Tuesday, 20 May 2025

Lancashire v Derbyshire day four

Lancashire 458 and 184-7d

Derbyshire 314 and 220-8 (Came 63, Andersson 43)

Match drawn

It was a fascinating final day at Old Trafford, with a generous Lancashire declaration giving Derbyshire a sniff of a victory. Even if, as I wrote the previous evening, the pitch wasn't really conducive to an aggressive run chase. Both sides knew that and the home side gave themselves every chance of a win with an early closure to their innings.

For Derbyshire to get those runs, one of the top five had to score a century. When that didn't happen, the only alternative was to shut up shop, which they did admirably once Harry Came's fine knock ended. The battling of Anuj Dal, Ben Aitchison and Jack Morley was a joy to behold, from someone who has witnessed more than enough capitulations over many years. Nuj faced 114 balls for his 13 runs, Aitchison 21 for none, Morley 36 for the same. It would never have won an award for brighter cricket, but it was crucial. Those draw points kept us ten points clear of third place, a position we would never have imagined at the start of the summer. It was also one in the eye for someone on social media who asked 'How do you want to go about the win?' to home supporters..too much chicken counting, methinks...

I think Hartley missed a trick in the final innings, bowling over the wicket and allowing far too many deliveries to be padded away when they pitched outside leg. In my opinion, he was outbowled by Jack Morley in this game and the Derbyshire man impresses me more with every game.

It is nice to write these words from a position of strength, sitting where we are, but it is clear where we need to strengthen. There is a long way to go, but if we were to go up, it would be a huge ask for the current squad to stay there. 

We need a top bat. We have five players who average over 40, which is good, but there have only been three centuries so far, only one of them - Madsen of course - from the top five, the others from Martin Andersson. To chase those runs down yesterday, we needed a Chris Rogers, Simon Katich, Marcus North or Dean Jones. Caleb Jewell may yet go on to score big, but that is the role and responsibility of the overseas bat. Are such players still available? Would they come to Derbyshire? The relative failings of the top order are being masked by the battling qualities of those lower down, but we need to post bigger first innings totals and the top five have the key role there.

We also need something different in the bowling. Watching closely over the last two days, in the absence of Luis Reece there was no variety to the Derbyshire attack. Tickner is by a distance the quickest, but a good bat could pretty much line up the rest, right arm medium fast. Jack Morley bowled very well, but the need for someone with an X factor was clear. Does Mickey's contact book have an Aussie or South African with a UK passport? Or can he successfully utilise the loan market?

Look at Leicestershire. They are running away with the division at the moment and you wouldn't say their team was much stronger than ours. But Ian Holland and Ben Green have come in on loan and given something to the attack, 48 wickets between them. There will be similar players out there, worthy of consideration, craving opportunity.

I am a little concerned at the form of Anuj Dal and Zak Chappell. Nuj is averaging 19 with the bat and over 40 with the ball, Zak's twelve wickets are costing 52. Both are some way from their best and perhaps Zak might benefit from a break before the T20, as he has bowled more overs than anyone this year apart from Jack Morley. Whether we have enough fit men for that is a moot point, of course.

But this is hopefully construed as constructive criticism. The team is doing well and I feel supporters are more behind them, as a consequence, than in many years. The T20 is coming, which will give a breather to a few people, but a good performance against Kent, starting on Friday, would see our team get to the halfway point of the four-day season daring to dream.

I can't thank anyone is disappointed in that.

25 comments:

  1. I always used to think of Chappell as a fast bowler. Would you say he's slowed down so much as to be just fast medium these days?

    Incidentally I think of Dal and Reece as medium pace. Is either fast medium?

    Be interested in your bowling speed rankings!

    Agree with all your points. Jewell has been frustrating in that he's batted well and clearly is a talented player but 6 games in and despite looking good he's not gone on for a ton.

    Now my thinking is that the batter who has gone on to score tons is Anderssen and he's done it from low in the order. I'd be tempted to move him up. And equally Lloyd might benefit from dropping down or a rest ahead of the t20, plus Wagstaff should get an opportunity...

    My side for the next game (no knowledge of pitch):

    Jewell
    Wagstaff
    Came
    Madsen
    Anderssen
    Guest
    Lloyd/Reece
    Dal
    Tickner
    Aitchison
    Morley

    Rest Chappell as you say.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just don't think Zak has his rhythm this year, maybe switching between new ball and first/second change doesn't aid confidence?

