I went to my first cricket match in the summer of 1967, when ironically in a game between Derbyshire and Yorkshire, there wasn't an overseas player in sight. Derbyshire didn't move into the overseas market until 1970, with the signing of Chris Wilkins, while Yorkshire didn't feel the need for one until as late as 1992, when they picked up a young Indian by the name of Sachin Tendulkar. He was a late replacement for Craig McDermott, the Australian quick bowler, who injured his groin on the eve of the English season.
Tendulkar did quite well, making a thousand runs, even if it was asking a lot of a nineteen-year old player. He did pretty well subsequently and has frequently cited his time in England as being the making of him.
Even now I can go through the counties and reel off the names of the legends who played for each as I was getting into the game. Wilkins at Derbyshire, Keith Boyce at Essex, Majid Khan at Glamorgan, Mike Procter and Zaheer Abbas at Gloucestershire, Barry Richards and Gordon Greenidge at Hampshire, etc..
They were golden days. Until 1976 most of my summers were spent at Derby, Chesterfield or one of the outgrounds. Dad and I, together with friends, saw many of the greatest players in the history of the game. If we couldn't make it, or Derbyshire were playing away from home, there was the John Player League on BBC2 from 2pm, with full coverage of a 40-over game from one of the grounds. You never knew which, until the captions rolled at the start, but that just added to the excitement.
I still remember a televised game between Hampshire and Derbyshire from Southampton in 1972, when Chris Wilkins made 84 as Derbyshire recorded an improbable, at that time, 217 in their 40 overs. They duly beat Hampshire, even though Barry Richards made a glorious 95 for our hosts, yet what a feast for the eyes that was!
Fifty years on, the game has changed so much.
The best overseas players don't head for England, formerly the only place to play cricket at that time of the year. There are so many franchise competitions around the globe, they don't need to. Why would you condemn yourself to six months hard slog here, when you can get more money for a fraction of the work elsewhere? Why would you bowl 20 overs a day, often in cold conditions, when you can be far better rewarded for bowling just four? Not to mention seeing other parts of the world out at someone else's expense...
It was touched on last night at the Lancashire Members Forum. Mark Chilton, their Director of Cricket Performance, said that as soon as a bowler who can reach 85 mph comes on the scene, the franchise sides are all over them. No wonder counties find it difficult to recruit and it is just the same for spinners, especially leggies, who are always worth their weight in gold when people try to hit them out of the ground.
The Major League Cricket tournament in the United States this year saw top players able to earn £175k for a minimum of FIVE matches. It took place in July, the height of our season and coincided with The Hundred at the end of its run. How can counties possibly compete with that?
Yesterday came news that Lancashire have engaged Australian spinner Chris Green for the next TWO years for white ball cricket and some red ball if available. Green is 31 and has only played 13 first-class games in his career. I don't recall seeing a player engaged for white ball on more than a single year basis before, but again it is a sign of the times. He is a good performer, would probably have done Derbyshire a turn this year, but with respect, he won't go down as one of the all-time greats of the game.
Which brings it all back to our club. Caleb Jewell isn't the biggest name to come to Derbyshire from Australia, but he is a shrewd signing. If he has a stellar Big Bash he will come to the attention of other franchise competitions around the globe so this might be his only year with the club. Of course, not everyone is motivated solely by money and his long-term possibilities for Australia may be better served by building a reputation on the pitches of their oldest rival. A year or two in England could open the door to a central contract, from where the world is his oyster. It did no harm to Usman Khawaja, that's for sure.
Which is why last season we ended up with Blair Tickner and Daryn Dupavillon. Players with limited international experience, but with sound enough domestic record to be worth a punt. The danger is in assessing the quality of opposition they have faced and if they are capable of handling the pressure of being the go-to bowler in a foreign country. Kim Barnett has often cited the importance of Michael Holding to him, when he was a young Derbyshire captain. If the opposition were getting away, he could toss the ball to Michael, who would either keep things quiet or take a wicket or two. Charl Langeveldt did a similar job for the county a few years later.
The market for overseas players in this country is shrinking. There is a handful whose international career is over (like Cheteshwar Pujara, Mohammad Abbas), those with ambition (Shan Masood, Matt Breetzke, Caleb Jewell and plenty more) and those who want a short stint for experience, perhaps ahead of a tour.
My best guess, ahead of any official announcement, is that Blair Tickner will return next year, assuming all is well with his wife. A recent news article in New Zealand suggested she still had three months of 'heavy' chemotherapy to go, before a further eighteen months of 'maintenance-based' chemotherapy. How she responds to this will likely dictate the final decision, but I suspect he will commit only to red ball cricket at the start of the summer, leaving Derbyshire to find a T20 specialist for The Blast.
Time will tell. But if a change of target is required. It will be in players of similar experience and certainly there is no expectation from me of really big international names.
It simply isn't worth their time to commit to the county game.
Not for me. Grant from Telford.
ReplyDeleteTickner would be a very underwhelming signing. Surely we can do better than that ? He's no better than any of our domestic bowlers. And would be far more expensive. Do DCCC have any ambition ? Obviously not.
