After a weekend that could scarcely have been improved on if written by a top script-writer, Derbyshire face a massive game at Queens Park on Wednesday in which winning is essential to maintain a chance of promotion in the County Championship.
I'd accordingly expect a result track at Chesterfield, although they usually are. Batsmen get a reward for strokes on a quickish track with a short boundary, while bowlers get more bounce than the norm and sufficient movement to maintain interest, even with the Tiflex balls that are being used to general concern this season.
Irrespective of the result and the rest of the season, surely no one will argue when I say that this has been a season of major progress. We could easily go up, with Northamptonshire and Middlesex set to meet again before the end of the season, but could also finish in the bottom three, scant consolation for a very encouraging and competitive campaign.
I have always said on this blog that John Morris set the ball rolling with the recruitment of a better quality of player than we have seen for some time. Players like Wes Durston, Wayne Madsen, Tim Groenewald, Tony Palladino, Chesney Hughes, Luke Sutton and others were always likely to do a good job once Morris persuaded them to join the county, but it is no coincidence that for most their best form has come since Karl Krikken took over.
I'd a lot of time for John Morris but perhaps man management wasn't his strong point. Never having played for him I don't know, but Karl Krikken seems to get the best out of players and the improvement in the younger ones, in particular, has to be one of his major contributions to the campaign. None of us know whether Krikk can bring a similar class of player to the club, but after 25 years-plus in the game I expect him to know plenty of people, just the same as Luke Sutton. If these two identify the players they want, Chris Grant will then handle contract negotiations and we will continue to progress.
The third place positions in the CB40 and Championship are very much the result of a team effort. Only Northamptonshire have more batting bonus points, while only they and Gloucestershire exceed our bowling points. NINE players average between 29 and 41 with the bat, while five have taken their wickets under thirty. The spirit at the club is obvious, especially in the commitment of the overseas players. Guptill's joy at reaching three figures is tangible, his commitment in the field an object lesson. Usman Khawaja played most of the time at Derbyshire on one good leg. Overseas players and professionals are looked up to in any club and we have been lucky in two positive role models.
Of course, with the Academy being the focal point of the future side, the role of Krikken, AJ Harris and Howard Dytham will continue to be critical to our future and the signs are good. Today we read of two bright young players, Harvey Hosein and Will Davis, being selected for the England Development Programme at Under-16 level. Davis, a quick bowler from Staffordshire and Hosein, a wicket-keeper from Matlock appear to have all the credentials for success, including coaching from men who really know what they are doing.
They are, of course, the latest in what is becoming an exciting long line. From those in or around the first eleven, through to the likes of Slater, Siddique and Higginbottom and younger ones like Burgoyne, Cork and White, the hard work of the Academy is starting to bear fruit.
Former England man Keith Fletcher once said that if one in every three of your young players comes through it is well worth the investment. All the signs point to players like Redfern, Whiteley, Knight, Poynton and Borrington becoming fixtures in the next few years and Derbyshire will reap the rewards for the hard work both in their performances and in ECB funding. While the senior players from elsewhere will still have a role to play for the forseeable future, in the medium to long term I can see Derbyshire teams made up of Academy graduates as seniors, hopefully thanking the club for their time and investment with a level of loyalty that has not always been the case in the past.
When players enjoy the dressing room environment and the company of people they have grown up with, there is a far greater likelihood of their staying. Chris Grant's new structure, offering appropriate remuneration to young players in direct correlation to their performances, is a sound first step towards a bright long-term future at the club.
As for the short-term future? We need to beat Northamptonshire. If we do, promotion is very much a possibility.
If we don't, I'm still more optimistic about the future than I've ever been. There's always next year.
Good piece Peakfan. I would endorse most of your comments. We have made progress this season and that,s good enough for me. As you know,this was one of my biggest criticisms of the previous regime. No percievable progress,indeed in many ways we were going backwards.
ReplyDeleteNorthants is a big game.I hope we do ourselves justice and the weather is kind. For once,it would be nice to win a "must win game". My team would be as follows.
GUPTILL
LINEKER
PARK
DURSTON
REDFERN
WHITELEY
CLARE
SUTTON
TURNER
GROENEWALD
PALLADINO
12TH MAN- BORRINGTON
Must just mention the following regarding the comment on the spirit at the club.
ReplyDeleteFor anyone who is on twitter there is one thing that is obvious to note. Since leaving Usman Khawaja has constantly been in regular contact with Derbyshire players congratulating them on big scores, wickets, victories etc, whilst other players are always quick to praise the efforts and success of others in the team. The teams spirit is good and this could see them through!
An I agree with Peakfan, this season has been a success so far, and has the potential to get even better for all fans of the Falcons! Fingers crossed!
Another interesting 'tweet' today, this one from Chris Grant....
ReplyDelete"@luke_sutts Funny how the anonymous message-board moaners go absent when DCCC win or there is good news about hey Skip"
Evidence (as I thought) that this blog and comments are read by the chairman and some of the players so further reason to support peakfans appeal for supportive comments for the club. There are a lot of people within Derbyshire cricket that would like to get behind the team but having been a bit of a laughing stock for so many years it's no wonder there are many that have a negative take on things.