      Speed? Hard to say without facing them and I am a bit old for that! From the boundary I would suggest Tickner fastest, then Chappell, Reece, Aitchison, Andersson, Dal. Potts possibly second below Tickner but the direction is often lacking, which is a shame

      Delete
    2. No real arguments on the team. But people usually score runs because the position suits them and I would be reluctant to move Martin up before six in red ball. Certainly not above Guest, who I feel is second only to Madsen in technique.

      Delete
  2. There was discussion before the game about Wagstaff coming in for Came. Has Came done enough to keep his place against Kent do you think?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He top scored second innings and batted well, so yes. But if we don't play Wagstaff we will never know if he has what it takes.

      Delete
  3. An excellent analysis, Steve. To be honest, though, I was disappointed that we shut up shop so early. Coming out to bat after tea at 165-5 and needing 164 to win in around 40 overs, I felt this was an achievable target. We just had to the ball around for ones and twos and score an occasional boundary.

    But greater cricketing minds than me decided it was best to play safe and aim for a draw. Dal showed great concentration and determination in fending off the Lancs attack for so long, and he was well supported by the equally dogged Aitchson and Morley. I was urprised Sir Jimmy didn’t bowl more.

    So, were still second in the table and unbeaten. It’s been a good season, so far.

    In his post-match comments, Mickey said we didn’t execute our skills well enough in the game.

    He also said players need to be scoring hundreds more often. Only Madsen and Andersson (twice) have made centuries. Jewell, Lloyd, Came, and Guest have been decent, but none of them have managed to push on to a hundred. Perhaps the game against Kent will see some big individual scores.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those big scores nourish in the bad times! As George Gunn, the old Nottinghamshire professional said, if I can make 150, when conditions are good and in my favour, I can afford four relative failures and still be averaging 40.. he was right. It didn't mean he wasn't trying at all the times, but it took a little pressure off!

      Delete
  4. The way Zak batted yesterday only confirmed my thoughts that he could do with a break. This isn't meant as a criticism. We just need to ensure he remains fresh, he's a very important player for us. Given the present forecast for the weekend, he might get a natural break anyway.

    As for the game, satisfied with a draw. I hoped our new found resilience would endure. We still have something to play for in red ball cricket, bit of a novelty really!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think if Zak had played one of his innings it might have been the last throw of the dice. But it shows the trust they have in the lower order when they knew others could and would dig in

      Ben Smith deserves a lot of credit for the work he's done with everyone. We don't really have a rabbit in the side now, which is great to see

      Delete
  5. Ian from Suffolk20 May 2025 at 09:30

    Both your summary of the match and the season so far are excellent as is the comment from hamez. We could definitely do with at least a couple of changes with Chappell looking very tired and I think it’s obvious Lloyd isn’t really a long term opening batting solution. The Kent game is a really big one and if we could win that we could create a biggish gap between 2nd and 3rd place. The Lancashire game like you say did show a very good fighting spirit but not a lot other then that. But most teams squads in the 4 day game do seem to be getting a little smaller and weaker year by year so you possibly can go a long way without too much else. It would be interesting to know if Jewell prefers one day cricket because he certainly bats like he does. He always looks bang in form but only he knows if it’s concentration levels or boredom getting him out sometimes. Anyway a great and somewhat unexpected start to the season and mickey Arthur and the team deserve a lot of credit

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a similarity, as I have written before, to Chris Wilkins. He plays his way, not necessarily as dictated by the match situation. But I think they want him to do that and take the initiative at the start. If it doesn't come off it looks reckless, but we can only hope we see the very best of him in big innings over the course of the season

      Delete
  6. Entirely agree with you, Peakfan, on the areas that need to be improved, and so does MA judging by his post-match interview. That was good to hear, rather than a lot of "back-slapping" - the art of good management is always to be looking for improvement no matter how well things are going.
    Having said that, great resiliance was shown here by the late order, and Jack Morley had a terrific all-round game. For Kent, I agree with resting Zak Chappell - he has a big role to play in the Blast. Reece for him if fit, Wagstaffe if not.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Spot on with your assessment, and its definitely pleasing that we are here thinking about what we need to really push on. As it is seeing a Derbyshire that refuses to fold under pressure.

    Despite his heroics yesterday I do feel Dal is fortunate to be in the team at the moment. I don't think when Reece is fit we need 3 medium pace all rounders. Wagstaff, Thomson, and even Donald (when fit) would give a different option.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, you could certainly make a case for Nuj having a breather, as his averages till no lies at present. Equally he did a fine job yesterday and deserves credit. He won't play T20 and perhaps a reset will help.

      But as I wrote elsewhere, we won't know how good Mitch is unless we play him. He would be in my side and be told he was getting a run in the side, take a little pressure off.

