Monday, 8 June 2026

Monday musings

The North Group of the Vitality Blast is very odd, this year. 

Derbyshire currently sit fourth, ahead of Durham (who beat them) and Lancashire (who they have yet to play but have lost four from five).

Ahead are Leicestershire and Nottinghamshire, both of who were beaten easily, with Yorkshire on top of the pile having done a smash and grab at Headingley, in a game where Derbyshire had done all the hard work.

A few observations from me to stimulate discussion...

First - I don't think Nye Donald as skipper works. He is a lovely bloke, articulate, intelligent and a good 'face' for the media. But skippering as wicket keeper is really tough and there's no evidence that in the field any one player is in charge. Madsen, Whiteley and Montgomery all seem to be doing bits, but you cannot captain by committee. There needs to be ONE hand on the tiller or it dissolves into a rabble. I don't think it helps his keeping either, which looks ragged at times.

Second - and staying with Nye, he has to be told that he isn't just what used to be called a pinch hitter. He can hit a ball a long way and is blessed with both strength and timing, but it appears he considers his job done at the end of the sixth over. His shot yesterday was silly and unnecessary, with thirty on the board in three overs. The top franchise players would accept that and wait for the next ball in their arc, not try to make something from a position where feet, head and hands were all in the wrong place. He was only going to get a single from the shot, so why go through with it? He would have probably got a wide had he left it.

Third - what is really to be gained with risky shots in the last over of the Powerplay? Derbyshire were 54-2 from five, scoring at eleven an over, when chasing nine. 130 to win from fifteen overs, around 8/8.5 an over. Then they were 58-4 after six, all the form players gone, three of them through self-inflicted wounds. It would be nice to see them take a leaf from the top franchise sides and players - score a boundary early, then knock it around. Then when Basra was out they needed 67 from seven and most teams would fancy that these days. One boundary an over and knock it around, without the need for anything excessive.

Yesterday's target was far from excessive, but the methodology of the chase was akin to using a pneumatic drill to crack a walnut. 

They return to red ball cricket this week and a trip to Durham, but the make up of the side needs looked at before the return to the white ball game.

For me, Mohammad Ghazanfar has to come in so there are two overseas bowlers. But he cannot play AS WELL AS Jack Morley, because 7-11 would then be Potts, Aitchison, Ghazanfar, Javed and Morley. 

Martin Andersson and Matthew Montgomery have been in terrific form, but we saw yesterday what happens when they fail. Hard as it is for me to write, there is a decline in the form of Wayne Madsen in this format, with scores of 18, 2, 22, 24, 7 and 27. Meanwhile, Caleb Jewell has 11, 20, 58*, 4, 14 and 25. Batting at three and four, one of them has to be doing better and kicking on from starts. Jewell's 132 runs have also taken 99 balls, not quick enough, while Wayne's 100 runs have taken 76 balls.

Either Matthew Montgomery needs to move up, as one of the form players, or Amrit Basra should get a crack at three. Alternatively, Yusuf Bin Naeem should get his chance, after fine form in the second team. 

My team for the remainder of the tournament would therefore be:

Donald, Andersson, Naeem, Montgomery, Basra, Whiteley, Madsen, Potts, Aitchison, Ghazanfar, Javed.

It is a shame for Jack Morley, who started the tournament really well. But unless you play two spinners at Old Trafford (likely and so give Aitchison a breather) he hasn't bowled his full allocation in recent matches anyway. 

Madsen at seven? He can rebuild if required and could nurse the tail to a score if all else fails. But you need your impact players having the maximum time at the crease. I still think Wayne has another season in him, but the short game is an unforgiving format and his role in it has to change in the best interests of the team.

I know some have called for Harry Came and Mitch Wagstaff to be given a game, but I don't look at that top seven and see how they strengthen it in this format. Both should play the 50-over competition, when the county will be missing both Nye Donald and probably Martin Andersson, surely picked up as a wildcard for the 'other competition' after his Blast displays. 

