Yorkshire 450 and 59-1
Derbyshire 447 all out (Madsen 103, Donald 97, Chappell 78, Guest 75 Fisher 4-96)
Match drawn
Led by the evergreen Wayne Madsen, the county got within three of the Yorkshire first innings score, with Aneurin Donald and Zak Chappell playing fine innings.
I had mentioned yesterday that the first hour could be tricky and Brooke Guest didn't last long, being bowled one that came in and kept a little low. That brought in Nye Donald and he kept Madsen company as the veteran reached his 44th all-format century for the club. This one will rank highly, given the circumstances when he started to bat, combined with the hand injury he sustained in the field. At 40 he remains a tremendous asset to the side and we can only hope he doesn't miss too much cricket as a result of the knock.
Donald batted splendidly. There is always a chance he could go early, because he goes for his shots, but today he mixed them with sound defence and good judgement. It was disappointing to see him fall just short of his century, edging behind off Joe Root, but by the time he was out, the job was done from a Derbyshire perspective.
At the other end Chappell indulged himself in 'humpty' of Olympic magnitude. Not too many of his shots would have featured in the old MCC coaching manual, but he hit with remarkable power and considerable skill in making 78 from just 61 deliveries, including four sixes. I am not sure how he managed to keep hitting bouncers over mid-on, but he again illustrated what a fine cricketer he is - and what a very good eye he has.
Dal, Tickner and Brown also played their part and few would have expected Derbyshire to get within three of the home side's first innings.
After that it was all largely academic, Yorkshire batting out time with the only novelty value David Lloyd removing Finlay Bean while bowling offspin.
Looking around the country, there was only one positive result again. For what it is worth, if the 4-day game is to remain confined to the bookends of the season, perhaps we need to do a couple of things to encourage positive results.
Certainly I feel that eight points for a draw is too many. I'm not referring specifically to this game, but there is no real incentive to risk losing if you can still get eight points for getting a draw. I would like to see them maximise the win and perhaps make it two points for a draw. We might then see counties take a risk in going for a result.
It might also be worth considering an over limit on first innings, as we did back in the '70s and '80s. Back then it was a hundred overs in the first innings, which was an opportunity to play proper cricket and meant the game could move on in the course of two days.
If a team bats for a day and a half to make 600, then the weather intervenes as it has this year, there is greater entertainment value in one-on-one basket weaving than the rest of the game.
My opinion, those of others may differ, but I saw some cracking cricket with such restrictions in place and the way that the game is played today, I cannot see it would be in any way to the detriment of the county or national game.
Anyway, we move on to the Sussex game on Friday, still unbeaten and in better fettle than we were at the end of the Leicestershire game.
That in itself is progress.
I was looking at some of the archived scorecards in the 70s and 80s on the Derbyshire website and was thinking along the same lines regarding the first innings limit.
ReplyDeleteI would also move the Bonus Point threshold from 110 overs to 80. Teams are just batting to 110 just for bonus points.
It gets sad looking round all the scores as it feels like we are coming to the end of the red ball / county era as we know it.
Progress indeed. Credit where it's due, we showed fight and resilience. Well done.
ReplyDeletePleased that Donald has gone some way to proving my doubts about his abilities in red ball cricket. Long may it continue..
Also, let's face it. Rain saved Yorkshire there 😉
*I obviously meant disproving, with regards to Donald. 🤦♂️
DeleteGibson said he offered 400 in 80 overs to Derbyshire. I don't think Madsen could have gone again. It may seem negative, but I don't think we'd have got 400 in fading light. Then again, maybe someone like Donald would have been capable. We'll never know...Kris
ReplyDeleteYeah I saw that, but 400 in 80 overs is pretty big, with, as you say, a man down, if not out
DeleteAfter the time the pitch spent covered that would have been a huge gamble and there was only one winner
A brave man says open the batting with Donald and take it from there. Madsen's injury would have made me say no. Kris
ReplyDeleteIf true to form, that’s Donalds quota of red ball runs for the season. A very poor start, but luck was on his side today.
DeleteMaybe, maybe not, Andrew. But he batted well and maybe this is when he finds his home and cricket maturity. That he can bat is beyond argument, but he needs to put the scores together now, on a regular basis. He has earned his chance
DeleteI would open with Donald in T20, but if an opener is needed, Lloyd is the obvious choice, with Lamb or Whiteley coming in. Maybe both, if Madsen isn't recovered
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis was removed as a duplicate, not because anything controversial was said!
DeleteFrustrating that at the end of April with most sides having ‘played’ four games there has only been two positive results. I do agree that changes need to be made if the ECB insist on shoehorning a good part of the four day game into April. Having said that any incentives may not be enough if we continue to have extreme weather. I remember when the cricket season didn’t get underway until May. Just sad that the ECB continue to devalue the four day game.
ReplyDeleteA good effort today though and hats off to Madsen, Donald and Chappell. Hopefully this display will boost confidence ahead of Sussex and we get four full days of cricket.
Nudger
Really encouraging display with the bat at last and I now expect the openers to hit their straps against Sussex. Bat first if the toss is won and attack the game with confidence. Madsen again, Donald and Chapple have ignited the season and a win would incredibly put us in a good position.
ReplyDeleteGiven that Derbyshire have never scored 400 in a fourth innings in their 150 year plus history, let alone in 80 overs, let alone with the current batting line-up, for Yorkshire even to suggest such a target indicates a bizarre lack of realism, to put it kindly.
ReplyDeleteAgreed, Martin. It was a ridiculous suggestion with only one likely winner..
DeleteHear, hear.
DeleteSeems very much like sour grapes from the Yorkshire coach, and then to express such disbelief that Derbyshire didn't respond in the way that he expected...
Ian. South Africa.
To reach 447 after being 23-3 at one point is a fine achievement. It was good to see Madsen give us our first century of the season, and encouraging to see Donald and Chappell both weighing in with runs. Let's hope we can bat as well against Sussex.
ReplyDeleteThe four dor ay game is dead in the water even the administrators are playing games with it.We should revert back to a speeded up three day game. The idea of the four day game was to learn batsmen how to bat for extended periods of time.Well this is now redundant as players often only play a handful of first class games before their selected for England.And after that barely play for their County.So therefore it's 100 overs in a day and whoever bats first can't go past 85 overs leaving 15 overs for the opposition to move the game on through runs or for example losing 3 or 4 wickets in the 15 overs.Los day ing a day means we don't start till the last weekend in April or the first one in May. No guarantee of dry weather but the percentages of it go up.There are many other ideas that I have but it would take to long.This is I stress just an initial starting point for Day 1.Lunch drops to 30 minutes if the players can't or won't bowl 100 overs like wise tea to 15 minutes. Four day cricket is my favourite but it's finished and won't survive.
ReplyDeleteI've done it again forgot my name.
ReplyDeleteSteve jr
Steve i think thats an excellent idea , call me a bluff old traditionalist ,but i always found it the best cricket to watch and was never a fan of 4 day cricket , We may be able to play 16 matches , so everyone plays sides twice, I read somewhere that John ARLOTT liked 3 day matches and the third day could be unpredictible, MALBAR
ReplyDeleteThanks Mal. In these days when players are scoring 100s with ease in T20, a hundred over limitation on first innings is logical, for me. Good players could score big back then, so in the modern 'Baz ball' era it should be a cakewalk. And you then allow final day excitement, unless you allow 2 days for the game to play out. It would see more positive results
ReplyDeleteMust have missed something earlier this week because Matt Thomson isn't in the 12 for the Sussex game tommorrow. ?
ReplyDeleteSteve jr.