ReplyDeleteWell, The head of cricket said that the members meeting it was someone coming back.. I can't think of anyone else, to be honest. Unless it is van Beek or as a very outside bet, Matt Henry. But he would surely be too expensive?
DeleteRegarding Tickner, I don’t believe we saw the best of him because he would, obviously, not be totally focused on his craft. From what I saw of him bowling for New Zealand, he looked a decent signing.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Nick. He bowled well in the T20 at Northampton and was a far better bowler than DD. IF it is him then so be it. The market, as I explained above, is massively reduced. I am not blown away, but hope I am proved wrong, again IF it happens
DeleteDD is curious as Neil Manthorp that expert on Soith African cricket, flagged him and I think the Kent signing who's name escapes me as the 2 most exciting saffer county signings ahead of last season.
DeleteI don't think the Kent guy did a lot either. I will dig it out.
Essex fan.
Beyers Swanepoel averaged 22 and took 5 wickets at 50 in 4 day cricket. I think they were exciting as they were given opportunity, but it highlights that a lot of SA domestic cricket is very average. Having watched a fair bit on YouTube I am inclined to agree...
DeleteCould well be but he seemed to be expecting good things! But then you have ethan bosch who did quite well in his brief time for Essex who i dont think compares at all well in their domestic record with the aforementioned. But then mark steketee has struggled over here despite being highly rated in Australia. Just goes to show it can be a lottery, but jewell looks a shrewd signing.
DeleteEssex fan
To be fair to Tickner his bowling average for us would have been a hell of a lot better if our fielders hadn't dropped so many chances off him.
ReplyDeleteI'd not mind him returning but I can't see it, his priority will be staying with his wife at home surely.
There are plenty of South Africans, Kiwis and Aussies on the fringes of their international sides that we could sign. We should be looking to the likes of Dan Weston to find us the right player and not the nonsense of Arthur's supposed contact list.
We haven't had many good signings in recent years. Masood clearly was good and I still believe McDermott and Abott were the right signings but the timings just conspired to spoil them.
Kyle Simmonds a spin bowling all rounder would go well for us or Glenton Stuurman if want a pace bowler.
Fully agree , a county off our size and budget has to recruit an overseas that isn’t a franchise frequent flyer but instead a player that can integrate into the club for all formats .. Jewell is the right type hopefully we do the same with a bowling all rounder .. a couple of domestic loans from Div 1 counties awash with players would help ( Somerset , Warwickshire) ..
DeleteWe used to get some top overseas players, going as far back as Michael Holding for me, he was the best. Azharuddin, Dean Jones etc and more recently Martin Guptill, all quality. Where has it gone so wrong?
ReplyDeleteMy fondest cricket memory goes back to 1988 when I lived in South London and I went to Hove to watch Sussex v Derbyshire at Hove. After about 45 minutes Sussex were 27-6 and Holding had taken all 6. All fell to catches at slip or gully. Imran Khan was one of many Sussex batsmen who was clueless against our wonderful Jamaican bowler. Holding finished with 8-21 which would have been an even better analysis had he not overstepped on a few occasions. We eventually won by 6 wickets with John Morris making our major contribution with the bat. Those were the days!
DeleteA wonderful bowler, he would be a multi-millionaire in the modern game. Anyone with his skills, bowling fast and able to hit a long ball would be a first draft in every competition. Same as Azharuddin, Kuiper, Jones, Wilkins..they would make fortunes
DeleteLike it says in the article, CB. They don't need it any more and franchise cricket has priced counties out of the market
ReplyDeleteabout five plus years ago at the county ground me and a few mates were discussing overseas recruitment, and we came to the decision even then the days of the superstar overseas was over, and we would never see the likes of Holding, Azharuddin or a Dean Jones again.
ReplyDeleteThe way forward was to go for someone young(ish), was unknown but had the ambition to work hard and get his face on the map.
Yes, we knew there were risks (Billy Stanlake comes to mind), and some wouldn't come off, however we considered this was the only practical way forward with overseas.
That is for one reason I won't ever criticise anyone off overseas recruitment, it isn't easy.
In relative terms how much are we likely to be spending on Tickner (assuming it is him, or someone similar) as opposed to a domestic acquisition. ?
ReplyDeleteI would have thought we needed to add a few fast bowlers for next season as Aitchison is out of contract and his fitness must be questionable. Potts barely played in the first team this year and is also out of contract. Connors is leaving. Moore still has school to finish and has workload restrictions. Martin
I don't know, Martin. But when you include flights, accommodation, perhaps car rental I would expect it to be over three figures, comfortably. We have Chappell, Brown, Reece, Dal, Andersson plus an overseas and maybe Aitchison and Potts. Besides the budget limitations, it might be better to sign someone on loan rather than commit to another bowler full-time who might only play a handful of games. Moore will likely be available from June..
ReplyDeleteShan Masood - 151 for Pakistan v England today. What we've lost.
ReplyDelete