      Another home reared player in the side would be no bad thing..

      Delete
  8. Excellent report as usual Steve. I know we are sitting pretty at 2nd in the table but with only one win perhaps our optimism might be a bit misplaced don't you think? And it's about time our overseas players stepped up and made match winning performances. To my mind neither Jewell nor Tickner have made the sort of impact they should be doing. At least the Times cricket correspondent said in his report on the match today that we deserved the draw. Very unusual for a Derbyshire game to be reported on but in this case Anderson's return to the Lancashire ranks was the real reason!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think Tickner has done too badly, batting 34 and bowling 31, joint top wicket taker. Looks a good bloke to have around and just needs a little more support, for me. Maybe Aitchison will offer that.

      Caleb needs a big innings. As I have written before, breezy 50s are fine but you need more from the overseas player who is here to lead the batting.

      Ben Aitchison's knock in the first innings was great, but if Caleb had played it, there would have been frustration, I think

      Delete
  9. Sorry to bang on about bowling having won the toss but Derbyshire got 5 hard sessions in the field as a result of this latest decision. Surely this hands the initiative to the opposition.
    Great to see the fighting spirit though.
    As we have seen it's got Derbyshire through some tricky moments this season.
    The weather should be a bit different for the Kent match. Maybe bowling first will work for this game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interestingly, Ian, had Lancashire won the toss they were going to bowl. Damper side of the square that often does something early. Had we caught Wells they were 11-3 and in massive trouble. Anderson might have done the same to us, of course!

      Delete
  10. People still doubting Harry Came peakfan.Can't understand it I think he is doing really well at no3.He'll have his ups and downs of course but he has so much natural talent as we saw with some of those off drives yesterday.This season reminds me somewhat of Mickeys first year with us with plenty of effort but just lacking that quality to really test our opponents.Having said that the players should be happy with their start.Topspinner.

    ReplyDelete
  11. A great summary Peakfan and I agree with comments so far. We can be very happy with the current second place. However, we have been somewhat saved by our lower order so far this season. As you say, it was a superb rearguard action from Dal and Morley yesterday. At lunch we were one wicket down and up with the required rate so for a short time we could dream for a while (as against Glamorgan).

    However, to start pushing for wins, the top five need to be more consistent and post more big scores. At the moment they are rather inconsistent and flatter to deceive with only one or two posting fifties in each innings, though Madsen, Jewell and Guest are averaging over 45. Came played very well yesterday but is averaging 32 and Lloyd less than 25. The fact that 2 of the 3 centuries have been posted by Andersson, who began the first game batting at number 8, is also significant.

    The bowling is also of concern. Tickner, Morley and Reece have done fairly well and Aitchison was promising on comeback (Reece's all-round game was much missed in this match). Chappell seems like he needs a rest. I also agree that, despite yesterday's heroics, Dal’s place is under threat. As you say though, what are the alternatives? Wagstaff clearly needs to play in place of Lloyd or Dal. Lloyd if he plays needs to move down the order, but then who opens (Came?). Difficult decisions for the coach.......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good and fair comments, Adrian. Maybe Waggy does play in place of Nuj and Lloyd might rediscover his mojo down the order. The return of Reece would be welcome and Zak could then have a breather

      Delete
  12. Came is averaging 32 this year, slightly above his career average. He does get a little bogged down at times and seems a better player once he's in. Guest is the player who is most capable of scoring big, as I think Wayne would lack stamina now. Jewell and Lloyd are stroke makers, so their potential is limited, for batting time. The bowling is an issue, for getting 20 wickets and it's a shame Moore got injured. We really can't be too harsh. To not lose any of 6 games is incredible and the weather hasn't been the cause either. Kris

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is a fine effort by the team, Kris. Thing is, Harry is batting his career average, which as I wrote earlier in the year is the same as that of Caleb. Lloyd averages under 30 through his career. Can we realistically expect any of them to suddenly become Bradman-esque? Harry has time on his side, but the others have those averages because of technical flaws that stop them being higher. It would be a remarkable job to turn them around in players of considerable experience...

      Delete
  13. Loads of sensible comments above, some I agree with & some I don’t. But take a step back chaps. We are 2nd in the table & 10pts clear of third. Then add to that the fact that everyone seems to think that the squad could do better & has more potential. This positivity is a very refreshing change.

    MarkB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the positivity this summer is a nice change. But with the right improvements and the maintenance of standards the side could do very well.

      Oh and keeping Wayne going until he is 50...😉

      Delete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!