 

The likelihood is that they will declare overnight, or when Tattersall gets his century and then set to work on the Derbyshire batting early tomorrow, once the ground staff have done their magic on the outfield. 

While the Yorkshire batters appeared to be in no trouble at all today, I am less than confident the same will apply when it is our turn to bat tomorrow. 

I don't see anything here other than another frustrating and demoralising defeat. 

Quite frankly, we don't deserve anything other than that.

Sunday, 30 June 2024

Derbyshire v Yorkshire day 1

The question on everyone's lips at Queen's Park today was a simple and pertinent one. 

Why did Derbyshire, on winning the toss, decide to bat? 

It was a green pitch, on the ground that historically offers early help to seam bowlers. Talking to people around the ground, some of them family members of Yorkshire players, they were astonished that they were not asked to bat today. As it was, It only took them 27 overs to bowl out Derbyshire in a batting display so anaemic it would need both a transfusion and continued medication to improve.

The rationale was presumably to put on a high score then bowl out the visitors twice if and when it started spinning. To say that the Baldrick-style cunning plan was flawed is an understatement. I would love to hear Mickey Arthur's explanation at the end of this game...

I didn't see the early play, as I was visiting Edwin Smith and his wife, Jean on the way through. It was to turn out a highlight of the day, together with the many people I met for a chat as I walked around the ground. Thank you to everyone for your company, kind words and thoughts about the club and the blog. They were much appreciated.

As for Derbyshire, I cannot believe the players were happy with having to bat and I felt especially sorry for Mitch Wagstaff. He waits all season for a first-class opportunity then gets given it as opener on a lively pitch. Don't get me wrong, I would love to see such pitches at Derby, but we made a mess of the decision at the toss, a total hash of our innings and then produced some pretty uninspiring bowling when it was Yorkshire's turn to bat. Only when Guest and Reece were together was there any suggestion of permanence, but the conditions were such that the next ball was always likely to be a challenge. Especially against the succession of batters who played across the line or wafted at the moving ball.

Fair play to the visitors, who were purposeful and impressive. Sri Lankan Fernando made full use of the gifted conditions with the ball, while James Wharton made a splendid century full of crisp strokes. His late unbroken partnership of 118 with Tattersall put the visitors in a nigh-unassailable position at the end of day one and it is not inconceivable that they could wrap up an innings win tomorrow.

The Derbyshire side looked beaten well before the end came with bad light, the body language speaking volumes. Had it been a boxing match, the referee would have stepped in at the tea interval.

It really was that bad. Embarrassingly so.

It was, however, lovely to catch up with a couple of cricketing heroes during former players day. Ole Mortensen was resplendent in his blazer and club tie, while the great Dickie Bird was happy to chat and pose for a selfie. Not something I do very often, but then it isn't everyday you meet a bona fide legend.

91 and going strong. Take 'em in singles, Dickie...

Postscript: a recent contributor to the blog suggested that Sam Conners had signed for Lancashire.

I can confirm that is NOT the case, at this stage.