I really hope that a promotion run can continue in the closing games as current form is good for a lot of players bar Hughes and Madsen. Having stuck with then through poor scores for so long I'd be surprised to see them dropped but would love to see Lineker or Borrington get a chance - 2 players I've played against quite a bit in the league and wish them well when there chance comes.
Mostly agree with your comments, Peakfan, although you perhaps give more credit to Morris as a spotter of talent - against your list, try Telo,Doshi, Clarke, Lawson, Goddard, Sadler, Hinds, Law, Hayward (and maybe Park and Footitt to join the list, although I think Park is worth persisting with). The old proverb springs to mind - even a blind cat stumbles over a dead rat from time to time.
ReplyDeleteI am surprised though with marc's suggestion. After one of the best weekends I can remember, he proposes three changes in the batting order that as you point out has more batting points than Northants.
I agree that Redfen has to come back in, but however exasperating Smith's batting can be, he fails only by comparison with what we think he is capable of. His bowling and fielding brings balance that we can't replace within the current squad.
Madsen's a worry, but so was Guptill until the last match, and I seem to recall a number on here calling for him to be dropped. Madsen is class, and that will return. In the meantime, he's a balanced and positive influence in what is still a very inexperienced team, and should stay.
Hughes, for me, is the weaker link that should give way for Redfern. Even when he's scoring runs, he looks scratchy and only a ball away from being out at any point. It would be good to keep a settled team (just see what sticking with out of touch players has done for England) but redfern's sublime form before his injury means that someone has to drop down.
As for Lineker, he has to be a huge risk at this stage. Perhaps he should have had a chance before now, but why would we take the risk for this match? Lose it, and we lose the chance of promotion, and it's not fair to him or the team to plunge him in at this stage. If I was going to bet on Madsen recovering form in the next match, or Lineker thriving on his debut, I'd put my money on the former.
My guess is that if Krikken / Sutton was going to take a gamble on Lineker, they would have done it against Yorkshire. If they didn't do it in a competition we can't get promotion in, they won't do it against Northants.
It's good that Mr. Grant reads sites like this!
ReplyDeleteBen
Did Mr. Grant honestly expect more positive comments from a defeat than a win?
ReplyDeleteIt was great to beat Yorkshire but maybee Mr. Grant ought to be made to watch the dvds of our previous two 40 over games against Worcestershire and Middlesex before getting carried away!
Ben
Ben the point is that the message boards and comments here are always busier after a loss than a win. People are quicker to complain than praise, which is a sad fact of life. You ask any company you care to contact how many complaints they get compared to thank you letters. They will outnumber them at least five to one, probably more. And we don't support them!
ReplyDeleteMorning all,
ReplyDeleteFor those who are unaware, or need reminding, the remaining fixtures for Div 2 are:
17-20 August
Derbyshire v Northamptonshire
Kent v Middlesex
Essex v Gloucestershire
Glamorgan v Leicestershie
23-26 August
Essex v Derbyshire
Leicestershire v Surrey
Northamptonshire v Middlesex
30 August - 2 September
Middlesex v Leicestershire
31 August - 3 September
Gloucestershire v Glamorgan
Kent v Essex
Northamptonshire v Surrey
7 - 10 September
Derbyshire v Kent
Essex v Surrey
Glamorgan v Middlesex
Gloucestershire v Leicestershire
12 - 15 September
Kent v Glamorgan
Leicestershire v Middlesex
Northamptoshire v Gloucestershire
Surrey v Derbyshire
As I see it, a win this week is important and if Kent continue their form from last week to surprise Middlesex then we would be in touching distance of second. A draw wouldn't necessarily be the end but would probably force us to win the last three games and then rely on other results.
Many thanks for an entertaining blog.
Yours
Scorebook.
Hi Notoveryet. Like the cat and rat comment.Never heard that one before.
ReplyDeleteI can see where you,re coming from with regard to Madsen,Hughes and Smith,but i would argue the fact we are still in the running for honours has little to do with these three. On the contrary,many may see them as a handicap.
Madsen has done well in the past and no doubt that has bought him more time than some others may have been given. Hughes has also been afforded every opportunity to make his mark. There comes a time though when you have to say enough is enough and look elswhere. If we had no viable alternatives then we would have to persevere with them,but we have alternatives who deserve a chance.
It may be a high risk policy to bring in some of those players mentioned previously,but surely the real risk is continuing to play those who are hopelessly out of form,in the hope they may find some and in the meantime having to rely on the others to carry them. We cannot afford three frontline batsmen who can hardly score a run between them.
Krikken is in a difficult situation,but for me,doing nothing is not the right option. No one could justifyably criticise him if he axed all three. Smith has the strongest case for selection,but only relative to the other two. His bowling may be a deciding factor,but is it essential?.
I hope Krikken is brave enough to make tough decisions and prove he has his finger on the button. We shall see.
Ancient Chinese proverb, allegedly, but aren't they all?
ReplyDeleteObviously, my argument for Madsen fell on deaf ears. I know Hughes can always surprise, but an opener on a traditionally fast and seaming pitch with a full array of slips? A walking wicket I fear, with Durston effectively facing the new ball and Smith at 4. Pound to a penny on not many for three and depending on Redfern picking up where he left off. I haven't questioned many decisions taken by the new team management - are we sure it's Krikken making these calls - but I think this is one we might regret. And if it does of course, I'll be able to say how different it would have been if Madsen had played.