Maybe that is their competition this year, when the county could field:

Jewell, Came, Montgomery, Madsen, Naeem, Wagstaff, Guest, Chappell, Aitchison, Haydon, Morley. 

As always, I appreciate your comments. 

15 comments:

  1. Chesterfield Blue8 June 2026 at 11:44



    I think it's sentiment only that you'd persevere with Wayne ,Steve . He's never really flourished in this T20, and he's too slow when he does make a big score, he'd be out of my T20 side from now on. I'm not at all convinced by Basra and Jewell as well. My team for the next game would be:

    Donald
    Andersson
    Came
    Montgomery
    Reece
    Whiteley
    Bin Naeem
    Potts
    Aitchison
    Javed
    Ghazanfar

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with most of your points, but have slightly different ideas on how to go forward. My T20 side,
    Donald, Naem, Anderson, Montgomery, Madsen, Basra, Whiteley, Chappell, Potts, Ghazanfar, Javed

    Batters 4-6 to be fluid. Madsen is still our best player in the middle overs so we need him then. I just don’t see Aitchison as a T 20 bowler unless it is a bowlers pitch, so Chappell or Brown to come in for him, assuming at least one of them is fit.

    I haven’t kept score but it seems to me that when teams from the Northern group have played inter group games, they lose. Which indicates that we are in the weakest group

    Markb

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good comments.

    I have noticed Wayne Madsen has been caught out a lot this year when trying long aerial shots. He seems to be at his best when knocking the ball around and playing sweep shots. Do you think the shoulder injury might have reduced his power to clear the ropes?

    Dre.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Agree with your thoughts Steve, I'd perhaps be tempted to bring in Reece for Madsen if he's fit though...

    Reece also provides experience, potentially the odd over of left arm and he's a hitter.

    Madsen sadly looks past it in this format right now. It's not nice but there is no room for sentimentality in pro sport.

    We have young players in form and need a plan for them. In my opinion:

    Wastaff - Opens in red ball for remaining games. Let's see what he can do.

    Bin Naeem - Doing well for seconds and in the minor county game, give him remaining t20 games at 3 and see if we've got a serious white ball player here.

    Basra - Move him up to 4 or 5, wasted at 7 behind slow scoring Jewell and Madsen.

    Haydon - Demands a place in red ball but would probably also look to rotate with Aitchison in t20, the latter is a great red ball bowler but not ideally suited to t20. Perhaps Haydon can play both and need to find out.

    Stewart - Blood in 50 over cup and see how he goes, don't rule out red ball games this season.

    All the above plus Hawkins should have involvement in the 50 over comp. It's a development competition so use it thus with the experienced players providing the spine not the meat.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree the Royal London represents our best chance of a trophy due to squad retention .

    I’m not sure what 11 gets us over the line as we seem to have fragility in close games .

    I don’t think we have played the “pressure points” very well
    8 off 4balls v Durham
    Yorks 8 down needing 50 off 4 overs
    Yesterday was crying out for one of the top 6 to bat throughout the innings once Andersson had perished. All of the next 6 chucked it away .tbh , rate wasn’t an issue it was wickets ..
    Can’t see us progressing now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hope that the reason the Royal London represents the best chance of a trophy isn't because it hasn't existed for several years...:-)

      Dave

      Delete
    2. Ah yes, thanks Dave , for Royal London read Metro Bank ….but the point remains the same …as it stands we only lose Donald so the core group should do well . Form and fitness permitting 🤞

      Delete
  6. I think what we have seen over the years with MA is that he rarely changes the team unless he is forced to. We saw Haydon get his opportunity because of Abbas’ absence, and in the T20 side, Potts has replaced Chappell. Both have performed very well in their respective formats.

    What I don’t understand is why we haven’t seen more of Bin Naeem when he has been in such good form. It feels like he will only get an opportunity if something happens with Jewell if Ghazanfar arrives.

    I also think the batting lacks intelligence at times. Yesterday, it was quite easy to predict what was going to happen after Donald’s dismissal. I firmly believe that in T20 cricket, there are moments when you need to take stock of the situation, reduce the risk, score at seven or eight runs an over, and ensure the required rate or scoreboard pressure doesn’t get out of control I always believe you have chance if under 12 over. Then, once the innings is stable again, you can attack it. Maybe that to simple

    We seem to have the same discussion season after season. From the stands, it often looks obvious, so why can’t they execute it in match situations? Is it naivety? Has the modern cricketer become so programmed to play one way that they struggle to adapt to what the game situation requires?

    I’m a bit baffled because it feels like a very basic aspect of T20 batting and game management is missing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nye Donald is one of the most exciting batters Derbyshire have ever had, but I agree that asking him to be captain may be too much (not that I expect a mid-season change, unless he wants it) and that he could be more judicious at times. The real problem, though, seems to me to be the usual one - the fact that the team hasn't got enough of the winning mentality. Two years ago I watched us at Old Trafford, restricting Lancashire to a very gettable total. The batting then imploded (Came and Guest top-scored, but at a sedate pace that was part of the problem). What interests me is that, of that team, only one player (Whiteley) is in the current eleven. The team has changed almost completely in a very short time, but the same failings are evident. So, to be honest, I feel that it's over-optimistic to think that bringing in the younger players will make much of a difference. We all know that the players in the squad, including the young ones, have quite a lot of talent. But until those in charge can inculcate a more consistent winning mentality, and in particular an ability to cope with pressure, we could - again - make ten changes of personnel and see similar outcomes and find ourselves yet again bemoaning the small margins that make the difference between the teams that win trophies and Derbyshire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In relation to PF's third point: for me Donald may be one of the county's most exciting batters, but not one of the best.

      PF's point is why I've thought for a long time that he's vastly overrated, and also why he's never come anywhere near making himself into a consistently decent red-ball player: he too often sells himself short through the failure to apply intelligence, discipline or both--even, as PF says, in T20. At the age of almost 30, and the captain, he shouldn't need to be told about this.

      Dave

      Delete
  8. I agree with Martin. Our problem is maintaining a winning mentality and be able to handle the pressure. I watched the interview with Mickey today, and the first thing he said was, "I'm frustrated." He emphasised that the talent is there in the squad, but, too often, the team fails to press home an advantage.

    Skippering the team, being the player expected to rack up the runs at the start of the innings, and keep wicket is a lot to ask of Donald. Is it too much pressure on him? Only he knows.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm surprised that so many expected more from T20, this season. This side isn't as good as the 2017-22 one that did quite well. It's our weakest format nowadays, although I think we are a better red ball side, than those days. Kris

    ReplyDelete
  10. With Donald, it's quite possible that he will hammer 20 ball half centuries in the next couple of T20 games. Some people will then clamour for his inclusion in the championship side...

    I think we should stick with him as captain, he's new to the job and no doubt learning. I'm sure having Wayne on hand to offer advice is a benefit, and a reason to keep Wayne in the team. I think we know his keeping isn't that great, not sure being captain is making much of a difference, but for the T20 it's a gamble we probably have to take.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Agree with most of what you say.

    I'm fine with sticking with Donald as captain for now, it could be a selling point to keep him here as I expect the big clubs to come sniffing again when his contract is up. The selling point of a chance in red ball cricket seems to have been and gone… it he shouldn't be doing it from behind the stumps. We have enough all rounders we should be able to fit in Guest and have him down the batting order - especially if Reece could play though I'm not sure where we stand with that.

    I do think it might be time to look past Madsen (in this format) and I’d personally like to see Bin Naeem get a chance.

    Potential team for the second half of the competition.

    Donald
    Andersson
    Montgomery
    Madsen/Bin Naeem/Reece
    Whiteley
    Basra
    Guest
    Potts
    Aitchison
    Javed
    Ghazanfar

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!